PBS sues Trump for stripping its funds
In its lawsuit filed on Friday, PBS relied on similar arguments, saying Trump was overstepping his authority and engaging in 'viewpoint discrimination' because of his claim that PBS's news coverage is biassed against conservatives.
'PBS disputes those charged assertions in the strongest possible terms,' lawyer Z W Julius Chen wrote in the suit, filed in US District Court in Washington, DC. 'But regardless of any policy disagreements over the role of public television, our Constitution and laws forbid the President from serving as the arbiter of the content of PBS's programming, including by attempting to defund PBS.'
It was the latest of many legal actions taken against the administration for its moves, including several by media organisations impacted by Trump's orders.
PBS was joined as a plaintiff by one of its stations, Lakeland PBS, which serves rural areas in northern and central Minnesota. Trump's order is an 'existential threat' to the station, the lawsuit said.
A PBS spokesman said that 'after careful deliberation, PBS reached the conclusion that it was necessary to take legal action to safeguard public television's editorial independence, and to protect the autonomy of PBS member stations'.
Through an executive order earlier this month, Trump told the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and federal agencies to stop funding the two systems. Through the corporation alone, PBS is receiving $325m this year, most of which goes directly to individual stations.
The White House deputy press secretary, Harrison Fields, said the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime.
'Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,' Fields said. 'The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective.'
PBS, which makes much of the programming used by the stations, said it gets 22 percent of its revenue directly from the feds. Sixty-one percent of PBS's budget is funded through individual station dues, and the stations raise the bulk of that money through the government.
Trump's order 'would have profound impacts on the ability of PBS and PBS member stations to provide a rich tapestry of programming to all Americans', Chen wrote.
PBS said the US Department of Education has cancelled a $78m grant to the system for educational programming, used to make children's shows like Sesame Street, Clifford the Big Red Dog and Reading Rainbow.
For Minnesota residents, the order threatens the Lakeland Learns education programme and Lakeland News, described in the lawsuit as the only television programme in the region providing local news, weather and sports.
Besides Trump, the lawsuit names other administration officials as defendants, including Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. PBS says its technology is used as a backup for the nationwide wireless emergency alert system.
The administration has fought with several media organisations. Government-run news services like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty are struggling for their lives. The Associated Press has battled with the White House over press access, and the Federal Communications Commission is investigating television news divisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
39 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump sets new tariffs on dozens of countries' exports
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order imposing new 'reciprocal' tariffs ranging from 10 percent to 41 percent on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. The order, signed on Thursday, included a 25 percent rate for India's US-bound exports, 20 percent for Taiwan and 30 percent for South Africa. More to follow shortly.
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Laos braced for blow of Donald Trump tariff threat
Agencies Hawking clothes outside the garment factory where her daughter toils inside, a Laos vendor weighs US President Donald Trump's threat of trade tariffs that may soon snarl both their livelihoods. 'I just live day by day. For now, I still have my business, and the factory is operating as usual,' she told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity in the capital Vientiane. 'I'm not too worried about my daughter's job yet,' she added. Then again, she says: 'I don't know anything about what the US will decide.' Landlocked Laos -- a country of only eight million -- has a gloomy outlook as it counts down to a Friday deadline when Trump says a 40 per cent levy will kick in unless a trade deal is sealed. The rate is among the highest Trump has touted in his global tariff blitz, which has yielded a handful of deals with countries including Britain, Japan and Vietnam but left dozens others scrambling for a pact. Laos has limited exports, little leverage and supply chains deeply entwined with US trade rival China. The United States had a trade deficit of more than $760 million with Laos last year -- singling it out for steep tolls alongside other nations Trump sees as imbalanced business partners. 'A 40 percent tariff is just a nail in the coffin for any industry trying to ship to the United States,' said John F. Somers, head of garment manufacturing firm Diep Vu Co. Only a handful of factories, mostly in the capital, supply the US market and sales make up only between three and six percent of the country's gross domestic product. But with the Southeast Asian country already suffering from high inflation and a severe labour shortage, Trump's default tariff could still have a devastating effect, industry insiders say. 'We estimate about 20,000 workers or more could be impacted,' said Xaybandith Rasphone, head of the Association of the Lao Garment Industry. 'We're not certain about the exact number yet, but it could easily be higher if companies shut down,' said Xaybandith, who is also vice-president of the Lao National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LNCCI). He warned between 35 and 40 factories could be affected if buyers are spooked by the tariffs. 'If the tariff stays in place, some factories will definitely close,' he said. 'Finding alternative markets takes time, negotiations and a lot of effort. It could take years.' Like neighbouring Cambodia and Vietnam, Laos is a hub of the garment industry -- producing brands for western markets including Dr. Martens. But the production of mattresses, silicone products and solar panels also stands to be impacted. Solar panel manufacturing has exploded in Laos since 2023 and driven up its export figures after Trump hit China with a 50 percent tariff on the renewable power sources. However the US trade offensive has focussed on 'transshipment' -- a practice it alleges some countries use to help China dodge American tariffs by repackaging its goods for American markets. Casey Tolzman, head of the Lao-American Business Association (LABA), said the explosion of Laos' solar industry had likely been 'a cause for suspicion' in Washington. Rules governing the source of materials and the level of Laotian labour required to define products as domestically produced may prove the country's biggest bargaining chip. 'A big question for countries like Cambodia and Laos is what they can offer the US that's attractive enough to reach a deal,' Tolzman said. 'Any deal would probably need to see Laos enforce stricter rules on transshipment and country of origin, to ensure products aren't just coming from China and getting a Laos label slapped on.' The US may also ask Vientiane to crack down on internet scam centres targeting wealthy Americans from compounds in Laos, or seek concessions for American goods to enter the market, he added. The LABA and LNCCI say they are helping the government draft an appeal asking for tariffs to drop back to previous levels, or at least be capped at 20 percent. But Diep Vu Co boss Somers warns even if Laos manages to reach a deal with Washington, a bigger test soon lies is on track to graduate from 'Least Developed Country' status next year, meaning it is set to lose duty-free access to the European Union -- dealing another blow. 'We'll be at a competitive disadvantage, our industry will probably collapse within a few years,' Somers warned.
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Donald Trump announces 25% tariff on India, penalties over Russian energy
Agencies U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that a tariff of 25% would be imposed on goods from India as of Aug. 1, plus an additional penalty. He said India, which has the world's fifth-largest economy, will face an unspecified penalty on Aug. 1, but did not elaborate on the amount or what it was for, although it appeared to be tied to its purchases of Russian energy. Trump said in a Truth Social post that India 'is our friend' but its 'Tariffs are far too high' on U.S. goods. The president added that India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, which Trump said has enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of the launch of the administration's revised tariffs on multiple countries. 'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to end Stop the killing in ukraine; all is not well.!' Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the two countries, which had been under negotiation for several months. In a separate post, Trump doubled down on the timeline for 'reciprocal' U.S. tariffs on countries around the world. The August first deadline is the august first deadline. It stands strong and won't be extended. he stressed. Trump called the deadline 'A big day for America.' U.S. and Indian trade negotiators had held multiple rounds of discussions to resolve contentious issues, particularly over market access for American agricultural and dairy products. Despite progress in some areas, Indian officials resisted opening the domestic market to imports of wheat, corn, rice and genetically modified soybeans, citing risks to the livelihood of millions of Indian farmers. The new tariffs are expected to impact India's goods exports to the U.S., estimated at around $87 billion in 2024, including labour-intensive products such as garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jeweler, and petrochemicals. The U.S. currently has a $45.7 billion trade deficit with India. India's commerce ministry, which is leading the trade negotiations with the U.S., did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. At a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world's largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported Western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. When Trump in February met with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the U.S. president said that India would start buying American oil and natural gas. India now joins a growing list of countries facing higher tariffs under Trump's 'Liberation Day' trade policy, aimed at reshaping U.S. trade relations by demanding greater reciprocity. The White House had previously warned India about its high average applied tariffs – nearly 39% on agricultural products, with rates climbing to 45% on vegetable oils and around 50% on apples and corn. The setback comes despite earlier commitments by Modi and Trump to conclude the first phase of a trade deal by autumn 2025 and expand bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, up from $191 billion in 2024. U.S. manufacturing exports to India, valued at around $42 billion in 2024, as well as energy exports such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil, and coal, could also face retaliatory action if India chooses to respond in kind. Indian officials have previously indicated that they view the U.S. as a key strategic partner, particularly in counterbalancing China. But they have emphasized the need to preserve policy space on agriculture, data governance, and state subsidies.
