logo
The Power Of Workplace Organizing: Why Every Worker Should Consider It

The Power Of Workplace Organizing: Why Every Worker Should Consider It

Forbes2 days ago
Workplace satisfaction remains stubbornly low globally, and has steadily declined in the United States since 2020, even among employee segments that report enjoying their work.
In an era of worker dissatisfaction that spans industries and generations, Jaz Brisack, Rhodes Scholar turned barista who helped organize the first unionized Starbucks in the United States, argues in their groundbreaking book Get on the Job and Organize: Standing Up for a Better Workplace and a Better World that workers should organize not just when they hate their jobs—but especially when they love them.
This counterintuitive insight points to the heart of organizing workplaces - it's not solely about fixing problems, but claiming fundamental rights to dignity and meaningful participation in the places where we spend most of our waking hours.
Organizing Is Not a Dirty Word
For those wary of workplace organizing, it's worth nothing that employee-led collective action has shaped many benefits we take for granted.
Over the years, Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), diversity committees, and other worker-led initiatives have secured accommodations that are now considered standard practice: designated parking spaces for expecting parents, private nursing rooms for new mothers, quiet spaces for neurodivergent employees and those who speak English as a second language to focus on work, and flexible hybrid arrangements that allow caregivers to balance their professional and family responsibilities.
Even the hybrid work arrangements that became widespread during the pandemic were often the result of employee groups that had been advocating for flexibility long before COVID-19 made remote work an emergency necessity.
These practices have emerged from employees identifying shared needs and advocating for change.
Beyond Crisis: Organizing When You Love Your Job
We tend to think of unions as something you turn to when working conditions or pay are beyond tolerance. Brisack, cofounder of the Inside Organizer School and organizing director for Workers United, challenges this reactive approach with a proactive vision.
They make a case for organizing at work, focused on five key principles:
Securing Employee Voice: Even in companies with engaged leadership and progressive values, most workers remain fundamentally powerless over decisions that affect their daily lives. In the past month, formerly progressive companies such as Starbucks have instituted sweeping return-to-office (RTO) mandates, a move that's deeply antithetical to worker demands.
Organizing enables workers to move from being consulted to being true partners in workplace governance. As Brisack notes, it's about gaining "a true voice in the company" and shifting "the power dynamic" to achieve equality with corporate management.
Workplace Democracy as a Right: If we want to see democratic norms and values in society, we must push for it at work. Most workers spend upwards of 40-hours each week under what Brisack calls "a dictatorship of the bosses." Organizing represents the only proven mechanism for bringing genuine democracy to the workplace, transforming it from a hierarchy into a collaborative partnership.
Human Dignity, Not Vanity Metrics: It is a well established fact that the most productive and innovative employees are ones that are allowed to bring their full humanity to work. This is increasingly important as automation and efficiency pressures reduce workers to data points rather than recognizing them as whole people with needs, aspirations, and rights.
Long-term Stability Through Collective Action: While well-intentioned companies may offer benefits and improvements to retain talent, these gestures remain fundamentally paternalistic—subject to withdrawal when priorities or leadership change as we've seen with RTO mandates, reduction in paid family and medical leave and other benefits over the past year. Organizing also creates stability during management transitions, economic downturns, and shifting corporate strategies.
Accountability to Stated Values: Most organizations market themselves as progressive employers committed to social responsibility, diversity, and worker wellbeing. Organizing holds these companies accountable to their public commitments, ensuring that public-facing messaging translates into binding workplace policies.
Beyond Unions: The Spectrum of Workplace Organizing
While Brisack's book focuses primarily on formal unionization, the principles of workplace organizing extend far beyond traditional labor unions. Workers can build collective power through various approaches:
Any form of collective action, be it formal or informal, recognized or underground, offers the ability to shift power dynamics and create opportunities for meaningful workplace democracy.
And the ripple effects of workplace organizing extends to communities as well.
Research highlights that areas with large percentages of organized workers show improved outcomes across indicators of community wellbeing - from greater income and economic equity, to greater rates of civic engagement and social cohesion, as well as progressive policies on healthcare, education, and worker protections that benefit all residents.
These community benefits underscore that workplace organizing is not a zero-sum conflict between workers and employers, but rather a mechanism for building more equitable and prosperous communities.
Getting Started with Workplace Organizing
For workers inspired to begin organizing their own workplaces, Brisack offers practical guidance grounded in real campaign experience:
Organizing Is The Future of Workplace Democracy
A new generation of workers is leading the charge, rejecting the false choice between loving one's job and organizing for better conditions.
These workers are no longer in traditionally blue collar industries. Organizing efforts have expanded to companies like Apple, Amazon, and various tech startups responding to fundamental change in the nature of work.
As job security decreases from the ascendance of AI, benefits erode, and economic inequality widens, workers across all industries recognize the need for collective action to secure basic economic security and workplace dignity.
Jaz Brisack's Get on the Job and Organize arrives at a critical moment offering a key insight—that workers should organize their beloved workplaces, not just their toxic ones—challenges us to think more expansively about what work could be.
The ultimate goal, as Brisack frames it, is not just better wages or working conditions, but enabling workers to become "more fully free, more fully realized, more fully human." In a society increasingly dominated by corporate power, workplace organizing represents one of the most promising pathways toward genuine democracy and shared prosperity.
Whether through formal unionization or alternative collective action strategies, workers who organize together are not just improving their own lives—they're participating in the long American tradition of expanding democracy and opportunity for all. In that sense, workplace organizing is not just a labor issue, but a fundamental question of what kind of society we want to build together.
Jaz Brisack is touring the US – with stops at independent and campus bookstores across the country. Join her for engaging discussions about her book and discover why readers and critics alike are calling it a must-read. Check local listings for tour dates and bookstore locations near you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) Launches FluMist Home For At-Home Influenza Vaccination
AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) Launches FluMist Home For At-Home Influenza Vaccination

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

AstraZeneca (LSE:AZN) Launches FluMist Home For At-Home Influenza Vaccination

AstraZeneca recently launched "FluMist Home," an at-home flu vaccine delivery service, marking an important milestone for easier access to vaccinations in 34 U.S. states. This initiative likely contributed to its stock price increase of 12% last quarter, as it aligns with AstraZeneca's push towards innovative healthcare solutions. Despite this positive development, the overall market also experienced an upward trend, with the Dow hitting record highs and the market up 1% over the last week. AstraZeneca's performance seems to have been buoyed by both its strategic product launches and the broader market gains. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 2 possible red flags for AstraZeneca you should know about. The end of cancer? These 26 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's. The launch of AstraZeneca's "FluMist Home" aligns well with the company's focus on innovative healthcare solutions, potentially impacting the narrative around its future growth. This new service might enhance revenue streams by tapping into the demand for convenient medical solutions. Over the last five years, AstraZeneca's total shareholder returns, including both share price and dividends, have risen by 54.08%. This growth provides a broader context to the company's performance, indicating resilience and strong returns for investors. Over the past year, AstraZeneca's share price movement has been in line with the performance of the UK Pharmaceuticals industry, which returned 10.3%. Looking at the potential impact on revenue and earnings forecasts, the initiative could bolster AstraZeneca's earnings as analysts anticipate a growth to $13.9 billion by 2028, up from $8.3 billion today. The recent stock price increase narrows the gap to the consensus analyst price target of £137.89, reflecting a potential 18.95% discount from the current share price of £115.92. This price movement suggests optimism among investors regarding the company's ability to meet future expectations. Our comprehensive valuation report raises the possibility that AstraZeneca is priced lower than what may be justified by its financials. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include LSE:AZN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Employers need help managing workers who are taking second jobs
Employers need help managing workers who are taking second jobs

Fast Company

time3 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Employers need help managing workers who are taking second jobs

Employers who sense rising levels of anxiety and signs of disengagement or displeasure in their workplace now have survey data to explain the sources of that unsettling vibe. But those insights also suggest managers need to address the sources of that unhappiness to avoid losing employees to companies that are already doing so. That was the main lesson in a recent study by staff recruitment, management, and payroll software company Remote. It polled '2,000 full-time, desk-based U.S. workers' about their perceptions of their workplaces. The overarching message participants sent was they're 'worried about the economy, unsure about their career future, and searching for employers they can trust.' As a result, many respondents said they're looking for greater financial and job security, and simultaneously want more input and guidance from employers—as well as increased flexibility in their work. Some of those expectations are directly linked to financial pressures many participants said they were under, as well as habits developed under pandemic-era remote working arrangements. Their own money concerns—and the increased fears about the economy's future that 80 percent of respondents expressed—led nearly 20 percent of participants to say they'd already taken on a second job or side hustle. An additional 57 percent say they're looking to do so, for the same reasons. Rising employee preoccupations with working a second job, along with their pandemic experiences of having worked from home, made flexibility a top priority for all but 11 percent of participants. About a third said their desire for fully remote employment was higher than it was a year ago, with 26 percent saying the same for hybrid. Around 60 percent of both groups said they'd take a pay cut to secure those arrangements, which tend to offer greater range in doing work and alsofacilitate juggling a side hustle. Interestingly, other replies in the Remote survey indicated that employers providing increased flexibility may help remedy another problem cited: worker complaints about insufficient communication and support. Polling data found just 17 percent of respondents said they were getting enough resources and support to feel stable and engaged on the job. Meanwhile, only 8 percent said their company regularly shares information on how the economy may impact their role or organization, with about a quarter describing those updates as 'vague.' Over a third of participants—or 35 percent—said they receive no feedback on that from bosses—but wish they did. Unexpectedly, however, 50 percent of people with hybrid arrangements and 46 percent of fully remote employees reported getting higher levels of that information and direction from managers. Meaning, with only 37 percent of in-office respondents feeling the same, 'organizations with distributed teams may lean more towards intentional, proactive communication,' analysis of the findings said. What can employers do to respond to the study's results? Its authors offered the following steps that companies might take to provide workers the 'honesty, stability, and real investment in their well-being' they need and reduce the risks of them seeking these qualities elsewhere instead. Talk about it. Regular, transparent updates help employees feel grounded. Rethink flexibility. Flexible policies have moved out of perk territory, and into the essential camp. Flexible working can be a lifeline for disengaged and anxious employees and for those with needs and responsibilities that don't fit into rigid structures. Invest in development. Clear career paths build security and loyalty. Support financial wellness. Educational resources can go a long way. Create space for dialogue. Especially when the conversations are hard. 'The findings serve as a reminder that people-first leadership isn't about guesswork, but listening, responding, and proactively creating environments where employees can maintain stability and productivity, even in uncertain times, instead,' noted Remote's chief people officer, Barbara Matthews. — By Bruce Crumley

Mark Cuban and Sam Altman just warned about disappearing jobs and the need to learn AI
Mark Cuban and Sam Altman just warned about disappearing jobs and the need to learn AI

Fast Company

time3 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Mark Cuban and Sam Altman just warned about disappearing jobs and the need to learn AI

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman isn't shy about discussing the future of AI. As the CEO of a market leading company, his predictions carry plenty of weight, such as his worry that AI could make things go 'horribly wrong,' or that AI agents will completely transform the workplace. Nor is billionaire Mark Cuban, who also sees vast changes to an AI-dominated workplace. Altman's recent remarks to finance executives at a Federal Reserve conference on large banks and capital requirements included his belief that entire job categories will be eaten up by AI. He said customer service is all but completely ready for an AI takeover right now, as reported by the Guardian newspaper. 'That's a category where I just say, you know what, when you call customer support, you're on target and AI, and that's fine,' he said. When a user calls a hotline now, AI answers, and it's like 'a super-smart, capable person,' Altman explained, adding that 'there's no phone tree, there's no transfers. It can do everything that any customer support agent at that company could do. It does not make mistakes. It's very quick. You call once, the thing just happens, it's done.' You may have already encountered an AI customer service system, or at the very least spoken briefly to one before being forwarded to a person with the info you're seeking. And anecdotally, if Altman's promise of no mistakes proves true, then that's a huge sell for customer service departments—and consumer satisfaction. (We all know how frustrating it can be calling these lines.) What an AI can offer under these circumstances is also clearly defined: customers probably call with a discrete set of common issues, and the AI can be trained on what to do. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters But the next industry Altman said was ripe for an AI takeover is more complex, requiring deep knowledge and empathy, and there are much higher stakes at play. According to the AI CEO, AI is already better than human doctors. It can, 'most of the time,' surpass human physician skills, he argued, suggesting it's 'a better diagnostician than most doctors in the world.' But then he pointed out a very human truth: 'people still go to doctors,' he said, and he added that he felt the same, 'maybe I'm a dinosaur here, but I really do not want to, like, entrust my medical fate to ChatGPT with no human doctor in the loop.' That at least aligns with warnings from medical experts who say that while AI may be useful for medical advice under some circumstances, like helping to make medical notes, it's just too subject to misinformation errors to be trusted to give mental health advice or diagnoses, for example. In fact a group of therapists recently warned of the danger in doing so. Altman also told the bankers that he's worried near future AIs could be used by bad actors, perhaps based overseas, to attack the U.S. financial system. He cited the issue of AI voice clones as a direct risk. While he's not predicting AI will steal banking jobs here, he is essentially warning that the entire industry could be upended by AI, used the wrong way. You may think Altman is being unnecessarily doomy here. In this case, you may be more aligned with the thinking of billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban. He's just suggested that in his expert mind, AI will become a 'baseline' workplace skill inside five years. Essentially he thinks that 'like email or Excel,' everyone, from fresh graduates to practiced entrepreneurs, will have to master AI to succeed at their tasks. in an interview with Fortune, Cuban predicted that thanks to the force multiplying effects AI can have, 'we'll see more people working for themselves' thanks to the rise of AI assistants, possibly powered by agent AI tech, which can transform 'solo founders into full teams.' And worse, if you're note already using AI to 'move faster or make smarter decisions, you're behind,' he said. While framed more positively than Altman's statements, a closer look says Cuban is still predicting whole classes of jobs will disappear inside five years. Why would a startup CEO need a personal assistant, a coding expert or a marketing adviser if all those tasks could be done by next-gen AI? advertisement All of this, while interesting, could be dismissed as mere PR for the AI industry, but you should actually care about this expert advice. Altman's warnings could have you looking at what tasks you already feel comfortable outsourcing to an AI tool instead of a human worker. And then, taking Cuban's advice, you should consider taking time to properly educate yourself about the promises and risks of AI technology, and also plan on upskilling or reskilling your existing staff. The potential efficiencies AI promises mean they could — By Kit Eaton This article originally appeared on Fast Company's sister publication, Inc. Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store