Are England too nice? They think so – and this is how they're changing it
And pace bowler Brydon Carse has explicitly linked this abrasive approach to how England want to battle Australia for the Ashes here, where England have not won a Test match since 2011, the last time they retained the urn away from home.
After a spiteful Lord's Test where players on both sides lost their cool on several occasions, Brook said that coach Brendon McCullum – who has employed his friend and former New Zealand psychologist Gilbert Enoka to help motivate the England players – told the team before the game that they were 'too nice' to opponents.
When Indian captain Shubman Gill harried the England openers Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett as they tried to avoid another over being bowled on the third evening, Brook used the episode as a pretext to initiate a sledging barrage for the remainder of the match, which England went on to win narrowly.
''Baz' actually said a few days before the Test that we are too nice sometimes and I brought it up the night before the last day – I said, 'I think tomorrow is a perfect opportunity to really get stuck into them,'' Brook said before the fourth Test in Manchester. England lead India 2-1 with two Tests to play.
'We had a little conversation the night before, where everybody saw them guys get stuck into 'Creeps' and 'Ducky' [Crawley and Duckett] and we just thought, 'We're not having that'. We all piled into them.
Loading
'I've had a lot of compliments. Everybody says it was awesome to watch and it looked like there was 11 versus two out there when we were fielding and it was good fun. It made fielding a lot more enjoyable.'
Carse, who bowled a fiery spell to set England on the path to winning at Lord's while defending a small fourth innings target, said that expectations of a difficult Ashes assignment had the players thinking about making sure they were similarly aggressive in Australia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny
What transpired was particularly unpleasant. England's batters being brought on to bowl like an under-10s team to serve up anything but Test standard bowling. To this was added vituperative sledging, albeit hardly of the venomous kind. England's fielders ambled after balls struck through the cordon, running like puppets with broken strings. Only muted acknowledgment was given when each Indian batter brought up three figures. The match ended almost immediately after that. Fairly assessed, it was sooky and petulant conduct, driven by Stokes' incandescence at not getting his own way. This, to all intents and purposes, is of course the same England team that cried with poisonous fury after the Lord's Test of the 2023 Ashes series, once Jonny Bairstow was stumped by Australian wicketkeeper Alex Carey having absent-mindedly meandered from his crease. You almost get the sense of a theme … By any sensible analysis of what is legislated for under the Laws of Cricket, Bairstow was fairly dismissed that day. Equally, Gill's decision to not agree to prematurely end the Test match at Old Trafford was entirely within the rules of the game. The England team's posturing and remonstrations were misguided, unedifying and wrong. In almost any other sport – golf is the true exception which comes to mind – you would readily cop Stokes' and his teammates' behaviour. In any football code, Stokes' conduct would be seen as positively de rigueur. Yet cricket is supposedly different. For not only is it governed by the laws of the game, but also the esoteric spirit of cricket, which ties the laws together with a veritable golden thread. What the Laws of Cricket say is that although the laws themselves have governed the playing of the game for nearly three centuries, cricket owes much of its particular appeal and enjoyment to the fact that it should also be played within the right 'spirit'. But if indeed it exists, what constitutes cricket's spirit is hard to identify. The preamble to the Laws of Cricket are directed to this concept of the spirit of the game. The opening paragraphs state that the notion of respect is central to the spirit of cricket. It is expressly written that central to the spirit of this noble sport is to play hard and fair; to show respect for your opponents; to show self-discipline even in the face of adversity; to congratulate the opposition on their successes; and to establish an overall positive atmosphere. Could the case be prosecuted that the England team's actions in the fourth Test were consistent with this idea of the spirit of cricket? It would seem not. The England team's feigned incredulousness at India's decision to play on despite the likely impossibility of a match result, and everything that occurred thereafter, certainly has a spirit interwoven. But a slightly malicious one. The swearing of England's fielders, picked up by the stump microphones, and the incredulity displayed by Stokes and Harry Brook especially, bears scant correlation to the notion of the good spirit of anything at all. A mountain of pressure can reveal character; however this was not a situation where pressure existed. This was a Test match meandering towards oblivion. Stokes' ungracious reaction to his team being required to play on revealed much, but not much of it positive. Loading All of this leaves this columnist unconvinced that the spirit of cricket exists otherwise than in a form of words written within the rules of the sport. In 2013, the Australian Test umpire Simon Taufel delivered the Marylebone Cricket Club's Cowdrey Spirit of Cricket lecture at a black tie dinner at Lord's, during which he argued that the spirit of cricket means that the values of the game take priority over personal gain or advancement. If that's an accurate summation, you have to question whether it still exists at all.
The Age
11 hours ago
- The Age
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny
What transpired was particularly unpleasant. England's batters being brought on to bowl like an under-10s team to serve up anything but Test standard bowling. To this was added vituperative sledging, albeit hardly of the venomous kind. England's fielders ambled after balls struck through the cordon, running like puppets with broken strings. Only muted acknowledgment was given when each Indian batter brought up three figures. The match ended almost immediately after that. Fairly assessed, it was sooky and petulant conduct, driven by Stokes' incandescence at not getting his own way. This, to all intents and purposes, is of course the same England team that cried with poisonous fury after the Lord's Test of the 2023 Ashes series, once Jonny Bairstow was stumped by Australian wicketkeeper Alex Carey having absent-mindedly meandered from his crease. You almost get the sense of a theme … By any sensible analysis of what is legislated for under the Laws of Cricket, Bairstow was fairly dismissed that day. Equally, Gill's decision to not agree to prematurely end the Test match at Old Trafford was entirely within the rules of the game. The England team's posturing and remonstrations were misguided, unedifying and wrong. In almost any other sport – golf is the true exception which comes to mind – you would readily cop Stokes' and his teammates' behaviour. In any football code, Stokes' conduct would be seen as positively de rigueur. Yet cricket is supposedly different. For not only is it governed by the laws of the game, but also the esoteric spirit of cricket, which ties the laws together with a veritable golden thread. What the Laws of Cricket say is that although the laws themselves have governed the playing of the game for nearly three centuries, cricket owes much of its particular appeal and enjoyment to the fact that it should also be played within the right 'spirit'. But if indeed it exists, what constitutes cricket's spirit is hard to identify. The preamble to the Laws of Cricket are directed to this concept of the spirit of the game. The opening paragraphs state that the notion of respect is central to the spirit of cricket. It is expressly written that central to the spirit of this noble sport is to play hard and fair; to show respect for your opponents; to show self-discipline even in the face of adversity; to congratulate the opposition on their successes; and to establish an overall positive atmosphere. Could the case be prosecuted that the England team's actions in the fourth Test were consistent with this idea of the spirit of cricket? It would seem not. The England team's feigned incredulousness at India's decision to play on despite the likely impossibility of a match result, and everything that occurred thereafter, certainly has a spirit interwoven. But a slightly malicious one. The swearing of England's fielders, picked up by the stump microphones, and the incredulity displayed by Stokes and Harry Brook especially, bears scant correlation to the notion of the good spirit of anything at all. A mountain of pressure can reveal character; however this was not a situation where pressure existed. This was a Test match meandering towards oblivion. Stokes' ungracious reaction to his team being required to play on revealed much, but not much of it positive. Loading All of this leaves this columnist unconvinced that the spirit of cricket exists otherwise than in a form of words written within the rules of the sport. In 2013, the Australian Test umpire Simon Taufel delivered the Marylebone Cricket Club's Cowdrey Spirit of Cricket lecture at a black tie dinner at Lord's, during which he argued that the spirit of cricket means that the values of the game take priority over personal gain or advancement. If that's an accurate summation, you have to question whether it still exists at all.
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
The Ashes: Australia's cricket enemy No.1, Stuart Broad, heading Down Under with Channel 7
Australia's most despised Englishman is going to add fire to the hottest Test cricket series ever played on Australian soil. Stuart Broad — the English fast bowler Australian fans love to hate — has been unveiled as a Channel 7 expert for the blockbuster Ashes series this summer. The recently retired paceman is the man who controversially refused to walk during the 2013 series despite hitting a ball to slip and who whinged the hardest when Alex Carey stumped Jonny Bairstow at Lord's during the fiery 2023 clash. Now he will sit alongside Aussie legends like Ricky Ponting, Justin Langer and Matthew Hayden as the old enemy returns, with cricketing tensions between the two nations at an all-time high. Broad will be a part of Channel 7's leading coverage for all five matches of the series, which kicks off with The West Test in Perth from November 21. The 167-Test champion said stirring the pot with Australian rivals was just part of his nature and said the feeling from the 2023 series will carry through this time around. 'I wouldn't say I've loved winding them up, it seems to have come quite naturally,' Broad said. 'I think Ashes series, the history of it, always brings emotion. I think anyone who has played an Ashes series will say it is the best cricket you can play, it's the absolute pinnacle and you remember certain moments in Ashes series that define your career in a sense. 'The 2023 Ashes series here had a lot of emotion to it, particularly ignited by the Bairstow run-out and how everything turned about there. 'I think that brings a lot of emotion and excitement about this Ashes series. The next time the teams will meet will be in November. There's a lot of players still playing from those series and they will remember what happened in that.' England's players were at the centre of another flashpoint this week when they reacted petulantly to India's batters rejecting their calls for an early draw so they could reach their centuries. Broad warned his former teammates they were up against an entire nation, not just the Australian team. 'I know the Australian press picked up on the handshake stuff between England and India a little more than the English press did, but that's how Ashes series will work,' he said. 'One thing you know as an England player when you go to Australia — and I really respect everything about this — you are not going to play against 11 cricketers, you are going to play against the country. 'Everyone wants to beat you, whether you are going to a restaurant or for a drink in a bar, you are England versus Australia.' Broad admitted Australia — who have not lost an Ashes on home soil since 2010-11 — had the wood over his side for a long time, but warned England will bring a team that is up for the challenge.
