Environmentalists to challenge Eskom's nuclear plans amid concerns over outdated studies
Image: Dean Hutton/Bloomberg
Environmentalists and civil society advocates are gearing up for a critical meeting to address the government's contentious decision to uphold Eskom's 2017 Environmental Authorisation for a new 4 000MW nuclear power station in Duynefontein.
The decision has sparked intense criticism, particularly due to reliance on outdated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies, which raised alarms about the risks posed by high seismic activity and dense human populations in the area.
The green light for the nuclear project comes after environmentalists, led by groups such as the Koeberg Alert Alliance (KAA), filed appeals against the initial authorisation, arguing that recent developments since 2007 necessitate a reassessment.
However, Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Dr Dion George, on Friday upheld the decision granting Eskom environmental authorisation to build and operate the nuclear power station just south-east of Koeberg Nuclear Power Station in the Western Cape.
"The granting of an environmental authorisation does not exempt an applicant from complying with any other applicable legal requirements or obtaining permits from other competent authorities," George said.
In reaction to this announcement, KAA spokesperson Peter Becker described teh decision as a surprise, adding that civil society will be meeting to discuss the options.
Becker said as the EIA process was started in 2007, and so much has changed since then, including population density, and the cost of alternatives, thus it was not rational to ignore these changes in the environment of the proposed plant and to base such a crucial decision on thoroughly outdated studies.
"It is of note that the EIA consultants found that Duynefontein (Koeberg) was not the best site for a new plant, due to seismic risks and population density in the area," Becker said.
'It appears the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment has been pressured to override the consultants' view due to economic factors. It is of course far cheaper to build a new plant where there is already existing infrastructure."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Meanwhile, George argued that the government had carefully reviewed the EIA report, as well as the independent peer review conducted in respect of the project.
He said the decision to dismiss the appeals and uphold the environmental authorisation did not automatically grant Eskom permission to begin with the construction or operation of the nuclear power station.
He directed that Eskom still had to seek a Nuclear Installation Licence from the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR), approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa), water-use licences from the Department of Water and Sanitation, and any other relevant approvals, including those from the Minister of Minerals and Petroleum Resources.
Becker said given that this EIA process has taken 18 years to complete, it seems unlikely that Eskom will consider any other site as it would have to restart a new EIA.
"Nuclear power is already the most expensive technology for producing electricity so Eskom will try to avoid any additional costs, such as a new EIA." Becker said.
The Duynefontein site forms part of an ambitious government plan to double South Africa's electricity generation capacity by 2025, aiming to add 20GW of nuclear capacity to reduce reliance on coal and bolster energy security.
The project, originally slated for completion with units commissioned as early as 2016, has faced numerous delays and a barrage of criticism from environmental groups.
The Department of Environmental Affairs issued environmental authorisation for the 4 000MW Duynefontein nuclear power station on 13 October 2017 but the decision faced backlash from environmentalist groups like Greenpeace Africa, who openly criticised the authorisation.
They raised concerns over affordability, safety, and the timing of South Africa's Integrated Resource Plan.
'Greenpeace is strongly opposed to authorising a 4 000MW nuclear power station at Duynefontein,' said Greenpeace Africa senior climate and energy campaigner, Melita Steele.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Nvidia to pay US 15% of AI chip sales to China: reports
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Wednesday and agreed to give the federal government the cut from its revenues, a highly unusual arrangement in the international tech trade, according to reports in the Financial Times, Bloomberg and New York Times. Image: Li Hongbo / CFoto via AFP US semiconductor giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices have agreed to pay the United States government 15 percent of their revenue from selling artificial intelligence chips to China, according to media reports Sunday. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Wednesday and agreed to give the federal government the cut from its revenues, a highly unusual arrangement in the international tech trade, according to reports in the Financial Times, Bloomberg and New York Times. AFP was not able to immediately verify the reports. Investors are betting that AI will transform the global economy, and last month Nvidia -- the world's leading semiconductor producer -- became the first company ever to hit $4 trillion in market value. The California-based firm has, however, become entangled in trade tensions between China and the United States, which are waging a heated battle for dominance to produce the chips that power AI. The US has been restricting which chips Nvidia can export to China on national security grounds. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Nvidia said last month that Washington had pledged to let the company sell its "H20" chips to China, which are a less powerful version the tech giant specifically developed for the Chinese market. The Trump administration had not issued licenses to allow Nvidia to sell the chips before the reported White House meeting. On Friday, however, the Commerce Department started granting the licenses for chip sales, the reports said. Silicon Valley-based Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) will also pay 15 percent of revenue on Chinese sales of its MI308 chips, which it was previously barred from exporting to the country. The deal could earn the US government more than $2 billion, according to the New York Times report. The move comes as the Trump administration has been imposing stiff tariffs, with goals varying from addressing US trade imbalances, wanting to reshore manufacturing and pressuring foreign governments to change policies.


Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
DA unveils reforms to transform policies aimed at strengthening SOEs
JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) has unveiled a series of reforms to transformation policies, most of which are aimed at strengthening state-owned entities (SOEs). During a media briefing in Johannesburg on Monday, the party presented its alternatives to the (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment) BBBEE, the Employment Equity Act, and the Expropriation Act. While stressing that it's not against redress and transformation, the DA argues that these three laws are counterproductive. Party leader John Steenhuisen said fixing the public sector is key to an alternative to these policies. "The fifth reform of the sixth is one that is close to I'm sure everybody's feelings, and that is fixing local government. Coalition chaos, corruption and collapse of service delivery cannot continue, and we are championing a new law to stabilise local councils. This bill will set a minimum threshold for political parties to get a seat in the council." Steenhuisen said another reform and alternative to transformative policies is getting the basics right. "Secondly, no economy can grow without access to cheap, reliable electricity. We need to fix this energy crisis in South Africa once and for all by breaking Eskom's monopoly of electricity generation by creating a truly competitive energy market."


Mail & Guardian
7 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Dion George gives go ahead for new 4 000MW nuclear plant
Green groups warn of risks, including soaring upfront costs, the history of construction delays and budget overruns Forestry, Fisheries and Environment Minister The minister's decision, announced on Friday, came after he resolved under section 43(6) of the National Environmental Management Act (Nema), to dismiss the appeals from various environmental organisations, and confirm the environmental authorisation to Eskom for the planned 4 000 megawatt power station in Duynefontein. The proposed project is adjacent to the existing George said that he had carefully reviewed the environmental impact assessment report, as well as the 'In the end, my decision was made in respect of the principles of [the Act] … and with full appreciation of the environmental, social and economic considerations involved,' the minister said. The original decision to grant the environmental authorisation was made in October 2017. Various appellants challenged the decision, submitting appeals that ranged from comprehensive and detailed submissions to shorter, individual objections. George's decision does not automatically grant Eskom permission to begin with the construction or operation of the nuclear power station. The state-owned power utility is still required to obtain several additional statutory authorisations before proceeding in accordance with section 24(7) of Nema. 'As per section 24(7) of [the Act], the granting of an environmental authorisation does not exempt an applicant from complying with any other applicable legal requirements or obtaining permits from other competent authorities,' noted George. These authorisations include a nuclear installation licence from the National Nuclear Regulator; approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa; water use licences from the department of water and sanitation; as well as other relevant approvals such as those from the minister of mineral and petroleum resources. George emphasised that the protection and preservation of the country's environment is non-negotiable. He said his department supports the country's transition to a cleaner, more sustainable energy future 'where inclusive growth, job creation and poverty reduction are central'. Earthlife Africa is considering George's decision, as well as its next steps, said Lekalakala, the director of the non-profit environmental organisation. 'Our concerns include the length of time taken to conduct the environmental impact assessment and to make the appeal decision,' she said. 'We are also deeply concerned about the In addition, there has been no assessment of the socio-economic impacts of a major beyond-design-basis nuclear incident, nor of the generation of long-lived high-level McDaid, the strategic lead of the Green Connection, another non-profit, agreed. 'In recent months, we've seen a 'We are in the middle of a climate crisis, and we should be using our abundant natural resources, such as solar and wind, which can be built quickly and deliver affordable power to homes. Nuclear is expensive, and, like other large projects, is plagued by long delays.' Nuclear power also carries significant risks, requiring costly additional regulation, 'and there is always the possibility of an accident'. 'Even after 40 years of operation, South Africa still has no proper plan for managing toxic nuclear waste — a huge problem that is often ignored in discussions about this dangerous technology … Right now, in the absence of an inclusive, people-centred energy plan, it appears that vested interests are driving individual projects without public consensus.'