33-inch-long 'woolly' mountain rat caught on camera for first time ever
One of the largest rats in the world has finally been caught on camera, almost four decades after it was first discovered.
These gargantuan rats, named the subalpine woolly rat (Mallomys istapantap), measure up to 33.5 inches (85 centimeters) long from the end of their tail to their nose, and weigh as much as 4.4 pounds (2 kilograms).
The species was first identified in 1989 through museum specimens, but it had never been photographed or observed in the wild — until now.
In a new study published April 18 in the journal Mammalia, František Vejmělka, a doctoral candidate at the Czech Academy of Sciences and the University of South Bohemia, has revealed the very first images of these rats in their natural habitat.
He captured the footage right at the end of his six-month expedition to the mountains of New Guinea, where the subalpine woolly rat is native to.
It is the largest species of rat in the Australia and Oceania region, and one of the largest species in the world, alongside the Gambian pouched rat (Cricetomys gambianus), which measures 34.6 inches (88 cm) from nose to tail.
When they were first scientifically described, researchers noted that subalpine woolly rats are usually found in montane forests and grasslands between 8,040 and 12,630 feet (2,450 to 3,850 meters) above sea level, live a nocturnal lifestyle, mostly eats plant matter, and nest in burrows. These rodents have sharp incisor teeth, thick fur and huge 3-inch-long (8 cm) paws.
Little research has been done regarding this species in the decades since, due to its elusive nature and hard-to-access habitat, meaning it has never been formally observed, filmed or photographed in the wild before.
"It's astonishing that such a large and striking animal has remained so poorly studied. How much more is there to discover about the biodiversity of tropical mountains?" Vejmělka said in a statement.
On a six-month expedition to New Guinea, Vejmělka surveyed more than 60 species of rodents and marsupials on the slopes of Mount Wilhelm, the highest mountain in Papua New Guinea. With the help of local tribes, Vejmělka collected camera trap footage of the massive subalpine woolly rats and caught a few specimens, enabling him to obtain the first ever biometric measurements of the males of the species. The camera trap videos included a clip of one of the massive rats using a fallen mossy tree branch to cross a stream.
RELATED STORIES
—Rat numbers are skyrocketing across US cities — and it's only going to get worse
—Capuchins have started abducting newborn howler monkeys in bizarre, deadly fad
—Scientists solve mystery of how orange cats got their coats — and why so many are male
He also recorded data about the rats' parasites, diet and patterns of activity and movement, finding it spends its days hiding in underground burrows or tree canopies, and then climbs trees at night to feast on plant matter.
Vejmělka told Live Science that the extremely high and steep mountain ranges provide a unique ecosystem. "Their ancestors arrived from Asia to the island completely absent of any other terrestrial placental mammals (only marsupials and monotremes)," he said in an email, adding their size may be an example of insular gigantism — an evolutionary phenomenon where small animals on islands grow bigger than their mainland counterparts.
The discovery provides a glimpse into the mountains of New Guinea and the biodiversity there. "If it weren't for the indigenous hunters who accompanied me in the mountains and helped me locate the animals, I would never have been able to collect this data," said Vejmělka.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
From bees doing maths to fish driving cars: teaching animals irrelevant skills can help unlock the secrets of cognition
Scientists can get animals to do the strangest things. They've taught goldfish to drive cars, primates to perform calculations with Arabic numerals and giraffes to do statistical reasoning. But what's the point? In this episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast, biologist Scarlett Howard from Monash University in Australia – who has taught bees to tell the difference between odd and even numbers – defends the importance of these seemingly ecologically irrelevant experiments. She argues that they can help us understand the secrets of animal cognition, and even potentially unlock future technological developments for humanity too. Howard got hooked on working with bees when she realised it was possible to train individual bees using sugar water as a reward. 'We work with a single bee for hours and hours at a time and she comes back and forth from the hive to the experimental area,' she says. She began wondering what bees' cognitive boundaries were, which led to experiments exploring how bees count and tell the difference between pictures with odd and even numbers of objects. ' I wasn't doing these experiments just flippantly,' she says. 'There is a fun aspect to them, but I was also doing them because I thought they really had value to other areas of science.' Howard argues that these kinds of experiments are important for the field of neuromorphic technology, computer systems inspired by animals. Learning about cognition from animals, and particularly how they do tasks very efficiently compared to their brain size, can help to develop 'technology based on biological systems', Howard says. Read more: And she says that while these human-centric tasks may seem ecologically irrelevant to an animal's species now, we may just not know yet. 'Maybe one day we'll find out that they choose flowers or remember flowers by looking at the petal number and remembering if it's an even number, that's a good flower,' she posits. Listen to the conversation with Scarlett Howard on The Conversation Weekly podcast. This episode of The Conversation Weekly was written and produced by Katie Flood. Gemma Ware is the host and executive producer. Mixing and sound design by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl. Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here. A transcript of this episode is available on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Scarlett Howard currently has funding from the Australian Research Council and the Hermon Slade Foundation.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: 'Weird Tentacles' Or 'Horns' On Rabbit Heads Caused By Common Virus
Are rabbits spotted in the wild with "weird tentacles" or "horns" infected with a rare virus, as claimed by social media users? No, this is misleading. The rabbits have a common viral infection, papillomavirus, that causes extensive skin growth that looks like horns or tentacles. A spokesperson for the Colorado Parks & Wildlife Department told Lead Stories the "wart-like growths" on the rabbits are "not uncommon." The infection has long been known to hunters and affects wild cottontail rabbits in the Midwest and on the East Coast, according to a published scientific article. The claim appeared in a post (archived here) where it was published on on August 12, 2025 It opened: Rabbits in Colorado spotted with tentacle-like growths on their heads from rare virus This is what the post looked like on X at the time of writing: The Colorado Parks & Wildlife Department explains the infection on their website (archived here): Rabbit PapillomasRabbit papillomas are growths on the skin caused by the cottontail rabbit papillomavirus. The growths have no significant effects on wild rabbits unless they interfere with eating/drinking. Most infected cottontails can survive the viral infection, after which the growths will go away. For this reason, CPW does not recommend euthanizing rabbits with papillomas unless they are interfering with the rabbit's ability to eat and drink. Kara Van Hoose, a public information officer (archived here) with the Colorado Parks & Wildlife Department, told Lead Stories via email on August 13, 2025, that they have received about a dozen reports of rabbits in the northern Colorado area with "wart-like growths" on their face but they believe it is most likely people reporting the same rabbits and not a dozen rabbits infected. She explained that the virus is not rare: It's most likely the rabbit (or shope) papilloma virus which is not uncommon in Colorado. The virus is spread through biting insects like fleas or ticks. She said the virus cannot spread to humans or pets and warned, "As with any wildlife, pets should not interact or come in contact with the rabbits." An article published in 2024 on the National Library of Medicine website (archived here) titled, "A Century of Shope Papillomavirus in Museum Rabbit Specimens," explains the virus: Rabbit papillomatosis is a viral infection caused by Sylvilagus floridanus papillomavirus (SfPV; family Papillomaviridae). It can cause extensive skin growths in cottontail rabbits, especially around the head. Although long known to hunters, the disease was first reported in 1931 SfPV growths frequently occur on the face, head, neck, and back of Sylvilagus rabbits, but may appear anywhere (on the affected animal) and can be quite cryptic when small. Growths can be several centimeters in length. Social media posts claimed the rabbits with the virus were "invading parts of the US" without noting that the virus is common and known in the areas, like this one posted on X: And this one also posted on X: While some are calling the rabbits with the horns jackalopes, that is also not true, as jackalopes are not real. In the early 1900s two brothers were hunting Jack rabbits in Wyoming when they found one of their dead rabbits next to a pair of antlers. They taxidermied the rabbit with the antlers and the legend began, according to Live Wyld magazine (archived here). Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists discover sex reversal in Australian birds with cause unknown
A new study has found that about 5% of tested Australian birds have undergone a 'sex reversal'—meaning the birds' genetic sex did not match with their reproductive organs. 480 birds that had died after being admitted to wildlife hospitals in south-east Queensland were subjected to a DNA test and then a dissection. It was revealed that nearly all of the 24 birds that had undergone this surprising 'sex reversal' were genetically female, but had developed male reproductive organs. Although the cause of the phenomenon is still unknown, the discovery has left scientists worried about the potential impact that chemicals may be having on animals' hormones. Professor Kate Buchanan—who studies evolutionary bird biology but wasn't a part of the study—told The Guardian, 'The most likely explanation of the masculinisation is some environmental stimulation, probably anthropogenic chemicals.' Buchanan added that even if this masculinisation was reversible, 'it would probably knock them out of being reproductive.' Still, experts remain cautious of the findings since the birds were not a random sample, but had been tested after already being admitted to wildlife hospitals. Video transcript A new study has revealed that about 5% of tested Australian birds have undergone sex reversal, meaning the birds' genetic sex did not match their reproductive organs. Four hundred and eighty birds that had died after being admitted to wildlife hospitals in Southeast Queensland were subjected to a DNA test and then a dissection. It was revealed that nearly all of the 24 birds that had undergone this surprising sex reversal were genetically female but had developed male reproductive organs. Although the cause of the phenomenon is still unknown, the discovery has left scientists worried about the potential impact that chemicals may be having on animals' hormones. Professor Kate Buchanan, who studies evolutionary bird biology but wasn't a part of the study, told The Guardian the most likely explanation. of the masculinization is some environmental stimulation, probably anthropogenic chemicals. Buchanan added that even if this masculinization was reversible, it would probably still knock them out of being reproductive. Still, experts remain cautious of the findings since the birds were not a random sample, but had been tested after already being admitted to wildlife hospitals.
