Allahabad HC drops case against man, says liking post on social media different from sharing it
The observation was made by Justice Saurabh Srivastava while quashing criminal proceedings against one Imran Khan of Agra.
"Even otherwise, from the material on record, it appears that no message which could be provocative in nature is available on record and merely liking a message will not attract penalty u/s 67 of I.T. Act or any other criminal offence," the court added.
The court was dealing with an application filed under section 482 (inherent powers of the high court) under CrPC.
The petitioner had moved to court seeking quashing of a case against him for liking a post by one Chaudhari Farhan Usman.
Usman's post referred to a protest gathering that would be assembling near the collectorate to hand over a memorandum to the President of India.
Mr. Khan was booked for "provocative messages on social media, which resulted in the assembly of about 600-700 persons belonging to the Muslim community for arranging a procession without permission." Quashing the proceedings, the court had also observed, "Even otherwise Section 67 of the I.T. Act is for obscene material and not for provocative material".
The words "lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest" mean relating to sexual interest and desire, therefore, Section 67 I.T. Act does not prescribe any punishment for other provocative material," the court said.
During the course of hearing, the applicant's counsel had submitted that even no such content was found on his Facebook account. However, the police said he had deleted the same but similar content was found on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.
From the material on record, the court found that Mr. Khan had merely liked a message published by another person and no offence was made out against him.
"Having heard the counsel for the applicant and having perused the record, I do not find any material which could connect the applicant with any objectionable post, as there is no offensive post available in the Facebook and Whatsapp accounts of the applicant," the court said in its order passed on Thursday last.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Sakriya has criminal record, posed as animal lover online
New Delhi: Rajesh Bhai Khimji Bhai Sakriya appears to be a person with a complex personality, said police, based on the details that have surfaced since his attack on CM Rekha Gupta. Claimed to be an animal lover on social media, Sakriya was involved in at least seven criminal cases earlier. Just two weeks ago, he had celebrated his 41st birthday with his family and vowed to stay away from the world of crime, his relatives told police. "Born on Aug 4, 1984, Sakriya stays with his family in Gokul Park-2 on Kothariya Road in Rajkot. His father, Khimji Bhai Sakriya, was an auto driver and his mother, Bhanu Ben, a housewife," said an officer. The accused also works as an auto driver, but that seems to be a cover for his illicit activities as a bootlegger, officers said. At least seven criminal cases were already registered against him, they added. While scanning his dossier, police found that they included four bootlegging and three assault cases. Police have obtained the details of the bootlegging cases, in which Sakriya allegedly used his auto. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi In 2020, Sakriya was booked in two cases under sections 65AA (punishment for possession of a lesser quantity of intoxicants) and 116B (no analysis required for known brand of liquor) of Gujarat Prohibition Act. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo In 2022, he faced yet another case under the same act. In 2017, he was booked for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, intentional insult to provoke breach of peace and abetting an offence. Last year, he was again booked under similar IPC sections. "He is also known to have a habit of playing satta," said an officer. Sakriya, who completed Class VII from Setha School in Bhakti Nagar Circle in Rajkot, is married to Usha Rajesh Bhai, who is a housewife, and the couple has a 18-year-old son who works at a CNG pump to support the family. On his social media profiles, Sakriya, as Rajesh Patel, posted about animals of late. "Active on Instagram and Facebook, he presented himself as an animal lover, regularly following animal welfare pages, including those of activists," said an inspector. According to Rajkot Police and family members, Sakriya was a dog lover and often grew aggressive over issues related to cruelty against animals. His mother said her son was mentally unstable and short-tempered. He would even sometimes assault her in anger, she added. "Rajesh was a devotee of Lord Shiva. He left home for Ujjain on Sunday. His father spoke to him on Tuesday when Rajesh said he was in Delhi for dogs. He was upset after hearing about Supreme Court's ruling to relocate dogs from Delhi," Bhanu said. She added that Sakriya had approached influential people to open an animal hospital and would often ferry injured or sick stray dogs to hospitals in his auto. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
From grey list to digital hawala: Pakistan's dirty trick to keep Jaish alive
Pakistan has played a dirty trick to push itself out of the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2019, the Pakistani government implemented a National Action Plan to remove itself from the FATF list. Under this, Pakistan presented a complete plan to the FATF. As part of this, Pakistan claimed it had curbed Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) by taking control of its Markaz, monitoring the bank accounts of JeM chief Masood Azhar, his brothers Rauf Asghar and Talha al-Saif, and banning cash transactions. By 2022, FATF removed Pakistan from the grey according to intelligence reports, Pakistan's spy agency ISI and JeM have now found a new way to raise money — through Pakistani digital wallets like EasyPaisa and MONEY FOR 313 MARKAZFollowing the Pahalgam attack, the Indian Army launched 'Operation Sindoor' on 7 May. JeM's headquarters Markaz Subhanallah and four other training camps -- Markaz Bilal, Markaz Abbas, Mahmona Zoya and Sargal -- were destroyed. After the strike, the Pakistan government announced funds to rebuild these centres. Now, intelligence inputs suggest JeM has launched an online fundraising campaign via EasyPaisa to raise 3.91 billion Pakistani rupees to establish 313 new training centres across Pakistan. Instead of bank accounts, donations are now being directed to the digital wallets controlled by Masood Azhar's family members, allowing Pakistan to maintain the claim that JeM's funding has been IS BEING SENT THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIAJaish-e-Mohammed has activated its cadres to raise funds. According to intelligence reports, posters, videos and even a letter from Masood Azhar are being posted through proxy accounts linked to JeM and its commanders on platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp. These appeals state that JeM is building 313 markaz and requires 12.5 million Pakistani rupees (1.25 crore) for each centre. The fundraising drive is targeting not just people in Pakistan but also Pakistanis abroad and their sympathisers, urging them to IS GOING TO THE WALLET OF THE MASTERS OF JAISHAccording to intelligence reports, JeM's fundraising campaign is linked to several large digital wallets. These include:A SadaPay account in the name of Talha Al Saif (Talha Gulzar), registered with the phone number of Haripur district commander Aftab EasyPaisa wallet is run by Masood Azhar's son, Abdullah EasyPaisa account belonging to Jaish commander Syed Safdar Shah in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Among these, more than 250 additional EasyPaisa wallets are reportedly TRANSACTED ANNUALLY THROUGH DIGITAL WALLETSAccording to intelligence reports, Masood Azhar's family operates 7–8 digital wallets at a time, replacing them every 3–4 months and transferring lump sums into new accounts. Large amounts are first deposited in a main wallet and then distributed in smaller sums to 10–15 other wallets for cash withdrawals or further transfers. Reports also indicate that Jaish-e-Mohammed activates at least 30 new wallets every month to make tracing the original funding source more around 80 per cent of JeM's funding flows through these digital wallets, with transactions amounting to 80–90 crore Pakistani rupees annually. The money is used to buy weapons, run training camps, maintain communications, purchase luxury cars and fund Masood Azhar's family. A large portion of these funds comes from Gulf has effectively become a 'digital hawala' for JeM. In addition to online donations, JeM commanders continue to collect funds in mosques every Friday despite the Pakistan boasts of FATF compliance, JeM thrives through digital platforms operating outside the banking system. EasyPaisa and SadaPay have become the nerve centres of Pakistan's terror financing.- EndsMust Watch
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
HC suspends conviction of Abbas Ansari in hate speech case: ‘refusal to do so also amounts to injustice to his electorate'
The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday suspended the conviction of Abbas Ansari, the son of gangster-politician Mukhtar Abbas Ansari, in a three-year-old hate speech case, saying 'refusal to stay his conviction amounts to injustice not only to him but also to the electorate which elected him'. Abbas Ansari, who was elected from the Mau Assembly seat in 2022 Uttar Pradesh elections, was sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment in May this year, leading to his disqualification from the membership of the House. The 33-year-old was booked on March 3, 2022, for his campaign speech in which he had allegedly threatened to 'teach a lesson' to the administrative officials of Mau after the elections. On May 31 this year, a court in Mau convicted him and sentenced him to two years of imprisonment, leading to his disqualification from the UP Assembly. He then challenged the order in the sessions court, which on July 5 stayed the sentence but declined to stay the conviction. He then appealed in the Allahabad High Court. In his order, Justice Sameer Jain of the Allahabad High Court cited the 2024 Supreme Court order against disqualifaction of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi (Rahul Gandhi Vs Purnesh Ishwarbhai Modi, 2024), saying 'disqualification of a person not only affect the right of public representative to continue in the public life but also affect the right of electorate who have elected him to represent their constituency'. '… (Abbas Ansari) was a sitting MLA and at the time of election he was delivering the speech, and although being an MLA, he should restraint himself but merely on delivering such speech… refusal to stay his conviction in view of this Court amounts to injustice not only to the revisionist (Ansari) but also to the electorate who elected him. It appears, while refusing the prayer to stay the conviction, appellate court (sessions court) did not consider this aspect,' the order stated. 'Further, non-suspending the conviction… indicates far-reaching consequences… He not only remained disqualified, but also remained disqualified to contest the future election,' the court said. The order further stated that the purpose of the introduction of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act 'is to resolve the issue of criminalisation of politics and to depoliticising criminality.' '…but while deciding the issue at hand, it is also necessary to consider the other facts and circumstances of the case like what are the actual allegations against the person who has been disqualified due to his conviction and whether his criminal antecedents of such nature which threatens the very idea of democracy,' Justice Jain added in the order. Setting aside the July order of the sessions court, Justice Jain in his order said: 'Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case including the political background of the revisionist and his family, facts of the present case and his criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that it is not a case in which prayer to suspend the conviction of the revisionist should be refused.' '…the impugned order dated 5.7.2025 passed by learned appellate court is illegal and is liable to be set aside… The conviction order passed by trial court against the revisionist (Abbas Ansari) shall remain suspended during the pendency of his appeal before the appellate court,' the High Court ordered, adding, 'the instant revision filed by revisionist (Abbas Ansari) stands allowed'. The High Court also made it clear that the observation made by his court was only for the purpose whether the conviction order can be stayed or not during the pendency of the appeal. 'The appellate court shall not be influenced from any observation made in this order and shall decide the appeal of the revisionist independently in accordance with law,' the High Court added. In his revision petition filed in the High Court, Abbas Ansari submitted that due to the conviction order passed by the trial court, he has been disqualified as a sitting MLA, and therefore, the case fell under the category of 'rare and exceptional' cases. He argued that the appellate (sessions) court should have stayed his conviction order, but the 'learned appellate court refused to stay the conviction and therefore committed gross illegality'. He also submitted that due to the refusal of the appellate court in granting a stay on his conviction, his entire political career was adversely affected. He also added that due to his conviction, he has also been disqualified from contesting elections for six years. In his petition before the High Court, Ansari stated that out of 11 cases, proceedings of three cases have been quashed, including a case related to the UP Gangsters Act, and in another case he was convicted, but granted bail, and his appeal is pending. The counsel appearing on behalf of the UP governmnent vehemently opposed his plea and submitted that Ansari committed offences under sections 171 F, 153A and 189 of the IPC, and 'considering the entire evidence produced by prosecution, prima facie, it cannot be said that the trial court wrongly convicted him'. Abbas's younger brother, Umar Ansari, who is also an accused in the same case, is pending in the court.
