Joseph Kabila: Ex-DR Congo president returns to the country, party says
Speaking to the BBC, a Goma youth leader for Kabila's People's Party for Reconstruction and Democracy (PPRD), confirmed earlier reports from the M23 that Kabila had returned and stated that residents were "happy" about his arrival."Kabila should be allowed full access to the country. For us it is like a father has returned to his children," Innocent Mirimo told BBC Swahili.Last month, the PPRD was banned because of its "ambiguous attitude" to the occupation of Congolese territory by the M23.In a message on X, rebel spokesperson Lawrence Kanyuka welcomed Kabila to Goma saying: "We wish him a pleasant stay in the liberated areas."A similar message was shared by another spokesperson, Willy Ngoma.The Congolese authorities, who accuse Kabila of war crimes and treason, say there is a "substantial body of documents, testimony and material facts" that link the former leader to the M23.In a now-deleted YouTube video released on Friday, Kabila called the Congolese government, led by President Félix Tshisekedi a "dictatorship", and stated there was a "decline of democracy" in the country.He also outlined his plan to end decades of instability in the country. Congolese government spokesperson, Patrick Muyaya, has rejected Kabila's remarks, telling Congolese TV channel RTNC TV that Kabila "has nothing to offer the country".Fighting between the Congolese army and the M23 first broke out in 2012 and ended in a peace deal the following year. But in 2021 the group took up arms again, saying the promises made in the deal had been broken.Since the beginning of this year, the M23 has made major advances in the mineral-rich east, including taking the key city of Goma in January.The group, which Rwanda has denied backing, says its goal is to protect the minority Tutsi-ethnic group.However, the ongoing conflict has led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians who have been forced to flee their homes in the last few months. Kabila, who stepped down as DR Congo's president in 2019, was once an ally of President Tshisekedi. However the two men fell out, culminating in the termination of their parties' coalition in December 2020.The former president has been living outside the country, in South Africa, for the past two years. But at the beginning of last month he said he would be returning to help find a solution to the conflict in the east.
More BBC Africa stories about DR Congo:
What's the fighting in DR Congo all about?The evidence that shows Rwanda is backing rebels in DR Congo'We would vote for peace - if we had a vote'
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
To Americans, Britain is no longer the free country we thought it was
Every year, the US Department of State releases a report on human rights practices in other countries (CRHRP). One of my first assignments as a political officer at the US embassy was to coordinate and edit one country report. Not surprisingly, certain governments sometimes take issue with how their policies are characterised in the CRHRP. For example, South Africa claimed a recent CRHRP was 'inaccurate and deeply flawed' in criticising them for failing to 'investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses … or violence against racial minorities'. President Cyril Ramaphosa seemed bewildered in May when President Trump took him to task for the murders of white farmers. His government's defence seems to be that South Africa's horrific levels of crime afflict everyone, not just white people, and that the motives are not racist but merely criminal. That is unlikely to mollify a country impoverished under an incompetent succession of ANC leaders, nor will Ramaphosa's explanation that they haven't actually used their sweeping new Land Expropriation Act inspire commercial farmers who feed the country to invest in their farms. But I digress. China doesn't just reject US criticism, they've cheekily published their own report criticising the US for 'the chronic disease of racism,' and 'basic rights and freedoms being disregarded'. Usually, the governments taking the most criticism in the CRHRP are repressive or feckless regimes, from China to Zimbabwe, that suppress free speech, stifle religious expression, or oppress women, minority groups, and political dissidents. That doesn't sound like the England in which I was born over half a century ago. But this year, the Country Report on the UK flags Britain as a risky place to speak your mind. The CRHRP claims that 'the human rights situation worsened in the United Kingdom during the year,' citing 'credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by anti-Semitism'. The report notes restrictions on speech – even silent meditation – near abortion clinics, and the Online Safety Act's curtailment of internet speech, policed by Ofcom. It calls out government censorship of speech deemed misinformation or 'hate speech', including in relation to migrants and crimes committed by foreign nationals. It could have gone even further. In its section on Worker Rights, the CRHRP doesn't discuss the people who have been sacked or disciplined for refusing to accept the forced speech codes of gender ideology, like prison officer David Toshack or nurse Jennifer Melle; or for social media posters who have criticised government action, like teacher Simon Pearson. Like the proverbial frog in slowly heating water, perhaps Brits can't see what is happening to their freedoms. But looking from the outside, we can, and the State Department has called it out. In reaction, I expect the British Left to be as indignant and in denial as the establishment in Washington DC is about crime. Now Donald Trump has temporarily taken over local law enforcement in the city, the Leftist establishment and the national media are claiming that violent crime is lower than in recent years. This ignores some inconvenient realities. First, unreliable numbers. The city has reportedly just settled a lawsuit from a whistleblowing police officer who had alleged that her supervisors were re-classifying serious crimes as lesser offences, to flatter the city's crime statistics. Second, even the supposedly lower murder rate puts Washington among the most dangerous cities in the nation. Like the DC establishment, the British government and much of the media are happy to ignore Lucy Connolly, who is still in prison after she made an unwise online post (and then deleted it); Hamit Coskun, who was prosecuted after he burnt a book; and the thousands of ordinary Brits who have been accused of 'Non-Crime Hate Incidents,' which is at the very least an astonishing waste of police time. The Left likes to pretend that the real villains in the fight for free speech are people like Kathleen Stock, Maya Forstater, and JK Rowling, who courageously state objective truth, rather than the gender ideologues trying to force women to accept men in their changing rooms, prisons, and shelters. George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, and other writers of the early 20th century predicted a future where the populace was dumbed down, repressed, and fed information by an authoritarian state. In the dystopian futures they imagined in 1984 and Brave New World, independent, critical thinking was banned and speech violators were punished. That sounds like the logical destiny of Britain if it maintains its present course. There is already a semi-official dogma on gender ideology, immigration, and crime which it is costly to challenge. Censorship and group-think get worse if not disrupted. Instead of rejecting America's criticism in high dudgeon, I hope Britain will heed the warning of its Atlantic cousins and return to the people their right to speak their minds. For the land of Magna Carta to slowly sink into repression and state control would be a great injustice to Britain's present inhabitants, and an insult to our ancestors' work of centuries. 'The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey)' from Academica Books.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Uganda denies reports that it has struck deal with Trump to take in US deportees
Uganda said it has not reached any agreement with the US to take in undocumented immigrants, contradicting reports that the east African country had struck a deal with the Trump administration to do so. Henry Oryem Okello, Uganda's state minister for foreign affairs, told Reuters the country does not have the capability to take in immigrants. It comes as the US has deported migrants convicted of crimes in the US to non-native countries including South Sudan and Eswatini. 'To the best of my knowledge we have not reached such an agreement. We do not have the facilities and infrastructure to accommodate such illegal immigrants in Uganda. So, we cannot take in such illegal immigrants,' Oryem said. On Tuesday, CBS News, citing internal government documents, reported that the White House had reached deportation deals with Honduras and Uganda. CBS News wrote that Uganda had 'agreed to accept deportees from the US who hail from other countries on the continent, as long as they don't have criminal histories'. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for clarification. The US Department of Homeland Security said in June that third-country deportations – sending undocumented migrants from the US to countries other than their own – were necessary to expel people 'so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back'. Critics have said the deportations are unnecessarily cruel. In July, the US flew five immigrants from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Cuba to Eswatini – an absolute monarchy with a troubling record. Eswatini, the subject of a damning human rights report by the state department in 2023, said it had accepted the US deportees after 'months of robust high-level engagements' with the US. Though other administrations have conducted third-country removals, the Trump administration's practice of sending immigrants to countries facing political and human rights crises have raised international alarm and condemnation. Uganda, a US ally in east Africa, hosts nearly 2 million refugees and asylum-seekers, who mostly come from countries in the region such as Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan and Sudan.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
South African minister under investigation for historic racial slurs on social media
South Africa's sport, arts and culture minister, Gayton McKenzie, is under investigation by the country's human rights commission for historical social media posts containing a highly offensive racial slur, reigniting a debate about racism, identity and the lingering effects of colonialism and apartheid. McKenzie, an anti-immigrant populist from the Coloured community with a history of stirring up controversies, was given a Wednesday evening deadline by the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) to issue an approved apology, undergo sensitivity training, donate to an agreed charity and delete the X posts, which were still online at the time of publication. The posts came to light after the hosts of a podcast called Open Chats said on an episode that Coloured people committed incest and were 'crazy'. The podcast segment was later removed. McKenzie's Patriotic Alliance party, which got 2% of the vote in 2024 national elections and draws its support mainly from Coloured people, filed complaints with the police and the SAHRC. McKenzie told the national broadcaster: 'There should be no place to hide for racists.' Social media sleuths soon unearthed posts made on X between 2011 and 2017, where McKenzie had used the word 'kaffir' – a racial slur for black people – though he was not directing it at particular individuals. In posts on X on 11 August, McKenzie denied being racist and said he is also Black. 'I did tweet some insensitive, stupid and hurtful things a decade or two ago, I was a troll & stupid,' he wrote. 'I cringe when seeing them and I am truly sorry for that. I shall subject myself to the investigation.' Tshepo Madlingozi, the SAHRC's anti-racism commissioner, told local TV channel Newzroom Afrika on 17 August: 'The use of the K-word has been declared unlawful. The use of the K-word, to quote the constitutional court, is unutterable … the court has made it very clear that it is one of the most offensive slurs that one can use.' He said of the posts still being online: 'The harm is ongoing, the harm continues and the alleged offences are still there.' The white minority apartheid regime, which took power in 1948, forcibly separated South Africans into Native, Coloured, Indian and White categories. It lumped together mixed-race people, descendants of south-east Asian slaves and Khoisan Indigenous communities as Coloured and gave them slightly better benefits than their Black counterparts. Today, official data is still collected in four racial categories – Black African, Coloured, Indian/Asian and White. Coloured people were 8.2% of the population in the 2022 census. The tensions that the apartheid 'divide and rule' strategy fostered are still evident. 'In my entire life, I have never called anybody the K-word, never. We are the victims. This is a political campaign,' McKenzie said in a Facebook Live video on 10 August. McKenzie and his spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment. Tessa Dooms, co-author of the book Coloured, said: 'Even if what he had to say was not meant to be derogatory, in a context where Coloured communities have been accused of anti-blackness, the use of that word by a very prominent Coloured figure in society would always be read in the context of presumed anti-blackness.' She said that while some Coloured people were racist, 'Anti-blackness was cultivated as part of the apartheid project.' The enduring tensions are due, in large part, to many communities still living in the separate areas forced on them by apartheid, said Jamil Khan, who researches Coloured identities at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Study. Khan said: 'What this shows us, really, is that South Africans don't really know each other.'
