logo
Milwaukee church saw opportunity to plant trees on empty land. Trump team saw DEI effort.

Milwaukee church saw opportunity to plant trees on empty land. Trump team saw DEI effort.

Yahoo03-04-2025

This spring, Solomon Community Temple United Methodist Church in Milwaukee's Harambee neighborhood was going to get greener.
The church, which is heavily invested in protecting the environment, had secured nearly $28,000 to plant 16 native trees on its property with the hope of bringing more shade to the neighborhood. It was to be a small but important step toward making sure all city neighborhoods reap the health and environmental benefits trees provide, not just wealthier ones.
"We're in a very visible spot in Milwaukee," said Katharine Goray, the church's chair of projects and outreach ministries. "If we can create a ripple effect through other houses of faith and nonprofits, it would make a substantial difference and help balance that lack of green space."
Those plans are now on hold.
The money came from former President Joe Biden's sweeping climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act — money that President Donald Trump froze upon taking office and ordered agencies to review. With the review ongoing, Faith in Place, a Chicago nonprofit which received $1.9 million in Inflation Reduction Act funds for tree-planting work, can't pass on the funds it promised to groups across the upper Midwest.
That included the money for Solomon Community Temple.
More: A new Milwaukee program gives away free trees, improves health, builds community. Here's how.
More: Many Milwaukeeans live in a heat island, and 'we can't air condition our way out of this'
Goray is adamant that the funding freeze won't stop the church from adding to the neighborhood's tree canopy. If the congregation can't plant 16 trees, she said, they can at least plant one.
But it will slow the work down — and with trees, which can take a decade or more to mature, time is of the essence.
The grant money came from a $1.5 billion investment in urban tree-planting that the Biden administration announced in 2023 through the U.S. Forest Service, a division of the Department of Agriculture. It was part of Biden's Justice40 initiative, which mandated 40% of the benefits of certain environmental programs go to disadvantaged communities. Trump ended the Justice40 initiative in his purge of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts from the federal government.
Trees provide myriad benefits to the environment and to health, like filtering out air pollution, storing carbon dioxide and taking water into their root systems to reduce flooding. Tree cover also provides shade, keeping things cool during the summer heat. That helps combat the urban heat island effect, where an abundance of manmade surfaces like parking lots, sidewalks and streets absorb and hold onto heat and produce temperatures several degrees hotter than the overall temperature forecast.
More urban green space has even been tied to improved mental health, more active lifestyles and reduced crime and violence.
But not all neighborhoods have the same amount of tree cover. A 2021 study from the Nature Conservancy found that lower-income blocks had less tree cover than higher-income blocks in 92% of the cities surveyed. People of color are more likely to live in areas with more concrete and fewer trees because of discriminatory practices like redlining.
This is true in Milwaukee, one of the nation's most segregated cities, although organizations across the city have been working to increase tree cover in neighborhoods that need it most. That includes the Harambee neighborhood, which has a lack of trees and lots of impervious surfaces, Goray said.
More: A new urban forest is growing in Sherman Park. Here's why that's big for the neighborhood
More: This Milwaukee neighborhood has a program that can help save on energy costs
The church has more control over its property than, say, a city park, Goray said, and its actions affect more than just one household. That's why it wanted to get involved in the effort.
"If every church or nonprofit or house of faith were even to plant a couple trees ... it would make Harambee much more livable and healthy," she said.
Fifty-nine faith and community groups in Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana were to receive money from Faith in Place for tree-planting, education and maintenance, said Rev. Brian Sauder, Faith in Place's president and CEO.
The groups were excited to begin the work when the grants were announced in January, Sauder said. Contacting them to tell them the funds couldn't flow was devastating.
"In my 11 years being CEO of Faith in Place, I haven't had a situation where I committed to our partners, 'We're going to be able to provide this for you,' and haven't been able to follow through on that," Sauder said.
On March 13, Faith in Place joined onto a lawsuit against the Trump administration by Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental law group, alleging that the administration is illegally withholding funds from the Inflation Reduction Act that have already been appropriated by Congress.
Sauder said March 28 that his organization has been notified by the Forest Service that some requests for advance payment, which Faith in Place needs to disburse the money, were being "considered and processed." The USDA did not respond to a request for comment from the Journal Sentinel.
Goray said her initial reaction to hearing about what happened to the grant was despair, then anger. But now, she said, she's ready to move forward. Through a different grant, Solomon Community Temple will plant almost 500 native plants on its property this summer, she said, and continue other acts of environmental stewardship.
"If we don't do it," she said, "it's not going to get done."
Madeline Heim is a Report for America corps reporter who writes about environmental issues in the Mississippi River watershed and across Wisconsin. Contact her at 920-996-7266 or mheim@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Federal review of funds stalls Milwaukee church tree-planting project

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe
Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe

Advertisement Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple reflected on his own 'failure' Monday in scrutinizing press coverage of Joe Biden and his cognitive decline, particularly after the infamous 'Where's Jackie?' gaffe. As the legacy media continues to face a reckoning over how it handled covering the former president's mental acuity before his disastrous 2024 debate performance, Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out news organizations for not admitting any errors with the headline, 'Did legacy media fail in its Biden coverage? Not if you ask them!' In his lengthy critique, Wemple revisited an episode from a September 2022 event where Biden called for Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., who had died just weeks earlier in a car accident. Biden previously released a statement acknowledging her death after it happened and the event he attended similarly honored her memory. Advertisement 4 Erik Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out the media's lack of self-reflection. Fox News 'Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie?' Biden said in the viral moment. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended the president at the time, insisting Walorski was simply 'top of mind.' 'It's time to turn this exercise on my own byline,' Wemple wrote Monday. 'The 'Where's Jackie' episode was my cue to start hammering mainstream outlets for not pushing on this story. Never happened — that was a failure.' Wemple noted, as Fox News Digital did at the time, that neither CNN nor MSNBC offered any coverage of the 'Where's Jackie' comment. Advertisement 4 Former President Joe Biden speaks during the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, at the Ronald Reagan Building, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022, in Washington. AP 4 Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., is seen before a House Ways and Means Committee markup in Longworth Building on July 12, 2018. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag While acknowledging some in the press, like Axios' Alex Thompson and The Wall Street Journal's Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes for their pre-debate reporting that shed light on Biden's cognitive decline, Wemple knocked the media for broadly lacking the vigor to get to the bottom of it sooner. 'White House coverage must involve more than observing the president in action and writing up analysis pieces about his comings and goings,' Wemple wrote. Advertisement 'It needs to include a muckraking component detailing behind-the-scenes strategies, conflicts and debates over all manner of issues, particularly those relating to the president's mental acuity. An adjacent question relates to whether Biden himself was fully abreast of and in charge of day-to-day decisions.' 4 The Washington Post office in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'And it's on these fronts that major media organizations fell short: Though Biden's declining faculties were clear to all, they never ignited one of those glorious mainstream-media investigative frenzies that colonizes television and radio broadcasts,' he added. Thompson's 'Original Sin' co-author, CNN anchor Jake Tapper, said there should be 'soul-searching' in the legacy media for how Biden's clearly apparent issues were covered. 'Few souls are undergoing a pat-down,' Wemple wrote.

Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle
Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle

Consider what the average American is seeing on their phones/TV screens/computers out of Los Angeles over the past 48 hours: Cars being lit on fire (see below) Masked protesters waving Mexican flags standing in front of the burning cars Fireworks and rocks (and scooters!) being thrown at police vehicles Buildings being spray-painted with anti-law enforcement slogans To be clear: I am not saying that that is the whole story. As virtually every news story I have read is careful to note, these protests are very limited in scope—with much of Los Angeles not even noticing that they are happening. Trump's decision to call up the National Guard could well have been an accelerant to the violence as opposed to the solution for it. But, as I say over and over again: The average person is not seeking out every single nuance of a story like this. They are focused on their daily lives. They catch this sort of news only in passing. And, when you see a quick gloss of this story, it's one that clearly favors Donald Trump. Remember that Trump ran—expressly—in 2024 on getting MUCH tougher on illegal immigrants. The consensus—especially among loose partisans and swing voters—was that the Biden administration had been ineffectual at the Southern border, largely because of its unwillingness to put in place real and biting policies that would curtail the flow of illegals into the U.S. Even as Trump's numbers have faded on virtually every issue during his first five months in office, his polling on the border and immigration more broadly has stayed strong. Ask yourself this. If you are Trump would you rather have the big national story be: Your fight with Elon Musk? The ongoing struggles to pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' through Congress (and all the stuff that's actually IN the 'OBBB')? An immigration fight where the dominant images are protesters lighting cars on fire and clashing with the police? It's a TOTAL no-brainer. Don't believe me? Check out the full-court press Trump has put on to draw as much attention to the issue as possible over the last 24 hours, via his Truth Social feed. Here's just one(of many) examples: Trust me, this is 100% a fight he wants. And he will egg it on in all possible ways over the coming days—as a way to keep it in the news. (I'd argue the decision to call up the California National Guard without even consulting California Gov. Gavin Newsom is an example of how Trump is working to turn up the heat.) And it appears as though Democratic elected officials are willing to play along. Newsom's weird come-arrest-me threat on MSNBC on Sunday night felt tone-deaf. And speaking of tone-deaf, California Rep. Maxine Waters' comments—'I don't know why we have guns. What are those guns for? Are they to shoot protesters?'—feel decidedly out of step with the images we are seeing of the protests on TV. Politics, as I have said many times before, is about picking your battles. It's about fighting on ground that is favorable for you—and unfavorable for your opponent. Like him or hate him, Trump gets that. He knows a fight about deportations defined by burning cars and anti-police graffiti is a winner for him. Democrats need to think this way if they want to beat Trump and the broader Republican party. Fighting Trump on ground where the public is clearly on his side makes ZERO sense. Want more ball and strike calling—no matter what uniform the batter at the plate is wearing? Check out Chris Cillizza's Substack and YouTube channel.

Trump Stumbles On Air Force One Stairs After Mocking Biden For The Same Thing
Trump Stumbles On Air Force One Stairs After Mocking Biden For The Same Thing

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Stumbles On Air Force One Stairs After Mocking Biden For The Same Thing

President Donald Trump nearly face-planted as he climbed the stairs of Air Force One on Sunday ― something he once mocked former President Joe Biden over. Trump was gripping the handrail when his left foot caught the edge of a step. He stumbled, but steadied himself with a hand on the stair and quickly recovered as he proceeded to the top. The moment was caught on video: President Trump stumbles while attempting to board Air Force One — Acyn (@Acyn) June 8, 2025 And by a still photographer: Presidential stumbles are nothing new, especially on the Air Force One stairs. President Barack Obama did it, so did President Ronald Reagan and President Gerald Ford. Biden fell more than once, and Trump repeatedly mocked him for it. 'Joe Biden can't even walk up a flight of stairs on Air Force One,' he said in 2023. Later that year, he said Biden uses 'the children's stairs' on Air Force One and that he 'he can't quite make it up or down' those stairs. Fox News also turned Biden's stumbles into multiple stories on its website and on the air as they became talking points among right-wing media.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store