Tasha Kheiriddin: Indigenous leaders put Carney's dreams on notice
Will Prime Minister Mark Carney's national infrastructure dreams be kiboshed by Canada's First Nations? That's the question hanging over Ottawa this week — and if Carney's not careful, the answer could well be yes.
Article content
At Monday's First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon, the PM rolled out his big plan: slash approval times for 'national interest' infrastructure projects from five to two years. He got buy-in from the premiers, hoping to stimulate growth, counter U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, and pull Canada together as one economy. Despite a shortage of specifics, there finally appears to be a willingness to get things done and reconcile the interests of East and West. Quebec Premier François Legault said he's open to a pipeline, Ontario Premier Doug Ford was positively giddy about energy corridors, and even Alberta's Danielle Smith was cautiously optimistic.
Article content
Indigenous leaders, however, are not impressed. National Chief Cindy Woodhouse of the Assembly of First Nations warned that the plan risks trampling Indigenous rights and took umbrage at being given seven days to review draft proposals. Regional Chief Scott McLeod of the Anishinabek Nation went further, suggesting that Canada could see a new indigenous protest movement along the lines of Idle No More. That movement arose in 2012 in response to Bill C-45, legislation advanced by then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper that sought to streamline the project approvals process, and spawned protests and rail travel disruptions across the country.
Article content
Article content
Now, Carney could face the same opposition, made worse by the actions of his own party and other progressive politicians over the past ten years. Their version of reconciliation did little to advance Indigenous people economically, but much to reinforce the idea that non-Indigenous people are guests in their own country.
Article content
Article content
From the denigration of Canadian historical figures like John A. Macdonald, Henry Dundas and Egerton Ryerson, to the performative and divisive repetition of land acknowledgements, to the spreading of falsehoods about the existence of mass graves at residential schools, Canada was depicted as the country that could do no right by its First Nations. Little wonder, then, that many Indigenous people don't see themselves as part of Canada and have little interest in pulling together for the 'national interest.'
Article content
Article content
There is no question that a succession of Canadian governments implemented policies that damaged generations of First Nations people, including the Indian Act, the residential school system, the pass system, and the potlatch ban. But guilt will not help fix current problems facing First Nations. Nor will opposition to development. It will actually hurt, by weakening Canada economically and reducing its capacity to fund real change in indigenous communities, such as ending all boil water advisories and building adequate housing and schools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
9 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why an increase in mortgage-free young people is a worrisome sign
'Generation Z is unprecedentedly rich.' That was the bold headline of a recent Economist article, drawing on international data showing many young adults today financially outpace boomers when they were the same age. Since I often report the opposite for younger Canadians, the claim gave me pause. So, I revisited national data on income, unemployment and home ownership for those aged 20 to 34. Canada tells a different story from the Economist headline, except for one notable trend: home ownership among young adults surged during the pandemic. This raises a deeper concern. Canada may be drifting from a meritocracy (albeit an imperfect, and often tilted toward white men, meritocracy) toward a landed aristocracy, where access to secure housing increasingly depends on being born into the right family. The concern doesn't show up in income data. In 1976, when most boomers were young adults, the median full-time, full-year earnings for 20- to 24-year-olds was $43,800 in today's dollars, according to Statistics Canada. The contemporary figure is slightly lower at $41,400. For 25- to 34-year-olds, median earnings dipped from $64,400 in 1976 to $62,500 today. But things shift when we turn to housing. I combined data from Statistics Canada's surveys of consumer finance and financial security, along with five-year mortgage interest rates with average price data from the Canadian Real Estate Association. The result is telling. In 1977, 41 per cent of Canadians under 35 owned a home. The average house cost $253,000 (in today's dollars), it took five years of full-time work to save a 20-per-cent down payment and mortgage rates averaged 10.75 per cent. By 2019, home ownership for young Canadians had dropped to 36 per cent. The average home (now more often a condo) cost $598,000, and it took 13 years to save the down payment. Lower interest rates around 4.6 per cent made carrying a larger mortgage more manageable. Then came the pandemic. As emergency-level interest rates fell to around 3 per cent for 5-year fixed mortgages, home prices soared to $789,000 in 2021 before easing to $700,000 in 2023. Despite the sharp rise in costs – and the 14 years now needed to save a 20-per-cent down payment – home ownership among Canadians under age 35 jumped to 44 per cent, the highest level in five decades. That surge is striking when compared to older peers, whose home-ownership rates remain below historical norms. Among 35- to 44-year-olds today, just 63 per cent own a home – 10 points lower than the same age group in 1977. One clue behind the surge in home ownership among Canadians under 35 stands out: in 2023, 18 per cent of young homeowners reported having no mortgage. The only time this figure was higher was in 1984 – when home values were a third of today's, and interest rates were three times as high. Since 1977, the net value of Canadian principal residences – the total worth of homes minus outstanding mortgages – has grown by $1.5-trillion, after adjusting for population, economic growth and inflation. Canadians over 55, who represent just 30 per cent of the population, captured 60 per cent of that windfall. During the pandemic, record-low interest rates allowed many older homeowners to liquify their housing wealth through refinancing. The data – particularly the number of mortgage-free young people - suggest some may have used that wealth to help younger family members enter the market. At the family level, it's a beautiful act of intergenerational love. At the societal level, it's deeply troubling. Because entering the housing market increasingly depends on how much housing wealth your family has accumulated – not how hard you work. That's the textbook definition of a landed aristocracy. This trend is already driving a sharp divide among younger Canadians. The median net worth of homeowners under 35 is $457,000. For their peers who rent, it's just $44,000. In my last column, I called for a national task force to confront a question too many politicians dodge: should home prices rise, stall or fall? That same task force should also take up a related challenge – how to address the growing housing wealth divide between generations, and now increasingly within them. If we believe Canada should reward effort over inheritance, then we must face a hard truth: our housing system is failing the meritocracy test.
Globe and Mail
12 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
B.C. cedes much of Nuchatlitz provincial park to Nuchatlaht First Nation
The B.C. government has quietly ceded a large portion of a provincial park off the west coast of Vancouver Island, in response to a precedent-setting court ruling on an Indigenous land claim. Public access to parts of Nuchatlitz Park is no longer assured, after the B.C. Supreme Court declared last year that the Nuchatlaht, a First Nation with 180 members, has proved Aboriginal title to 1,140 hectares of land on the north end of Nootka Island. The remnants of the park are not marked, and the province says it is up to visitors to ensure they are not trespassing. Kayakers and recreational boaters are only just learning, through word of mouth, that the popular destination is no longer public land. Meanwhile, the First Nation is building a road through the former parkland for its members. The lawyer for the Nuchatlaht says it is the first time parkland has been included in a title ruling from the courts. The title lands include 320 hectares of old-growth forest in Nuchatlitz Park, which was established in 1996 with the primary goal of protecting special natural features. The land, about 110 kilometres northwest of Tofino, includes critical habitat for several at-risk species, including sea otters, the wandering salamander and the marbled murrelet (a small seabird), and features increasingly rare coastal sand ecosystems. The Nuchatlaht argued that the park was created without their approval and brought many visitors to the area without any benefit to the Indigenous community. A spokesperson for the First Nation says that guidance for the public has yet to be determined. 'We know the kayakers and the guys with the four-wheelers will be going there,' said Archie Little, an elder and councillor, 'and so we have to set the policies that they don't harm or damage the land.' Mr. Little said the Nuchatlaht plan to develop their title lands. 'Hopefully we will have some logging to do but with really strict guidelines.' Much of their traditional territory on Nootka Island has already been commercially logged, making the former parkland one of the few pockets of intact forest. Robert Devault, who has lived on a private island adjacent to Nuchatlitz for more than 50 years, is concerned about the road being built. It appears to be designed for resource development, he said. 'I'm hoping that what they're doing now won't be completely destructive, but my main disappointment is the lack of response from the government.' While he supports the Nuchatlaht people in asserting their Aboriginal title, Mr. Devault said the province should have negotiated some protections. 'We have entrusted the government to save those parks for everybody, for the future, not only humans, but for the environment. And so it's a betrayal.' The NDP government has committed to reconciliation with First Nations. Last year, it signed a groundbreaking agreement to recognize that the Haida Nation has Aboriginal title to all one million hectares of the Haida Gwaii archipelago. It has also agreed to temporary close the popular Joffre Lakes Park near Pemberton for parts of this summer, at the request of the Lil'wat and N'Quatqua First Nations. Tamara Davidson, B.C.'s Minister of Environment and Parks, declined to comment on the Nuchatlaht case. A member of her staff said the matter is still before the courts. The Nuchatlaht are appealing the decision because it granted them only roughly 5 per cent of the territory they claim. The appeal, however, does not apply to the existing title lands. The province still promotes Nuchatliz Park as a destination for wilderness camping, although the boundaries of its remaining 175 hectares of parkland are not obvious. The province has simply ceased to apply the law that governs parkland and protected areas for the portion that is now Nuchatlaht land. Jack Woodward, the lawyer who represented the Nuchatlaht, said that the courts have set a precedent establishing that Aboriginal title can supersede park protections on Crown land. 'When you have Aboriginal title, you are entitled to the full economic benefit of the land,' he said in an interview. 'You're unencumbered by a whole bunch of things that would prevent you from using the land.' Jacinthe Goulet, a spokesperson for Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, said there are no Aboriginal title lands outside of British Columbia, although there is active title litigation across Canada. Currently, there is no federal law that defines governance of Aboriginal title lands, but Ottawa asserts that federal laws and provincial laws of general application - statutes that apply to all residents without exception - continue to stand on those lands. Mr. Woodward said the governments of Canada and B.C. have failed to provide legal guidance for Aboriginal title lands. 'We're left in a complete legislative vacuum. There are now two places in Canada where we know that there's Aboriginal title. That is the Tsilhqot'in territory, and also Nuchatlaht territory. We know that there's Aboriginal title there, but there is no legislation guiding this,' said Mr. Woodward, who also won the Tsilhqot'in case in B.C. 11 years ago. Indigenous groups in U.S. and Canada clash over cross-border land claims Thomas Isaac, an expert in Aboriginal law at the Vancouver law firm Cassels, said the province has legislative tools to protect the park, but is not using them. 'The legislative objective of protecting the environment can justifiably infringe an Aboriginal right, including title,' he said. 'The government is negligent, asleep on the job. The Nuchatlaht is not responsible for the public interest‚' he said, adding that it's up to governments to balance Indigenous interests with those of the wider public. Several environmental organizations supported the First Nation in its court battle. 'Colonial governments and corporations have degraded the splendour of Nootka Island,' the Wilderness Committee wrote in a 2022 report about to the case. Torrance Coste, the non-profit's national campaign director, said the Nuchatlaht have the right to manage and access their territories as they see fit. 'While First Nations rights and title are ignored and actively denied by the B.C. government, logging, mining, oil and gas and other industries blast thousands of kilometres of roads every year,' he said. 'This has been and remains our bigger concern.'
CBC
34 minutes ago
- CBC
Quebec mulling over major cuts to immigration
Quebec's immigration minister is laying out his targets for the next four years. Jean-François Roberge is also reiterating calls to Ottawa to cut the number of temporary immigrants to the province.
