Trump reignites proposal that could change prison system forever
' Crime in American Cities started to significantly rise when they went to CASHLESS BAIL. The WORST criminals are flooding our streets and endangering even our great law enforcement officers. It is a complete disaster, and must be ended, IMMEDIATELY!,' he wrote on Truth Social on Monday.
Crime, in fact, is not on the rise in most American cities right now. The latest national and city-level data for 2025 actually show violent crime, murders and shootings declining during the first six months of the year. Some reports indicate the U.S. is on track for the lowest property and violent crime rates since national record-keeping began in the 1960s.
The president has - in recent days - posted other items on social media that are tied to the prison system, including an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being arrested at the White House. Trump also has called for Alcatraz, California's infamous island prison, to be reopened.
While Trump signed criminal justice legislation into law during his first term that reduced certain mandatory minimum sentence and expanded eligibility for early release, he did not take on the bail system. Trump has had his own experience with cash bonds in order to stay out of prison.
He had to post a $175 million bond to New York in a case involving his business practices. And he was required to post $200,000 bond in his election subversion case in Georgia, which he did so after surrendering at the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta in August 2023.
But Trump falsely claimed in May 2024 that he had to put up bail in his New York hush money case, saying New York City was violent because other defendants did not have to post bail. He was actually released on his own recognizance, like many charged with a non-violent crime. And in two federal cases - one in Washington, DC, over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, and one in Florida over his post-presidency retention of classified documents - Trump was released on his own recognizance.
A cashless bail system would see defendants released based on factors like flight risk or a danger to community and not on ability to pay. However, the system may not work like Trump wants it to. A study in California earlier this year found 70 percent of suspects released on zero-dollar bail, reoffended. The state recently ended its current money bail system. The data showed suspects released on zero-dollar bail were twice as likely to be rearrested for felonies and three times as likely to be rearrested for violent crimes compared to those who had to post bail, CBS News reported.
Proponents of cashless bail, however, say it could decrease prison populations as a cash bail system sees people being detained in jail, sometimes for lengthy periods of time while awaiting trial, solely because of their inability to pay. Illinois, in 2023, became the first state to eliminate the use of cash bail. But the move didn't decline prison populations as much as expected, a study from the Center for Criminal Justice at Loyola University in Chicago found.
'What's changing is that the means of release are changing,' David Olson, a co-director of the center, told ABC News . 'People don't have to post the money, and rather than being released in a few days when they come up with the money, they're being released in a day or two.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woman hurled in jail after letting grass in front of her home go brown during hot weather
A woman in Florida was thrown in jail after letting the grass in front of her home go brown during hot weather, violating HOA guidelines. Irena Green was arrested and spent a week in jail after a battle with her homeowner's association in Hillsborough County over browning grass in front of her home. 'I think they have way too much power,' Green told ABC news. 'I've never heard of anything like this in my life.' Green said her grass is often not green due to a large tree that's planted near her sidewalk, as well as mandatory watering restrictions that were put in place last year following a drought. She claimed, however, that her lawn was not the worst looking in the Riverview Creek View subdivision. 'If you drive around my neighborhood, you'll see there's plenty of yards not up to par,' she added. The Trowbridge Company Inc., the HOA management company, began notifying her of the violations, which spanned a range of issues including her browning lawn and a dirty mailbox, Green said. 'The grass had started turning brown. So they started sending notes, and it went from the grass being brown to there's a dent in my garage.' Green said the grass often isn't green in her yard due to a large tree that's planted near her sidewalk as well as mandatory watering restrictions last year following a drought On May 23, as she drove home with her daughter, she was pulled over and asked to step out of her vehicle and she was arrested and booked into the Orient Road Jail Green also was notified of violations including owning a commercial cargo van, which is not the only in her neighborhood, ABC reported. But as she failed to comply with the guidelines and respond to a request for mediation, the HOA filed a lawsuit against her alleging that she violated community appearance rules. Yet as she attempted to represent herself in court, she was told last July by the judge that she had around a month to fix the violations. 'My grass had to be brought up to par. He said you can get seed, you can do something, but you've got 30 days to get it corrected. So I said fine. He said if it's not done in 30 days, you're gonna go to jail,' Green told the outlet. Green said she did what she could to comply, even selling her van and cleaning her mailbox. She bought seed and watered her grass, but missed her next court date and claimed she hadn't been notified to appear at the hearing last August. 'I was supposed to receive documentation. Nothing was sent to my home,' Green said. 'And I reached out to the courthouse several times to try to find out when was my court date.' Green said she did what she could to comply, even selling her van and cleaning her mailbox. She bought seed and watered her grass, but missed her next court date and claimed she hadn't been notified to appear at the hearing last August Yet, the judge ordered that she was in contempt of court and a warrant was issued for her arrest. On May 23, as she drove home with her daughter, she was pulled over and asked to step out of her vehicle. 'He asked me can I get out. When I got out he said, "Ms. green, did you know that you have a warrant for your arrest?"' Green said. She was arrested and booked into the Orient Road Jail, according to ABC News. Yet, she was placed into custody without bond. 'So I couldn't even go home to my family. I sat in there for seven days. Seven days in the jailhouse like a criminal,' she added. Green described the process of being booked into the jail as 'horrible.' 'I work hard to buy this home for me and my kids in a better neighborhood and environment and to be taken to jail and to be treated like that for brown grass at my own home... that's horrible,' she said. She even described being held in jail with other inmates who queried why she was being held in custody. 'One girl, she kind of came over and asked me like "Hey, what are you in here for?" And I told her it was like for my grass,' Green said. 'And she's like 'Oh grass, they should make that stuff legal'. She's thinking that I'm talking about weed and I'm talking about my front yard grass.' Green's sister, a paralegal, filed a petition six-days after she was booked into the jail which requested an emergency hearing. 'I went to court, and I had to be shackled from my hands to my feet,' Green said as she recalled being the only person in county civil court wearing a jail uniform. In court, the HOA's attorney even opposed her release, Green said: 'He says "Well, it hasn't been resodded. The whole yard needs to be re-sodded." And she's like not from those pictures I see. She's like "No. I want her released immediately."' 'He wanted me to continue to sit in jail and not come home to my family,' she added. In a statement to the outlet, the Creek View HOA Board of Directors said: 'Ms. Green received notices of violations. She disregarded them. Legal action was filed by the Association after she failed to accept the offer to mediate the matter, pre-suit, as is required before a lawsuit can be filed...' 'After suit was filed and final judgment was entered against her, Ms. Green showed up for the court hearing on July 11, 2024... At the July 11 hearing, with Ms. Green present, another court date was set by the judge for August 19, 2024. 'She was instructed to comply with the requirements of the final judgment by August 19 and to report to the judge what was accomplished on August 19. Ms. Green failed to show up in court on August 19. 'Her failure to abide by the Court's instruction led to the arrest warrant being steps were taken by the Court due to Ms. Green's failure to comply with the Court's instructions.' While Green was released the next day following her hearing, she said: 'I definitely wish I would have hired a lawyer.'
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Musk's X must face claim of negligence over child abuse images, judge rules
A federal appeals court on Friday revived part of a lawsuit accusing Elon Musk's X of becoming a haven for child exploitation, though the court said the platform deserves broad immunity from claims over objectionable content. While rejecting some claims, the ninth US circuit court of appeals in San Francisco said X, formerly Twitter, must face a claim it was negligent by failing to promptly report a video containing explicit images of two underage boys to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The case predated Musk's 2022 purchase of Twitter. A trial judge had dismissed the case in December 2023. X's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk was not a defendant. One plaintiff, John Doe 1, said he was 13 when he and a friend, John Doe 2, were lured, on Snapchat, into providing nude photos of themselves to someone John Doe 1 thought was a 16-year-old girl at his school. The Snapchat user was actually a child abuse images trafficker who blackmailed the plaintiffs into providing additional photos. Those images were later compiled into a video that was posted on Twitter. According to court papers, Twitter took nine days after learning about the content to take it down and report it to NCMEC, following more than 167,000 views, court papers showed. Circuit judge Danielle Forrest said section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability over user content, did not shield X from the negligence claim once it learned about the images. 'The facts alleged here, coupled with the statutory 'actual knowledge' requirement, separates the duty to report child pornography to NCMEC from Twitter's role as a publisher,' she wrote for a three-judge panel. X must also face a claim its infrastructure made it too difficult to report child abuse images. It was found immune from claims it knowingly benefited from sex trafficking, and created search features that 'amplify' child abuse images posts. Dani Pinter, a lawyer at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement: 'We look forward to discovery and ultimately trial against X to get justice and accountability.'
The Herald Scotland
33 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Voters hate Medicaid cuts. Now Republicans are backpedaling
But many of those same Republicans in Congress are now openly fretting about President Donald Trump's signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed into law on July 4. Some worry that it slashes Medicaid funding for the working poor. Some think it doesn't cut enough federal funding. And it adds $4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Call this "Vote yes and second-guess." That's not exactly the vibe Trump was looking for from his political party for what he had hoped would be a summer victory tour to celebrate this and other early accomplishments in his second term. But here, Trump - and his party in next year's midterm elections - have a serious problem. Americans don't like his massive budget bill, which swaps short-term tax relief for some low-income working people for permanent tax cuts for America's wealthiest people. That's only going to get worse as Americans see what programs Trump and his Republican allies have defunded and where they are boosting federal spending. Trump is dumping money into immigration policies Americans don't like Consider immigration, a signature issue for Trump, which previously won him significant support among American voters in 2016 and 2024. He's seen a reversal of fortunes here. That's probably because so many of us are watching masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents indiscriminately grabbing people off the street to be deported with little or no due process under the law. What Trump touted as an effort to deport violent criminals who entered this country illegally has devolved into an oppressive spectacle as ICE agents snatch people who hold green cards or appear at immigration hearings. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on people, power and policies in the time of Trump from columnist Chris Brennan. Get it delivered to your inbox. Trump's new budget bill includes $170 billion for more of that over the next four years, with $76.5 billion going to ICE to detain people snatched off our streets and to add 10,000 new agents to a force that already has 20,000. How is that going to play across America? Gallup offered us a clue with a mid-July survey that showed a sizable shift in how Americans view immigration. Opinion: Trump's policies on immigration, economy and trade are unpopular with Americans In 2024, 55% of Americans told Gallup they thought immigration should be decreased. That dropped to 30% this year, after they saw Trump's approach on the issue. And a record high - 79% - of U.S. adults told Gallup that immigration is good for this country. That same survey found that 62% of Americans disapprove of Trump's immigration policies. And he's about to drive this country deep into debt to ramp up an approach Americans don't like. Now Republicans want you to believe they're saving Medicaid Then there is the Republican regret. You get the feeling Republicans in Congress want to increase funding either for a time machine to undo their vote or a device to make voters forget how those senators and representatives supported Trump's big, beautiful bill. This game of both sides is as desperate as it is hypocritical. U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri wrote an essay for The New York Times in May expressing concerns about how the bill will slash Medicaid for the working poor. Then he voted for Trump's budget. Now he says he's trying to undo some of the harm he supported with new legislation. U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska expressed concerns before folding to support Trump's budget. Murkowski's shameless bid to spread the blame, by urging Republicans in the U.S. House not to endorse the bill she had just endorsed, of course, fell on its face. U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado touted her vote for Trump's budget in May. By late July, she was denouncing the government for not reducing the national debt. Opinion: MAGA is coming for Trump over lost Epstein files. Bondi may pay the price. U.S. Rep. Ted Cruz of Texas is among the legislators now calling to roll back the provision in Trump's budget that changes tax deductions for gamblers. Cruz's explanation for backtracking, according to NBC News: "Most Republicans didn't even know this was in the bill when they voted to pass it." Republicans are still spending our tax dollars recklessly Trump has assumed control of the Republican Party in Congress, where legislative leaders are careful to never act as an independent and coequal branch of government. They sing a song about making America great by cracking down on federal spending, while piling up the nation's debt. They're not spending less of your tax dollars. They're just making sure the super rich in America don't have to pay at the same rates as middle-class people. They're spending much, much more, just as Americans discover they like Trump's policies less and less every day. There's a cure for all this. It's called the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans in Congress are afraid of Trump. They really should be afraid of voters tossing them out of office for backing his budget. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
