
Ex-Small Business Administration employee sentenced to 4.5 years for PPP fraud
A former Small Business Administration employee who learned the system from the inside and cashed in on pandemic loans for herself and others was sentenced Friday to over four years in prison for committing fraud.
Malaina Chapman was also ordered to pay back about $1.3 million to her former employer by U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz in Miami federal court.
Chapman, 38, of Hialeah, pleaded guilty in March to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, including submitting COVID-19 loan applications and advising a half-dozen others on filing similar requests for emergency benefits that were managed by the Small Business Administration.
In that scheme, her associate, Raisha Kelly, 44, of Palm Beach County, was sentenced in May to five years in prison after being found guilty by a Miami federal jury of multiple counts of wire fraud for submitting falsified tax returns on loan applications. She was also ordered to reimburse about $445,000 to the SBA, which guaranteed pandemic loans through the agency's Paycheck Protection Program.
As the coronavirus swept across the country, the two South Florida women teamed up to steal more than $1 million in federal government loans that were meant to help small businesses survive the economic collapse during the public health crisis, according to prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Dan Bernstein noted that Chapman was making about $57,000 a year as an SBA employee when she stole not only from the agency's PPP loan program but also from other relief programs at the federal, state and local levels. Bernstein pointed out that Chapman spent the ill-gotten funds at luxury stores such as Louis Vuitton and Chanel and leased a BMW for more than $2,300 a month — not on her side businesses or employee payroll, as was required by law.
In a sentencing memo, Bernstein said Chapman 'never met a trust-based government program that she didn't steal from,' calling her 'a financial predator who views government relief programs as her personal piggy bank that existed to fund her dreams of living in the luxury she felt entitled to.'
Since Congress adopted the pandemic relief program run by the SBA, South Florida has been a hotbed of PPP loan fraud. Business people, law enforcement officers and hundreds of others have been convicted of stealing millions from the government program by fabricating loan applications for their companies. Several used their emergency loans to buy Lamborghinis, Teslas, Porsches and other expensive cars.
READ MORE: Lambos. Jewels. How 'easy money' from Uncle Sam made Miami a feast for PPP fraudsters
First ex-SBA employee charged
Chapman was employed as a disaster relief specialist with the Small Business Administration from Sept. 28, 2020, through her resignation on March 18, 2021, according to court records. During her employment, Chapman fleeced the PPP and Economic Injury Disaster loan programs, as well as credit unions and pandemic-related rental programs, according to federal court records.
Chapman was the first ex-SBA employee in the country to be charged with bilking the agency responsible for doling out $800 billion in PPP and other pandemic loans, according to federal authorities. Chapman advertised her side businesses in real estate and credit services on her Instagram account under the handle upscale_yourhomegirl.
Chapman was accused of helping Kelly and five other members in a South Florida ring with their bogus PPP loan applications, leading to disbursements of hundreds of thousands of dollars in 2021 by private lenders backed by the SBA.
With the exception of Kelly, five members of the ring agreed to plead guilty to charges of fraudulently receiving more than $800,000 in PPP loans, court records show. Chapman and Kelly received kickbacks from loan applicants, according to prosecutors.
In addition, on Feb. 10, 2021, Chapman submitted a PPP loan application in the name of her company, Upscale Credit Lounge, which included a falsified tax document that reported revenue of $103,674 and a profit of $81,860. Eleven days later, a private lender approved another loan for $17,052, according to court records.
On Feb. 19, 2021, Chapman, again while still employed by the SBA, submitted another PPP loan application for her business, DA TRAP. Chapman claimed that she had four employees and an average monthly payroll of $14,191. As backup material, Chapman submitted four IRS Employers Quarterly Tax Return forms, which documented the wages paid by DA TRAP. A week later, a private lender approved a loan for $35,477.
All of the information in her application was fabricated, prosecutors said.
In a similar manner, on April 10, 2021, Chapman submitted another PPP loan application for a property management business, falsely claiming on a tax form that it generated revenue of $123,950, with profits of $78,187, court records show. Five days later, a private lender approved that loan for $20,833.
In addition to defrauding the PPP program, Chapman was also accused of exploiting the state of Florida and the city of Miami's COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance programs.
On Oct. 13, 2021, Chapman began the process of applying for benefits under Florida's Emergency Rental Assistance program. Chapman pretended to be a tenant at a residence in Miami, according to court records. She submitted information and documents through an online portal set up to distribute benefits.
On Jan. 20, 2022, Chapman submitted a written document titled '3-day notice to pay rent or quit.' The document was dated Dec. 7, 2021, showing it was signed by Chapman's mother. But her mother had died the previous year on May 25, 2020.
Nonetheless, the state accepted Chapman's misrepresentations and approved payments totaling $15,000. They were made into her bank account, according to authorities.
The PPP fraud cases, investigated by the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General and other federal agencies, were handled by prosecutors Bernstein, Eduardo Gardea Jr. and Gabrielle Charest-Turken.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Press
33 minutes ago
- American Press
Google offers buyouts to more workers amid AI-driven tech upheaval and antitrust uncertainty
Google said Friday it's laying off 12,000 workers, becoming the latest tech company to trim staff after rapid expansions during the COVID-19 pandemic have worn off. (Special to the American Press) Google has offered buyouts to another swath of its workforce across several key divisions in a fresh round of cost cutting coming ahead of a court decision that could order a breakup of its internet empire. The Mountain View, California, company confirmed the streamlining that was reported by several news outlets. It's not clear how many employees are affected, but the offers were made to staff in Google's search, advertising, research and engineering units, according to The Wall Street Journal. Google employs most of the nearly 186,000 workers on the worldwide payroll of its parent company, Alphabet Inc. 'Earlier this year, some of our teams introduced a voluntary exit program with severance for U.S.-based Googlers, and several more are now offering the program to support our important work ahead,' a Google spokesperson, Courtenay Mencini, said in a statement. 'A number of teams are also asking remote employees who live near an office to return to a hybrid work schedule in order to bring folks more together in-person,' Mencini said. Google is offering the buyouts while awaiting for a federal judge to determine its fate after its ubiquitous search engine was declared an illegal monopoly as part of nearly 5-year-old case by the U.S. Justice Department. The company is also awaiting remedy action in another antitrust case involving its digital ad network. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta is weighing a government proposal seeking to ban Google paying more than $26 billon annually to Apple and other technology companies to lock in its search engine as the go-to place for online information, require it to share data with rivals and force a sale of its popular Chrome browser. The judge is expected to rule before Labor Day, clearing the way for Google to pursue its plan to appeal last year's decision that labeled its search engine as a monopoly. The proposed dismantling coincides with ongoing efforts by the Justice Department to force Google to part with some of the technology powering the company's digital ad network after a federal judge ruled that its digital ad network has been improperly abusing its market power to stifle competition to the detriment of online publishers. Like several of its peers in Big Tech, Google has been periodically reducing its headcount since 2023 as the industry began to backtrack from the hiring spree that was triggered during pandemic lockdowns that spurred feverish demand for digital services. Google began its post-pandemic retrenchment by laying off 12,000 workers in early 2023 and since then as been trimming some divisions to help bolster its profits while ramping up its spending on artificial intelligence — a technology driving an upheaval that is starting to transform its search engine into a more conversational answer engine.

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Bankrupt iconic retail chain closes 125 more stores
Major drugstore chains have struggled to remain profitable as several economic issues have put pressure on revenues. Many of the financial problems are tied to economic challenges they have faced since the Covid pandemic, including rising costs of labor and products, driven by inflation and increased interest rates on debt obligations. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Competition among the top pharmacy chains, including Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid, has grown significantly as big-box retail chains like Walmart, Target, and Costco expanded their pharmaceutical services, and internet drug providers like Amazon and Mark Cuban's CostPlus Drug Company added their services as patient options. Related: Bankrupt retail chain closing over 200 more stores Both Walgreens and CVS embarked on store-closing programs over the last four years to eliminate locations that do not make economic sense. Walgreens, which operated about 8,600 stores with 6,000 profitable locations in 2024, evaluated 2,000 stores for potential closure and identified 1,200 locations to shutter, with 500 set to close in fiscal year 2025. Drugstore chain CVS in 2021 revealed it would close 900 of its nearly 9,900 stores to reduce costs and cut losses, closing 300 locations each year in 2022, 2023, and 2024. The company expanded the store closing campaign in 2025, revealing in its annual report in February that it would close 271 more stores this year. Rite Aid's store closing plans were much more extreme as it filed for bankruptcy twice over the last two years, with plans to ultimately close all of its stores. When Rite Aid filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the first time on Oct. 15, 2023, it closed about 800 of its 2,100 stores as part of a reorganization plan. The drugstore chain filed for Chapter 11 protection a second time on May 5, 2025, as New Rite Aid LLC, and has begun a process of closing hundreds of its remaining stores. Rite Aid filed its seventh notice of additional store closing locations with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey on June 13, seeking approval to close 125 additional stores and liquidate their assets, adding to previously designated locations for closing, for a total of 829 of its stores. Related: Bankrupt retail chain closing dozens more store locations Rite Aid already filed notices of store closing locations with the original notice and an additional closing notice on May 9, a second additional closing notice on May 15, a third additional closing notice on May 23, a fourth additional notice on May 30, and on June 6 filed fifth and sixth notices of additional store closing locations. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The first seven groups of store closings listed 704 locations in 13 states, including Pennsylvania (214), California (181), New York (97), Washington (48), Oregon (32), New Jersey (31), New Hampshire (26), Virginia (24), Delaware (21), Maryland (13), Connecticut (6), Idaho (5), Massachusetts (3), Vermont (2), and Ohio (1). The debtor's seventh additional closing notice, includes 125 store closures in California (56), New York (24), Pennsylvania (19), New Hampshire (11), New Jersey (4), Washington (4), Delaware (2), Maryland (2), Connecticut (1), Ohio (1), and Virginia (1). Rite Aid will file several additional store closing notices before its bankruptcy case closes, since it plans to close all of its stores, estimated at about 1,240. Judge Michael B. Kaplan signed an interim order on May 9 approving initial and additional location closings. Objections to the interim location closing order and any of the proposed store closings must be filed with the court and received by the debtor and their counsel no later than June 23, according to court papers. Related: Bankrupt drugstore chain closing over 150 stores; here's where The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons to Avoid AMC Stock and 1 Rival to Buy Instead
AMC's business never fully recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic. The share count has soared, leading to significant dilution for investors. Meanwhile, Netflix keeps going from strength to strength and remains a fantastic buy in 2025. 10 stocks we like better than AMC Entertainment › Movie theater operator AMC Entertainment Holdings (NYSE: AMC) has been on the outs for a while. The stock soared 1,180% in 2021, but that lofty peak was followed by price drops of 76%, 82%, and 35% in the next three years. AMC's stock price is down another 20% year to date. Some might call this the bottom of the barrel, arguing that the stock is poised for a huge recovery. Let me show you three reasons why I disagree, followed by a sector rival that really does look like a good investment today. The movie theater industry was already struggling when the coronavirus pandemic arrived. At the end of 2019, AMC's stock had fallen 53% over the previous two years amid flattish sales growth and unpredictable profits. The lockdown era only accelerated an existing downturn. AMC's business has indeed improved from the absolute trough of late 2020 and early 2021, but it remains a shadow of its former self. The company has consistently burned cash in each of the last five years, trailing sales are down 17% from fiscal year 2019, and the theater network is shrinking. AMC has about 900 theaters and 10,000 screens today, approximately 10% below the screen count in 2019. AMC was a meme stock in 2021. The record stock price wasn't based on business success, but on successful promotion in social media channels. The online chatter about "AMC stock" has died down, and so has the trading volume. On the other hand, the stock remains heavily shorted, even though the share price is down more than 99% from the fading all-time high. You might want to bet on a modest recovery in AMC's business, but the potential returns will never be a hundredfold. The stock was priced at $339 per share, with a $38.6 billion market cap in a very different era. AMC started issuing more stock as soon as the share price took off. After a brief pause, the share count started skyrocketing again in 2023. There are now 433 million AMC shares on the open market, up from 23.5 million at the end of 2019. These stock sales put extra cash in AMC's coffers while diluting the value of existing shares. I mean, I get it. AMC needed extra cash to keep the company alive, so why not ask shareholders for some help? But this habit doesn't make me want to own AMC stock, especially since the stock sales are still ongoing. This isn't ancient history, but an active cash management policy. A sea change is underway in Hollywood (and related areas). As always, you'll find Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) leading the charge into new territory. Many investors were giving up on Netflix's growth story in 2022, when the company introduced ad-supported subscriptions and switched tactics from maximal subscriber gains to profitable revenue growth. If you bought more Netflix shares three years ago, near the bottom of that temporary dip, you'd have a 54% return on your hands today. The fall of 2018 was another weak point. Netflix shares fell as much as 20% from September to December that year. Investors at the time worried about generous content production budgets and deeply negative cash flows. But then-CEO Reed Hastings called those expenses "investments" in Netflix's money-making future, and he turned out to be right. If you had picked up Netflix stock six and a half years ago, near the bottom of that downswing, you'd have seen a 126% gain by now. I haven't even talked about the Qwikster rout of 2011, the sudden increase in international expenses in 2015, or several other short-term issues that Netflix easily overcame. Critics are often quick to dismiss Netflix as a former growth stock whose golden age already happened. And the company is equally quick to prove them wrong, time and time again. Yes, Netflix shares are trading near all-time highs in the summer of 2025. Sure, the stock still looks expensive at 58 times trailing earnings and 13 times sales. But I'm more than happy to hold on to my Netflix shares at this point and am tempted to buy more. Netflix is the future of filmed entertainment. Like Blockbuster, AMC represents the same industry's fading history. Before you buy stock in AMC Entertainment, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and AMC Entertainment wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Anders Bylund has positions in Netflix. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons to Avoid AMC Stock and 1 Rival to Buy Instead was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data