
The Three Key Steps to Diagnose Dementia in Primary Care
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Today we're going to discuss a new clinical practice guideline from the Alzheimer's Association on the evaluation and testing for Alzheimer's and related dementias. This is an important area for us in primary care because we are the first clinicians that most patients see when they are concerned they may be having memory problems or dementia symptoms. It's a challenging area and this document provides much-needed guidance.
The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD) recommends a three-step approach to diagnosis. The first step is to assess whether there's a cognitive deficit. If there is a cognitive deficit, then assess whether that deficit fits mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or whether it fits mild, moderate, or severe dementia. Remember the main difference between MCI and dementia is that dementia, by definition, interferes with the capacity for independent everyday activities.
It's important to get a history from both the patient and a significant other, with attention to activities of daily living, time course of the cognitive decline, and any potential precipitating factors. Patients themselves may not always give the best personal history to provide a complete picture of what's going on, due to factors such as memory impairment, embarrassment, or a lack of self-awareness. In addition, the DETeCD-ADRD guideline recommends performing a mental status exam using a validated instrument like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment or the Mini Mental State Examination. If that evaluation shows that the patient is cognitively unimpaired, then no further evaluation is needed and we can educate the patient about brain healthy behaviors and, of course, plan for follow-up assessment. If the patient does show evidence of cognitive impairment, then it's important to define the effect of that impairment on the patient's function.
The second step in the evaluation is to characterize the clinical profile of a patient's cognitive-behavioral syndrome. What this means is that we want — to the degree that is reasonable — to delineate the domains of impairment, which might include memory, executive function, attention, language, and emotional and social functioning. Here's where neuropsychological testing can be helpful, if it's available. These first two steps allow us to develop a plan for personalized care and support.
The third step is testing to help figure out the cause of the patient's symptoms. It's important to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from Alzheimer's disease–related dementias (ADRD), such as frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, multi-infarct or vascular dementia, or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's dementia. It's also important to determine if the cognitive decline is caused by or being made worse by other diseases like depression, sleep apnea, and B12 deficiency or if other factors like the effect of medications (eg, anticholinergics and alcohol) are contributing to the cognitive or behavioral symptoms.
Step 3 of the evaluation includes ordering what the guidelines refer to as 'tier 1 laboratory studies.' They are first tier because these are laboratory studies that are considered routine and should be ordered for all patients who have MCI or dementia. The recommended labs should include a complete blood cell count with differential, complete metabolic panel, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin B12, homocysteine, and C-reactive protein levels. In addition, the DETeCD-ADRD guideline recommends that physicians order imaging, preferably a brain MRI without gadolinium or, if MRI is contraindicated, a noncontrast head CT. The MRI can rule out tumor, show multiple infarcts, or show regional atrophy patterns that may suggest specific neurodegenerative pathologic changes — but it's important to recognize that the MRI is not in any way diagnostic.
The guideline recommends against using the term 'labs for reversible causes of dementia' because the labs only rarely uncover a cause for dementia that is reversible. The guideline authors cite a meta-analysis that showed less than 1% of dementia syndromes are reversible, but nearly 10% of people with dementia have a common comorbid condition that may be contributing to their decrement in cognitive function. This certainly fits my experience. The preferred term for tier 1 labs is a 'cognitive lab panel.' Additional testing, termed tier 2 and 3 tests, are only recommended when necessary on an individual basis. These can include sleep studies and antinuclear antibody, folate, ammonia, lead, Lyme antibody, rapid plasma reagin, and HIV tests. Of course, there are plenty more tests that can be done in specific circumstances.
Now what's missing here? How about blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease? I recently reviewed the Alzheimer's Association workgroup recommendations on revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease. The key principle which that guideline lays out is that Alzheimer's disease is defined by its biology — neuropathologic changes in the brain, like deposition of amyloid and tau protein. We are now on the cusp of having blood-based biomarkers for amyloid beta and p-tau that will enable us to either rule in or rule out Alzheimer's disease with a high degree of accuracy. It's important to recognize that while the biomarkers are promising and will be incredibly useful, they still need to be further validated in large populations. And although the blood biomarkers can now be ordered through many lab tests, there is not yet a biomarker that is fully approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. In my opinion, start to understand the place of blood biomarkers now, because once they are regulatory approved, they'll become a routine addition to the initial panel of laboratory tests that we typically order when evaluating patients for dementia.
Finally, I was thrilled to see that the guidelines specifically acknowledge that in the primary care setting, two or more problem-focused visits would usually be required to assess for dementia. I certainly find that to be the case. When there's uncertainty with regard to diagnosis, early age of onset, rapid progression, and/or consideration of biologic therapy, then referral to a dementia specialist makes sense.
This is an important update and it provides a clear, straightforward approach which allows us to evaluate patients for dementia with confidence. I'm interested in your thoughts, please leave them in the comments section below. For Medscape, I'm Dr Neil Skolnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former LeBron James Teammate Tells Wild Club Story About Lakers Star
Former LeBron James Teammate Tells Wild Club Story About Lakers Star originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James takes precise care of his body, which has helped him play 22 seasons in the NBA at an elite level. Advertisement James is 40 years old. He's the oldest active player in the NBA. The average person wouldn't know that by watching him play, as James made the All-NBA Second Team this year and became the oldest player in NBA history to receive an MVP vote, breaking Michael Jordan's 23-year-old record. A four-time MVP, James has played for the Cleveland Cavaliers (twice), Miami Heat and Lakers. He's a four-time champion and a four-time Finals MVP. James is the only player in NBA history to win a Finals MVP Award with three teams. Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James© Soobum Im-Imagn Images A future Hall of Famer, James won his first two titles with the Heat in 2012 and 2013. Mario Chalmers, who was on those Miami teams, recently told NFL legend Shannon Sharpe that James used to get treatment in the clubs. Advertisement "I tell people this all the time, Bron will really get treatment if he was in the club. Like, he would literally have something on his knees or something on his back inside the club. So it's like why is somebody doing that, like that's a real dedication to just be in the club with treatment." Chalmers said. Sharpe went on asking what were the kind of treatments he is doing in the club. "Not ice bags, it'd be like the stim, like the stim machine that shoot electrolyte or electricity in your knees and stuff like that. He always have something [for] recovery." James has said many times that he takes recovery very seriously. The leading scorer in NBA history has never undergone surgery on his body because of an injury. The small forward is arguably the most durable athlete in NBA history. Advertisement Arguably the greatest player of all time, James has career averages of 27.0 points, 7.5 rebounds, 7.4 assists, 1.5 steals and 0.7 blocks. He's the only player in NBA history to rank top five all-time in points and assists. James, who turns 41 in December, has a player option to return to the Lakers next season worth $52.6 million. The King is widely expected to pick up his option and play his 23rd NBA season. Related: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Predicted to Repeat Feat Not Seen Since LeBron James This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Sanofi to Buy Blueprint for $9.1 Billion Equity Value
Sanofi SA will buy Blueprint Medicines Corp. for $9.1 billion equity value, in a deal that sees the European pharmaceutical firm expand its rare immunological disease portfolio. Sanofi will pay $129 per share in cash, the companies said in a statement Monday. That represents a 27% premium to Blueprint's closing price on Friday.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Remission, Attaining CV Risk Targets Drops CVD Risk in Lupus
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had more than double the risk for atherosclerosis progression over 10 years than healthy control individuals, but maintaining cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) targets and achieving sustained disease remission significantly reduced this risk. METHODOLOGY: Researchers collected carotid ultrasound measurements from 111 patients with SLE and 94 age- and sex-matched controls, including baseline measurements from 2012 to 2013 with follow-up assessments at 3, 7, and 10 years. They tracked carotid plaque progression, CVRF target attainment on the basis of the 2016 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and additional CVD risk modifiers, and incident CVD events over 10 years and looked for predictors of plaque progression. TAKEAWAY: Patients with SLE demonstrated a 2.3-fold higher risk for carotid plaque progression than healthy control individuals (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.26; 95% CI, 1.34-3.81; P = .002). = .002). Each CVRF maintained at target during the 10-year follow-up reduced plaque progression risk by 32% (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P = .004). = .004). Achievement of definition of remission in SLE for ≥ 75% of follow-up decreased risk for plaque progression by 43% (IRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .033). = .033). Persistent triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity increased 10-year risk for incident cardiovascular events in SLE more than sevenfold (hazard ratio, 7.52; P = .014). IN PRACTICE: 'Patients with SLE experience a 2.3-fold higher 10-year atherosclerosis progression risk than [healthy controls], which is significantly mitigated by sustained [cardiovascular risk factor] control and prolonged clinical remission,' the study authors wrote in the abstract. 'Carotid ultrasound may have an additive role in enhancing CVD risk assessment in patients with SLE.' SOURCE: Maria G. Tektonidou, MD, PhD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, presented the study at the 16th International Congress on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Toronto. LIMITATIONS: The study sample was relatively small. Carotid ultrasound is dependent on operator skill and experience, which can lead to interobserver and intraobserver variability. DISCLOSURES: Funding information for this research was not provided. Disclosure information for the authors was not available.