logo
Why now is the time to invest in sustainability—if you make it brand-led

Why now is the time to invest in sustainability—if you make it brand-led

Fast Company30-07-2025
FAST COMPANY EXECUTIVE BOARD
According to Luc Speisser, global chief strategy and innovation officer at Landor, this moment isn't the time to retreat. It's time to rethink the approach.
[Courtesy of Luc Speisser]
The Fast Company Executive Board is a private, fee-based network of influential leaders, experts, executives, and entrepreneurs who share their insights with our audience.
BY
Sustainability's momentum has slowed. Companies are delaying net-zero pledges. Budgets are being slashed. And in the face of economic pressure, many organizations are quietly stepping back from ESG commitments. But according to Luc Speisser, global chief strategy and innovation officer at Landor, this moment isn't the time to retreat. It's time to rethink the approach.
'Sustainability can't just be about compliance,' Speisser says. 'If it's compliance, it's a cost. And when times get tough, costs get cut.'
THE PROBLEM WITH COMPLIANCE
Speisser points to a hard truth: Compliance-driven sustainability doesn't differentiate. 'At best, it creates relevance. And relevance just gets you in the door,' he explains. 'It doesn't help you stand out. If everyone's doing the same thing (setting net-zero targets, reducing plastic), you end up with a green sea of sameness. Nobody remembers who said what.'
This sameness, he argues, is why many sustainability initiatives fail to generate a return on investment. 'If you're spending millions and no one can tell the difference between your efforts and your competitor's, you're not building preference. And if you're not building preference, you're not building value.'
CONSUMERS STILL EXPECT MORE
Despite the slowdown in investment, public expectations remain high. Citing Kantar data, Speisser notes that 86% of global consumers say urgent action is needed to address climate change, and 64% believe it's businesses, not governments, that should lead the way. Meanwhile, 94% of marketers believe it's part of their role to push sustainability forward.
Yet, there's a massive say-do gap. 'People say they care, but most won't pay more for sustainable alternatives,' he says. 'That's the disconnect brands have to solve. Not by scaling back but by making sustainability brand-led, so it drives business value, not just moral value.'
A BRAND-LED APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY
At Landor, the answer starts with the brand. 'We always begin with the brand promise,' Speisser says. 'A brand is a promise, and a great brand is a promise kept.'
That promise becomes the foundation for brand-led sustainability. The process, as he outlines, is simple but powerful: Identify what the brand stands for, map it against the UN's 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and choose the right problem to solve, one that aligns with the brand's culture, capabilities, and point of view.
Critically, brands shouldn't try to solve everything. 'Don't be a champion of everything,' Speisser advises. 'Be a champion of something. That's how you differentiate.'
He points to Saudia Airlines as an example. Their brand promise, Welcome to Our Future, blends traditional Arabic hospitality with modern ambition. Rather than apply this broadly, Saudia chose to focus on one overlooked but deeply relevant area: caring for the millions of Hajj pilgrims who travel annually in extreme heat. As such, Saudia Airlines takes a stand on SDG 3: Good health and wellbeing.
'This led to the creation of the Coolest Ihram,' says Speisser. 'It's a high-tech garment using BRRR cooling technology to create a personal microclimate, lowering the skin temperature by up to two degrees. And those two degrees can be the difference between heat stroke and safe travel.'
The initiative is a clear realization of Saudia's brand. 'It's not just sustainable,' he adds. 'It's specific. It's culturally relevant. It's emotionally resonant. And it's fully ownable.'
One of the biggest challenges brands face is proving the business case for sustainability. As Speisser puts it, 'Sustainability as the only ingredient won't work. You have to add value to the user, to the business, to the brand.'
Take Ariel's Ecoclic pod container. While switching from plastic to cardboard was a relevant move, the real breakthrough came in adding accessibility. 'The new pack design is easy to open for the 750 million people globally who live with dexterity challenges, while maintaining high safety standards for children,' Speisser explains. 'That's not just compliance—it's innovation. It creates new market access. It creates preference.'
Or consider Accessories, a 3D-printed, 'one size fits one' toothbrush handle co-designed with people living with arthritis. 'We asked participants what they'd pay for a solution that removes their pain. Some said they would be ready to pay even £300, as this is a life-changing solution for them and has immense value. We brought it to market for £50,' says Speisser. 'That's innovation rooted in empathy and brand equity.'
These aren't compliance moves. They're what Landor calls ownable firsts: ideas that are brand-led, business-generating, and category-defining.
A PLAYBOOK FOR BRAND LEADERS
For leaders under pressure to cut sustainability spending, Speisser offers pragmatic guidance:
Plan for uncertainty. Don't rely on regulators. Don't assume the cultural climate will shift in your favor. Build a strategy that works no matter what.
Expect no premium. Consumers won't pay more for sustainability. So give them something better, more functional, more beautiful, more meaningful.
Make the business case. Sustainability must serve people, planet, and profit. Only when it hits all three does it become a smart investment.
Think in road maps. Quick wins are important. But brand-led sustainability isn't a one-off campaign. It's a pipeline of meaningful innovation.
Landor uses a framework to help companies balance 'points of parity' (like switching to recyclable materials) with 'points of difference' (like creating inclusive design or redefining category norms). The goal: Make sustainability work for the brand, beyond the common good.
WHY NOW?
At a time when many companies are pulling back, Speisser argues the opposite: Now is exactly the right moment to lean in.
'Tough times cut the fluff,' he says. 'Sustainability that doesn't serve the business won't survive. But brand-led sustainability? That's different. It makes the brand stronger. It opens new markets. It builds lasting preference.'
He says plainly, 'If you just want to do good and hug trees, that's fine. But it won't be sustainable. Someone in the company will eventually ask, 'What is this driving?' And if the answer is nothing, the funding disappears.'
In contrast, the brands that win will be those that connect sustainability with purpose, performance, and profit. 'You have to make sustainability work for your business,' Speisser concludes. 'Because if you don't, it won't work at all.' He adds: 'And let's not forget that bringing together people, planet and profit is nothing more than the United Nations' definition of Sustainability.'
The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The Fast Company Executive Board is a private, fee-based network of influential leaders, experts, executives, and entrepreneurs who share their insights with our audience. More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Long Magnificent 7" once again world's most crowded trade, BofA survey finds
"Long Magnificent 7" once again world's most crowded trade, BofA survey finds

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"Long Magnificent 7" once again world's most crowded trade, BofA survey finds

LONDON (Reuters) -Owning big U.S. tech stocks is once again the most popular trade, according to BofA's monthly fund manager survey, as upbeat earnings and improved sentiment towards the global economy send investors back into stocks. 45% of the 169 participants in August's survey, who have $413 billion in assets under management, said they thought the most crowded trade was "long Magnificent 7", a group of large U.S. tech stocks, including Nvidia and Microsoft. Strong earnings have helped big tech stocks to bounce back sharply since their tariff induced selloff in April. They were last seen as the most crowded trade in March, the survey, which was released on Monday, showed. Broad investor sentiment improved in August, with just 5% of asset managers positioning for a hard landing, characterised by a sharp slowdown in economic growth. A net 14% of those surveyed were overweight global equities, the highest since February, though still down sharply from net 49% overweight in December. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati

The $4.4 Trillion Payoff: Why Climate Action Is Smart Business
The $4.4 Trillion Payoff: Why Climate Action Is Smart Business

Forbes

time32 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The $4.4 Trillion Payoff: Why Climate Action Is Smart Business

In 2024 alone, a small group of companies unlocked a combined $4.4 trillion in financial value by acting on climate-related opportunities. These gains weren't projections,— they were realised, reported and verified through one of the world's most widely used corporate disclosure systems. The figure comes from CDP's latest report The 2025 Disclosure Dividend, based on environmental disclosures from nearly 25,000 companies worldwide. The conclusion is clear: climate action has moved beyond risk mitigation into the realm of strategic value creation, with direct implications for corporate strategy, capital allocation, and financial performance. As Kari Stoever, chief growth officer at CDP, explained, 'The $4.4 trillion figure represents the aggregate financial value reported by companies for already-realized opportunities. Only data where both criteria were met: (1) the opportunity had already materially affected the company in the reporting year, and (2) a specific financial value was disclosed, were included in the calculation.' Climate Action As A Growth Engine Extreme weather is already costing insurers $145 billion this year and rising. Climate volatility is driving operational costs, disrupting markets, and triggering new regulation. Yet companies acting on their reported data are seeing up to 2,000% ROI. CDP analysis shows companies already earn up to $21 for every $1 invested in resilience, a return better than most capital expenditure options. More than 64% of companies identified environmental opportunities in 2024, from energy efficiency upgrades and clean energy transitions to new market entries and product innovations. Only 12% acted in the same year and reported measurable financial gains. The upside for those still on the sidelines is significant. Companies not yet acting risk leaving $13.2 trillion in opportunities unrealised. 'The top types of future opportunities reported but not yet realized are: products and services ($7.5 trillion), new markets ($2.9 trillion), and energy source ($1.6 trillion),' Stoever said. Resource efficiency improvements were the most commonly reported but offered a smaller upside at $0.3 trillion. Opportunity values varied dramatically by geography. Japan and Canada lead with median values of $73 million and $72 million per company, while the U.S. and China come in at $15 million and $10 million. This variation reflects sector mix, company size, and disclosure culture more than ambition. Canada's small pool of reporting companies includes a high proportion from financial services, fossil fuels, and power generation, all high-opportunity sectors. Japan also has a high share of these sectors and a striking 97% of companies responding to investor requests, which correlates with higher reported value By contrast, the U.S. and China have more representation from sectors such as apparel, biotech, and hospitality, which tend to disclose smaller-scale opportunities. Chinese companies also have smaller median revenues (about $800 million) constraining potential opportunity size. Reporting behaviour matters too: U.S. companies tend to report fewer opportunities and favour short-term horizons, which generally yield lower valuations. Regardless of region, the economic upside of environmental action is no longer abstract. It's quantified, reported and increasingly bankable. A Market Shift: Climate Risk As Investment Risk These results land as climate risk is being woven into the architecture of global finance. Physical risks are becoming more systemic, with climate-related disasters projected to cost the world $38 trillion a year by 2050. In the UK alone, climate damage could cut GDP by 12%, a deeper hit than the financial crisis or the pandemic. Financial institutions are responding with new tools and policies. The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change's new Physical Climate Risk Appraisal Methodology (PCRAM) gives portfolio managers a replicable framework for assessing exposure not just at the asset level, but across interconnected systems, geographies, and value chains. The logic is straightforward – climate resilience now carries a measurable premium in investment terms. That shift is now becoming visible in monetary policy. In July 2025, the European Central Bank announced it will begin adjusting the value of corporate bonds used as collateral in its refinancing operations based on climate vulnerability, using a climate factor. From the second half of 2026, bonds exposed to higher transition risk, whether due to sector, issuer, or maturity profile, will face valuation haircuts. 'By integrating climate risk into our collateral framework, we are safeguarding the Eurosystem against future shocks and encouraging banks to shift towards more sustainable investments,' said Christine Lagarde, president of the ECB in a statement. 'This is a necessary step to ensure financial stability in a changing world.' In other words, resilience now has an identifiable return. The message is to treat disclosure data like any other capital-allocation input, not a CSR checkbox, reframing climate action not as an expense, but as a source of measurable business value. For companies, the implications are profound. Access to capital will increasingly depend on credible climate strategies, and the cost of inaction will show up not just in physical damage or lost market share, but in bond valuations, insurance terms, and investor relations. These firms are also aligning with evolving regulations such as the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and new global standards from the International Sustainability Standards Board. But regulation isn't the only driver: customers, employees, and investors are all pushing for credible action. The value is especially pronounced in sectors where environmental risk intersects with core business models, such as energy, agriculture, manufacturing, logistics, and consumer goods. Investments in nature-based solutions, emissions reduction, and climate adaptation can reduce exposure while generating new revenue streams and cost savings. Stoever notes that sustainable products are already outperforming peers by up to 25% in revenue. Companies tackling Scope 3 emissions have saved $13 billion, with $165 billion more achievable at a cost of just $94 billion. 'This isn't ESG,' she says, 'It's economics. Disclosure and action are not just risk management tools; they are strategic levers for growth, efficiency, and long-term value creation.' Despite the compelling data, many companies remain slow to act. While 90% of large firms disclosing through its platform have processes in place to identify and assess environmental risks and opportunities, fewer than half have a credible climate transition plan. The reasons are familiar: short-term shareholder pressure, limited capacity to manage climate data, and fear of revealing vulnerabilities. SMEs and Global South companies face additional hurdles, from restricted access to transition finance, lack of technical support, or insufficient regulatory clarity. 'These obstacles are real but increasingly surmountable,' Stoever notes. 'As financial institutions, central banks, and governments integrate climate risk into their decision-making frameworks, the tools, capital, and incentives to act are becoming more accessible.' The real gap, she says, is in governance and leadership, aligning CFOs, sustainability leads, and capital allocators, and moving beyond incrementalism to recognise climate resilience as a driver of long-term value. 'Environmental risk is financial risk,' she says. 'Boards and CFOs must shift from viewing environmental data as compliance to treating it as capital strategy.' Call to Action: Translate Insight Into Impact 'The core insight of The 2025 Disclosure Dividend is that value comes not from disclosing climate risk, but from acting on it,' Stoever says. 'Companies must move quickly from data to decisions, and from decisions to execution. The winners will be those that understand climate data not as a compliance burden, but as an investment signal, a lens through which to identify upside, safeguard continuity, and unlock future markets.' The message from CDP's report is unambiguous: disclosure is the beginning, not the end. Data alone has no financial impact until it is embedded into core business decisions, capital allocation, procurement, product design, and strategic planning. This is no longer a sustainability team's sole domain. Boards must treat climate strategy as a fiduciary responsibility. CFOs and risk officers should integrate climate metrics into financial modelling, while investors must hold companies accountable not only for what they report, but for what they do. Policymakers must ensure disclosure frameworks lead to real-world outcomes through just transitions, adaptation finance, and systemic accountability. 'For every $1 a company invests in climate risk mitigation, it could see up to $21 in return,' Stoever said. 'Climate action isn't a cost centre; it's a growth engine.'

31 Concept to Debut Patent-Pending Technology at ISS Asia 2025 in Singapore
31 Concept to Debut Patent-Pending Technology at ISS Asia 2025 in Singapore

Associated Press

time43 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

31 Concept to Debut Patent-Pending Technology at ISS Asia 2025 in Singapore

After just seven months in stealth mode, 31 Concept's research division delivers a breakthrough in network intelligence - now patent-pending and set to debut at one of the world's top security conferences. DUBAI, AE / ACCESS Newswire / August 11, 2025 / 31 Concept (31C), an emerging leader in network intelligence and cybersecurity innovation, today announced it will unveil its first patent-pending technology at ISS Asia 2025 in Singapore. The breakthrough, developed entirely within the company's 31 Concept Research Lab, marks a major milestone for the startup, which is stepping out of stealth mode after just seven months of intense development.31 Concept's Innovation Patented The 31 Concept Research Lab serves as the company's innovation engine, uniting world-class experts in deep packet inspection, AI-driven analytics, cybersecurity, and advanced networking. With decades of combined experience from projects spanning telecom, military, and national infrastructure, the lab's team operates at the intersection of applied research and practical deployment, delivering solutions designed to solve real-world challenges at scale. 'Our patent-pending technology is the direct result of the unique expertise and relentless drive inside our Research Lab,' said Misha Hanin, CEO and Co-Founder of 31C. 'We built this in record time without compromising on quality or innovation. This is just the first step in a series of breakthroughs we intend to bring to the market.' ISS Asia, recognized as one of the most important professional conferences in the world for intelligence, security, and law enforcement technologies, will provide the global stage for the debut. The event draws leaders from government, telecom, and private industry, making it the perfect venue for 31C's first public presentation. 'The speed at which the 31 Concept Research Lab turned a concept into a patent-pending reality shows the strength of our people and our process,' added Boriss Heismann, CTO of 31C. 'This is technology designed to address the most pressing needs in network visibility, security, and performance - and to do it in ways the industry has not seen before.' The company's presentation at ISS Asia 2025 will highlight the capabilities of the new platform, detail the patent-pending elements, and outline the roadmap for further innovations currently in development. About 31C 31 Concept is a technology company focused on next-generation data intelligence platforms for telecom providers, governments, and regulated industries. Its flagship R&D division, the 31 Concept Research Lab, develops breakthrough technologies in network intelligence, cybersecurity, and AI-driven analytics. Contact InformationMisha Hanin CEO SOURCE: 31 Concept Related Images press release

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store