logo
Antibiotic resistance: a plague of our own making

Antibiotic resistance: a plague of our own making

Express Tribune2 days ago
Muhammad Sufian, 8, admitted to Benazir Children Hospital Mardan (BCHM) with a high-grade fever, has taken different antibiotics for almost 24 days.
'Before admission to BCHM,' shares Sufian's father Aziz Ur Rehman. 'My son was treated by local medical practitioners in clinics situated in Lundkhawar area of Mardan district, and then by doctors at nearby hospitals. They all used a variety of antibiotics.'
Sufian's medical history shows that the antibiotics administered to him include Cefixime and Augmentin that were given orally, while Ceftriaxone, Azithromycin, Grasil, and Mycacine were administered as injections. None of these could not develop positive response.
According to Dr Abbas Ali Khan, a pediatrician at BCHM, a sample had been sent to the lab for a culture test, but since the result would take seven days, Meropenem injections were administered in the meantime which showed a positive response against the infection. Finally, Sufian's temperature began to drop.
'Based on previous culture test observations and clinical criteria, Cefoperazone – Sulbactam, Tanzo, and Meropenem injectable antibiotics are the remaining three weapons against infections in such resistant cases,' he says.
Heath experts said that despite growing concerns over antimicrobial resistance (AMR), antibiotics are being offered to children without proper investigations and diagnosis in small clinics, and other medical facilities across Pakistan, and the situation is worsening day by day.
According to the report of the American Society for Microbiology, Pakistan ranks 176th out of 204 nations in AMR-related mortality per 100,000 people.
In 2019, the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance Project reported 59,200 deaths in Pakistan directly attributable to AMR, with an additional 221,300 deaths listed as being AMR-associated. AMR was therefore the third-leading cause of death for Pakistanis in 2019, behind cardiovascular disease and maternal/neonatal disorders.
'In the misuse and inappropriate use of antibiotics, parents, quacks, and even doctors are involved,' explains Dr Abbas Ali Khan. 'Parents know the names of some common antibiotics and without a qualified doctor's examination, get them from medical stores and without knowing the accurate strength and duration give them to their children who are sick. Quacks and non-qualified doctors, who run clinics in rural areas, also administer antibiotics without proper dosage to small children, and this is how antimicrobial resistance (AMR) develops among children.'
He mentioned that qualified doctors follow all protocols during the treatment of children, which usually takes 3 to 4 days. However, for immediate recovery in high grade fever, parents often rush their children to other medical facilities, where antibiotics are prescribed unnecessarily due to their pressure, he added.
'We mostly receive children aged 5 to 10 years with high temperature, who have already been treated with antibiotics by parents, quacks, or doctors in peripheral hospitals, where there is no concept of culture testing,' shares Dr Khan. 'Culture tests conducted in the facility show that almost 90 percent children have developed resistance to various antibiotics, as the medicines were not administered to them properly.'
According to health experts, antibiotics are given to children even for viral infections such as sore throats, colds, coughs, fever, flu, and condition of mild diarrhea, where antibiotics do not provide any benefit.
They shared that nowadays the resistance to different antibiotics is observed in enteric fever, tuberculosis, urinary tract infections, and gastroenteritis.
Recent findings by Aga Khan University, in Karachi, show that Pakistan has witnessed one of the world's largest outbreaks of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid, which began in Hyderabad in 2016.
By 2018, over 5,000 confirmed XDR Salmonella Typhi cases had been reported, nearly 70 percent of them in Karachi.
'In Pakistan, this silent epidemic is taking a firm grip, especially among children who are our youngest and most vulnerable,' says Dr Imran Nasir, Associate Professor at Aga Khan University, Karachi. 'Hospitals across the country are seeing an alarming surge in antibiotic resistance, much of it stemming from the widespread and often reckless use of antibiotics.'
He explained that due to weak diagnostic capacity, with many clinics lacking access to timely lab tests, doctors often prescribe antibiotics with a 'just in case,' approach, rather than based on confirmed diagnosis of bacterial infections. Another contributing factor, he added, is poor antibiotic stewardship.
'According to a multi-centre study, most Pakistani hospitals lack clear guidelines on rational antibiotic use, and few have formal stewardship programs in place,' explains Dr Nasir. 'There are prevailing misconceptions even among some in the physician community, who believe antibiotics are effective against viral infections or fear losing patients' trust if they don't prescribe something strong. The unnecessary use of antibiotics may offer short-term relief but carries long-term consequences.'
He added that overexposure to antibiotics disrupts the gut microbiome, which plays a critical role in immune development.
'This leaves children more vulnerable to future infections, allergies, and even obesity,'says Dr Nasir. 'Moreover, it increases the risk that bacteria in a child's body will become resistant, turning minor infections into life-threatening ones,' he explains.
He said that in Pakistan stronger stewardship, tighter regulations, better diagnostics and public awareness are urgently needed. Until then, antibiotics will continue to be handed out like candy, and the bacteria will keep getting stronger and smarter, he warned.
To combat antimicrobial resistance, under the AMR National Action Plan 2.0, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) government has established an AMR secretariat and has notified a provincial surveillance committee, and a technical working group, shared Dr Musawir Manzoor, a surveillance officer at Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response System (IDSRS), KP health department.
He added that for the awareness among local community the department has conducted awareness activities across the province during the AMR week last year in November.
Dr Shafa Haidar, Director of Registration at the KP Health Care Commission (KPHCC), shared that besides licensing health facilities, regulating pharmacies and rising public awareness, the commission is also combating against quackery, a major contributor to AMR.
She added that the KPHCC conducted raids and took legal action against quacks and illegal healthcare facilities to dismantle practices that contribute to antimicrobial resistance.
The Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) project suggests that bacterial antimicrobial resistance will cause 39 million deaths between 2025 and 2050 globally – equating to three deaths every minute.
The study forecasts a 67.5 percent increase in annual deaths directly attributed to bacterial AMR, rising from 1.14 million in 2021 to an estimated 1.91 million in 2050. Deaths associated with AMR are also expected to increase by 74.5 percent, from 4.71 million in 2021, to 8.22 million deaths in 2050.
From rural clinics to urban hospitals, antimicrobial resistance is eroding treatment options, turning routine infections into life-or-death battles. If left unchecked, Pakistan's overreliance on antibiotics will continue to shrink the arsenal of drugs that can save lives, leaving doctors with fewer — and often more toxic — options. The battle against antimicrobial resistance is not only a medical challenge but also a social one, demanding stricter regulations, better diagnostics, and a cultural shift in how we perceive antibiotics. Every unnecessary prescription, every self-medicated dose, is another step towards a future where common childhood infections become untreatable. Protecting our children means acting now — before the medicines we trust become relics of the past.
Abdur Razzaq is a Peshawar-based multimedia journalist. He tweets @TheAbdurRazzaq
All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the writer
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Auburn is completely justified in claiming 4 more national titles
Why Auburn is completely justified in claiming 4 more national titles

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Auburn is completely justified in claiming 4 more national titles

The Auburn Tigers just closed the gap on the University of Alabama in the national title debate, and they didn't have to take a single snap to do it. Claiming four new national titles in one swoop, in the year 2025, has to rank as Auburn's greatest victory since the Kick Six. Thing is, based on the precedent already set down by that school across the state, Auburn is completely justified in claiming most, if not necessarily all four of the new titles. What's good for the Tide is good for the Tigers, after all. 'For too long, Auburn has chosen a humble approach to our program's storied history — choosing to recognize only Associated Press national championships,' Auburn athletic director John Cohen told On3 in announcing the new title windfall. Two banners, for the 1957 and 2010 seasons, hang in Jordan-Hare Stadium, and prior to this week the Tigers also acknowledged the 1913, 1983 and 1993 seasons as meeting national championship qualifications. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Effective immediately, Auburn will now claim the 1910, 1914, 1958 and 2004 seasons as national championship ones, because, as Cohen notes, the Tigers' recognitions 'now align with the well-established standard used by the NCAA's official record book and our peers across the nation.' Auburn can justify the new rings on two fronts: first, because pre-21st-century college football was a chaotic nest of competing rankings and ad hoc justifications, and second, because Alabama already went there. Reason #1: Nobody knows anything The Tigers are taking advantage of 20th century college football's inherent absurdity. Then as now, the soul of college football lies in argument, the furious and fiery debate over unanswerable questions of strength and worth. But for all the good that the College Football Playoff and its predecessor postseason series have brought the game, they've robbed us of the debate of which team really would've come out on top in a winner-take-all matchup. When you determine your postseason rankings via polls rather than games, there's ample room for debate … and ample territory to claim championships on your own a century after the fact. Multiple contemporaneous and after-the-fact polls have attempted to make sense of college football's anything-goes era, some with far more statistical rigor and validity than others. Still, finding a poll that breaks your way is like finding a $100 bill on the ground; you might not be entitled to it, but you're going to keep it anyway. Auburn does have history in its corner. The Auburn of the 1910s was a fearsome unit, led by a diminutive Irishman named Mike Donahue and featuring players with spectacular names like Fatty Warren, Baby Taylor and Moon Ducote. In the three national championship seasons Auburn now claims, the Tigers won 22 games, lost one and tied one. Auburn and Alabama weren't playing at that time due to hard feelings on both sides, which was good news for a Tide team that went a mediocre 15-11 over the same stretch. The 1958 Auburn team played under a total blackout — no television, no bowl appearances — but still managed to go 9-0-1. That was only good enough for fourth in the final rankings, behind LSU (10-0), Iowa (7-1-1), and Army (8-0-1). The 2004 team went 13-0 but was not included in the two-team BCS, losing out on a berth by mere percentage points to USC and Oklahoma. Auburn and Oklahoma were tied going into the regular season's final week, but because Auburn didn't beat Alabama badly enough in the Iron Bowl, winning by 'only' eight points, Oklahoma moved ahead only to get shellacked by USC in the Orange Bowl. (Incidentally, I cover all this in my new — and apparently already dated — book "Iron In The Blood: How the Alabama vs. Auburn Rivalry Shaped the Soul of the South," on sale next Tuesday. Feel free to correct the appropriate passages by hand.) Reason #2: Alabama did it first If you're mad at Auburn for claiming four new titles, you might want to reserve a good measure of your scorn for their rival. Back in the 1980s, an Alabama sports information director went diving in the record books and in one swoop, awarded Alabama five pre-Bear Bryant-era titles. These range from defensible and acceptable to absurd, like the 1941 season where Alabama went 9-2 and finished 20th (!) in the AP poll … but ranked No. 1, tied with Minnesota, in a single, much smaller poll. Nothing Auburn did Tuesday is anywhere near as egregious as that, and yet the 1941 team remains canonized on Alabama's Walk of Champions in front of Bryant-Denny Stadium. Now, granted, there's the question of an incredibly slippery slope here. If Auburn is going to claim a national title for 2004, why can't Utah — which also went undefeated at 12-0 that year — also claim one? Why couldn't 2017 Central Florida or 2023 Florida State, which, like 2004 Auburn, were both left out of the postseason dance despite going undefeated? For that matter, why can't Alabama claim the 1966 title and jump up to 19? That season, Alabama went 11-0 with six shutouts, but finished behind two teams — Notre Dame and Michigan State — that went 9-0-1 and played to a tie in late November. The suspicion, then and now, was that pollsters of the day were punishing the Crimson Tide for the state of Alabama's woeful record on civil rights in the turbulent 1960s. (Politics and sports have always intertwined.) Yes, Auburn's ring-grab could well set off a new wave of schools retroactively seeking to claim national titles won by their great-grandfathers. We could see new banners hanging in stadiums all across the country as enterprising researchers whip up dissertation-length justifications for why their school deserves titles from the days before cars or TV. But so what? We now have in place a means of determining, once and for all, a season's indisputable national champion. And as college football sins go, a bit of reapportioned valor ranks pretty low on the list. We've got to hold onto something to argue about, after all.

Trump's 401(k) move could unlock billions for crypto, says Reserve Exec
Trump's 401(k) move could unlock billions for crypto, says Reserve Exec

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 401(k) move could unlock billions for crypto, says Reserve Exec

Trump's 401(k) move could unlock billions for crypto, says Reserve Exec originally appeared on TheStreet. Thomas Mattimore, co-founder of Reserve, says President Donald Trump's recent executive order opening 401(k) plans to alternative assets marks a watershed moment for innovation — with crypto standing to benefit. Reserve is a permissionless platform enabling anyone to launch, mint, and govern on-chain crypto indexes — called Decentralized Token Folios (DTFs) — that function like ETFs but with full transparency and 24/7 redemption.'This isn't just a pro crypto change, but it's a pro innovation change,' Mattimore said in an interview with TheStreet Roundtable. 'For a huge swath of the population who uses 401(k)s as their savings mechanism, they've been very limited. Crypto is the fastest growing asset, best performing asset of anything in the last decade.' Accessibility and new products Until now, most Americans have only accessed crypto through exchanges or exchange-traded funds. Mattimore said the new order could quickly expand that landscape. 'There's actually only one 401(k) provider that gives people access to native crypto assets today,' he said. 'This executive order is taking the stigma off of crypto as opposed to encouraging it.' He expects that index-style products will dominate retirement accounts, mirroring traditional markets. 'For the last 30 plus years we've seen an explosion in index investing, specifically ETFs,' Mattimore said. 'I expect that it's going to be the same for crypto over time. At Reserve, we're building DTFs, which are like ETFs in crypto.' Standards and scale Mattimore pointed to encouraging signals from regulators. 'We've seen and heard a lot from the SEC this year encouraging transparency and encouraging good acting from various different players in the space,' he said. 'For something like retirement accounts, transparency and the trustability so that people can actually understand what they're getting into is critical.' On yield-bearing products, Mattimore argued it's only a matter of time. 'Offering exposure to crypto assets without some of the staking or without some of the underlying yield just wouldn't make sense,' he said. Looking at the bigger picture, Mattimore said the inflows could be massive. 'The estimate on the size of the 401(k) accounts is seven and a half to eight trillion,' he said. 'One percent of 8 trillion is still $80 billion. That would still be quite a bit of inflows.' Ultimately, he views the policy as a turning point. 'This executive order is really removing the stigma from enabling people to get involved in this innovative sector,' Mattimore said. 'I'm really excited for rule-based index investing to come to the crypto space.' Trump's 401(k) move could unlock billions for crypto, says Reserve Exec first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 19, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 19, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store