logo
Government to extend validity of infra projects cleared under IPZ notification

Government to extend validity of infra projects cleared under IPZ notification

Hindustan Times11-07-2025
The Union environment ministry has issued a notification to extend the validity of infrastructure projects cleared under the Islands Protection Zone (IPZ) notification 2011 that applies to areas in the Andaman and Nicobar islands as well as Lakshadweep, while also making way for splitting or transfer of IPZ clearances among entities. The Radhanagar Beach on the Andaman Islands.(Unsplash)
The notification issued on July 4 states that the clearance accorded to projects under this notification will be valid for 10 years. The period may be extended by a maximum period of a year, if an application is made during the validity of the clearance along with the recommendation of the Coastal Zone Management Authority concerned. The notification states that the objective of the amendment is to make the validity of make the validity of IPZ clearances in IPZ 2011 uniform with provisions of the environment impact assessment notification 2006 that is implemented across the country.
'Certain provision related to validity of clearance in the IPZ Notification, 2011 and its amendment therein is not in conformity with EIA Notification 2006 and the Central Government is of the opinion that it is imperative to amend the IPZ Notification, 2011 to make it in consonance with EIA Notification 2006 as amended,' the notification states.
Where the application for extension of the period of validity of clearance is filed within 30 days after expiry, the delay may be condoned by the head of the division concerned in the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change or the member-secretary of the Coastal Zone Management Authority. If such an application is made 30 days after expiry of the period of such validity but within 90 days after expiry, the delay may be condoned by the Union environment minister or the chairperson of the Coastal Zone Management Authority.
The amendment also makes a provision for transfer or splitting of IPZ clearances. An IPZ clearance granted for a specific project or activity to an applicant may be transferred during its validity to another legal person entitled to undertake the project or activity on application by the transferor on the same terms and conditions under which the clearance was initially granted and for the same period of validity.
A clearance granted for a specific project may be split between two or more legal persons entitled to undertake the project and transferred during the validity to another legal person. The IPZ notification divides the islands into Island Coastal Regional Zone (ICRZ-I) areas that are environmentally most critical; the ICRZ-II constituting the developed land areas up to or close to the shoreline, within the existing municipal limits or in other existing legally designated urban areas; ICRZ-III land areas that are relatively undisturbed; and ICRZ water areas. In general, setting up of new industries and expansion of existing industries, operations or processes is prohibited in these areas due to the ecological sensitivity of these islands but it is allowed in exceptional circumstances for certain categories of industries under IPZ.
By amendments made in 2019 to the 2011 IPZ notification, the clearances accorded were valid for 7 years, provided that the construction activities are completed and the operations commence within seven years from the date of issue of such clearance. The validity may be further extended for a maximum period of three years, provided an application is made to the authority concerned by the applicant within the validity period.
The latest notification changes this clause and introduces provisions of splitting or transfer of environmental clearances to infrastructure projects coming up on the islands.
The notification adds that the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 provide that whenever it appears to the central government that it is in public interest to do so, it may dispense with the requirement of notice and, hence, there is no provision for sending objections/suggestions to the amendments made.
HT has reported that several infrastructure and tourism projects are coming up in Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep. The Great Nicobar Holistic Development Project has four major components: an International Container Transshipment Terminal (ICCT); an international airport; a power plant; and a township. There is also a Trunk Infrastructure Road that will cut through Great Nicobar Island. The total cost is estimated at ₹81,800 crore. The Nicobar Islands fall in the Sundaland Biodiversity Hotspot and cover the western half of the Indonesian archipelago.
'Public participation in environmental decision-making enhances the legitimacy of governmental actions and supports better, more informed choices. Recognizing this, the Ministry of Law & Justice introduced the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy, 2014, recommending that all departments place draft subordinate legislations in the public domain for consultation. The policy advises a minimum of thirty days for public feedback and requires an explanatory note to accompany each draft to improve accessibility and understanding.Therefore, any proposed amendment of this nature—particularly when it is technical and has far-reaching ecological and public implications—must undergo a process of public consultation,' said Debadityo Sinha, lead of the climate and ecosystems team at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Environment ministry notifies rules for management of contaminated sites
Environment ministry notifies rules for management of contaminated sites

Hindustan Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Environment ministry notifies rules for management of contaminated sites

NEW DELHI: The Union environment ministry has notified the Environment Protection (Management of Contaminated Sites) Rules, 2025 for remediation of contaminated sites by those responsible for contamination These rules are important in light of incidents such as the Baghjan oil field blowout in Assam in 2020 The rules also provide for voluntary remediation of sites that are not already identified as contaminated. The local body or district administration, on its own or on receipt of a complaint from the public, shall identify an area affected with contaminants and list all such areas as suspected contaminated sites in its jurisdiction on a centralised online portal, according to the rules. The notification names 189 contaminants and their response level for agricultural, residential, commercial and industrial areas. A senior official said the rules will not apply to radioactive waste as defined under clause (xxii) of rule 2 of the Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal of Radioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987 or mining operations as defined under clause (d) of section 3 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 among others. But, if the contamination of a site is due to a contaminant mixed with radioactive waste or mining operations or oil spill or solid waste from a dump site, and if the contamination of the site due to the contaminant exceeds the limit of response level specified in these rules, then remediation of the site would be covered under these rules. The rules cover various halogenated aromatic compounds, pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, organofluorine compounds, and some metals, among others. These rules are important in light of incidents such as the Baghjan oil field blowout in Assam in 2020, near the Maguri-Motapung Wetland and the Dibru-Saikhowa National Park, which impacted the ecosystems in the area. The local body or District Administration shall furnish the state board with a list of suspected contaminated sites on a half-yearly basis. Upon receipt of a list of suspected contaminated sites, the state board, either on its own or through a reference organisation, undertakes a preliminary site assessment of the suspected contaminated site by sampling and analysis within ninety days from the date of receipt of such a list. The state board shall then furnish a list of probable contaminated sites and investigated sites to the Central Board on the centralised online portal within thirty days from the date of completion of the preliminary site assessment. The state board shall issue a public notice restricting or prohibiting any activity during the preliminary or detailed assessment of the suspected or probable contaminated site, taking into account the risks involved to human health and the environment. It shall publish the list of contaminated sites on the centralised online portal, inviting comments and suggestions from the stakeholders likely to be affected, within sixty days of such publication. It is the state board's responsibility to identify, following an inquiry, the person responsible for causing the site contamination within a period of ninety days. In case the contaminated site has been transferred by the person (transferor) causing the contamination to another person (transferee), the state board shall determine the transferee as the responsible person. Where the responsible person is identified, the state board shall direct the responsible person to prepare a remediation plan and undertake remediation through a reference organisation as selected by the state board and bear all the expenses towards it. The state board shall review and approve the remediation plan submitted by the responsible person within three months from the date of submission of remediation plan, and forward it to the Central Board. However, where the responsible person is not identified, the state board shall, on its own or through the reference organisation, prepare a remediation plan within six months from the date of publication of the contaminated site, for undertaking remediation of the contaminated site either out of its own resources or through support from State Government or both and resources of Central Government. The central board may appoint any reference organisation to verify the completion of remediation activities. In all cases, funds for conducting preliminary assessment and detailed assessment for suspected contaminated site and probable contaminated site, respectively, may, to the extent feasible, be initially met in whole or part by the Central Government from the Environmental Relief Fund under sub-section (9) of section 7 of the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and also by the State Government. Further, the central government shall constitute the Central Remediation Committee to review the remediation activities under these rules. The committee will consist of chairman, Central Board; a representative from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry; the Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers; the Ministry of Science and Technology; the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; two technical experts from the field of environment, geotechnical and industrial waste management to be nominated by the Central Government among others. The state board may impose environmental compensation on any responsible person who does not comply with the provisions of these rules in undertaking the remediation or does not undertake the remediation under these rules in respect of a contaminated site and poses risks to human life and the environment, contributing thereby to loss, damage or injury tothe environment or human health. 'The Rules address a long-pending legal vacuum around the remediation of legacy pollution sires, but they place disproportionate operational and oversight burden on the State and Central Pollution Control Boards, which are already constrained by limited capacity. The composition of the Remediation Committees is also skewed toward industrial, urban development, and chemical sector ministries, with little to no representation from the Ministries such as Agriculture, Jal Shakti, or Environment which are important trustee of the soil and water. Furthermore, the absence of independent ecologists, public health experts, and social science raises concerns about balanced decision-making. There should also be a third-party audit or an independent verification mechanism in the remediation or monitoring phases for proper monitoring,' said Debadityo Sinha, Lead- Climate & Ecosystems, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.

NTA declares SWAYAM January 2025 semester exam result held in hybrid mode
NTA declares SWAYAM January 2025 semester exam result held in hybrid mode

Indian Express

time2 days ago

  • Indian Express

NTA declares SWAYAM January 2025 semester exam result held in hybrid mode

SWAYAM January 2025 Result: The NTA on July 25 announced the Study Webs of Active Learning for Young Aspiring Minds (SWAYAM) January 2025 semester exam results. The SWAYAM January 2025 result of the exams held in hybrid mode can be checked and downloaded from the NTA website – As per NTA data, the hybrid-mode exams covered 65 courses, with 2,226 candidates registered and 1,864 candidates appearing for the exams. The announcement follows an earlier declaration on June 27, 2025, regarding results for 524 computer-based test (CBT) courses. Step 1: Go to the official website of NTA SWAYAM January 2025 exam — Step 2: Click on the download SWAYAM scorecard tab Step 3: Enter your login credentials like the NTA SWAYAM application number or email ID and password Step 4: The SWAYAM January 2025 hybrid exam result will be displayed on the screen Step 5: Save the result for future use Candidates can log into the NTA website using their application number or email ID to view, download and print their SWAYAM score cards. The final score card and certificates will be issued by the concerned national co-ordinators, NTA added. NTA has also provided a helpline number and an email ID so that candidates can contact in case queries arise and clarifications are needed. These are 011-40759000 and swayam@ Meanwhile, a parliamentary panel in February pointed out that less than four per cent of students enrolled for SWAYAM courses have completed the programme since 2017, with complaints including outdated content, inflexible teaching, and poor infrastructure. The committe, headed by Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh, also noted that digital initiatives in education would only provide lukewarm response in terms of engagement unless the Union education ministry proactively assisted in placements, wherever possible, or established a platform associated with SWAYAM for connecting recruiters to students. The SWAYAM platform facilitates hosting of courses, taught in classrooms from Class 9 till postgraduation, to be accessed by anyone, anywhere at any time. All the courses are interactive and available free of cost to learners.

Gujarat leads in mangrove cultivation under Mishti scheme
Gujarat leads in mangrove cultivation under Mishti scheme

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Gujarat leads in mangrove cultivation under Mishti scheme

Gandhinagar: The state govt said on Friday that Gujarat leads the country in mangrove cultivation under the Mangrove Initiative for Shoreline Habitats and Tangible Incomes (Mishti) scheme of the Union govt with 19,520 hectares of cultivation. The govt added that Gujarat ranks second among all states for mangrove cover. July 26 is observed as International Mangrove Conservation Day. "Gujarat has achieved the top position in the country by cultivating mangroves over 19,520 hectares as part of the Mishti scheme, with 6,000 hectares planted in Kutch district alone," an official statement said. Gujarat's mangrove cover expanded from 397 sq km in 1991 to 1,175 sq km in 2021, reflecting the state's dedicated efforts to protect and restore its vital marine ecosystem, the statement added. The state ranks second behind West Bengal in area under mangroves. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad Quoting the 2023 Forest Survey of India (FSI) report, the govt said that Gujarat's mangrove area saw a notable increase of 241.29 sq km. Mangrove trees play a role in preventing coastal erosion, promoting biodiversity, and providing protection against natural disasters. Gujarat's mangrove cover is distributed across four major regions of the state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Walgreens Hides This Cheap 87¢ Generic Cialis Health Alliance by Friday Plans Learn More Undo Kutch district leads with 799 sq km of mangrove cover, comprising the majority of the state's mangrove area. The Gulf of Kutch, including Marine National Park and Sanctuary, covers 236 sq km of mangrove cover, encompassing areas like Jamnagar, Rajkot (Morbi), Porbandar, and Devbhumi Dwarka. The central and southern Gujarat region, including the Gulf of Khambhat and Dumas-Ubhraat areas, covers 134 sq km of mangrove cover, including districts like Bhavnagar, Ahmedabad, Anand, Bharuch, Surat, Navsari, and Valsad. Additionally, the Saurashtra region, covering districts like Amreli, Junagadh, and Gir-Somnath, has a mangrove cover of 6 sq km.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store