
Hamilton couple out $8,000 deposit after wedding venue closes
Thomas Coleman and Alina Raposo have been counting down the days until their wedding reception at The Grand Olympia for more than a year.
The Hamilton couple paid their $8,253 deposit, had a food tasting in March and hosted Raposo's bridal shower at the Stoney Creek venue in late April.
Nothing seemed amiss.
'Everything just seemed so normal,' said Coleman in an interview, adding that they chatted with the venue about plans for the reception. 'No one seemed concerned.'
Until last Friday, when Coleman and Raposo saw a post on Facebook about Orchard Park Secondary School students needing to book a new venue for their prom that night, as the parent company of The Grand Olympia, along with Michelangelo Banquet Centre, had
gone into receivership
.
Both of the banquet centres
shut down late last week
, after Ontario's Superior Court of Justice denied a request from its owners for an extension to repay debt.
Michelangelo Banquet Centre and The Grand Olympia were shuttered indefinitely after Ontario's Superior Court of Justice denied a request from its owners for an extension to repay the debt.
According to court records, the two banquet halls and their related companies are owned by a Mississauga-based family that owes more than $14 million to the Bank of Montreal, including around $8.2 million tied to Michelangelo and $6 million for Grand Olympia.
Aftab Elahi, listed as the sole officer and director of Mario's Catering Service and Grand Olympia Realco, the parent companies of the banquet halls, did not respond to an email from The Spectator on Thursday requesting comment.
Calls to both venues also went unanswered Thursday afternoon.
The ripple effect has been considerable, with the indefinite closures affecting events booked by non-profits, industry groups, high school students and soon-to-be married couples, like Coleman and Raposo, whose reception was booked for June 21.
Coleman told The Spectator he reached out to the venue on May 16, and the couple later received an email from management describing the situation as 'a period of operational transition,' adding that the venue was 'not in bankruptcy.'
The email, shared with The Spectator, noted that the company was working to 'stabilize and strengthen' its services and to restore operations, with the 'goal of resuming all events at full capacity as soon as possible.'
The couple also reached out to their event co-ordinator, and she repeated similar talking points.
Coleman said they didn't hear from the venue again until Tuesday evening, when they got an email claiming the business was 'headed in the right direction' and 'on track to be back in operations soon.'
But Coleman said that message contradicted what he'd heard from others about the situation with the venues, including when he reached out to MSI Spergel — who has been appointed as the receiver over both banquet halls.
In an email, also shared with The Spectator, MSI Spergel told Coleman on Wednesday that all events at both venues 'are cancelled' — the first notification of such, not even from the venues.
With their wedding reception just a month away, Coleman said the couple spent last weekend calling venues across Hamilton and as far away as Mississauga to try and rebook their event — and they weren't alone.
Locks were placed on the gates of Michelangelo Banquet Hall last week after its parent company was put in receivership.
'Dates for June were booking up very quickly for people who were left scrambling,' Coleman said. 'It was a lot of pressure for people not wanting to hold out too long waiting, which could have meant potentially losing out on our date that we had.'
Luckily, the couple was able to rebook their reception at Carmen's on Stone Church Road East, not far from their original venue, but still at a significant cost.
Carmen's Group CEO PJ Mercanti told The Spectator their sales and operations team was working to accommodate events, including some planned for the weekend the venues shut down.
Coleman explained that they will likely lose their $8,253 deposit paid for The Grand Olympia, and with some extra costs associated with Carmen's, the venue debacle will end up setting them back roughly $19,000.
MSI Spergel also told Coleman in an email that 'currently there is no claims process,' noting that returns of deposits will be 'dependent on the net realizations under the Receivership and subject to evaluation of all claims, including claims of secured creditors and priorities at law.'
'That's a tough thing to swallow, especially four weeks before our wedding day,' said Coleman.
But with their reception rebooked and only some administrative work to do with notifying guests and vendors, Coleman is hopeful the couple is back on the right track and can enjoy their day, despite the unexpected hurdles.
'Getting the new venue was the first kind of sigh of relief,' said Coleman. 'Obviously, there is still the financial thing, but we just have to keep pushing forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
I landed a remote job for a European company, and now I'd find it hard to go back to a US-based company — I feel spoiled by the perks
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with 34-year-old Meghan Gezo, from Michigan. The following has been edited for length and clarity. In 2022, I left my job working remotely in people operations for a US company. Juggling my job and raising my one-year-old wasn't working. I wanted to take a break while I looked for another opportunity that would allow me to have better work-life boundaries. After a few months of job hunting, I started as a people experience manager at Storyblok, a fully remote content management company based in Austria. I'd never worked for a company based in Europe before. Living in the US, most jobs that pop up are US-based. People have come to expect more work-life balance in Europe, as the employment laws differ from the US. For me, there have been perks related to my life as a parent, my working hours, and my professional growth. I was immediately drawn to the benefits of working for a European company I've been working in remote jobs for tech companies since 2016. I'd previously worked in an office, but thought a remote job meant I could focus on higher-impact work than the office administration that usually fell to HR, as well as branch out beyond the manufacturing and automotive industry jobs in my area. It was easier to find a remote job in 2022 than in 2016. I found the listing for Storyblok on a job board. The people I spoke with were genuine and direct. In the first interview, they talked about time off norms and said the standard workweek is 38.5 hours. They seemed to emphasize work-life balance and gave me concrete examples of how it worked at the company. I was optimistic I could be successful in the role while staying involved in my daughter's life. In the US, the norm on paper is a 40-hour workweek, but in practice, people often work until they finish their tasks, especially in tech. I used to work, feed my daughter, put her to bed, and then work some more. It felt normal. At my current company, you focus on work when you're at work and then log off until the next day. There have definitely been times when I've had to work extra hours, but overall, I'd say that my work-life balance is better. In the US, it can often feel that your work is your identity. My European colleagues take pride in their work and are extremely hard workers, but their job is one facet of their identity. Working for a European company has pushed me in new ways I've gained experience working with people from other cultures. Learning about Austrian law has also pushed me to expand my HR knowledge beyond US employment law. One thing I've noticed about the company culture is that when people are on vacation, they're on vacation. Meanwhile, it's more the norm in the US to answer messages on vacation. I've not completely broken this habit, but it has felt more attainable for me to delete work communication apps from my phone when I'm away. I've felt very supported in my role as a parent at my European company The Austrian norm of " care leave," which isn't a norm in the US, is a great part of working for a European company. Because I have kids under a certain age, I get to use two paid weeks off a year for days when my kids are sick and I need to take them to a doctor or take care of them. Having this bucket to pull from is a huge weight off my shoulders as a parent. My previous employers had generous parental leave policies. However, at Storyblok, I got slightly more time — 16 weeks. I went on maternity leave at a previous company with my firstborn and again at my current job in 2023. During my most recent maternity leave, people in the company treated it very seriously. I got a lot of support from my manager and team to help plan for my leave and assign my tasks to others. During my first maternity leave for a previous company, I didn't mind answering a few questions as needed to support my team, but at Storyblok, no one asked me work-related questions while I was away. There are some downsides While my working hours suit my season of life, there are days when I wish I could start later at 9 a.m. However, I don't think I'd be as effective without overlap with my European colleagues. Right now, I work 6:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. ET. Sometimes, if I have a question I want to ask colleagues in Europe during my afternoons, I'll know that I won't be getting an answer until the next day because of the time zone difference. I've learned to work these expectations into my regular workflow. It does make me sad that I don't live near my colleagues. I've built strong relationships with these people, but they're an ocean away. I'd find it hard to go back to a US-based company Working for a European company didn't occur to me as an option before I interviewed for this job. Having worked here for over two years, I feel spoiled by the benefits and perks of European working culture, and it would be hard for me to go back to working for a US-based company.


Business Upturn
6 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Populous Acquires Fentress Architects, Expanding Global Aviation Portfolio
Kansas City, Mo., United States: Populous, the world-renowned design firm specializing in sport and entertainment venues, today announced the acquisition of Denver-based Fentress Architects, a global leader in iconic aviation projects and prominent public buildings, including convention centers, museums and government facilities. This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: Los Angeles International Airport. Designed by Fentress Architects. This strategic acquisition unites two of the most respected names in architecture, combining Populous' unparalleled expertise in designing memorable experiences with Fentress' award-winning portfolio of aviation, civic and cultural landmarks. The acquisition significantly broadens the scope and scale of services that Populous can offer clients across the globe. Bruce Miller, Populous Global Chair and CEO, commented: 'We are committed to expanding the breadth of our practice. Fentress Architects has long been known for its visionary aviation and public architecture, exceptional design quality and commitment to innovation. Uniting our aviation team with Fentress to form Fentress Studios, a Populous Company, symbolizes our dedication to design quality. Adding Fentress' expertise and client base to the Populous global aviation and transportation portfolio, as well as synergies across convention center design, will enable us to transform the future of people-centric design and supercharge our global impact in those sectors.' Founded in 1980, Fentress Architects has designed more than $52 billion of architectural landmarks worldwide, including Denver International Airport, Incheon International Airport, Miami Beach Convention Center and the National Museum of the Marine Corps. The firm is known for creating architecture that is sustainable, contextual and deeply connected to the communities it serves. Curt Fentress, Founder and Principal in Charge of Design at Fentress Architects, commented: 'Populous shares our values of design excellence and people-centric thinking. Together, we will continue to redefine great architecture and its capacity to ignite social and economic change through inspired design for people.' Fentress Architects will rebrand as Fentress Studios, a Populous Company, with the studios continuing to be based in Denver and Washington D.C. The acquisition further propels Populous' capabilities in aviation, transportation and public sector design. About Populous Populous is a global design firm that began with a singular focus — to draw people together around the things they love, through experiences that capture all the senses and amplify the pure emotion shared in human moments. Over the last 40+ years, the firm has designed more than 3,500 projects worth over $60 billion across emerging and established markets. Populous' comprehensive services include architecture, interior design, event planning and overlay, branded environments, wayfinding, and graphics, planning and urban design, landscape architecture, aviation and transport design, hospitality and sustainable design consulting. Populous has over 1,500 employees in 32 global offices on four continents with regional centers in Kansas City, London and Brisbane. For more information, visit About Fentress Architects Fentress Architects is an international design firm that passionately pursues the creation of innovative, sustainable, and iconic architecture. The firm's work includes landmarks such as the Tom Bradley International Terminal at LAX, the Ralph L. Carr Colorado Supreme Courts, and the Royal Norwegian Embassy. View source version on Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Business Wire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.


CNBC
6 hours ago
- CNBC
U.S. judge approves settlement allowing NCAA schools to pay athletes
A U.S. judge on Friday granted final approval to a $2.8 billion settlement with the National Collegiate Athletic Association that will allow schools for the first time to compensate student athletes for past and future commercial use of their names, images and likenesses. The settlement, approved in a ruling by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in the Oakland, California, federal court, resolves long-running litigation between the NCAA and student athletes. "Despite some compromises, the settlement agreement nevertheless will result in extraordinary relief for members of the settlement classes," Wilken wrote. She said the deal will "permit levels and types of student-athlete compensation that have never been permitted in the history of college sports." The ruling marked a "historic day for college sports and the rights of athletes," the lead attorneys for the plaintiffs, Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler, said in a statement. In a statement, NCAA President Charlie Baker welcomed the judge's ruling. "Student-athletes will benefit from the rich opportunities they enjoy now, plus far more scholarship opportunities, landmark financial benefits and a streamlined NCAA to support them," Baker said. The NCAA denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. The deal faced dozens of objections that it didn't adequately compensate athletes or was unfair in other ways. Objectors to the deal now can appeal to the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The settlement, covering hundreds of thousands of current and former students since 2016, resolved three lawsuits that claimed NCAA rules barring payments to athletes violated U.S. antitrust law. The $2.8 billion will cover past damages. The plaintiffs' lawyers previously estimated the deal would provide tens of billions of dollars to class members over the next 10 years. Schools will be allowed to pay athletes from funds that universities receive from broadcasts and other commercial sources. The NCAA in April convinced a federal judge in Manhattan to dismiss a lawsuit seeking compensation for thousands of former student-athletes who played team sports in college prior to 2016. Those students have filed an appeal.