Gun accidentally fired, Milwaukee police officer joins lawsuit
An MPD officer has joined a federal lawsuit against a gun manufacturer.
The lawsuit claims the SIG Sauer P320 fired without anyone pulling the trigger.
The lawsuit seeks a recall of the weapon and compensation.
MILWAUKEE - A Milwaukee police officer whose gun accidentally fired and injured his partner has now joined a federal lawsuit against the weapon's manufacturer.
What they're saying
Attorney Robert Zimmerman, who is based in Philadelphia, represents more than 100 people who claim the same thing: The SIG Sauer P320 fired without anyone pulling the trigger.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
"The reality is people are experiencing unintended discharges when their hands are not even on the gun," said Attorney Robert Zimmerman.
Twenty-two people, mostly law enforcement, are part of the latest lawsuit. That includes MPD Officer Yang Lee.
"His hand wasn't on the gun," Zimmerman said. "The gun discharged while it was in its holster."
The backstory
In September 2022, Lee was searching a suspect's vehicle when his SIG Sauer P320 fired. It struck and injured his partner. The officer who was injured when Lee's gun went off is part of another lawsuit against the gun manufacturer.
"Officer Lee does not trust this gun. He has had severe emotional distress from years and years being on the force," Zimmerman said.
Dig deeper
MPD transitioned away from the P320 three years ago and replaced them with glocks after several incidents.
In July 2020, a SIG Sauer went off during an arrest and injured the officer's partner. Less than six months later, surveillance captured the moment a shot went off – the officer's hands weren't on the gun.
"They ought to know what they can do at this point," Zimmerman said.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
What's next
The federal lawsuit calls for SIG Sauer to recall the weapon. It also seeks compensation.
If there isn't change, Zimmerman expects more lawsuits: "It's not going to stop until SIG changes their ways and does the right thing."
FOX6 News reached out to SIG Sauer for comment but did not hear back by the deadline for this story.
The Source
FOX6 News interviewed Attorney Robert Zimmerman about the lawsuit and referenced prior coverage of the weapons' accidental firings for information in this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
SC Gov. McMaster deploys National Guard to 'restore law and order' to Washington D.C.
South Carolina's governor has authorized the deployment of 200 South Carolina National Guardsmen to the Capitol in Washington, D.C., amid a federal crackdown on crime. Gov. Henry McMaster announced on August 16 that Palmetto State guardsmen will be deployed to Washington, D.C. to support President Donald Trump. The U.S. Department of Defense stated that Trump called roughly 800 troops from the Army and Air National Guard into the Capitol on August 11 in a crime-fighting effort. This move faced criticism by city leaders, including Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who says crime in the nation's capital is at a 30-year low. South Carolina is one of three states that have chosen to deploy their state National Guard to the Capitol. The other two states are West Virginia and Ohio. The federal government will pay for South Carolina's deployment under Title 32, according to the governor's office. That title enables the Secretary of the Army to offer financial aid to a state that utilizes its National Guard to support specific federal duties. 'South Carolina is proud to stand with President Trump as he works to restore law and order to our nation's capital and ensure safety for all who live, work, and visit there,' McMaster said in a statement. The governor's office said South Carolina National Guardsmen are subject to immediate recall in case of a hurricane or other natural disaster in the state. Crime rates in South Carolina versus Washington, D.C. The White House issued a media release on August 11 saying that crime in Washington, D.C., is "out of control." "While Fake News journalists and politicians go out of their way to claim otherwise, the reality is that our nation's capital is anything but safe," the White House release stated. The U.S. Department of Justice stated on January 3 that crime in the capital is at a 30-year low. Data from the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) showed a 35% drop in violent crime between 2023 and 2024. The Rochester Institute of Technology compared 2024 homicide rates across 24 U.S. cities. It put Washington D.C.'s homicide rate at 27.3 per 100,000 people. That ranking put Washington, D.C. as the city with the fourth-highest crime rate of the ranked U.S. cities, in between Atlanta and Detroit. The 2023 homicide rate in Washington, D.C. was 40.4, according to population data from World Population Review and crime statistics from MPD. The capital notably had a significantly higher homicide rate in 2023 than in previous years, with 226 incidents in 2021 and 203 reports in 2022. How does this compare to South Carolina cities? The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) works with Beyond 20/20 to operate an interactive crime statistic database. The most recent data set available is from 2023. More: Panelists address gun policy challenges: 'Thoughts and prayers are not enough anymore' North Charleston had the highest homicide rate of the three most populous cities in South Carolina at 25.5 per 100,000 people. Spartanburg had the highest homicide rate of the three Upstate communities, with a rate of 21.1. Greenville, Spartanburg, and Anderson do not have a population over 100,000. Their homicide rates were calculated with the same formula used for Washington, D.C., and the three most populous South Carolina cities. The data for those three cities indicates an estimate of a homicide rate if each municipality had a population of at least 100,000. Lawmakers applaud, criticise use of National Guard President Trump signed the Presidential Memorandum on August 11 to "restore law and order" in Washington, D.C. The order directs the Secretary of Defense to mobilize the capital's National Guard to fight crime in the city until law and order are restored. The response to McMaster's deployment of the South Carolina National Guard is split along party lines, with Democratic lawmakers criticising the decision as Republicans applaud it. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, and Congressman William Timmons are some Republican politicians who have expressed support for the move on social media. I fully support @henrymcmaster's decision to deploy 200 South Carolina National Guardsmen to assist @realDonaldTrump in restoring law and order in our nation's capital. This mission is federally funded under Title 32, and our Guard remains ready to return home immediately should… State Rep. Wendell Jones (D-Greenville), State Sen. Karl Allen (D-Greenville), and Democratic Party leadership all came out in opposition to the decision over the weekend. "Hurricane season is here. We need our soldiers home, not on call for photo ops," Jones said in a statement posted to the media. Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘An intimidation tactic': Trump's show of force dismays Washington residents
Washington DC's only Home Depot was busy with contractors and customers on Thursday morning – but the Hispanic day laborers who usually gather and wait for work under the parking lot's sparse trees were nowhere to be found. Two days earlier, masked federal agents swarmed the area and made several arrests, which were photographed by bystanders and posted on social media. Juwan Brooks, a store employee who witnessed the raid, said the agents grabbed anyone who appeared Hispanic. 'They don't ask no questions,' Brooks said. People walking across the parking lot, getting out of their cars, or even sleeping in their vehicle – all were grabbed by the agents, leaving behind empty work trucks that were eventually towed away. 'It was cool when Trump was saying it, but to actually see it first hand? I didn't like it,' Brooks said. The day laborers 'are not bad people', and he wondered what happened to the children of the men that were taken away. Four days after Trump ordered federal agents and national guard on to the streets of Washington DC to fight a crime wave that city leaders say is not happening, residents of the capital are becoming used to the presence of groups of armed men in their neighborhoods, and the aggressive tactics they use. Beyond the apparent immigration arrests at Home Depot – which Brooks said was the second raid there he is aware of since Trump took office – federal agents have been spotted setting up roadblocks at busy intersections, and patrolling neighborhoods across the city. Trump, who exercised a never-before-used clause in the law governing the district to take over the Metropolitan police department (MPD) for 30 days, this week said he would seek Congress's approval to keep it under federal control for the 'long term'. I just feel like it's too much federal overreach It's unclear how much of a difference the deployment has yet made on public safety. Rates of violent crime dropped to 30-year lows last year, but it remains more prevalent in Washington DC than many cities with similar populations. Since Trump made the deployment official on Monday, the city recorded two homicides, bringing its count for the year up to 101. 'I just feel like it's too much federal overreach. I think it's unnecessary, and I think our MPD does a great job,' said Kevin Cataldo, a neighborhood commissioner whose district includes the block just north of downtown where the 100th homicide of the year took place on Monday, hours after Trump announced the federal takeover. The White House says 800 national guard troops will be on the ground in the city, along with hundreds of federal officers from the Drug Enforcement Administration, border patrol, FBI and other agencies. On Thursday afternoon, a half-dozen unarmed troops, who said they had been told not to talk to the press, could be found milling among the tourists visiting the Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall, an area not known for crime. 'What they are doing right now? It's just a show of force. I did that in Iraq,' said Kevin Davis, a 21-year army veteran visiting the capital from El Paso, Texas. 'When people see the uniform, they act differently.' More prevalent have been the federal agents who have appeared in neighborhoods across the overwhelmingly Democratic city. [Residents] were trying to tell them to leave, you know, the people in the street and the neighbors They began arriving over the weekend, and on Sunday night, a justice department employee was arrested for hurling a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection official, and later charged with felony assault on a federal officer. Recent evenings have seen federal agents and police set up roadblocks and pull drivers over on major roads, as protesters gathered to condemn them. On Tuesday evening on 14th Street in Columbia Heights, a north-west Washington neighborhood that is home to the city's largest Hispanic population, police and federal agents, some with their faces covered, began stopping cars, said a local shop manager who declined to be named. Before long, dozens of people emerged to berate them. '[Residents] were trying to tell them to leave, you know, the people in the street and the neighbors,' he told the Guardian. 'They yelled back 'don't make the people scared, this is a free country', 'why make the community unsafe?',' the manager said. The scene repeated a little over a mile south on 14th Street on Wednesday evening, with police and federal agents pulling over cars, and locals heckling them and trying to warn approaching drivers away, according to videos posted on social media. Owen Simon, an undergraduate government student at Georgetown University, had heard that agents were spotted in the tony neighborhood around campus, and wondered what they were doing there. Muggings happened occasionally in the neighborhood, but Simon said he was less concerned about those than what the agents might do to foreign students – or students who appeared to be foreign. 'No one wants to walk around knowing that anyone could be scooped up out of the street at any moment,' he said. 'I don't think that this move by the Trump administration is a way to crack down on crime. I think it's about optics.' As he smoked a cigarette in the Home Deport parking lot, Brooks had a similar concern about Congress Heights, the south-east Washington neighborhood where he lives. Crime there is undoubtedly a concern, but it was teenagers who were behind it, not his working-class neighbors. 'You got other people catching strays off that, too,' he said. 'You got working people living in the neighborhood, going to the store, getting picked up because of 16-, 17-year-olds. 'I understand targeting the area, but you can't really blame the people in the area who are trying to do better,' he added. Over the weekend, he had seen eight cars full of federal agents driving through his neighborhood like they wanted to be seen, something he had never witnessed the city police do. 'What is this for?' he wondered. 'It's more of an intimidation tactic.' Joseph Gedeon contributed reporting Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats introduce joint resolution to end Trump's ‘lawless' DC takeover
Democratic lawmakers have introduced a joint resolution aimed at ending what they call Trump's unlawful and unprecedented move to federalize the Metropolitan police department (MPD) in Washington DC. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the House judiciary committee; DC's non-voting House delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton; and representative Robert Garcia, ranking member of the House committee on oversight and government reform, introduced the resolution on Friday, invoking the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973. The resolution states that Trump has not demonstrated the existence of any special emergency conditions that would warrant the federalization of the police force. In the Senate, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland will sponsor the resolution. Related: 'It's not illegal to be homeless': disquiet as Trump crews clear DC encampments 'The only emergency here is a lawless president experiencing a growing public relations emergency because of his close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his stubborn refusal to release the Epstein file despite his promise to do so,' said Raskin in a statement shared with the Guardian. The Home Rule Act of 1973 states that DC residents have the authority to govern their local affairs, including by electing a mayor and local council members. But because DC is considered a 'federal district' rather than a state, the president and Congress (where DC residents have no voting representatives) are given the legal ability to manage local laws and local tax dollars. Under the act, the president has limited power to temporarily take over the DC police department for 'federal purposes' under 'special conditions of an emergency'. On Monday, Trump signed an executive order granting himself direct control of the MPD in a highly controversial and suspected premeditated move. But lawmakers argue that the special conditions have not been met and that Congress has the authority to end such emergency control through a joint resolution. In a substantial development early on Friday evening, White House officials and attorneys for Washington DC agreed to scale back the executive order of the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, regarding the federal takeover of the city's police department. Under the new agreement, DC's Metropolitan police department will remain under the control of the DC police chief, Pamela Smith, instead of the Drug and Enforcement Administration's top administrator, Terry Cole, according to reports. According to the joint resolution's sponsors, the president has attempted to rationalize his decision to place local police under federal control and increase militarization of the city by pushing a misleading account of DC's crime rate, which has actually declined for two consecutive years and recently hit its lowest point in three decades. 'President Trump's incursions against DC are among the most egregious attacks on DC home rule in decades,' said Norton. 'DC residents are Americans, worthy of the same autonomy granted to residents of the states … No emergency exists in DC that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the DC Police for federal purposes, as required by law.' Lawmakers say that his actions have worsened public safety by blocking DC's access to $1bn in locally generated funds intended for police, fire, emergency services and other safety programs. Additionally, the resolution notes that Trump has removed or reassigned many of DC's prosecutors, creating a backlog in criminal cases and delaying justice for victims. He also pardoned or granted clemency to nearly 1,600 people involved in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol in 2021, including hundreds found guilty of assaulting law enforcement officers. Solve the daily Crossword
