LNG imports force closure of local gas fields
A parliamentary panel was informed on Monday that local gas fields were being shut down owing to continuous import of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar.
The Senate Standing Committee on Petroleum, chaired by Senator Umer Farooq, met at the Parliament House, where it received a briefing on the curtailment of gas supply from local fields.
It was highlighted that gas fields were being closed in the wake of an agreement with Qatar, under which 10 LNG cargoes were arriving each month.
The discussion also underscored the critical condition of pipelines, which were under immense pressure and at risk of bursting along with the lack of adequate storage facilities.
Following the exchange of views, Senator Umer Farooq emphasised the need for a detailed review of drilling operations and associated costs on a daily basis.
He recommended a comprehensive report on gas extraction and development work in different areas, the number of drilling operations conducted and the time frame for each of them. He also requested details of utilisation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) budget allocations and operational costs exceeding budgeted amounts.
In reference to the recommendations made on August 27, 2024, Senator Farooq aired concern over the long-delayed Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project. While many goods continued to arrive from Iran without facing sanctions, development projects were subjected to restrictions, he noted.
Committee members expressed concern over the lack of clarity about the board of directors of petroleum companies. They recommended seeking guidelines from the Ministry of Finance on the matter as well as on the appointment of managing directors.
Senator Farooq also expressed his dismay over the absence of competent candidates for key positions and suggested that advertisements for such posts should be shared with the standing committee. The panel chairman directed officials to report back with a progress timeline. He also called for inviting representatives of the Ministry of Finance to get further clarity on the issue.
Committee members voiced concern over the failure of Oil and Gas Development Company Limited's (OGDCL) cell to issue production bonus and the violation of Supreme Court ruling.
It was informed that OGDCL was not obligated to pay the production bonus but committee members noted that though the matter had been addressed by the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Petroleum had yet to review the court's judgement. Additional secretary of the Petroleum Division assured the committee that court orders would be reviewed and a way forward would be charted accordingly.
The Senate panel was also briefed on financial and administrative irregularities, including details of inquiries conducted over the past three years. It was reported that the stealing of pipeline material at the Central Base Store in Manga by company officials resulted in a loss of nearly Rs380 million.
Similarly, the committee was informed about the Bannu West project, where the stolen civil material caused an estimated loss of Rs5 million. Additionally, the theft of industrial material scrap at CMS Lahore and the recovery of around Rs28 million were also reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JCP to review tenure of constitutional benches
A crucial meeting of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), chaired by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, will be held on June 19 in the Supreme Court building. The meeting will discuss extending the tenure of constitutional benches. The matter was last addressed in the commission's session on December 21, 2024, where a majority approved a six-month extension for the nominated judges of the Supreme Court's constitutional benches. At present, 15 judges have been working for the constitutional benches. Among them, a committee led by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazahar selects judges for the particular constitutional benches. Extension of constitutional benches has been proposed for the second time. The federal government on December 21 managed to get its way at the JCP which had rejected a suggestion to nominate all Supreme Court judges to its Constitutional Bench (CB) by a majority vote of 7 to 6. Except Justice Aminuddin, all JCP's judicial members namely CJP Yahya Afridi, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail had voted for all the Supreme Court judges to be part of the CB. Two PTI members Barrister Gahar Ali Khan and Barrister Ali Zafar supported their view. However, the government as well as the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) representatives in JCP did not support their suggestion. The judicial members had faced embarrassment, when their own fellow judge, Justice Aminuddin Khan, did not support their suggestion. The JCP by majority 7 to 6 endorsed the extension of the CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan for six months. Once again it is being expected that the government will be successful to get majority votes for the extension of present CB, which performance is under question. There is no objective criteria for the selection of judges for CB. Performance of CB The present CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan has been able to issue only three reported judgement since it's creation through 26th constitutional amendment. The CB had issued first reported judgement in January. This two-page decision was related to the jurisdiction of CB itself. The order had held that regular benches could not hear matters related to the interpretation of law and constitution. Secondly, reported short order has been passed in military courts case. Likewise, another reported judgement was authored by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail. Lawyers are wondering as who will judge the performance of the constitutional bench. They are also raising question that why Justice Mandokhail is not being given independent CB. A lawyer says that the CB started by spending two months studiously avoiding the 26th Amendment case in favour of hearing cases of no importance which had already become infructuous. "It followed that by spending four months almost exclusively on the military courts case before passing a verdict which must surely have pleased the establishment. The only other order of note it passed in that period was to ensure that no regular bench of the Supreme Court could hear any case of importance. "Next, it took up the reserved seats review case in which most of the original judges were excluded and the few who were included seemed to have suddenly, and inexplicably, become of the opposite view from day one", says the lawyer. He said that when the idea of a CB elected by politicians was first floated; many said such a bench was fundamentally against the idea of judicial independence and predicted it would reduce the credibility of the SC to nothing. Nonetheless, judges in Pakistan have sometimes defied predictions. 'Unfortunately, the CB's performance thus far has proved this is not one of those times.' He also said that the stated rationale of the CB at the time of the 26th Amendment was to improve the constitutional jurisprudence of the SC. In its first six months, the number of detailed judgments it has issued can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And all of them have tended to take out jurisprudence backwards and closer to the desires of the establishment,' he adds.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers
ISLAMABAD: The government, through the Finance Bill 2025-26, has proposed to grant extensive discretionary powers to tax officers and Commissioners to restrict the operations of bank accounts or transfer of immovable property for any individual who fails to register under the Federal Sales Tax Act. Arshad Shehzad, advocate of the Supreme Court, explained that the Finance Bill 2025-2026 intends to add new Sections 14AC, 14AD, and 14AE to the Act in order to promote sales tax registration and enhance economic documentation. According to the explanatory notes from the board, these provisions aim to strengthen enforcement measures, including restrictions on bank account operations, the transfer of immovable property, sealing of business premises, property seizure, and the appointment of a receiver to compel compliance from unregistered individuals. While this initiative appears to be directed at strengthening enforcement, it also bestows excessive discretionary powers upon tax officers. Shehzad argues that a comprehensive mechanism already exists under the law for compulsory registration, penal actions, and the recovery of sales tax, including default surcharges, penalties, and other consequences for non-registration. These additional measures would only grant more discretionary authority to tax officials and may lead to unnecessary conflicts. Shehzad emphasises that the implementation and enforcement of existing laws are far more important than introducing harsh, coercive measures repeatedly. Shehzad suggests that the government should focus on building confidence within the business community, utilising the database of unregistered individuals in a pragmatic manner to integrate new taxpayers into the tax system without creating an atmosphere of harassment. Any measure that create a negative perception among businesses could hinder growth and lead to capital flight; therefore, all such measures that threaten the confidence of businesses and trade should be avoided, he concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Sister challenges Mahrang's detention in apex court
A sister of Baloch rights activist Dr Mahrang Baloch has approached the Supreme Court against an order of the Balochistan High Court (BHC) in her sister's detention case. A division bench of the BHC on April 15 dismissed Dr Mahrang's petition against her detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance, 1960, stating that an alternative remedy was available to the activist in the shape of a representation. The bench had also converted the petition into a representation and directed its office to present it before the competent authority constituted for the purpose of deciding representations under the MPO. The petitioner, Nadia Baloch, contended that the BHC erred in holding that a petition could be filed before a court only after exhausting the option of filing a representation. The petition argued that the high court in its writ jurisdiction is competent to intervene and directly grant relief to a petitioner by determining the legality of an MPO order without the need of the detained person making a representation. It said that the BHC did not consider Dr Mahrang's right to file habeas corpus petition. "[This is her] high prerogative right and a constitutional remedy for all matters if illegal confinement," the petition said.
