logo
‘I have babies': Kim Kardashian testifies about her terror in Paris robbery trial

‘I have babies': Kim Kardashian testifies about her terror in Paris robbery trial

CTV News13-05-2025

Kim Kardashian waves as she arrives to testify regarding a robbery of millions of dollars in jewels from her Paris hotel room in 2016, in Paris, Tuesday, May 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Aurelien Morissard)
PARIS — Kim Kardashian said a silent prayer -- for her sister, her best friend, her family -- as a masked man pulled her toward him in a Paris hotel room during the 2016 jewelry heist that changed her life. She was wearing only a bathrobe. Her hands were zip-tied. Her mouth was taped. She thought she wouldn't survive.
'I was certain that was the moment that he was going to rape me,' she told a Paris court Tuesday. 'I absolutely did think I was going to die.'
When she heard footsteps thundering up the stairs that night, Kardashian said she first thought it was her sister Kourtney and a friend returning from a night out. The noise got louder. 'Hello? Hello? Who is it?' she called out. Moments later, her door flew open.
She begged the robbers: 'I have babies,' she said. One replied that she would be OK if she stayed quiet.
The last time Kardashian saw the men that police say robbed her, she was bound at gunpoint and locked in a marble bathroom while masked assailants stole more than $6 million in jewelry. On Tuesday, nearly a decade later, she faced them again from the witness stand.
Her testimony marked the emotional climax of a trial that has gripped France and reignited global debates about the cost of fame and what it means to live -- and nearly die -- in public.
At the time of the robbery, Kardashian was one of the most recognized women on the planet. A fashion icon. A reality star. A billionaire business mogul. She had mastered a new kind of celebrity -- one broadcast in real time, post by post, to millions of followers.
But in the early hours of Oct. 3, 2016, that visibility became a weapon against her. The robbery marked a turning point for Kardashian, and for how the world understood vulnerability in the digital age.
Dressed in black, Kardashian on Tuesday stood across from her mother, Kris Jenner, in the heavily secured courtroom. Her voice trembled as she thanked French authorities for 'allowing me to share my truth.'
She described how the attackers arrived at her hotel disguised as police officers, dragging the concierge upstairs in handcuffs. 'I thought it was some sort of terrorist attack,' she said.
They tied her hands, dragged her toward the bathtub and pointed a gun at her temple. One gestured at her diamond ring. 'He said, `Ring! Ring!' and he pointed to his hand,' she recalled.
French prosecutors say the assailants -- most in their 60s and 70s -- were part of a seasoned criminal ring that tracked Kardashian's movements through her Instagram posts. Two of the defendants have admitted being at the scene. One claims he didn't know who she was.
Twelve suspects were originally charged. One has since died. Another was excused due to illness. The French press dubbed the group les papys braqueurs -- 'the grandpa robbers' -- but prosecutors insist they were no harmless retirees.
Kardashian, who once shared nearly every moment of her life online, later acknowledged the dangers of that hyper-visibility. 'People were watching,' she said in a 2021 interview. 'They knew what I had. They knew where I was.'
Earlier in the trial, Kardashian's childhood friend and then stylist, Simone Harouche, testified that she had been sleeping downstairs when the robbery began. She heard Kardashian's voice: ''I have babies and I need to live.' That is what she kept on saying, 'Take everything. I need to live.''
Kardashian, she said, was 'screaming with terror in her voice.'
Harouche locked herself in the bathroom and texted Kourtney Kardashian and the bodyguard: 'Something is very wrong.' Later, she heard Kardashian hopping down the stairs with her ankles still bound. 'She was beside herself,' Harouche said. 'She just was screaming.'
Harouche testified that the robbery 'forever' changed her friend's sense of freedom. 'She now has a completely different lifestyle,' she said. 'In terms of security, she can't go alone, she doesn't go alone to places anymore. To lose your sense of freedom ... it's horrible.'
Judge David De Pas asked whether Kardashian had made herself a target by posting photos of herself with 'jewels of great value.' Harouche rejected the premise. 'Just because a woman wears jewelry, that doesn't make her a target,' she said. 'That's like saying that because a woman wears a short skirt that she deserves to be raped.'
In the days after the robbery, critics like designer Karl Lagerfeld questioned whether Kardashian had shared too much. But as the details emerged, public sentiment began to shift.
In the aftermath, Kardashian withdrew from public life. She developed anxiety and symptoms of agoraphobia. 'I hated to go out,' she said. 'I didn't want anybody to know where I was ... I just had such anxiety.'
Kardashian's lawyers say she is 'particularly grateful' to French authorities -- and ready to confront those who attacked her.
By Thomas Adamson, John Leicester And Nicolas Vaux-montagny

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.K. judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
U.K. judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

U.K. judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court

LONDON — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a 90 million pound (US$120 million) lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.' Jill Lawless, The Associated Press

A river cruise with our American frenemies – what could go wrong?
A river cruise with our American frenemies – what could go wrong?

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

A river cruise with our American frenemies – what could go wrong?

Jane Christmas is a Canadian author. We are on the Rhine, sailing down the lazy river, staring at ancient European castles and pine-covered hills. The occasional barge or river boat passes in the opposite direction. We wave. We lean over the rail and watch the currents and eddies. The river flows, the sun beams. It's life in the slow lane, and boy, do we need it. Away from the noise of an angry, divided world. Away from blaring headlines, from the fearmongers urging us to prepare an emergency kit because the Apocalypse is closing in. Away from the stuff that makes our hearts race and our minds plunge into dark thinking. Look who's sorry now: Americans are an apologetic bunch to this Canadian on vacation Our party of four Canadian couples finds itself to be among a distinct minority on this small cruise ship. The American passengers vastly outnumber us: 135 of them, fewer than 30 of us. It's awkward, given the trade tensions between our two nations. Still, we're pretty sure we can roll with it. We're a friendly, easygoing bunch. Two nights in, the cruise director announces a pub quiz. Hey, that sounds fun. Let's do it. The other passengers form their groups, grab their drinks, and off we go. Team Canada hits a near-perfect score, falling at the question, On which side of her face is Mona Lisa's smile? But it doesn't matter, we've won handily. Our reward is two bottles of champagne, one of which we immediately hand to the American group sitting next to us as thanks for marking our answer sheet. They're simpatico. We think. Walking back to our rooms, I clock another large group of Americans. Their lips are tight, their arms crossed. I can imagine they're the type to start yelling 'U.S.A.! U.S.A.!' at a moment's notice. They glare at us. One of them – male, white, obese, scarfing down an entire tube of complimentary peanuts – gives me the stink eye and calls out, in a MAGA tone, the number 51. 'In your dreams, buddy,' I say with a smile, and walk on. But when I reach the door of our room, the smile is gone and my head is filled with less civil replies, ones that might elicit a punch being thrown. One of our friends asks what that guy had said to me. I confirm what she overheard. The faces on the rest of our group fall. Apparently, there's no escape from bullies, even on a seniors' cruise. Keller: We see your joke about the 51st state, and raise you a reference to sacking the White House As the trip goes on, things do not improve. Aside from two Americans who approach us to apologize for their current President, the rest treat us as if we're COVID carriers. They rarely acknowledge us in the hall, don't meet our eyes or say hello or good morning like normal people do when they're on a pleasure boat together. During the off-board excursions, they huddle with their countrymen and either ignore us or shoot us looks of disdain. More Canadian invisibility arrives via the tour guides, who constantly point out Americanisms to their guests – a U.S. embassy here, a bridge named after JFK there, the former home of the guy who designed the Statue of Liberty. Americans are on a constant drip-feed of their own cultural fodder. That's why we won the quiz – as the saying goes, Canadians know about the world; Americans only know about themselves. Here's the thing: It's not enough for Canadians to buy ABA (anything but American), we need to work on self-belief and entrepreneurship. We haven't promoted our country or culture abroad as vociferously or aggressively as we could, believing that polite and passive would win the day. How's that been working out for us? As a Canadian living in Britain, I've witnessed the fallout. We are a ghost nation beyond our borders. I had to remind an otherwise educated English twentysomething where exactly Canada was on a map. It's humbling given the rhetoric that 'Canada matters on the world stage.' What stage? We can't even get verbal support from the Commonwealth or England when it matters. They snickered when our PM was called 'governor,' and our sovereignty was bullied. They thought it was a joke. Look at them scrambling now. Still, why have we assumed that the world knows who we are? Each week I leaf through the British newspapers and see the same dull tourism ads for Niagara Falls and the Rocky Mountaineer that I've seen for the last two decades. Where's the nightlife of Canada's cities? The picturesque Newfoundland villages? The Inuit arts and awesome Northern landscapes? The architectural and cultural charm of Quebec? Where are the theatres, galleries, literary festivals and vineyards? I'd suggest our tourism ads include shopping as a visitor activity (our dollar being a bargain) but we've shamefully cross-border shopped so much that we've lost our signature department stores, having sold most of them to the highest (often American) bidder. Nice one. Is no one minding our commercial legacy? It's time to step up. We need to be seen as a country on the rise, as well as one that gets involved. Yes to increasing our defence spending, but also to elbowing in to some of the world's ongoing conflicts and helping to mediate their end. Why do we always leave this task to the U.S.? Then there's the lack of overseas trade. Aluminum and steel, sure, but what about wine? There's no end of Australian, New Zealand and American wines on the shelves of British grocery stores, but nothing from Canada. No one in Britain is even aware of Canadian viticulture. Let's get those bottles overseas. It's all very well to wear your 'Never 51' shirt, or to post your Canuck creds on Instagram, or to boycott Netflix and Amazon, but it's time to think bigger, bolder. Time to make a splash. If our efforts are rebuffed south of the border, big deal. There are other countries in this world to woo. Why do we still measure Canadian success against our neighbour's barometer? It's obvious by now that big isn't always best. Back on board our cruise boat, the froideur continues and mystifies my group. Did we belittle their leader on national television, as Donald Trump did ours? Did we threaten their sovereignty? Upend their trade deals? No. They started it. And it sounds like a playground spat until you understand that it's moved into gaslighting territory: We are somehow the enemy. This is the strategy of their leader: Drop the stink bomb and blame the other guy. He's told/signalled/tweeted to his nation that Canadians are lazy, do-nothing freeloaders. Of course it's a lie, but try convincing a boatload of Americans of their country's misguided path, a group who've dined on a century of obsequiousness that the world – including Canada – has fed them. The water might be choppy, but it's time we charted our own course, and make waves that count.

Lethbridge residents charged after drugs seized in traffic stop
Lethbridge residents charged after drugs seized in traffic stop

CTV News

time13 hours ago

  • CTV News

Lethbridge residents charged after drugs seized in traffic stop

Two Lethbridge residents are facing charges after RCMP officers seized drugs, weapons and cash from a vehicle during a traffic stop near Aldersyde, Alta., last week. Okotoks RCMP officers were patrolling near the hamlet on Saturday when they noticed a vehicle with a licence plate that didn't match the vehicle it was attached to. Officers stopped the vehicle and arrested the occupants. A search of the vehicle led to the seizure of: 88 tablets of suspected fentanyl; 35 grams of suspected cocaine; 40 dots of suspected lysergic acid diethylamide; 6 grams of suspected psilocybin; 177 grams of suspected cannabis resin; 257 tablets of prescription medications; An extendable baton and two knives; and $7,300 in cash. Two people, a 45-year-old and a 49-year-old, are facing multiple charges. Both are scheduled to appear in court on June 17.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store