
‘Trump needs to pick phone, call PM Modi': US Congressman Ami Bera
Could you help us make sense of the latest 50% tariff we've seen from President Trump?
You know, we try to figure out what President Trump does every day. What I would urge the Indians and people in the Indian government to do is to not react to everything that Donald Trump does. Obviously, you have to take the threat of 50% tariffs very realistically. That's taking place in the context of Russian negotiations, taking place in the context of a lot of what President Trump says. I think the longer-term US-India relationship is so much more important than this short blip. But again, we've got to work through this. Obviously, a country is going to push back on 50% tariffs. So, you know, I think this is a place where cooler heads need to prevail. Congress should weigh in here and say, hey, let's take a step back here for economic purposes, supply chain purposes and geopolitical strategic purposes in Asia. India is a major ally.
You're a key player on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. What are you hearing from your colleagues in Congress? Is there a sense that Trump is mishandling the relationship?
We've been on recess, so around the tariffs, we haven't had conversations. But certainly, we saw the terror attacks in India in April and then President Trump claiming that he was responsible for the ceasefire. I certainly think Secretary Rubio played a role in facilitating dialogue. But at the end of the day, it really is India and Pakistan deciding as two nuclear nations, we've got to de-escalate this. This is still a tenuous ceasefire. I mean, there's still a lot that could go wrong here. That's what I would focus on. That's what I would urge the Trump administration to support, both India and Pakistan in moving this tenuous ceasefire to something more stable long term. So on that note, I think there's strong support for India. Certainly, on the economic side, the U.S.-India caucus remains extremely strong. I think there's a lot of vocal support for the U.S.-India relationship. I don't think any of us think a 50% tariff on a good friend is where you should go. But I don't think slapping tariffs on our closest neighbor, Canada or Mexico, is also a good idea. Right.
How serious is the present crisis in India-US relations?
I think Trump has certainly taken it in a different direction. I think Prime Minister Modi and President Trump at times have demonstrated the ability to have a good relationship. And I think they certainly have worked at it. Obviously, I'm working closely with the ambassador in Washington D.C. with Indian counterparts. Again, this is a long-term play. And yes, it will be a give-and-take. And yes, there will be some in India that say, hey, we're not ready to open up these markets because it's too sensitive. But that's some of the trade-offs in negotiation. So India is now a major player in the world. And it's not a developing nation. It's a developed nation. And that's going to come with some responsibilities. Again, I get where President Trump is coming from to say, hey, we've got to have a fairer playing field. And some of the America First movement has changed that. But at the end of the day, it's in America's long-term interest and India's long-term interest to have a strong partnership here.
Where do both countries go from here?
If President Trump were to ask me what to do, I'd say pick up the phone and call Prime Minister Modi. You've had a good relationship in the past. Encourage the Prime Minister to engage with Russia to help see if they can be a partner in bringing an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
What does that look like? India has lines of communication and a longer history with Russia. Be a partner in bringing this war to an end with Europe and the United States. Again, I think India could play a role here. In exchange for playing that constructive role, let's also think about how we de-escalate these trade tensions. Where are the opportunities? How do we also then work on maritime security issues and freedom of navigation issues? It's in no one's interest to have a war in Asia. So, let's work together, not to pit India against China, but to say what does the 21st century world order look like? What's India's role in that world order? So I would look for those common opportunities and de-escalate the tensions. I don't expect him to pick up the phone and ask for my advice, but if he reads the Hindustan Times, this advice will be in there.
A key component of the tensions with America seem to be linked to the Trump administration's approach to Pakistan. What exactly is President Trump's thinking on Islamabad?
Look, I find it deeply odd as well. This is not orthodox for American politics. Democratic and Republican presidents would not have done this in the past. Again, I don't know if it's just a lack of thinking through how the optics would look in India, especially so shortly after the April terror attacks. Obviously, I understand that it did not play very well in India and it doesn't help smooth over relations. So I don't understand what their strategy was there. I also don't see India and Pakistan as equivalent countries. India is a country on the rise with a fast-growing economy that will be a major player in the 21st century. Pakistan is a country that has the most domestic terror attacks in the world, has a failing economy, has real deep political challenges, but unfortunately, is a nuclear-armed nation. So they're not equivalent partners here. And again, I would say that to the Indian public, I don't see it that way. I don't think most of my colleagues in Congress see it that way. But again, I think these are some missteps that the Trump administration has made.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Breaking news live updates, August 12: Rahul Gandhi lauds INDA bloc MPs for support in 'movement against vote theft'
00:17 (IST) Aug 12 US stocks are drifting around their record heights on Monday as Wall Street waits for an upcoming update on inflation. The S&P 500 fell 0.1% and is just below its all-time high set two weeks ago. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 171 points, or 0.4%, as of 2:30 p.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite fell 0.1%, coming off its own record. The highlight of this week for Wall Street is likely to arrive on Tuesday, when the government will report how bad inflation was across the country in July. Economists expect it to show U.S. consumers had to pay prices for groceries, gasoline and other costs of living that were 2.8% higher in July from a year earlier, a slight acceleration from June's 2.7% inflation. Inflation has remained above 2%, even if it has improved substantially from its peak above 9% three years ago. And the worry is that President Donald Trump's tariffs could push it higher. That in turn is raising fears about a potential, worst-case scenario called 'stagflation' where the economy stagnates but inflation remains high. The Federal Reserve has no good tool to fix both at once, and it would need to concentrate on either the job market or inflation first. But helping one of those areas by moving interest rates would likely hurt the other. A top Fed official, Michelle Bowman, said on Saturday that she believes the job market is the bigger concern. She is still backing three cuts to interest rates by the Fed this year following this month's stunning, weaker-than-expected report on the U.S. job market. Trump himself has also been angrily calling for cuts to interest rates to support the economy. Other Fed officials, led by Chair Jerome Powell, are more hesitant. Powell has said he wants to wait for more data about how Trump's tariffs are affecting inflation before the Fed makes its next move, and Tuesday's update on the consumer price index may offer a big clue about that. Strategists at Stifel are warning that stagflation may already be on the way, with spending by U.S. consumers slowing, and they warn that it could cause the U.S. economy to slow to a crawl by the second half of the year. That in turn could create a reckoning for investors after they sent stock prices soaring to records from their low point in April. 'Rate cuts cannot save an overvalued S&P 500,' according to the strategists, led by Thomas Carroll and Barry Bannister. One way companies can make their stock prices appear less expensive is to deliver bigger profits. Micron Technology climbed 3% Monday after raising its forecasts for profit and revenue in the current quarter, which will end later this month. The maker of memory for computers said it's benefiting from higher prices for its products. AMC Entertainment rose 2.9% to shave its loss for the year so far, which came into the day at 26.4% after it reported better results for the spring than analysts expected. The theater chain said moviegoers paid more for their tickets per person than ever before, while also spending more on food and drinks. TKO Group Holdings climbed 8.2% after reaching a deal to distribute the full slate of its 13 marquee UFC numbered events, along with 30 'Fight Nights' on the Paramount+ streaming platform. Paramount Skydance's stock fell 1.6%. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices advanced after a U.S. government official confirmed that the two agreed to share 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China with the U.S. government. The two had said in July that Washington would allow them to resume sales of their advanced H20 and MI308 chips, which are used in artificial intelligence development, in China but didn't reveal the 15% cut. Nvidia added 0.2%, and AMD climbed 0.7%. On the losing side of Wall Street was after the AI application software company warned it may report an operating loss as large as $124.9 million for its first quarter. CEO Thomas Siebel called the first-quarter sales results 'completely unacceptable,' and its stock tumbled 25%. In stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed amid mostly modest movements across Europe and Asia. In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury held at 4.27%, where it was late Friday.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline
US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens' read more US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens,' while praising China for its cooperation in ongoing trade talks with the US. 'We've been dealing very nicely with China. As you have probably heard, they have tremendous tariffs that they're paying to the United States of America,' Reuters quoted Trump as saying at a news conference at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'They've been dealing quite nicely,' he said, adding that he had a good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. A tariff truce between the US and China is set to expire on August 12, though the Trump administration has signaled the deadline could be extended. More from World PM Modi to visit China: Why the trip matters amid Trump's steep tariffs on India Without an extension, US tariffs on Chinese goods are expected to surge to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on American products could reach 125%. The two countries agreed to a 90-day pause in their trade dispute during talks in Geneva this May, allowing time for further negotiations. A follow-up meeting in Stockholm in late July ended without any announcement on extending the truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington is making progress and expressed optimism about reaching a deal with Beijing. With the clock ticking, Trump on Sunday night called on China to quadruple its purchases of American soybeans and noted that doing so would help reduce America's trade deficit with China. 'China is worried about its shortage of soybeans,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a message directed to Xi Jinping, China's leader. 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans,' he added. With inputs from agencies


News18
7 minutes ago
- News18
US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage
Curated By : Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 00:39 IST It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case (Pexels/Representative Image) The US Supreme Court legalised same-sex marriage in 2015 following its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Now, nearly a decade after that historic decision, the nation's highest court is being urged to revisit the ruling. Kim Davis, a former county clerk from Kentucky, has submitted a petition asking the Court to consider granting her protection from personal liability under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, reported ABC . Davis made national headlines in 2015 when she was jailed for six days after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing her religious beliefs. At the time, she was the only official authorised under Kentucky law to issue marriage licenses in Rowan County. When she denied a marriage certificate to David Ermold and David Moore, a lower court ordered her to pay $100,000 in damages for infringing on their constitutional rights. Recommended Stories In her recent appeal to the Supreme Court, Davis is contesting the $100,000 jury verdict and is also seeking $260,000 in emotional damages and attorneys' fees. Her claims had previously been dismissed by lower courts. A federal appeals court panel earlier this year ruled against her, stating that the former clerk 'cannot raise the First Amendment as a defence because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case. The justices are expected to consider if they will take the matter during a private conference at the end of September. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments would likely take place in the spring of 2026, with a final decision anticipated by the end of June. 'I'm hoping that we'll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks," said Matt Staver, Davis' legal representative, in a statement to Scripps News . View All "Dragging Out War" Zelensky Eyes "Stronger Global Pressure" on Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Meet Donald Trump Will Try To Get Back Territory For Ukraine In "Feel-out Meeting" With Putin In Alaska North Korea Slams US-South Korea Drills; Lukashenko Admits Kim's Troops Took Part in Ukraine War |4K Air India Crash Victims' Families Demand Immediate Release Of Flight Recorders, Hire Us based Lawyer "Road To Misery" IRGC Slams Trump-Backed Zangezur corridor, Iran to Hold Meet with Armenia | 4K View all Meanwhile, William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, expressed confidence in the current legal outcome. In a statement to ABC , he noted, 'Not a single judge on the US Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis' rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that her arguments do not merit further attention." In her petition, Davis further argues that the Court should treat the issue of same-sex marriage similarly to how it addressed abortion in its 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. This is the first time that someone has challenged the same-sex marriage ruling after it was announced in 2015. News world US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage Read More