
Iranian Christians feared death in Iran. Then the US deported them to Panama.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Critics question the legality of undocumented migrants sent to Guantanamo Bay
For the first time around ten undocumented migrants arrived at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base.
The U.S. government has begun flying migrants to Panama and Costa Rica as part of a strategy to increase deportations.
Immigrant advocates say the flights violate migrants' rights and could put asylum-seekers in danger.
The young woman in the video sounds desperate.
Sitting on a bed in a hotel room surrounded by eight other people, including several children, she explains to the camera that they're all Iranian Christians who journeyed to the U.S.-Mexico border near Tijuana to seek asylum – then were shackled and flown six hours in a military plane to Panama.
'All of our cases are legitimate,' she says, her eyes burrowing with worry. 'I'm a protester in Iran with a record. I can't go back.'
The woman – later identified as 27-year-old Artemis Ghasemzadeh – was part of a group of Iranian Christians, as well as migrants from Afghanistan, Nepal, China and other countries, who were recently flown from the U.S. to Panama and Costa Rica.
The flights are part of President Donald Trump and his administration's strategy of outsourcing some of its most challenging deportations and removing as many people as possible who are in the U.S. without permission. On Thursday, the administration took another step designating eight gangs from Latin America as "foreign terrorist organizations," increasing the reach of U.S. law enforcement as they race to deport record number of migrants and deliver on one of Trump's biggest campaign promises.
But these deportation flights trample migrant's rights and could return some asylum-seekers to dangerous situations, immigrant advocates and attorneys say.
'This is unprecedented,' Hillary Walsh, an immigration attorney in Phoenix whose office has been in touch with the Iranians in Panama, said of the new flights. 'It's not making asylum law hard – it's eliminating asylum law.'
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which oversees the deportations, did not respond to a request for comment.
'Cries and horrifying noises'
Ghasemzadeh and the other Iranians traveled through several countries, including Mexico, to reach the U.S.-Mexico border at Tijuana, Walsh said. After they crossed the border, U.S. officials took their passports and other documents and gave them immigration detention wristbands. They were never given 'credible fear' interviews, Walsh said, often the first step to determining whether migrants could apply for asylum.
The migrants were told detention centers there were full and they were transporting them to Texas, Walsh said. Instead, they were shackled, boarded onto a C-17 military cargo plane and flown to Panama.
'They tied our hands and feet,' Ghasemzadeh says in the video, which, as of Wednesday, had been shared more than 160,000 times. 'Women and children were getting sick, fainting … You could hear cries and horrifying noises from the plane.'
As of 2019, there were about 385,000 Iranian immigrants living in the United States, or less than 1 percent of the nearly 45 million immigrants, according to the Migration Policy Institute. That year, there were approximately 7,000 unauthorized Iranian immigrants, or less than 0.1% of the estimated 11 million unauthorized immigrants in the country.
Iranian Christians present a particularly compelling asylum case, according to immigrant advocates, since the Iranian government prohibits converting from Islam to any religion. Sharia, or Islamic religious law, as interpreted by the government considers conversion from Islam apostasy, a crime punishable by death, according to the U.S. State Department.
The vast majority of Iranians who arrive in the U.S. do so through a third country, often Turkey, and with the proper visas, said Peyman Malaz, chief operating officer of the PARS Equality Center, an L.A.-based advocacy group that helps mostly Persian-speaking migrants.
More Iranians arrive at the border
Over the past four or five months, however, his center has seen an uptick in Iranians arriving at the border who complain that their wait times in third countries are stretching past five or six years, he said. Those who arrive at the border are often the most persecuted and desperate, such as Iranian Christians, he said.
Malaz said he was dismayed to hear of the Iranian Christians who were flown to Panama without any process for asylum.
'I was shocked,' he said. 'The United States has always been a beacon of hope for refugees. These people are running away from an autocratic government.'
The Iranian Christians were part of a flight of 119 people who arrived in Panama aboard the C-17 on February 12, the first of three flights to arrive in the country the past week, said Tom Cartwright, who tracks deportation flights using publicly available flight records for the advocacy group Witness at the Border. Another flight filled with migrants later landed in Costa Rica.
More: 'Woman, life, liberty': Iranians on why they'll risk beatings and death for change
The last time the U.S. government transported migrants to a third country that was not their country of origin was when immigration officials flew asylum-seekers from Guatemala, Honduras and other countries to southern Mexico under the Biden administration, Cartwright said. Those flights ended in late 2022.
The use of military cargo flights is baffling, he said, since U.S. officials could transport migrants on commercial charter flights for a fraction of the cost. Also, some of the nationalities on the flights, such as Nepal and India, the U.S. could deport directly to their countries of origin rather than pay to take them through a third country, Cartwright said.
More: OnPolitics: Why Iranians are fighting for their freedom
'From a financial sense, it makes no sense at all. Zero,' he said.
'They'll definitely be harmed'
Cartwright said he and other immigrant advocates suspect Trump is using an executive order he signed last month to invoke a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that gives the president the authority to 'suspend the entry' of certain noncitizens, whose entry would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.'
Earlier this month, immigrant rights groups sued the Trump administration in federal court, claiming the executive order unlawfully shut down asylum at the border.
'This is an unprecedented power grab that will put countless lives in danger,' Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, said in a statement accompanying the filing. 'No president has the authority to unilaterally override the protections Congress has afforded those fleeing danger.'
On Tuesday, Ghasemzadeh and the other Iranians were transferred from their hotel in Panama City to a remote migrant center at the edge of the jungle, according to Walsh's office. It's unclear what rights and procedures are being afforded to them.
Attorneys are trying to help her and others, Walsh said. But at such a distance and with communication a challenge, it's becoming increasingly difficult, Walsh said.
Her top concern: That Ghasemzadeh and the others could be returned to Iran.
'They'll definitely be harmed when they go back,' Walsh said. 'There's no question in my mind.'
Follow Rick Jervis on X: @MrRJervis.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: It's safe for oil tankers to go back to B.C.'s north coast
In 2017, the Trudeau government introduced Bill C-48, which imposed an oil tanker moratorium on British Columbia's north coast, replacing the voluntary 'tanker exclusion zone' in place since 1985. Public discourse about such measures has been partly guided by the fear of a massive oil spill similar to the one caused by the Exxon Valdez in 1989. The Exxon Valdez was a single-hulled tanker with an inexperienced hand at the wheel, a captain below deck and a broken collision-avoidance radar system. The accident spilled 37,000 tonnes of oil into Alaskan waters, resulting in a major environmental disaster. Supporters of the tanker moratorium believe nothing has changed since 1989. But it has. The Exxon Valdez spill instigated major changes in the international regulation of global shipping and in measures to minimize accidents, design tankers and contain and clean up spills when they occur. Single-hull tankers have been completely phased out. For more than 10 years now all new vessels have had to be double-hulled. The measures taken have resulted in global seaborne oil spills declining from an annual average of 2,340 barrels per day in the 1980s to about 100 barrels per day since 2010 — even as tanker shipments have doubled to about 60 million barrels per day. The annual number of spills exceeding seven tonnes has declined by 90 per cent since the 1970s. Canada's performance in avoiding and reducing oil spills has been even better. In recent years, spills of crude oil and refined products in Canadian waters have been so small they are now measured in litres, not tonnes. In 2024, the Canadian National Aerial Surveillance Program, which monitors marine spills, reported 19 greater than 10 litres in volume, for a total estimated volume of 739 litres — less than one tonne. Not only are spills much less common but Canada's ability to respond quickly and clean them up is much improved. The federal government has established a national ship-source oil spill regime involving prevention, preparedness, response, liability and compensation. The Canadian Coast Guard is the on-water operator to ensure that responses to marine incidents are 'effective, efficient and appropriate.' It works closely with regional response organizations such as the Western Canada Marine Response Corporation (WCMRC), which operates off the Pacific coast. These organizations are responsible for responding to spills up to 10,000 tonnes. Why 10,000 tonnes? Because that is equivalent to the largest spill in Canadian history, which occurred off the Nova Scotia coast over 50 years ago. The worst spill off Canada's Pacific coast was 240 tonnes, caused by the sinking of B.C. Ferries' Queen of the North in 2006. In 2013, the WCMRC said it had the capacity to quickly recover about 26,000 tonnes and was continuing to grow. It has doubled its fleet of response vessels from 44 to 88 and increased its workforce from about 30 to over 200 full-time employees. In 2010, Det Norske Veritas, an international certification body and classification society, performed a risk analysis of the marine shipping component of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. It estimated the risks in terms of 'return periods,' i.e., the average number of years expected between spills. It concluded that with proper mitigation measures an oil spill of up to 5,000 cubic metres (31,400 barrels) would occur every 350 years and a spill exceeding 20,000 cubic metres (126,000 barrels) every 550 years. Terence Corcoran: Finally, maybe, a real climate science debate Jack Mintz: Is Canada the most European non-EU country? Let's hope not! In sum, Canada's ability to respond to and clean up oil spills has improved substantially while the actual number of spills and risk of future spills has declined sharply. By any reasonable standard, the public policy rationale for a moratorium on tanker traffic off the northern British Columbia coast has essentially disappeared. Decisions on new energy infrastructure should be based on facts, not fear. Continuing the tanker moratorium effectively blocks approval and construction of an oil pipeline from Alberta to the northern B.C. coast from where crude would be shipped by tanker to Pacific markets, thus expanding Canada's market access to countries other than the United States and achieving the energy resurgence the federal government claims to support. Robert Lyman is a retired energy economist. Sign in to access your portfolio


The Intercept
a day ago
- The Intercept
ICE Agent Caught on Camera Disguised as a Construction Worker
Despite their proclivity for wearing masks, the Department of Homeland Security denies that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents refuse to identify themselves in the field. 'I've been on a number of these operations,' Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said last month. 'They are wearing vests that say ICE or ERO, which is the enforcement arm of ICE or Homeland Security Investigations. They clearly verbally identify themselves.' But video from a confrontation in a New York state town that was reviewed by The Intercept contradicts her claims. In the footage, Juan Fonseca Tapia, the co-founder and organizer of the Connecticut-based immigrant advocacy group Greater Danbury Unites for Immigrants, questions a man dressed as a construction worker. 'What agency are you with?' asks Fonseca Tapia, filming through his car window. 'I'm not going to tell you,' responds the man, who is wearing a high-visibility construction vest, an orange helmet and glasses, with a camouflage mask covering most of his face. 'It's none of your business.' The construction worker getup was actually a disguise — ICE confirmed to The Intercept that the man in the hard hat is an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent. 'ICE New York City officers were conducting surveillance in Brewster, New York, August 2, when anti-ICE agitators followed them and attempted to disrupt their operation,' an ICE spokesperson told The Intercept by email. In the video – which was posted last weekend on social media by Greater Danbury Area Unites for Immigrants – the ICE agent said only that he is a member of 'federal law enforcement.' Neither 'ICE' nor 'ERO' is visible on his vest in the footage. That puts the lie to McLaughlin's claims that ICE agents identify themselves. Fonseca Tapia told The Intercept that he spotted a second man who was similarly disguised as a construction worker. 'I find it outrageous. It's indefensible. This is where we are crossing a dangerous line on immigration enforcement into these paramilitary type tactics with a secret police force,' said New York State Senator Patricia Fahy who last month introduced the Mandating End of Lawless Tactics (MELT) Act which would ban the use of face coverings and plainclothes by ICE and other federal enforcement agents during civilian immigration actions conducted in New York State. 'The first three words of the provision that we're adding into law are 'Masks and disguises prohibited,' period. And this video is Exhibit A. This is exactly what we are alarmed about.' On Tuesday, at a National Conference of State Legislators in Boston, Fahy joined colleagues from Massachusetts and Pennsylvania in condemning the use of 'paramilitary-type secret police' tactics by ICE agents. 'We started to reach out to all the states that have legislation concerning masked ICE agents and said, 'Let's do this jointly. Let's collectively bring attention to this,'' Fahy told The Intercept. 'We had a couple of dozen lawmakers all standing up to say 'This is not who we are' and calling out these authoritarian-type tactics.' The interaction with the disguised construction worker began when Fonseca Tapia spotted a group of people he believed to be ICE agents in downtown Brewster. He began alerting day laborers who congregate in the area, while driving in his car. Soon, Fonseca Tapia said, realized that he was being followed in a vehicle by the man in the construction worker get-up. Eventually, he found himself surrounded by several vehicles with dark tinted windows. Fonseca Tapia said that the man in the construction worker disguise confronted him and repeatedly tried to persuade him to roll down his window or get out of the car. He said he feared that he might be 'kidnapped' by ICE. After Fonseca Tapia stopped filming, he said that the masked agent issued a warning: 'More of my guys are coming and we're going to take care of you.' To Fonseca Tapia, that sounded like an act of intimidation. 'It's literally a threat,' said Fonseca Tapia. 'You have three vehicles with very tinted windows, so it's impossible to see inside. People are wearing masks and refuse to identify themselves and one of them tells you he is going to call more of them to 'take care of you?' This is for sure an intimidation tactic to instill fear in people who are working to alert the community when there is an ICE presence.' 'It's undermining all of law enforcement because they come across as impersonators.' An ICE spokesperson cited 'increased assaults toward ICE,' as the reason that the ICE agent confronted individuals who followed and filmed them in Brewster. 'The officer was concerned for the safety of himself and others,' the spokesperson wrote. 'I don't know what the concern was — because he was following me,' said Fonseca Tapia. 'If he thought I posed a threat, I don't think he would put himself in danger by following me.' Since President Trump's return to office, masked ICE agents carrying out immigration raids have become increasingly common. Across the country, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies working with ICE, launch operations wearing disguises or plainclothes and sometimes arrive in unmarked vehicles and arrest people without warrants. Often ICE agents don masks, balaclavas, neck gaiters or other facial coverings to conceal their identities. Lawmakers, veteran law enforcement officials, activists, and citizens have criticized the donning of masks by law enforcement as anti-American and for sowing confusion, chaos, and fear, while reducing accountability and undermining public trust. 'The failure of ICE officers and agents to promptly and clearly identify who they are and the authority under which they are acting has led witnesses of immigration enforcement operations to justifiably question the law enforcement status, authority, and constitutionality of ICE officers and agents and their operations,' wrote U.S. Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) in a May letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Tom Homan, the Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, and top ICE officials. 'We remain deeply concerned that ICE's lack of transparency will lead the public to intercede in enforcement efforts, escalating an already tense interaction, and risking an entirely avoidable violent situation.' Fahy emphasized that she had a family member who served in law enforcement and that she saw the use of masks and disguises as a threat to law and order. 'It's undermining all of law enforcement because they come across as impersonators. There's no accountability and there's no transparency, so it erodes public trust and undermines decades of work and millions of dollars spent,' she told The Intercept. 'When they use disguises, these arrests – without presenting an arrest warrant, neither a judicial or even administrative warrant – come across as abductions or kidnapping. These are third-world tactics, and they should shock the collective conscience.' Read Our Complete Coverage The International Association of Chiefs of Police warns that 'members of the general public may be intimidated or fearful of officers wearing a face covering, which may heighten their defensive reactions.' An ICE spokesperson said the agency has no policy on masks, aside from pandemic safety requirements. The Department of Homeland Security has endorsed the agents' right to wear masks, citing attacks on agents or the doxing of law enforcement or their families. In an email, DHS specifically mentioned one Texas man's threat to shoot ICE agents as a reason to allow masks although it was unclear how a mask would protect an agent from a bullet. Nonetheless, DHS insisted that because of such fears, ICE would not discourage its agents from wearing masks during anti-immigrant raids. For almost two months, DHS has failed to respond to The Intercept's questions about escalating statistics quoted by government officials about supposed assaults of federal agents. In June, DHS told The Intercept that 'ICE law enforcement and their families are being targeted and are facing an over 400% increase in assaults.' ICE now claims that figure has jumped to 830 percent. ICE failed to answer The Intercept's questions about the use of disguises by ICE agents and if the agent who failed to identify himself in Brewster had been reprimanded. 'At no time did the officer attempt to make an arrest or detain anyone without being plainly marked as an ICE officer,' the spokesperson said. The New York City Bar Association has noted that secret police tactics are a gateway to further lawlessness. 'Allowing masked ICE agents to conduct detentions also makes it increasingly likely that third-party actors will impersonate federal agents and use their anonymity to subject vulnerable populations to harassment and violence under the apparent color of law,' the group said in a June statement. Bad actors have, indeed, masqueraded as ICE agents from coast to coast this year. Various people have reportedly impersonated ICE agents to commit or attempt robbery in Pennsylvania, kidnapping in Florida and South Carolina, scams in California, sexual assault in North Carolina, rape in New York, as well as acts of impersonation, intimidation and other offenses in California, Florida, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Washinton State. In Congress, Democrats have introduced several bills, including the No Secret Police Act, which would bar federal agents from concealing their faces with 'home-made, non-tactical masks' and require law enforcement officers and DHS agents engaged in border security and civil immigration enforcement to clearly display identification and insignia when detaining or arresting people 'If you uphold the peace of a democratic society, you should not be anonymous,' saidRep. Adriano Espaillat, D-NY, the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. 'DHS and ICE agents wearing masks and hiding identification echoes the tactics of secret police authoritarian regimes – and deviates from the practices of local law enforcement, which contributes to confusion in communities.' An ICE spokesperson claimed the persons filming the agent in Brewster presented 'a safety concern for the officers, the community and even the agitators themselves' and that the 'ICE officer contacted the local police.' The Village of Brewster Police Department, however, told The Intercept that it did not take part in any such interaction. The Putnam County Sheriff's Office refused to entertain The Intercept's questions. 'We don't have somebody that would handle even communicating that to the press if it was even for the press's knowledge,' said a person who replied to a request for her name with 'No, thank you,' before hanging up. A message left for the department's civil affairs division was not returned. Fonseca Tapia said that personnel from both the Brewster Police Department and the Putnam County Sheriff's Office were called to the scene and spoke with him. 'This is a call to action for people to understand that this is wrong and this is not normal. Nobody is coming to save us. We are all we got,' Fonseca Tapia told The Intercept. 'Now is the time for action. People need to get involved because today it's immigrants' rights but who knows what group it's going to be tomorrow?'


Time Magazine
a day ago
- Time Magazine
Trump to Deploy More Federal Forces on Washington, D.C.
President Donald Trump is expected on Monday to announce plans to use federal resources to crack down on crime in Washington, D.C., and remove homeless people from the city's public spaces, a move that local leaders are condemning as an overriding of local control of the city based on false pretenses. Data show that violent crime in the nation's capital is down significantly from a peak in 2023. But Trump paints a different picture. Trump described Washington as 'one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the World' in a post on Truth Social Saturday. On Sunday, Trump wrote, 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before. The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.' In recent days, Trump has deployed federal officers from the U.S. Park Police, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the U.S. Marshals Service on night patrols in D.C., according to ATF's X account. The President is scheduled to announce his latest plans for Washington at a press conference scheduled for 10 a.m. When asked about what actions Trump was planning, a White House official replied, "Tune in." Trump has considered deploying the National Guard in Washington, D.C. to address crime. If he follows through, it would be a rare use of military forces on U.S. soil and a potential violation of the Posse Comitatus Act that restricts the military from being used as a police force for domestic law enforcement. During racial justice protests in June 2020, Trump sent uniformed National Guard troops to Lafayette Park in front of the White House to help clear the park of protestors. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, said on MSNBC on Sunday that Trump's statements comparing the capital to a 'war-torn country' are 'hyperbolic and false.' According to city police data, violent crime in D.C. is down by 26% so far in 2025 compared to the year before. Trump's focus on public safety in the capital comes after former U.S. DOGE Service software engineer Edward Coristine, who is known by the nickname 'Big Balls,' was injured during an alleged carjacking in DC early in the morning on Aug. 3.