‘For solo use': Outrage over fine print in landlord's listing for two-bed apartment in Nelson Bay
A would-be landlord has been slammed on social media for trying to take advantage of a tight rental market by offering up their holiday home with a major twist.
The female landlord is currently seeking a tenant for a 'fabulous' two-bedroom, two bathroom apartment in Nelson Bay for $380 per week.
While renters get a stunning ocean view, they would only be allowed to stay in the place for around 85 per cent of the time – with the landlord returning when she wanted a break from Sydney.
'You will be expected to vacate the property so the owner can use the apartment for her sole use about 15 per cent of the time, about 30 days over six months, mainly Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights,' the listing states.
The advertisement on Flatmates.com.au goes on to say the place available for the 'right person' with the potential landlord expecting the apartment to be left in a 'great to come home condition'.
The clause has provoked outrage over social media, with one person taking to Reddit to share an insight into the local offering.
'Apparently the last tenant was a single mum. The owner would ring her mid week and tell her she had to be out the next day for 4 days at a time,' the post continued.
Another wrote: 'Cool, I'll happily pay 85 per cent of the rent too then.'
A third questioned where tenants who took up the offer were supposed to live when ordered out.
'It was like $350 a week for only 4 days of it. No idea where they expect you to disappear off to every weekend,' the user wrote.
The $380-a-week rent does not cover bills, with any potential tenant asked to sign on for a minimum three month stay.
Despite coming with unusual terms and conditions, another renter said the landlord would likely find a tenant.
'Accommodation is stupidly scarce at the bay. I've no doubt this person will get someone to agree to this,' another Reddit poster said.
'It's really gotten way too out of hand.'
According to the latest figures from the Real Estate Institute of NSW (REINSW) the state continues to show residential rental availability remain at a 'crisis level'.
The research said rental market conditions remained dire in March, with REINSW chief executive, Tim McKibbin, stating that vacancy rates continue to 'hover at historically low levels'.
'Month after month, the story remains the same – rental availability is at crisis levels, stock is diminishing, and rents are increasing,' Mr McKibbin said.
In regional NSW, the REINSW's findings indicated that vacancy rates decreased in many areas over the past month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Online site gouging home sellers
Isabella Higgins: Buying a home in Australia is expensive, but selling a home is also getting more expensive. Australia's consumer watchdog is probing the digital real estate giant REA Group over price-gouging concerns on listing prices. The group is responsible for the popular website, with the watchdog saying this investigation comes after years of complaints. Nassim Khadem reports. Nassim Khadem: It now costs more to advertise a home for sale in Australia than almost anywhere else in the world. Consumer Pam Tindill sold her home in May. She discovered one major player, 32 billion dollar publicly listed REA Group, reaps most of the online advertising fees. Pam Tindill: We were quite surprised on how it was. We had no choice really to pay the price, no negotiating. And it's all dominated by one company. Nassim Khadem: According to REA Group's own figures, the site attracts more than 133 million average visits each month, almost four times more than rival domain. Tim McKibbin is the CEO of the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales. He says REA Group are very close to having a monopoly. Tim McKibbin: As REA became more and more dominant in the market, they've been able to ratchet their fees up. So in some cases you can be paying three or four thousand dollars or more for your classified ad. Nassim Khadem: Aaron Scott runs Bright Agent, an online portal that connects buyers with agents. He says REA's listing fees go up every year and are based on the suburb a property is sold in. Aaron Scott: Well essentially what you're seeing is a postcode tax. So are effectively saying if you're from a more affluent area, you have to pay more to list your property on their portal to get the right amount of visibility. Nassim Khadem: On top of the cost to list on the portal, REA Group charges real estate agents subscription fees that are also often passed on to the consumer. Agents like Jo Mooney, who sells homes in Melbourne's North East, doesn't feel agents and consumers are getting a fair go. Her subscription fee, which allows her to place a certain number of properties on the portal each month, is rising by 34% on July 1. Jo Mooney: It doesn't cost any more money for them to host the ad. It's cyberspace. It's a cloud. Nassim Khadem: An REA spokesman told ABC News listing a property online is not free. He said the company's pricing reflects a small percentage of the property sale and the average increase for listings this year is 7%. On subscription fees charged to agents, he said this is the first time they've changed in over a decade because of big investments to enhance the service. Tim McKibben says agents worry REA could use the wealth of data gathered about consumer habits to start charging them for leads. His fear is that agents could be wiped out altogether, although REA says that's not their strategy. Tim McKibbin: The industry remains concerned that that is their logical trajectory. And we do know that's possible because in the United States, there is one of the portals over there has done just that. Nassim Khadem: It could take up to a year before the ACCC hands down its findings. Isabella Higgins: Nassim Khadem reporting.
ABC News
29-05-2025
- ABC News
ACCC announces investigation into REA Group
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has announced it is in the early stages of an investigation into REA Group, the 33 billion-dollar operator of over concerns about competition in the real estate industry. The investigation comes as the News Corp-controlled real estate advertising service has told customers it would increase subscription prices for real estate agents by as much as 78 per cent from July 1. Guest: Tim McKibbin, chief executive of the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales Producer: Grace Stranger The REA Group released the following statement: "REA is committed to providing choice, value and flexibility to its customers and consumers, and remains focussed on delivering products and services that improve the property experience of buyers, sellers and renters. "REA is cooperating fully with the ACCC and is unable to comment further for confidentiality reasons."
News.com.au
28-05-2025
- News.com.au
Secret tactics of dodgy agents exposed
Secret tactics used by unscrupulous agents to drive up home prices have been exposed by Aussie homebuyers who are now warning others how to spot it. As housing affordability falls to record lows across the country, home buyers and former agents have begun sharing tips for how to tackle agents who resort to deceptive tactics to force more money out of buyers – a major issue given surging prices now have many already bidding at their borrowing peak at auctions. The Australian property community exploded with advice and shared experiences after a Redditor asked 'post auction, am I being played' over a real estate agent continually coming back for more, claiming there was a second party gunning for a house. 'Went to an auction, there was just me and a buyers' agent bidding. Buyers agent's last bid was $1.4m, mine $1.45m. Property passed in. Went to negotiations, vendor wanted $1.56m. Bid against myself and offered $1.48m. No deal, walked away. Buyers' agent had left.' 'Phone call 3 hours later, buyers' agent had offered $1.50m. Asked if we would submit a better offer. Submitted $1.51m. Agent sent through contract for signature. Signed offer. Received a call the next day, buyers' agent has submitted a higher offer. Said they won't reveal offer, and want my best and final offer. I think I am being played.' Culture Kings founders' bold $30m push The feedback was fast and furious, with many urging the buyer to walk away or even drop their offer back to the original auction top market price. One user said 'the seller wanted the highest price the market would pay. That's why it went to auction and that was demonstrated – market price: $1.45m. After that the b*llshit started because they don't agree with the market price.' Several former real estate agents chimed in, one confirming the tactic, saying 'when I worked in real estate we would do this quite often and it was all legitimate, reason being to stop the back and forward especially post auction and to get a deal done (mostly at vendors request)'. Another said 'having been on the selling side, this is exactly what a 'good' selling agent does to squeeze every dollar out of you.' The ex-agent's suggestion was 'go back with a LOWER offer, as the owner is often desperate to sell. You have power with your offer'. Zac Efron's Aussie long lunch haunt is on the market Among the experiences shared was one saying 'house was up for $399k, my offer was in at 375k before the open home, they apparently got another offer and the agent kept giving me the FOMO treatment to get me to offer more, and said they had another offer. I said I will only go up to 380k, that's it. Still tried pressing me for more and I got annoyed and said 'if I lose it, I lose it'. Call came in next day and my offer was accepted by the owners'. Another said 'agent called for 2 days straight talking about another buyer and hubby said a number 40k over what we had offered and agent says yep $1000 more than that amount and it's yours. We said no, house sat for another 6 weeks and ended up going for 25k under our offer'. 'Same thing happened to us,' said another, 'property range around 1-1.25 mil, we offered 1.25 because we wanted a quick sale and ready to move in. Agent played around and said owner wanted more than 1.25 mil … We walked away … That property ended up selling for 1.105 mil. Sometimes agent and seller just have to learn to say yes to a good deal and not trying to push for an extra 5k or 10k'. Artist builds Aus first aircrete dome home Another said 'I told the agent that my final bid was x amount (the amount I'd already offered), and they could accept it by the end of the day, or I would pull out. By the end of the day I was signing contracts. So it turns out that there likely was no other party'. A last minute tactic was also exposed by another Redditor: 'we were all good to proceed with signing the contract, confirmed this with the agent … Then 10 minutes later the agent called, sounding all sad, saying that there had been another offer that had come in late that was substantially higher than ours and that he was legally obligated to present that offer to the seller etc etc. Pushed for us to offer more in response.' 'We told him to do what he had to do and left it at that. Another 15 minutes later the agent called again, sounding rather sheepish saying that the other buyer was not serious and that the house was ours … It really soured us on the agent who otherwise had seemed like a genuine (for an agent) straightshooter. He just carried on like that whole event never happened.' After the flood of advice, the original poster told the community 'this morning I sent off an email and have withdrawn our offer. So if they don't have the other offer, they have nothing. We are happy to walk. It's not our perfect place and if it does go, we are happy to let it go above our offer'. This was followed by an update: 'Got an email just then. Apparently the other buyer has pulled out. Hahahahahahahaha.' Among the tips from those suggesting buyers walk away was one Redditor saying 'make sure you rescind your offer in writing' while another said 'if passes in at an auction, give an offer, but say it is withdrawn in 3-4 hours if I don't see a signed contract. I have done it and been successful thrice. Agent typically wants to sell and move on'. Another said 'as a rule of thumb, don't make an offer before an auction, that's when they play you against an imaginary buyers' agent'. 'Typically if there are no other real buyers, they will advertise a firm price on the Monday (after the auction). If they put up a range, walk away. Ideally you want to close it before 6pm Sunday or walk away otherwise they Dutch auction your offer'.
