DOGE nerds reveal their biggest fear after Musk and Trump's spectacular falling out
Employees of the Department of Government Efficiency are worried Elon Musk 's infamous chainsaw to government waste may come for them after his falling out with Donald Trump.
Musk and Trump's fallout dates back to the man who once wore a t-shirt proclaiming himself 'the DOGEfather' leaving the White House in late May.
The ex-'First Buddy' has spent the days since torching the relationship, everything from publicly slamming Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' to claiming the president is in The Epstein Files (which he quietly later deleted).
Trump has also knifed a key Musk ally by pulling his nomination to become NASA administrator.
That has many of those who remain at the Department of Government Efficiency worried that they may 'get DOGE'd' themselves, as group chats between employees have reportedly lit up wondering where their future in government lies.
As former DOGE software engineer Sahil Lavingia said, he and many of the people attempting to streamline the government were already allies or employees of Musk.
'I worry with Elon gone, no one will join, and it will just slowly fade away,' Lavingia told the Wall Street Journal.
Even if they remain, without Musk, the organization that claimed it has already cut $180 billion in government waste may never be the same.
'Working there felt like pushing a boulder up a mountain, and it'll just fall back down if the work doesn't continue,' Lavingia added.
For now, the Trump White House remains proud of the department's work and looks for it to continue.
'Trump's success through DOGE is undisputed, and [the president's] work will continue to yield historic results,' spokesperson Harrison Fields said.
However, sources told WSJ that many are worried that at the very least, DOGE will see massive staffing cuts without Musk's protection.
Russell Vought, the head of the Office of Management and Budget, seemed to confirm that they are now at the mercy of whomever is in charge of the department that they were hired to cut waste from.
'Cabinet agencies that are in charge of the DOGE consultants that work for them are fundamentally in control of DOGE,' he told Congress earlier this week.
The fallout between Trump and Musk - who were political allies for a little less than a year - started in recent weeks when the billionaire started resisting Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' arguing that the spending wiped out DOGE's cost-cutting efforts.
However, there were signs of the strain between the two on the day Musk left the White House, as Trump pulled the nomination for Jared Isaacman to be the new NASA administrator despite reports he was a shoe-in for confirmation.
Isaacman, 42, had his nomination pulled after a 'thorough review' of his 'prior associations,' Trump said.
He believes the nomination was withdrawn to coincide with his friend Musk parting ways with the administration and was pushed for by Sergio Gor, an anti-Musk White House official.
Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism.
From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters.
The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced the Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts.
'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.'
Musk posted to X as Trump's Q&A with reporters was ongoing. 'Whatever,' the billionaire wrote.
'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he advised.
'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk continued.
'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.'
The spat quickly turned personal with Musk then posting that Trump would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man - him.
Musk publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured around $290 million into the Republican's campaign.
The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day.
After his meeting with Merz, Trump continued to throw punches online. He asserted that he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said he was 'CRAZY!'
'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote.
It was after that post that he then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts.
Musk then taunted Trump to act. 'This just gets better and better,' he wrote. 'Go ahead, make my day …'
In a follow-up post, Musk said he would 'begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.'
Trump continued his 'crazy' remarks on Friday when speaking with CNN Anchor and Chief Political Correspondent Dana Bash.
He said: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.'
The tech billionaire also claimed Trump appeared in files relating to disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in a post on his social media platform X as the pair traded blows in a sensational public row.
Musk gave no evidence for the claim, which has since been deleted, and the White House dismissed the allegation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
32 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'
The Chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, while Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. Ms Reeves will use Wednesday's spending review to allocate tens of billions of funding for major infrastructure projects over the rest of the decade. Officials hope SMRs will be cheaper and quicker to build than traditional power plants, and projects could be connected to the grid by the mid-2030s. Ms Reeves said: 'The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow with Rolls-Royce SMR as the preferred partner for this journey.' The SMR project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear. Tuesday's announcement of Rolls-Royce as the preferred bidder came after the Government confirmed financial support for Sizewell C. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the Sizewell move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Alison Downes, of Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. She said: 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?' The Government has also promised £2.5 billion over five years for fusion energy research and £6 billion of investment for the industrial base supporting the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine fleet.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Megan ‘planning to expand brand As Ever into hotels and restaurants'
Meghan Markle 's lifestyle brand, As Ever, is reportedly planning to expand its offerings beyond jam to include hospitality services such as food, drink, and temporary accommodation, potentially including hotels and restaurants. The expansion news follows the Duchess of Sussex's announcement that As Ever will be restocking some of its popular products, which sold out quickly after the initial launch in April. Meghan teased the return of her products on Instagram, encouraging fans to sign up for the brand's mailing list for details and timing, though a specific restock date has not been revealed. In an interview with Fast Company, Meghan stated she plans to assess new avenues for her brand, focusing on the hospitality aspect and understanding customer needs seasonally, with potential future exploration into fashion. During a former podcast episode with Tina Knowles, Meghan discussed her decision to pause production after the initial products sold out in 45 minutes, questioning whether immediate replenishment would be beneficial for customers.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Exact date millions of pensioners will qualify for Winter Fuel Payment
In a huge U-turn, it was confirmed that pensioners will now receive the Winter Fuel Payment this year if they earn below £35,000 a year - we explain the full eligibility below The exact date millions of pensioners will qualify for Winter Fuel Payments later this year has been revealed. It comes after a major change to the eligibility criteria was announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves this week. Since last year, Winter Fuel Payments have only been paid to those in receipt of means-tested benefits, such as Pension Credit or Universal Credit. These payments used to be available universally to everyone over state pension age, regardless of their income or benefit entitlement. The decision to narrow the scope of Winter Fuel Payments was met with fierce criticism from MPs and charities, who warned the decision would leave many older people in poverty. But in a huge U-turn yesterday, it was confirmed that pensioners will now receive the Winter Fuel Payment this year if they earn below £35,000 a year. Labour says approximately nine million pensioners will receive Winter Fuel Payments in England and Wales this year as a result of these changes. There are different systems in Northern Ireland and Scotland. Winter Fuel Payments are worth £200 for eligible households, or £300 for eligible households with someone aged over 80. Your eligibility will be based on your age by the end of the qualifying week. The qualifying week changes every year, but for winter 2025/26, the Government has confirmed it will be September 15 to September 21, 2025. Rachel Reeves said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' If you earn above £35,000 a year, you will still get the payment - but then you will have to pay it back. HMRC will clawback the payment via PAYE, or through self-assessment return. You can choose to opt out of receiving the payment if your earnings are above £35,000, with details to be confirmed. The income eligibility is based per person - but the Winter Fuel Payment will still be issued per household. For example, if you have two people living together and one earns £30,000 a year and the other earns £40,000, one person would keep their share of the Winter Fuel Payment but the other would pay it back. Winter Fuel Payments are paid automatically, with most people normally receiving the cash into their bank accounts from November. Winter Fuel Payments are tax-free payment and do not affect any benefits you may receive.
