logo
FACT FOCUS: Trump misrepresents facts about coal as he signs executive orders to boost its use

FACT FOCUS: Trump misrepresents facts about coal as he signs executive orders to boost its use

Independent09-04-2025

President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed four executive orders designed to boost the U.S. coal industry, outlining steps to protect coal-fired power plants and expedite leases for coal mining on U.S. land. But in touting the benefits of coal, he misrepresented several aspects of its safety and use.
Here's a look at the facts.
CLAIM: 'I call it beautiful, clean coal. I told my people, never use the word coal unless you put beautiful, clean before it.'
THE FACTS: The production of coal is cleaner now than it has been historically, but that doesn't mean it's clean.
Planet-warming carbon dioxide emissions from the coal industry have decreased over the past 30 years, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Energy lobbyist Scott Segal said that 'the relative statement that coal-fired electricity is cleaner than ever before is true, particularly when emissions are measured per unit of electricity produced.'
And yet, coal production worldwide still needs to be reduced sharply to address climate change, according to United Nations-backed research.
Along with carbon dioxide, burning coal emits sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides that contribute to acid rain, smog and respiratory illnesses, according to the EIA.
Over the past 15 years, the U.S. has seen a major shift from coal to natural gas for electricity use, a key reason U.S. carbon emissions have declined over that period.
Coal once provided more than half of U.S. electricity production, but its share dropped to about 16% in 2023, down from about 45% as recently as 2010. Natural gas provides about 43% of U.S. electricity, with the remainder from nuclear energy and renewables such as wind, solar and hydropower.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright acknowledged during his confirmation hearing in January that the burning of fossil fuels — coal, oil and natural gas — causes climate change. That's because the combustion of fossil fuels is drastically increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, warming the planet.
___
TRUMP: 'It's cheap, incredibly efficient, high density and it's almost indestructible.'
THE FACTS: Coal is one of the most expensive sources of new power generation. New coal plants would produce electricity at nearly $90 per megawatt hour on average, though no one in the U.S. is currently building or planning to build a new coal plant, according to estimates from the EIA.
Standalone solar without battery storage is the cheapest source of new power generation at about $23 per megawatt hour on average for new projects connecting to the grid in 2028, the EIA estimates. That includes tax credits and other subsidies under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which help reduce the cost of renewable energy.
New natural gas plants are expected to produce electricity at nearly $43 per megawatt hour, according to the estimates.
A nonpartisan climate policy think tank, Energy Innovation, found that 99% of existing U.S. coal plants are more expensive to keep running than if they're replaced with local solar, wind, and battery storage. Americans immediately begin saving money when coal plants retire and communities transition to clean energy, according to Energy Innovation's 2023 report.
' Trump has promised to cut American energy bills in half – this is yet another way he's forcing Americans to pay more,' Greg Alvarez, a spokesperson with Energy Innovations, wrote in an email Tuesday.
Coal plants operated at full power about 42.4% of the time in 2023, according to EIA's most recent data. In comparison, nuclear and geothermal plants ranked highest, at about 93% and 69.4%, respectively.
___
CLAIM: "The value of untapped coal in our country is 100 times greater than the value of all the gold at Fort Knox."
THE FACTS: Although the U.S. does have an abundance of coal, its estimated value is not nearly as high as Trump claims.
There are currently about 147.3 million troy ounces of gold stored at Fort Knox with a book value of approximately $6.2 billion, according to the U.S. Treasury. Gold closed on the open market Tuesday, trading at $2,990.20 per troy ounce, making its market value much higher, at about $440.6 billion. A troy ounce, a weight measurement for precious metals, is approximately 31.1 grams.
There were about 469.1 billion short tons of coal in U.S. reserves as of Jan. 1, 2024, according to the EIA, though only about 53% of that was available for mining. EIA estimates its value at approximately $598.3 billion. That's more than all of the gold at Fort Knox, but far short of 100 times that amount. A short ton, also known as a U.S. ton, is equivalent to 2,000 pounds.
___
TRUMP: 'They're opening up coal, coal plants all over Germany.'
THE FACTS: That's not accurate. According to Germany's economy ministry, 18 coal-fired power plants were shut down in 2024. 'No new coal-fired power plants will be built,' a spokesman for the ministry said Wednesday in response to a question about Trump's claims. The spokesperson noted the country plans to phase out coal-fired power generation by 2038 at the latest.
Germany did bring some coal-fired plants back online in 2022 and 2023 to deal with natural gas shortages after Russia invaded Ukraine, but that was done as a short-term move.
___
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oh, Canada! Trump cuts off all trade talks with US's northern neighbor citing ‘blatant attack on our country'
Oh, Canada! Trump cuts off all trade talks with US's northern neighbor citing ‘blatant attack on our country'

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Oh, Canada! Trump cuts off all trade talks with US's northern neighbor citing ‘blatant attack on our country'

President Donald Trump on Friday said he was suspending all trade talks with Canada — and making plans to force Americans to pay high import taxes on its goods — after the northern ally's finance department confirmed plans to collect a digital services tax. The late afternoon move quickly caused markets to spiral amid fears of a return to t he president's self-inflicted trade war. In a post on Truth Social, the president complained that he had 'just been informed' about the Canadian government's decision, which will see it require payment of a 3-percent tax on revenue collected from Canadian users of digital platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X, above $14.6 million in a calendar year retroactive to 2022. The tax could saddle American technology companies with bills as large as $2 billion for the first retroactive payments. Although it is meant to apply to any company that provides digital services and takes in profits from selling advertising or user data, Trump groused that it amounted to Ottawa 'putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies' and called the move 'a direct and blatant attack on our Country.' 'They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also,' wrote Trump, who added that the result of the 'egregious tax' would be the U.S. 'hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately.' The president concluded his post with an unsubstantiated claim that any tariffs on Canadian goods would be paid by the government of Canada (rather than by American importers and consumers), writing: 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.' Trump's threat to punish Canada by taxing Americans comes just weeks after a group of House members wrote to him urging 'a swift government response' to any attempt by Canada to collect what they called an 'unprecedented, retroactive tax' that would 'set a terrible precedent that will have long-lasting impacts on global tax and trade practices.' 'Allowing Canada to proceed with this unprecedented, retroactive tax on U.S. firms would send a signal to the rest of the world that they have the green light to proceed with similar discriminatory cash grabs targeting our firms, workers, and tax base,' they said. According to the U.S. Trade Representative's office, U.S. goods trade with Canada totaled roughly $762 billion last year, making Canada one of the country's two largest trading partners. Earlier this month, Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced an agreement to set a July 21 deadline for a new trade agreement at the Group of Seven summit hosted by Carney in Alberta. Ottawa has been pushing for Washington to stand down from the 50 percent tax currently charged on steel, aluminum and automobile imports as well as other taxes Trump has unilaterally imposed on Americans with the aim of purportedly punishing Canada for not doing enough to stop fentanyl trafficking. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court for International Trade had previously ruled that Trump's use of tariffs for such purposes was illegal but that ruling is on hold pending an appeal.

Is Trump a genius? Top economist and tariff skeptic admits president may have outsmarted us all on the economy
Is Trump a genius? Top economist and tariff skeptic admits president may have outsmarted us all on the economy

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Is Trump a genius? Top economist and tariff skeptic admits president may have outsmarted us all on the economy

Did President Donald Trump outfox the world with his tariff plan Maybe, according to Torsten Sløk, the chief economist at Apollo Global Management. On Saturday, Sløk published a blog post titled "Has Trump Outsmarted Everyone On Tariffs?" In it, he explains a possible scenario in which Trump keeps tariffs below his highest threatened rates just long enough to ease uncertainty and avoid the economic pains that would come with massive tariffs. 'Maybe the strategy is to maintain 30% tariffs on China and 10% tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower nontariff barriers and open up their economies to trade,' he wrote. The post comes just before a 90-day pause on Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" — which triggered a huge stock selloff in April — ends in early July, Fortune reports. The pause was meant to provide the U.S. and its trade partners time to negotiate deals, though few actually materialized, at least publicly. That said, the Trump administration has been saying for weeks that they are close to reaching deals with several unnamed trade partners. Sløk theorized that by extending that deadline by another year, other countries and U.S. businesses would have more time to adjust to a "new world with permanently higher tariffs," and would ease the immediate uncertainty rocking the markets. 'This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for U.S. taxpayers,' he wrote. 'Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and U.S. tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.' Sløk previously was a critic of Trump's tariff plan, and it does not appear that his position will change if the president continues his erratic and aggressive tariff program. But he has identified what he believes would be a way to come out on top — so long as the president is willing to play a longer game. Trump may or may not be willing to do that. He seems to have responded negatively to the TACO nickname he's been given by Wall Street — standing for Trump Always Chickens Out — and as a result may refuse to back off any of his proposed policies, even if it makes more sense to do so. Sløk warned in April that a U.S. and China trade war would cripple American small businesses, and advised that providing some sense of stability would give the Federal Reserve a better view on inflation. As it stands now everyone from heads of state to small business owners are in a wait-and-see pattern, unsure of how to proceed in the choppy economic waters Trump has created.

Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump
Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Supreme Court limits ability of judges to stop Trump

An emboldened President Donald Trump celebrated a new bombshell Supreme Court ruling that clamped down on federal judges' ability to halt his policy moves by slamming federal judges who have confronted him in the past. Trump hailed the decision severely proscribing nationwide court injunctions as 'monumental' and took a victory lap in a nearly hour-long session in the White House briefing room. 'I think taking power away from these absolutely crazy radical left judges is a tremendous – this is such a big day,' Trump crowed. Throughout the frenetic start of his term, Trump has seen judges stop or stall some of his most consequential policies on immigration, deportations and birthright citizenship – as well as his moves to take on perceived rivals like law firms and universities and slash agency staff. He has signed 164 Executive Orders and counting. His administration has drawn legal challenges for deporting migrants to El Salvador, singling out individual law firms who have challenged him, and slashing grants to universities. By issuing a sweeping ruling against the use of universal injunctions that a District Court judge can impose nationwide, the Supreme Court took one more burden away from Trump as he seeks to impose his policy agenda even when a closely-divided Congress fails to act on an issue. 'It only takes bad power away from judges .. it takes bad power, sick power and unfair power, and it's really going to be, is a very monumental decision,' Trump said Friday soon after the ruling came down. The high court, where conservatives hold a 6-3 majority, issued the ruling about a year after handing Trump another big win, ruling that presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution for most of their official acts taken while in office. The ruling gave a big boost to Trump's campaign while he was facing four criminal charges – and allowed Trump more latitude when he took the oath for a second time in January. Trump, who railed against individual judges during his 2016 and 2020 campaigns, took on the general judicial power as a 'colossal abuse' – calling them a threat to his own authority. 'In recent months, we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers that was a grave threat to democracy, frankly,' he said. He said the judges have attempted 'to dictate the law for the entire nation. In practice, this meant that if any one of the nearly 700 federal judges disagreed with the policy of a duly elected President of the United States, he or she could block that policy from going into effect, or at least delay it for many years, tie it up in the court system. 'This was a colossal abuse of power which never occurred in American history prior to recent decades, and we've been hit with more nationwide injunctions than were issued in the entire 20th century together.' His warning came in a term where Trump has met little resistance from House and Senate Republicans controlling Congress, even when his administration and DOGE slashed contracts and staff at agencies funded by the legislative branch. Blasting the court's ruling as a threat was Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the trio of dissenting liberals. She accused the government of playing a 'different game' by asking the Court ' to hold that, no matter how illegal a law or policy, courts can never simply tell the Executive to stop enforcing it against anyone.' She said the government does not defend the legality of the Trump order ending birthright citizenship, and that a judge's ruling should apply only to the narrow group of people who brought suit. 'The gamesmanship in this request is apparent and the Government makes no attempt to hide it. Yet, shamefully, this Court plays along,' she wrote. 'No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates. Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship. Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from lawabiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship.' She said it 'renders constitutional guarantees meaningful in name only for any individuals who are not parties to a lawsuit,' calling it a 'grave an attack on our system of law.' 'By stripping all federal courts, including itself, of that power, the Court kneecaps the Judiciary's authority to stop the Executive from enforcing even the most unconstitutional policies,' Sotomayor wrote. Also torching the ruling was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in her own dissent. 'Disaster looms,' she wrote. 'What I mean by this is that our rights-based legal system can only function properly if the Executive, and everyone else, is always bound by law. Today's decision is a seismic shock to that foundational norm. Allowing the Executive to violate the law at its prerogative with respect to anyone who has not yet sued carves out a huge exception—a gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could turn out to be a mortal wound,' she wrote. 'What is more, to me, requiring courts themselves to provide the dagger (by giving their imprimatur to the Executive Branch's intermittent lawlessness) makes a mockery of the Judiciary's solemn duty to safeguard the rule of law,' she added. 'This decision I think opens the door very widely to granting presidents ... essentially to get away with illegal activities for quite a while, and maybe forever' if Congress and the courts to serve as a check on President Trump, said Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina, in comments to CNN.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store