logo
If Labour cuts my PIP, I lose everything I have worked for

If Labour cuts my PIP, I lose everything I have worked for

Independent3 hours ago

It's been a horrific few weeks – few months – for disabled people, with the never-ending uncertainty around the Labour government's disability benefit cuts making our community scared for our lives.
The government claims their welfare reforms are to help support disabled people into work, but they're ignoring the fact that many disabled people can only work because of the benefits they receive – and I'm one of them.
I live with a wide range of conditions including lupus, endometriosis, arthritis, migraines and dyspraxia, the toll these have on my body means that my disability mostly manifests through lack of energy and cognitive function. I would never be able to work a full time job or one with a strict schedule, as I can only work for a few hours at a time before I can't look at a screen anymore. I mostly work from bed as that's where I'm most comfortable.
However, I've still managed to build a pretty successful career as a writer. With my limited energy and time, I've also helped shape the Taking the PIP campaign, which has brought together more than 130 well-known disabled people to urge the prime minister to stop the cruel cuts to benefits.
But the harsh reality is that if these cuts are approved next week, with a second reading vote on the welfare reform bill, I will lose everything I have.
I receive £558 a month in PIP. I also receive Universal Credit, the amount of which changes every month because I have to input my earnings, but is roughly around £400 a month. At a time when I only have the energy to work one or two hours a week, it means that I'm not working myself to the bone in order to be able to afford to live and can still afford my bills.
Currently, you have to score 8 points to qualify for the daily living component of PIP. But if the eligibility changes come in, you will also have to score at least 4 points in one activity – these involving your ability to cook and clean, socialise and maintain good hygiene.
On my last assessment, the highest I scored on all activities was 2. Due to my depression and neurodivergent conditions, I've made myself ill in the past with bad hygiene. I have to be reminded or pushed to keep myself clean. When I'm in deep depressive episodes, I will go days, or sometimes even weeks, without changing my clothes or washing myself.
It's unsafe for me to do certain things in the kitchen as I sometimes lack control of my hands. I enjoy cooking, but often cut or burn myself and struggle to use many kitchen utensils. My cognitive and mental health conditions also mean I put housework at the bottom of the list, and prioritise just keeping myself alive. Only this week, I had to deep-clean my house – with the support of friends – after I discovered a fly infestation.
But I make allowances so that I can live a good, independent life. I have apps that remind me to clean and eat, I buy pre-sliced food or mostly rely on ready meals. I live in social housing, in an accessible bungalow, so I can move around it safely without fear that I will put myself in danger. I live five minutes from my parents, who are on hand to help with housework.
But if Labour's cuts to PIP go through, I won't be able to afford to continue living my lovely little life. I will be forced to find a job that will push me mentally and physically to breaking point. If I lose my PIP, I genuinely can't guarantee I'll still be here in five years time.
And I'm far from the only one. Under Labour plans, more than 3.2 million people will see their benefits cut, pushing around 8,000 people into poverty or even absolute poverty, which is defined by the UN as 'a condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services.'
More than 280,000 PIP claimants who are already in work would lose their support – and, as a result, could lose their jobs.
In return, just 1-3 per cent of those affected will be able to move into work. While many working people will be affected, those who can't work will also be hard hit.
Where I agree with the government is that the welfare system does need reform, but only to make it more compassionate and less inhumane. Starmer says the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone', and that it's 'counterproductive' and 'works against them getting into work'.
It is all well and good the government saying they want to support people into work – but when they're also quietly cutting Access to Work entitlement, their actions don't show it.
I hear every single day from scared disabled people who have no idea how they'll survive if these cuts go through. The government can claim this is a cost-cutting measure all they want, but the reality is that the very real cost will be that of disabled people's lives.
Is that really a debt politicians want on their hands?
* Rachel Charlton-Dailey is a journalist and disability rights campaigner who is part of the 'Taking the PIP' campaign

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut in September ‘unless Government acts'
UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut in September ‘unless Government acts'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut in September ‘unless Government acts'

The UK's largest bioethanol plant says it will stop production by mid-September unless the Government acts, following the recent trade deal with the United States. Hull-based Vivergo Fuels said that, given 'the strategic importance of a domestic ethanol supply', the Government has committed to formal negotiations to reach a 'sustainable solution'. But the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said on Thursday that it is simultaneously beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation. The Government described the company's announcement as 'disappointing', coming as it had entered into negotiations with Vivergo about financial support on Wednesday. The firm said in a statement: 'Unless the Government is able to provide both short-term funding of Vivergo's losses and a longer-term solution, we intend to close the plant once the consultation process has completed and the business has fulfilled its contractual obligations. 'We would cease all manufacturing before the end of our financial year on September 13 2025.' The statement said: 'In our interim results announcement on April 29 2025, we stated that the commercial viability of Vivergo, our bioethanol business, was being undermined by the way in which the UK Government was applying regulations to imported ethanol. 'Since then, the situation has been made significantly worse by the UK's trade deal with the US, which will allow tariff-free US ethanol into the UK. 'ABF has engaged in extensive discussions with the Government to find a financial and regulatory solution that would enable Vivergo to operate on a profitable and sustainable basis. 'Yesterday, our extended deadline for the Government to deliver that solution passed.' Last month, Vivergo wrote to the wheat farmers who supply it, telling them it will have to close unless there is quick Government intervention. It said the removal of a 19% tariff on US ethanol imports, which formed part of the recent UK-US trade deal, was the 'final blow'. The bioethanol industry says the deal has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. Vivergo said the Hull plant can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms. It described bioethanol production as 'a key national strategic asset' which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future. The plant is also the UK's largest single production site for animal feed and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region. A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families and it is disappointing to see this announcement after we entered into negotiations with the company on financial support yesterday. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said the bioethanol industry has been facing significant challenges for some time and officials and ministers have met with Ensus and Vivergo consistently over the last few months to address the challenges. It said both the business and transport secretaries met with representatives from the industry on June 10 and engagement with the companies 'will continue at pace' to assess potential solutions, with the help of external consultants.

A broken housing market is driving inequality right across Europe – and fuelling the far right
A broken housing market is driving inequality right across Europe – and fuelling the far right

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

A broken housing market is driving inequality right across Europe – and fuelling the far right

Housing is as personal an issue as it gets. Homes are where we take refuge from the outside world, express ourselves, build relationships and families. To buy or rent a house is to project your aspirations and dreams on to bricks and mortar – can we see ourselves sitting outside in the sunshine on that patio? It can also be a deeply frustrating process – can we afford that house? For more and more of us, the answer is no. Experienced at such an individual level, it's easy to think that rising costs are a problem particular to your community, city or country. But unaffordable house prices and rents are a continent-wide issue. According to the European Parliament, from 2015 to 2023, in absolute terms, house prices in the EU rose by just under 50% on average. From 2010 to 2022, rents rose by 18%. As an editor, I wanted to know some of the stories behind these stats and, as a person who lives in a very expensive city (hello from London!), hear some solutions. I commissioned a range of housing experts to contribute to a series, The housing crisis in Europe, describing what the situation looks like in some of Europe's most expensive cities. Agustín Cocola-Gant writes about how changes to policy after the 2008 financial crisis encouraged wealthy foreigners to buy second homes or short-term rentals in Lisbon, pricing locals out of their city. Now some Portuguese families rent rooms, not flats. In a reversal of roles, it's the newcomers who have it worse in Amsterdam, according to Amber Howard. Older, long-term residents live in secure and affordable social housing while younger people and recent arrivals, often on lower incomes, are left to the costly and insecure private housing sector. While social housing stock has dropped over time, private stock has increased as politicians sought to encourage wealthier residents to move into the city. It's a similar story in Budapest, says Csaba Jelinek. Social housing was sold off after the end of the cold war, and private ownership was championed as a rejection of socialist values. What this has meant in practice is older Hungarians investing in housing and driving up prices and rents for younger generations. One city not facing an affordability crisis is Vienna. As Justin Kadi writes, since the 1920s the city has had a stable stock of social housing for tenants of all incomes. Like in Amsterdam, newcomers rent privately, but social housing has had a damping effect on rents. You don't need to be a housing expert to see the dynamics playing out in Europe's housing market. Over more than 40 years, housing policy has favoured those who invest in homes at the expense of those who live in them. This power imbalance is at its most stark in countries with big institutional investors – such as private equity, hedge, insurance and pension funds – as Tim White explores in his piece. When houses are not homes but assets, there is a transfer of wealth from those who have not to those who have. Across Europe – and much of the rest of the world – property has become a driving force of inequality. In turn, inequality is a driving force of resentment. Far-right politicians have tapped into this anger for their own political gain, as reported by the Guardian in a previous series of reports from the frontlines of Europe's housing crisis. As the European commissioner for jobs and social rights, Nicolas Schmit, commented: 'The housing problem divides our societies, and it may be a risk for our democracies.' Housing policies are set at a national level, but the European Union can set frameworks and support access to finance. In 2024, all housing ministers from member states signed a declaration calling for a 'new deal' on affordable and social housing. There are solutions, and there is political will, and in the meantime let's hope this series will go some way to helping those who face unaffordable housing across Europe realise they're not alone. Kirsty Major is a deputy Opinion editor for the Guardian

Keir Starmer defends Labour's tax hikes and employment rights red tape as business chiefs warn burden must not be increased again
Keir Starmer defends Labour's tax hikes and employment rights red tape as business chiefs warn burden must not be increased again

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer defends Labour's tax hikes and employment rights red tape as business chiefs warn burden must not be increased again

Keir Starmer defended Labour's tax hikes and employment rights red tape today as business chiefs warned the burden must not be increased again. The PM admitted the government had 'asked a lot' of firms as he addressed the British Chambers of Commerce conference in London. However, he argued that money from the monster national insurance increase had been needed to 'fix the foundations' of the country, by propping up the NHS and investing in skills and infrastructure. The head of the BCC has sent a stark message at the gathering that companies are already 'wading through treacle' thanks to government policy, and cutting back on hiring. There is alarm that more pain is looming, as Rachel Reeves desperately struggles to balance the books with the economy stalling and Labour MPs forcing U-turns on benefits cuts. The BCC said a third of small and medium-sized firms have made staff redundant or are thinking about job cuts as a direct result of the NICs increase. Some 13 per cent of more than 570 members surveyed had already cut jobs and 19 per cent were actively considering it. Speaking after Sir Keir, BCC director general Shevaun Haviland insisted the Chancellor cannot increase the burden again. 'There must be no further tax increases on business in the Autumn Budget,' she said. 'Business leaders are resilient, but they are also flexible. 'Some of our well thought-out business plans sometimes no longer meet our needs. When the facts change, so do we. 'And the Government needs to take the same approach. 'If the UK economy is subject to any further economic shock, such as a sustained spike in oil prices, then we need fiscal rules that are responsive and protect business investment.' In his speech, Sir Keir said firms were responsible for 'creating the jobs, the wealth, the tax receipts that means that we have the opportunity to change our country for the better'. 'I fully acknowledge, and I do acknowledge here, that this year, as we've had to fix the foundations of our country, deal with the unprecedented mess that we inherited, we have asked a lot of you,' he said. 'I understand that and I want to acknowledge that. 'It has made a huge difference. Because of it, the money has gone into the NHS and waiting lists are coming down. 'We have put investment into the skills of our young people, the new homes, new roads, new infrastructure that we're building, they are all vital for the long-term growth of our country. 'But none of that would have been possible without your contribution. And I say thank you. It's what I mean by partnership.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store