logo
Who owns the ‘Jungle' homeless encampment in Olympia?

Who owns the ‘Jungle' homeless encampment in Olympia?

Yahoo20-07-2025
Days after The Olympian published a story about an elected official and others touring the homeless encampment known as the Jungle — a meeting that was spurred by concerns about recent violence at the camp — readers had more questions about the site between Martin Way and Pacific Avenue near Interstate 5.
Chief among those questions: Who owns the land? The answer: Although the city of Olympia owns some of it, most is privately held by a business called JJP Group LLC, which also owns the Chevron station near the camp on its Pacific Avenue side.
A representative of JJP Group LLC declined to comment.
The Olympian, working with a Thurston County Assessor's Office representative, identified six parcels owned by JJP Group between Martin Way and Pacific Avenue that total 16.40 acres. The city owns two parcels that total 6.75 acres.
Why does the city own those parcels and what arrangement do they have to access the site for camp residents?
The city-owned property was purchased in June 2021, said Assistant City Manager Stacey Ray.
'The city purchased the property for multiple uses including, but not limited to, the future extension of Ensign Road and to allow the city more flexibility in managing several informal homeless encampments and providing other housing and homeless services to individuals living there,' she said.
Accessing the private property, including a large chunk of land near Martin Way, is the result of a two-year option agreement to purchase land in the area that was agreed to between the city and JJP, Ray said.
That option is still in place, she said, and it specifies that access will be allowed for trash cleanup, homeless outreach activities and for the installation and construction of fencing between the camp and neighboring businesses, she said.
Neighbors weigh in
The Olympian decided to ask a neighboring business owner about the experience of operating next door to the camp.
THC of Olympia, a marijuana retailer, couldn't be closer. The business is situated steps away from the front entrance to the camp at 3200 Martin Way E.
THC owner Ciaran Wilburn, who has been there for about nine years, said the camp has evolved from one he described as a group of 'old-timers looking to escape society' to what he called a 'large drug and mental health crisis.'
Wilburn said he does not have many issues with the people who occupy the camp, but he scoffed at a city officials who say the city is doing a good job of balancing accountability with compassion at the Jungle.
'This is compassion?' said Wilburn as he stood outside his business and gestured at the camp.
He rattled off a list things that would help: better defined camp spaces, more sanitation services, running water and security cameras that might prevent crime.
'Put the camera systems up you have in the grocery store parking lot, so at least there's the illusion of security,' he said.
Wilburn wasn't done.
'This is the most accepting area I've ever visited, and this is how we're dealing with this? It's a joke,' he said. 'Nine years of watching this, the city's a joke.'
What do camp residents say?
The Olympian spent time at the front entrance to the camp to interview those coming and going. Those interviewed were uncomfortable with using their full names, but they did agree to first names and ages.
Former long-term camp resident, Danielle, 35, pulled up in her car to pick up some people on the fringe of the camp. She recalled it was kind of cool to build her own shelter there, but although the camp was safe for the most part, it had an 'uncomfortable energy.'
She said she was finally able to get housing with the assistance of the Family Support Center. She said there needs to be more shelters for women, so they don't have to wait as long in a camp like the Jungle for housing.
'It's not right, it's not fair,' she said.
Does the camp govern itself? She said it is self-governing to a degree and that people hold each other accountable. When young people enter the camp because they are curious about it, they are told to leave, she said.
'It's not OK. The young should not be here.'
Mark, 36, originally from California, said he has lived in the camp a long time.
'I like it here,' he said, adding that he has freedom in the camp and nobody bothers him. He described the camp as safe.
C.J., 49, who was sitting in the backseat of Danielle's car, said she lived in the Jungle for five years before she secured housing.
She said the camp has a hierarchy, but it's not too different from regular society in that there's an expectation that you'll pick up after yourself and not touch other people's stuff.
There was a time when the camp had an 'aura of peace and calm' to it, but not in the last 18 months, she said.
In that time, The Olympian has reported about a rape at the camp and the violent assault of a woman by a group of people.
Wolf, 59, said he has lived at the camp for the last six to seven months.
'The goal is to get out of here,' he said.
He, too, said the camp is 95% safe, although there are a few characters in the Jungle that account for that 5%.
'A lot of people help each other,' he said, adding that it feels like a 'big, loose, chaotic family.'
Equal time
When The Olympian wrote about the tour of the camp, one of those on hand was Olympia City Council candidate Wendy Carlson, who is challenging incumbent Clark Gilman.
Gilman did not participate in that tour, so in the interest of equal time, The Olympian reached out to him after Tuesday night's council meeting to get his thoughts about the camp.
Here's what he had to say:
'I agree that the living conditions are not appropriate for anybody at the Jungle, but I also recognize the reality that we don't have the resources to just end it,' he said.
'And so instead, we're in a position of managing it as best we can, and that's been through a combination of policing, of social work and mutual aid outreach, of having our crisis responders be in relationships with people there.'
Gilman also said that without policy changes the problem continues.
'There's not a finite number of people who are very poor or who are not able to access health care services that they need,' he said. 'And as long as we keep minting more people who are very poor, and as long as we keep reducing what's available for health care, we're going to continue to have more individuals who are in this situation that we're trying to help as best we can and to manage the situation.'
Concerns about 'Jungle' homeless encampment spur tour with Lacey, Olympia officials
Four people charged in connection with June 18 attack in Olympia's 'Jungle'
Olympia man charged with attempted murder in Lacey rape case faces new rape charge
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fort Stewart Shooting Injures Five Soldiers, Suspect Arrested
Fort Stewart Shooting Injures Five Soldiers, Suspect Arrested

Bloomberg

time3 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Fort Stewart Shooting Injures Five Soldiers, Suspect Arrested

A US Army sergeant opened fire Wednesday morning at Fort Stewart in southeast Georgia, shooting five fellow soldiers and prompting a temporary lockdown of the base, military officials said. The shooting occurred just before 11 a.m. inside the complex housing the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team. Authorities said the gunman, who's assigned to the same unit as the victims, was taken into custody without further incident at 11:35 a.m.

Analysis: An Epstein cover-up? Victims and allies suggest it's happening now, under Trump
Analysis: An Epstein cover-up? Victims and allies suggest it's happening now, under Trump

CNN

time31 minutes ago

  • CNN

Analysis: An Epstein cover-up? Victims and allies suggest it's happening now, under Trump

For years, Republicans and MAGA influencers have been keen to rip the lid off a supposed government conspiracy to cover up information related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and alleged associates. Many key figures who now serve in the Trump administration pledged to do exactly that. The administration's failures to live up to those promises and its bizarre handling of the situation now have it scrambling. On Wednesday night, that will take the form of top officials strategizing at Vice President JD Vance's residence, CNN is now reporting. But their task is only getting harder. And that's in large part because a growing chorus of Epstein's victims and their allies now suggest there could indeed be a cover-up afoot. One forged by the same MAGA administration that built itself up as the antidote. To be clear, President Donald Trump has not been accused of any crimes in relation to Epstein. But repeatedly in recent days and weeks, those victims and allies have stepped forward to raise serious questions about the Trump administration's handling of the matter. They've complained about favorable treatment of convicted Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. They've objected to the lack of disclosure. They've complained about the administration's treatment of them. They've invoked the phrase 'cover-up' on at least three occasions. Others have more subtly pointed in that direction. Victims have raised concerns about the government's handling of the matter for years – in particular focusing on a favorable non-prosecution agreement Epstein landed in 2007 and the years before he was later charged – but their complaints are now directed squarely at the Trump administration. All of which makes it much more difficult for the administration to just move on, as the president would clearly prefer. Last week, family members of one of Epstein's and Maxwell's most prominent accusers, Virginia Giuffre, cited Trump's recent admission that he had been aware that Epstein recruited Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago. They cited other evidence that Trump was aware of Epstein's affinity for young girls and women and said, 'It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions.' (Giuffre died by suicide earlier this year.) In another letter, Giuffre family members and other accusers also cited the still-unexplained prison transfer of Maxwell to a lower-security prison camp that sex offenders like her don't appear eligible for, without a waiver. That news came shortly after Maxwell, who's serving a 20-year sentence, was interviewed by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. And it comes as Trump has dangled the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, who's appealing her conviction. 'This move smacks of a cover up,' they wrote. 'The victims deserve better.' They're not the only ones to raise concerns about the prison transfer. Two attorneys who have represented Epstein accusers, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, said in a letter Tuesday that they were given no notice of Maxwell's transfer or any chance to object. They said the victims view the transfer 'as extraordinarily insensitive and suggestive of ulterior purposes.' That letter was one of several entered into the record as part of proceedings over whether to unseal grand jury testimony from the investigations into Maxwell and Epstein. And some of those letters have also raised concerns about a cover-up. One unnamed victim in her letter appeared to cite a Bloomberg report that the FBI has redacted the names of Trump and other prominent public figures in the Epstein files – a report that CNN hasn't confirmed. The unnamed victim said, 'I feel like the DOJ's and FBI's priority is protecting the 'third-party', the wealthy men by focusing on scrubbing their names off the files,' adding: 'That is their focus? Wow!' Another victim, Annie Farmer, offered similar thoughts. Her lawyer cited the Justice Department's statement last month that it would not release 'information related to third parties who neither have been charged or alleged to be involved' in Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes. 'Any effort to redact third party names smacks of a cover up,' Farmer's lawyer said. Farmer previously told The New York Times that she urged law enforcement and the FBI two decades ago to look more broadly into Epstein's associates, including Trump, who was friendly with Epstein but has said they had a falling out. Farmer also described a troubling encounter with Trump and Epstein in Epstein's office in the mid-1990s. There is no evidence of Trump's involvement in Epstein's crimes, and Farmer said she had no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by Trump. The White House has denied the alleged encounter by saying, 'The president was never in [Epstein's] office.' But Farmer's account reinforces how Trump's name could appear in the Epstein files and how it might reflect poorly on him, even if there's no accusation of wrongdoing. Also suggesting a cover-up last month was Alicia Arden, who alleged that Epstein assaulted her in 1997. Arden told NBC News that she supported Trump but believed 'there's a cover-up of some kind going on.' She cited Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments in February indicating she had Epstein's client list on her desk – comments Bondi and the White House now claim referred to other Epstein-related documents. The DOJ now says there is no client list. 'She doesn't want something to come out, and I don't understand why,' Arden said. 'Maybe the list is more horrifying than we think.' Another anonymous Epstein accuser told NBC: 'I am not surprised Trump is now saying we should stop talking about Epstein,' adding, 'These people are trying to protect themselves.' And David Boies, a prominent attorney who represented Giuffre, told NBC: 'I think they ought to release the material after promising, and if they don't, people will believe they are hiding something, and that cannot be tolerated.' Boies points to something important. While Epstein-related conspiracy theories have been mostly pushed by Republicans and right-wing influencers, polls suggest large swaths of Americans buy into them, at least to some degree. A CBS News-YouGov poll last month found Americans agreed 92-8% that the Epstein files 'probably include damaging information about powerful or wealthy people.' A Reuters-Ipsos poll showed Americans agreed 69-6% that the federal government was 'hiding information' about Epstein's clients and 60-12% that it was covering up details of his death (with many doubting he died by suicide, as the administration affirmed he did). The comments of Epstein's victims and their allies would seem to bolster that pre-existing belief. And that makes it a lot harder to claim there's nothing to see here – whether for Trump or the many people who have built followings by pushing these theories.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store