German investors eye Egypt as key market, multiple trade delegations expected in 2025
German investors are showing a strong interest in Egypt's economic potential, recognizing the country's strategic opportunities and ongoing market reforms, according to Maren Diale-Schellschmidt, CEO of the German-Arab Chamber of Industry and Commerce (AHK Egypt). She emphasized that Egypt's economic reforms, expanding market, and strong bilateral ties with Germany make it an attractive destination for investment. Strengthening partnerships between German and Egyptian businesses, she noted, will be key to fostering sustainable growth and innovation across various sectors.
As part of efforts to deepen economic ties, three German trade delegations are scheduled to visit Egypt in the second half of the year. The first, arriving in June, will focus on energy efficiency in buildings. A second delegation, specializing in textile machinery, is set to visit in September, followed by a third in November concentrating on the pharmaceutical sector. Additionally, a delegation focused on the circular economy within the technology sector is also expected. This visit aims to facilitate the exchange of expertise while exploring investment opportunities for German companies in Egypt. Diale-Schellschmidt explained that these visits were planned for the latter half of the year due to Germany's ongoing elections.
In a separate development, the seventh session of the Egyptian-German Joint Economic Committee, originally scheduled for February, has been postponed to the second half of the year. The committee includes Egypt's Minister of Investment and Foreign Trade and Germany's Minister of Economy and Climate Protection, and its rescheduling is expected to further enhance economic cooperation between the two nations.
Energy remains one of the most promising sectors for German investment in Egypt, particularly in renewable energy and green hydrogen. Diale-Schellschmidt highlighted Egypt's abundant solar and wind resources but pointed out that one of the main challenges is the efficient distribution of this energy, an area where German expertise could provide significant value. She noted that while German participation in green hydrogen projects is expected to increase, significant investment in this field may not materialize within the current year. She also stressed that foreign investors need a flexible regulatory framework, economic and political stability, and attractive tax incentives to maximize their contributions to Egypt's energy sector.
Germany remains one of Egypt's top economic partners, with collaboration spanning trade, investment, and industrial development. Bilateral trade continues to expand, driven by investments in infrastructure, energy, and manufacturing. German companies are steadily increasing their footprint in Egypt, particularly in renewable energy, green hydrogen, and industrial automation. Beyond these sectors, both countries are strengthening cooperation in education and vocational training, supporting workforce development and technology transfer. Major German firms, including Siemens and Mercedes-Benz, play a crucial role in modernizing Egypt's economy. With ongoing projects in transport, logistics, and smart cities, Egypt is positioning itself as a key hub for German investment in Africa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Diplomats Seek Breakthrough in London Trade Truce
Top-level officials from Washington and Beijing convened at London's historic Lancaster House to try to uphold a fragile trade truce. The US team—led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer—pressed China to lift export restrictions on rare earth minerals, a linchpin in sectors from electric vehicles to semiconductors. China's delegation, headed by Vice‑Premier He Lifeng and joined by Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and vice‑minister Li Chenggang, emphasised sustaining the state‑driven economic model while seeking concessions on US visa rules and technology access. Talks resumed for a second day, with a declared focus on export‐control mechanisms that threaten to unravel the Geneva‐brokered tariff truce agreed on 12 May. That earlier pact suspended punitive levies exceeding 100 percent for 90 days, offering markets a brief reprieve. The inclusion of Howard Lutnick underscores the significance of rare earths, as Washington eyes relief from export curbs imposed this year. Economic data highlights the toll of stifled trade: China's exports to the US plunged 34.5 percent year‑on‑year in May—the steepest decline since early 2020—driven by both tariff escalation and export restrictions. In the US, while inflation remains subdued and employment resilient, early indicators hint at a cooling economy amid these disruptions. ADVERTISEMENT Diplomatic momentum emanates from a phone call between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping on 5 June—their first such exchange since Trump's inauguration—where Xi reportedly signalled Beijing's willingness to resume shipments of rare earths. Trump later described the discussion as yielding 'very positive' outcomes and claimed he was 'only getting good reports' from the London delegation. US National Economic Council Chairman Kevin Hassett offered further assurances, stating the administration was preparing to ease certain high‑tech export restrictions and expecting China to significantly ramp up rare earth shipments. Chinese officials upheld their stance on economic self‑reliance, under Xi's 'dual‑circulation' policy, signalling reluctance to overhaul structural economic controls. Analysts suggest Beijing may exchange modest export concessions for US rollbacks on visa limits for Chinese nationals and access to cutting‑edge semiconductor technology. Despite the diplomatic overtures, analysts caution that ambitions for sweeping reform are unlikely. The US retains a hawkish posture and is pursuing broader decoupling from China on strategic supply chains, reducing the odds of a comprehensive agreement. Eurasia Group chief Ian Bremmer warned there was 'little prospect for the bilateral relationship to become constructive' amid entrenched structural differences. European manufacturers, notably German automakers, have raised alarm over supply bottlenecks from China's rare earth export licensing regime, implemented in April, citing risks to global production schedules. The talks have therefore resonated well beyond the bilateral agenda, prompting heightened interest from supply‑chain dependent nations. UK officials, though officially not party to the negotiations, provided logistical support and voiced encouragement. Chancellor Rachel Reeves met with both delegations on the sidelines, while Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds engaged with Chinese counterparts. British leaders clearly signalled a preference for diplomacy, stating that a trade war 'is in nobody's interests'. Institutionally, this dialogue reflects the newly established China‑US economic and trade consultation mechanism, replacing previous multi‑track platforms and underscoring a shift towards direct and high‑level engagement. Legal complications persist in Washington: the Trump administration is appealing a federal ruling that its tariff actions exceed presidential authority. A decision from the appellate court, possibly extending to the Supreme Court, could determine whether tariffs remain in force during the review process. Markets responded with tentative optimism: global equities recovered a significant portion of pre‑talk losses following the Geneva truce and subsequent London announcements. However, investors remained cautious, aware the staged progress may not translate into lasting reform. The London round, stretching into Tuesday, is shaped by urgency driven from both capitals. Washington seeks tangible actions: resumed access to rare earths and easing of advanced technology curbs. Beijing aims to protect its economic model while negotiating incremental gains, such as improved visa issuance and broader recognition of Chinese tech firms. This high‑stakes diplomacy marks a pivotal moment in a wider geopolitical contest for economic supremacy. Whether the Lancaster House talks blossom into a durable détente or merely delay the next escalation depends on bridging both substantive and strategic divides.
Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
What to know about the new Trump travel ban now in effect
US President Donald Trump's new travel ban went into effect on Monday, to far less mobilisation and criticism than the first time around, in 2017. With a bigger mandate this time, and relatively high approval ratings for his immigration policy, Trump's new travel ban has not just expanded, it's also on far more solid legal footing, immigration lawyers told Middle East Eye. The executive order targets 12 countries: Afghanistan; Burma; Chad; the Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. Additionally, nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela will be partially restricted. Those already inside the US are exempt. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters For those abroad at the time the ban went into effect, they may enter the country if they are green card holders, preauthorised visa holders, preauthorised refugee claimants, dual citizens where one of the countries is not included in the travel ban, or if they are the immediate family members of a US citizen. Still, increased scrutiny at ports of entry and orders from Secretary of State Marco Rubio could lead to visa revocations by a border agent. The administration has made it clear that no person is entitled to entry into the US, apart from US citizens. The White House said the ban, as well as heightened vetting measures, is necessary because of excessive visa overstays, which the Trump administration says is a national security concern because it could lead to "terrorist" activity. 'We don't want them': countries facing travel ban to US Read More » The ban was initially expected back in March, but was only introduced following an attack by an Egyptian national on a pro-Israeli march in Colorado last week. "This is definitely a Muslim ban couched in language that the Trump administration knows how to get around as it pertains to the courts," Haris Tarin, the vice president of policy and programming at the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), told MEE. "There was a lot of online chatter - especially by the Laura Loomers and the Randy Fines - these intense Islamophobes in Congress and supporters of the administration who basically said Muslims are responsible for this, and that they needed to ban the Muslim Brotherhood and that they needed to have travel bans," he added. The administration "already spooked so many people from coming into this country... with the detention of students, with the detention of tourists," Tarin said. "This was the perfect time to go even further." 'Anxious, desperate, exhausted' Unlike the 2017 ban, this one is likely to remain in effect in its current form, Hassan M Ahmed, managing attorney at the HMA Law Firm, told MEE. "It's clear that a lot more thought went into this version of it. It seems that they learned their lessons from the previous iterations," Ahmed said, referring to the persistent challenges they faced in court. In a precedent-setting decision in late 2017, the US Supreme Court maintained that the president did not violate the First Amendment with his so-called Muslim Ban, and was well within his rights to determine what is in the national security interest. The Court also said there was no anti-Muslim animus in the ban, simply because many other Muslim countries were not targeted. "Anytime a policy changes, whether for good or for bad, we get an increase in phone calls," Ahmed said. "In this case, we're dealing not just with a change in policy, but there's sort of a psychological aspect to a lot of the administration's offensive policies, and that creates a great deal of uncertainty." On those phone calls are people who are "anxious, desperate, and exhausted", Ahmed told MEE. "Unfortunately, given the track record of open defiance of court orders and lawlessness that's become sort of emblematic of this administration, sometimes we as lawyers are at a loss [and unable] to tell clients that they don't have anything to worry about." Laila Ayub, an immigration attorney and co-founder of Project ANAR, which assists in the resettlement of Afghan refugees, said the climate of fear is deeply pervasive among the community she works with. "Everyone who's already here started contacting us, thinking they're now at risk of deportation just because of their nationality, which is not actually the reality," Ayub told MEE. "So there is a lot of opportunity still to empower people with information about their rights." "The number one question, though, that people have always despite their situation when they are in here in the US, is when they can reunite with their family. That is really something that will be impacted by the travel ban." Impact on visas While advocacy groups have been pleading with the Trump administration for months to make an exemption for Special Immigrant Visas for Afghans who aided American soldiers between 2001 and 2021, there is such a carveout. Still, the visa does not include everyone who worked for or who worked closely with the US during their presence in Afghanistan, Ayub said. Mirriam Sediq, who runs Seddiq Law Maryland, told MEE that previously "lawful categories for Afghans" now suddenly no longer exist. "There are people that came to the US in 2021, 2022 through humanitarian parole. There are also those who have [Temporary Protected Status]. And TPS has been ended for Afghans, so they're really left in a completely no man's land right now." Handful of US lawmakers demand Trump ban the Muslim Brotherhood Read More » Seddiq said she feels "super betrayed by this idea that we've told our clients to do [the right] things" in terms of entering legally and maintaining a law-abiding presence, yet "they're walking directly into the lion's den when they do it". Among other actions, the Trump administration has sent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to courthouses around the country to arrest largely undocumented immigrants who are appearing for their immigration court date, just as the government asked them to. This, Seddiq said, was always standard practice: as long as an immigrant did regular check-ins with ICE agents and showed up in front of a judge and violated no laws, they could carry on with their lives in the US. Now, they're being taken away from their US-born children to be detained and then deported. "We've allowed people to enter even when they don't have a pathway forward. And this is where we are," Seddiq told MEE. "But we've been here for decades and decades and decades, and we've asked for major immigration reform, major overhauls, maybe even some sort of amnesty for people who are doing all the right things. And there's never the political will to do it." Legislative change Despite a much more muted societal reaction compared to 2017, civil liberties groups and immigrant advocacy organisations are working on ways to respond to the new Trump travel ban. The public that took to the streets eight years ago is simply too exhausted this time, Tarin told MEE. "People have been responding to students being kidnapped off the streets by ICE. People have been mobilising to try to support students on student visas. Lawyers have tried to mobilise around protecting students on college campuses," he said. But that's also a strategy the administration has employed. "The way advocates organise is they take one issue at a time and they organise around it, and that's how they're successful. And so if you throw 15 issues at them, they won't be able to respond," Tarin said. In the immediate term, MPAC is putting together a network of lawyers that can be accessed in case of emergencies where otherwise legal entrants to the US are stuck at airports or put into detention. However, the group is also eyeing the 2026 midterm elections, when members of the House and Senate will be up for reelection, and Democrats may stand a chance of gaining a majority of seats in both chambers. MPAC is pushing for traction on the NO BAN Act so that if Democrats take control of Congress, there is an opportunity to make the bill a law. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in February by Democratic Congresswoman Judy Chu of California. It aims to limit Trump's authority to ban an entire class of foreigners - or "aliens" as they are called in the US - from arriving in the country, and demands that Rubio provide lawmakers with reports on the number of denied visitors. For the time being, people will "always try" to come to the US anyway, Seddiq said. "I am loath to tell anybody that the United States is closed the way the administration wants to seemingly advertise to the world. I think that where there's a will, there's a way, and frequently, when you're dealing with immigration, the key to success is merely standing up one more time when you're knocked down," Ahmed said.
Gulf Today
14 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Under Patel, FBI heightens focus on violent crime
When the FBI arrested an accused leader of the MS-13 gang, Kash Patel was there to announce the case, trumpeting it as a step toward returning 'our communities to safety.' Weeks later, when the Justice Department announced the seizure of $510 million in illegal narcotics bound for the US, the FBI director joined other law enforcement leaders in front of a Coast Guard ship in Florida and stacks of intercepted drugs to highlight the haul. His presence was meant to signal the premium the FBI is placing on combating violent crime, drug trafficking and illegal immigration, concerns that have leapfrogged up the agenda in what current and former law enforcement officials say amounts to a rethinking of priorities and mission at a time when the country is also confronting increasingly sophisticated national security threats from abroad. A revised FBI priority list on its website places "Crush Violent Crime" at the top, bringing the bureau into alignment with the vision of President Donald Trump, who has made a crackdown on illegal immigration, cartels and transnational gangs a cornerstone of his administration. Patel has said he wants to 'get back to the basics.' His deputy, Dan Bongino, says the FBI is returning to 'its roots.' Patel says the FBI remains focused on some of the same concerns, including China, that have dominated headlines in recent years, and the bureau said in a statement that its commitment to investigating international and domestic terrorism has not changed. That intensifying threat was laid bare over the past month by a spate of violent acts, most recently a Molotov cocktail attack on a Colorado crowd by an Egyptian man who authorities say overstayed his visa and yelled "Free Palestine." "The FBI continuously analyses the threat landscape and allocates resources and personnel in alignment with that analysis and the investigative needs of the Bureau," the FBI said in a statement. "We make adjustments and changes based on many factors and remain flexible as various needs arise." Signs of restructuring abound. The Justice Department has disbanded an FBI-led task force on foreign influence and the bureau has moved to dissolve a key public corruption squad in its Washington field office, people familiar with the matter have told The Associated Press. The Trump administration, meanwhile, has proposed steep budget cuts for the FBI, and there's been significant turnover in leadership ranks as some veteran agents with years of experience have been pushed from their positions. Some former officials are concerned the stepped-up focus on violent crime and immigration - areas already core to the mission of agencies including the Drug Enforcement Administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement — risks deflecting attention from some of the complicated criminal and national security threats for which the bureau has long borne primary if not exclusive responsibility for investigating. "If you're looking down five feet in front of you, looking for gang members and I would say lower-level criminals, you're going to miss some of the more sophisticated strategic issues that may be already present or emerging," said Chris Piehota, who retired from the FBI in 2020 as an executive assistant director. Enforcement of immigration laws has long been the principal jurisdiction of immigration agents tasked with arresting people in the US illegally along with border agents who police points of entry. Since Trump's inauguration, the FBI has assumed greater responsibility for that work, saying it's made over 10,000 immigration-related arrests. Patel has highlighted the arrests on social media, doubling down on the administration's promise to prioritise immigration enforcement. Agents have been dispatched to visit migrant children who crossed the U.S-Mexico border without parents in what officials say is an effort to ensure their safety. Field offices have been directed to commit manpower to immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has instructed the FBI to review files for information about those illegally in the US and provide it to the Department of Homeland Security unless doing so would compromise an investigation. And photos on the FBI's Instagram account depict agents with covered faces and tactical gear alongside detained subjects, with a caption saying the FBI is "ramping up" efforts with immigration agents to locate "dangerous criminals." "We're giving you about five minutes to cooperate," Bongino said on Fox News about illegal immigrants. "If you're here illegally, five minutes, you're out." That's a rhetorical shift from prior leadership. Though Patel's direct predecessor, Christopher Wray, warned about the flow of fentanyl through the southern border and the possibility migrants determined to commit terrorism could illegally cross through, he did not characterise immigration enforcement as core to the FBI's mission. There's precedent for the FBI to rearrange priorities to meet evolving threats, though for the past two decades countering terrorism has remained a constant atop the agenda. Then-Director Robert Mueller transformed the FBI after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks into a national security, intelligence-gathering agency. Agents were reassigned from investigations into drugs, violent crime and white-collar fraud to fight terrorism. In a top 10 priority list from 2002, protecting the US from terrorism was first. Fighting violent crime was near the bottom, above only supporting law enforcement partners and technology upgrades. The FBI's new list of priorities places "Crush Violent Crime" as a top pillar alongside "Defend the Homeland," though FBI leaders have also sought to stress that counterterrorism remains the bureau's principal mandate. Wray often said he was hard-pressed to think of a time when the FBI was facing so many elevated threats at once. At the time of his departure last January, the FBI was grappling with elevated terrorism concerns; Iranian assassination plots on US soil; Chinese spying and hacking of Americans' cell phones; ransomware attacks against hospitals; and Russian influence operations aimed at sowing disinformation. Associated Press
