logo
'Cannon' test boosts Karen Read's defense, showing taillight damage consistent with thrown bar glass

'Cannon' test boosts Karen Read's defense, showing taillight damage consistent with thrown bar glass

Fox News06-06-2025
Karen Read's legal team is nearing the end of the case for her defense with crash reconstruction expert Dr. Daniel Wolfe called to the stand Friday.
It was the 28th day of her retrial on murder and other charges in the death of her former boyfriend, a 46-year-old Boston police officer named John O'Keefe.
Wolfe is the director of accident reconstruction at a firm called ARCCA.
On the witness stand Friday, he said ARCCA designed a specialized "cannon" to simulate throwing a cocktail glass at Read's taillight and determined that similar damage could have been caused if someone threw the glass at around 31 mph and 37 mph.
"From the 37 mile per hour test, we are getting damage that's generally consistent, and by that I mentioned we have portions of the outer lens missing, the underlying diffuser," he said.
"There was also some fracturing on the backside of the assembly. So again we observed damage that was generally consistent with that of the subject taillight."
Wolfe said he gave an opinion that the damage Read's SUV was generally consistent with someone throwing that drinking glass at at least 37 mph.
In another ARCCA test, the reconstructionists wanted to see if an impact between the taillight and the back of O'Keefe's head could've caused his skull fracture.
Wolfe said he tested at 15 mph. Damage to the test taillight was significantly more than Read's taillight at that speed – but it didn't generate enough force to cause a skull fracture.
Prosecutors accused Read, 45, of hitting O'Keefe with her 2021 Lexus SUV and driving away as he died on the ground with a skull fracture during a blizzard.
The defense denies that she struck him and has called witnesses who have attributed his injuries to other causes, including a dog bite and a potential fistfight with a man Read was flirting with behind his back.
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Special prosecutor Hank Brennan unsuccessfully tried to have Wolfe and a colleague, Dr. Andrew Renstchler, blocked from testifying before the start of the trial.
Wolfe testified during the first trial, which ended with a deadlocked jury, that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with a collision involving O'Keefe.
Read told reporters outside court Wednesday that her defense could rest as soon as next Tuesday. There was no court on Thursday.
She could face up to life in prison if convicted. Her first trial, in which the defense claimed she had been framed, ended with a deadlocked jury last year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fox News covered the Sydney Sweeney ‘good jeans' ad 28 times more than Epstein this week
Fox News covered the Sydney Sweeney ‘good jeans' ad 28 times more than Epstein this week

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fox News covered the Sydney Sweeney ‘good jeans' ad 28 times more than Epstein this week

In recent weeks, Fox News has followed Donald Trump's lead and focused its attention on anything other than the all-consuming controversy over the administration's haphazard handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, which has dominated the coverage at other outlets. While the conservative cable giant has devoted much of its energy lately to peddling Tulsi Gabbard's revisionist claims that the Obama administration engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' to manufacture intelligence about Russia's 2016 election interference, Fox News has needed other ragebait stories to help distract right-wing viewers away from Epstein. The network appeared to find its perfect shiny object this week with the supposed 'liberal outrage' over actress Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle commercial, which was released last week and features the star dressed all in denim while emphasizing her 'good jeans,' an obvious play on words. According to a study by liberal media watchdog Media Matters for America, the network has spent over 85 minutes across at least 20 segments through Thursday afternoon discussing the commercial and the discourse surrounding it. At the same time, since Monday, Fox News has only talked about the latest developments in the Epstein saga a total of three minutes, despite the fact that Trump recently claimed that Epstein 'stole' the late Virginia Giuffre – one of the deceased sex offender's accusers – from Mar-a-Lago. Trump's remarks raised additional questions about his knowledge of Epstein's crimes and have led to Giuffre's family demanding more answers from the administration. The president sparked additional headlines when he reiterated this week that he's 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, the Epstein partner who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking and abuse of minors. Maxwell recently met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal attorney to Trump, to discuss what she knows about the Epstein case. Media Matters found that since Monday, Fox News has mentioned Sweeney 62 times on air compared to just 14 for Epstein. While MAGA competitor Newsmax has also given ample coverage to the Sweeney ad, the channel has also frequently discussed the Epstein situation – mentioning it four times more than the American Eagle commercial. MSNBC, which has yet to mention Sweeney on air this week, has brought up Epstein 756 times, while CNN has mentioned the disgraced financier 638 times, compared to just six references to the Sweeney ad. Meanwhile, much of the focus on the Sweeney commercial centers on the criticism that some on the left have made about the ad, claiming it shows an 'unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness' and for being a 'eugenicist dog whistle.' While the outrage has largely been limited to social media users and some op-eds, Fox News and other right-wing outlets have ascribed the backlash to 'Democrats' or 'the left' in its entirety. 'Democrats should change their pronouns to 'we suck,'' Fox News host Jimmy Failla stated. 'Not to be crass, but she's got big boobs, Laura, and that used to be the business model.' Primetime star Jesse Watters, meanwhile, flagged some TikTok videos assailing the ad while arguing that 'liberals saw a white woman with blond hair and blue eyes and thought she was ushering in the Fourth Reich.' Meanwhile, Semafor political reporter Dave Weigel explained how MAGA media was creating a manufactured outrage cycle about Democrats complaining about the Sweeney ad when exactly no prominent party officials had said anything about it. 'I have looked for a single Dem with an opinion on the AE ad and literally can't find one. It's just 'the left' which is a stand-in for 'what Democrats really think.' The ask seems to be that Dems condemn Twitter randos if they say something crazy,' he noted on Thursday. Still, it hasn't stopped the White House from adding more fuel to the fire by weighing in on the so-called controversy that's supposedly consuming the left as a whole. 'Cancel culture run amok,' White House communications director Steven Cheung declared this week. 'This warped, moronic, and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024. They're tired of this bulls**t.'

Phillips 66 hit with $800 million penalty in biofuel trade secrets case
Phillips 66 hit with $800 million penalty in biofuel trade secrets case

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Phillips 66 hit with $800 million penalty in biofuel trade secrets case

By Nicole Jao NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. refiner Phillips 66 was ordered to pay biofuel maker Propel Fuels $800 million in damages for stealing trade secrets to build up its renewable-fuel capabilities, according to a California state court document. A state court in Alameda, California, on Wednesday ordered Phillips 66 to pay $195 million in punitive damages, in addition to $604.9 million in compensation the refiner was ordered to pay following a separate verdict. "In summary, the court finds that Phillips 66's misconduct was 'reprehensible' from a business perspective. The evidence at trial reflects that Phillips 66 took advantage of Propel Fuels by abusing its bargaining power during due diligence," the court order said. In October, a jury in the California court decided that Houston-based Phillips 66 stole trade secrets under the guise of gathering information for a potential acquisition and then used that information to create a competing business. "We received the order and continue to evaluate all our legal options," a Phillips 66 spokesperson said on Thursday. Sacramento-based Propel Fuels specializes in low-emissions gasoline and diesel fuel. According to the legal document, Phillips 66 approached Propel Fuels in 2017 about acquiring the company to enhance its renewable fuel business in California. Phillips 66 abruptly withdrew from the deal in 2018 and began selling its own renewable fuel in 2019. Propel Fuels sued the refiner in 2022, accusing Phillips of unlawfully using trade secrets, including financial data and business strategies, that the biofuel company had shared during their talks. "This is the result of years of perseverance by our client," said Michael Ng, lawyer at Kobre & Kim and co-counsel for Propel Fuels. "It was really important to them that they stand up, not just for themselves, but for innovators generally." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Survivor of clergy sex abuse in Peru visits pope's hometown to call for more reforms
Survivor of clergy sex abuse in Peru visits pope's hometown to call for more reforms

Associated Press

time21 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Survivor of clergy sex abuse in Peru visits pope's hometown to call for more reforms

CHICAGO (AP) — A Peruvian survivor of clergy sex abuse brought her public campaign for reforms to the American hometown of Pope Leo XIV on Thursday, saying he failed in investigating her case when he was a bishop in her home country and needs to step up now as leader of the world's Catholics. 'I've been quiet since the pope has been elected,' Ana María Quispe Díaz said in Spanish at a news conference in downtown Chicago. 'But I'm not planning to be quiet forever.' She appeared with members of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. The advocacy group sent a letter to the pope on Thursday renewing demands for more accountability on clergy sex abuse complaints and released documents related to Díaz's case. The Associated Press doesn't name people who say they were sexually assaulted unless they consent to being identified or decide to tell their stories publicly, as Díaz has. She began speaking out on social media in 2023, and has faced threats and harassment in Peru because of it, SNAP officials said. Ahead of Leo's May election, SNAP filed a formal complaint against then-Cardinal Robert Prevost with the Vatican secretary of state, alleging he abused ecclesiastical power in his handling of two cases. Díaz said she is a victim in one of those cases which overlapped with Prevost's tenure as bishop of Chiclayo, Peru. According to the complaint filed in March by SNAP, Prevost's diocese didn't fully investigate in April 2022 when three women accused priests Eleuterio Vásquez Gonzáles and Ricardo Yesquén of sexually abusing them as minors. Díaz said Thursday that she had spoken briefly with Prevost on the phone in 2020, telling him how she was abused by Vásquez Gonzáles, but wasn't given assurances that much could be done. All three women spoke with Prevost in person in 2022 about both priests, according to Díaz. 'How much more damage can he do now that he is the pope?' she asked, speaking through a translator. Following a protocol set by Pope Francis But Prevost did everything he was supposed to do, according to the Chiclayo diocese and Vatican, including restricting the priest's ministry, sending a preliminary investigation to the Vatican's sex crimes office, offering the victims psychological help and suggesting they go to authorities, who archived the case because it happened too long ago. Pope Francis had a mixed record on responding to the clergy sexual abuse crisis, bungling a major case in Chile in 2018 before reversing course, ordering an investigation and apologizing to the victims. Ultimately, it became a turning point for how he directed the church to handle cases of priests sexually abusing children for the rest of his papacy. In these cases, the Vatican investigation found Prevost acted correctly in imposing preliminary restrictions on Vásquez Gonzáles while Peruvian authorities conducted their own civil investigation. The Vatican office archived the case for lack of evidence, then reopened it in 2023 after it gained traction in the media. Victims' groups are demanding an accounting from Leo. Meanwhile, his supporters say the Chiclayo case is being exploited by his opponents to undermine him after he made enemies by helping shut down Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, a scandal-plagued lay Catholic community in Peru. No one has accused Leo of abuse himself, nor of knowingly keeping confirmed abusers in public ministry, which has been the biggest issue affecting the Catholic Church recently. SNAP wants this accused priest removed ASAP SNAP has asked for accused priests to be removed, which Díaz has sought as well. The organization provided copies of letters sent in July between Peruvian church officials and Díaz. In them, Peruvian church officials say Vásquez Gonzáles requested earlier this year 'to be dispensed from the obligations arising from his ordination as a priest and to leave the clerical state.' The process would take at least six months to complete, according to the letters. Díaz said that's too long. Fidel Purisaca, director of communications for the Diocese of Chiclayo, neither confirmed nor denied Vásquez Gonzáles' request. 'That is a confidential matter between the priest, the bishop, and the Vatican Dicastery,' he told The Associated Press in a WhatsApp message. The diocese said Yesquén was too sick to continue his ministry, and neither priest has commented publicly on the accusations. While in Chicago, Díaz did interviews with Spanish language media and for podcasts. She also appeared at SNAP's annual conference in Pennsylvania last week. Now 29 and a mother of two young children, Díaz said she still isn't always ready to talk about it. But she said something changed when her daughter turned 1. 'Everything came back to me about the abuse,' she said, wiping tears at times. 'I couldn't leave her alone. Since then it's been a real fight for me to be able to leave them alone.' ___ Associated Press writer Nicole Winfield in Rome and Franklin Briceño in Lima, Peru, contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store