Why It's So Hard for Apple to Move Production From China to India
President Trump wants Apple to make iPhones in America. The company itself has talked about — and to some extent already has been — moving more of its production to other countries, like India. But in reality, Apple remains deeply, deeply enmeshed in the Chinese supply chain. In fact, the rise of Apple, and the iPhone specifically, is the ultimate example of the link between the American and Chinese economies. And while this has been fruitful for shareholders all around the world, and contributed greatly to Chinese economic development, this relationship is also now perceived to be a huge source of geopolitical vulnerability for the United States. On this episode, we speak with Patrick McGee, a reporter at the Financial Times and the author of the new book Apple In China: The Capture of the World's Greatest Company. He talks to us about how Apple discovered the opportunity of doing more manufacturing in China, and how close the company has become with Chinese political leadership. We walk through both the politics and the economics that makes it almost impossible to imagine the company building its products anywhere else at significant scale.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple iOS 18: Are You In The 12% Of iPhone Users Missing Out?
Are you on the latest version of iPhone software or have you never installed iOS 18 on your phone? Apple has just released figures for the uptake of its latest iPhone and iPad software. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max AFP via Getty Images The figures (released here) show an overwhelming majority of users are on the latest software, and that there's been a notable increase since the last time figures were released, in January 2025. At that point, 68% of all iPhones had updated to iOS 18, a figure that has now climbed to 82%. For iPhones introduced in the last four years, the figures are higher. Back in January, 76% of these iPhones had iOS 18 installed. Now, that's 88%. In other words, just 12% of those iPhone users are missing out. One of the key reasons Apple is able to boast such figures is that when an update is ready, it's instantly available to all compatible iPhones at the same time, thanks to its integration of hardware and software. Rivals like Android can't match this as each hardware manufacturer introduces their own version for their phone — look no further than the extremely belated introduction of Android 15 to Samsung Galaxy phones this year. Most iPhone users set their devices for automatic updates, so it's all done effortlessly, though you can of course control when you apply the update if you prefer. Security seems to be a big driver for users to update: as you'll know if you read my regular Should You Upgrade? posts, it's clear that the best way to keep your device safe is to keep the software current. It's also one of the reasons that when the next OS is out, Apple also releases new updates for the previous version, for those users who aren't quite ready to jump into the next series but want full security. The latest software also means you have the most recent features and improvements, which in turn adds to longevity goals. For the iPad, figures are also strong. Of all iPads, 71% use iPadOS 18 and of iPads introduced in the last four years, it's 81%. Though these aren't quite as high, it's worth remembering that iPads are particularly durable products, lasting for years, perhaps more than a decade, before they need replacing. In that context, the usage is especially impressive.
News24
43 minutes ago
- News24
Onderstepoort collapse ‘left SA defenceless', says Steenhuisen as foot-and-mouth surges
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple's loses bid to halt court ruling that blocks some fees from its iPhone app store
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A three-judge appeals panel rejected Apple's (AAPL) request to pause an April 30 order banning the company from charging a fee on in-app iPhone transactions processed outside its once-exclusive payment system in a two-page decision issued late Thursday. The setback threatens to divert billions of dollars in revenue away from Apple while it tried to overturn the order reining in its commissions from e-commerce within iPhone apps. Apple sought to put the order on hold after it was issued by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers in a stinging rebuke that also held the Cupertino, California, company in civil contempt of court and recommended opening a criminal investigation into whether one of its executives had committed perjury while testifying in her Oakland, California, courtroom. It marked another twist of the screw in a legal battle initiated nearly five years ago by video game maker Epic Games, which alleged Apple had turned the iPhone's app store had been turned into a price-gouging monopoly. The antitrust case focused largely on the 15% to 30% commissions that Apple rakes in from a portion of the commerce conducted within iPhone apps under a system that prohibited app makers from offering alternative payment methods. Apple is still seeking to overturn Gonzalez-Rogers' ruling in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but her order blocking Apple's commissions on some in-app commerce will remain in effect while potentially leaving a dent in its profits. 'The long national nightmare of the Apple tax is ended,' Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney wrote in a post after the appeals court denied Apple's request. Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Although Gonzalez-Rogers mostly sided with Apple in her initial 2021 ruling in the case, she ordered the company to begin allowing apps to include links to alternative payment systems — a decision that withstood appeals that went all the way to the Supreme Court in 2024. Apple then complied by requiring commissions of 12% to 27%, provoking Epic to ask Gonzalez-Rogers to hold Apple in contempt of her order. After holding a new round of hearings that unfolded over a nine-month period straddling last year and this year, Gonzalez-Rogers brought down another legal hammer on Apple.
