Buch says Jane St probe started during her stint, denies regulatory failure
In a written statement after the publishing of a media report, Buch pointed to chronology in Sebi's interim order against Jane Street, which has been accused of gaining at least ₹ 4,800 crore through market manipulation in support of her claim.
Attempts are being made to create a "false narrative of regulatory failure," Buch, whose term ended in March this year, said.
"It is extremely unfortunate that certain sections of the media are choosing to ignore facts in plain sight and seeking to create a false narrative by implying that there was regulatory failure by Sebi," the statement by Buch said.
Buch said the chronology shows that Sebi commenced examination of the matter as early as April 2024.
The regulator took "numerous steps", including identification of the index manipulation, issuance of circulars and caution letter to Jane street to cease and desist from undertaking certain trading patterns between April 2024 and February 2025, she said.
There were policy interventions initiated by Sebi as well in October 2024, and finally, in February 2025, Sebi instructed the NSE to issue a "cease and desist" letter to Jane Street.
As per the order issued last Friday, Jane Street restarted trading activities intended to gain through market manipulations in May this year, ultimately leading to the order.
According to market watchers, Sebi usually takes over a year to complete investigations. During Buch's term as the chairperson, Sebi had been disclosing pendency of investigations and other requests, seeking to minimise the timelines.
In an order released in the early hours of Friday, the market regulator has found Jane Street, a New York-based hedge fund, guilty of manipulating the indices by taking bets in the cash, and, futures and options markets simultaneously for making handsome gains.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Anil Ambani summoned by ED in ₹17,000 crore loan fraud investigation
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has summoned Anil Ambani, chairman and managing director of Reliance Group, for questioning in connection with its ongoing investigation into an alleged `17,000-crore loan fraud case. He's been asked to appear on August 5 at ED headquarters in the Capital, people in the know told ET. ED last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group across 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In a related development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) shared with ED and two other agencies the findings of a separate probe, launched by it into alleged diversion of `10,000 crore by Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). Sebi's report, accessed by ET, alleged R Infra diverted a large amount of money disguised as intercorporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group units through CLE Pvt Ltd, an undisclosed related party company. CLE is said to be the 'C' company that had cropped up during investigation and was the subject of much speculation. The engineering, procurement and construction firm has its office at Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai.A person close to Reliance Group questioned the findings. 'Reliance Infrastructure publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, and Sebi did not make any independent discovery. Reliance Infra had an exposure of Rs 6,500 crore. The allegation that the diverted amount is Rs 10,000 crore only serves to sensationalise the magnitude and is not based on facts,' the person told ET. 'When the exposure was Rs 6,500 crore, how can the diversion be Rs 10,000 crore? Reliance Infra diligently pursued recovery of its dues in this matter. Reliance Infra arrived at a settlement to recover its entire exposure of Rs 6,500 crore through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court Judge and filed before the Bombay High Court, the person said.'Odisha distribution companies contemplated in the settlement are operational, and their recovery is pending before the courts,' he added. 'This amount is fully recoverable, contrary to the allegations.' The person also denied receipt of any notice from Sebi on the matter. In the second week of May, Sebi sent a formal communication to ED, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to look into the matter independently. The market regulator's investigation found alleged non-compliance with approval and disclosure norms on related party transactions. 'This camouflaged the material diversion of funds to the undisclosed related part as genuine business transactions,' according to the Sebi regulator said non-compliance with statutory provisions resulted in R Infra 'withholding crucial information in its financial statements with respect to diversion of funds for the ultimate benefit of its promoter and related entities.' It added that 'by considering CLE as a third party company, R Infra avoided accurate and meaningful disclosures of specific fair value adjustments… and thereby misstated the financial statements… the misstatement continues till date.'Company dealings According to the Sebi report, R Infra had various financial dealings with CLE in the form of ICDs, investments in equity and corporate guarantees. As of March 31, 2022, this amounted to Rs 8,302 crore. Sebi's investigations are for the period between FY16 and FY23. The report said that from FY17 to FY21, R Infra had written off Rs 10,110 crore on account of fair value adjustment, provisions, impairment added that R Infra 'continued to provide advances to CLE despite recognising incapacity of CLE to repay the loans, that is, even after creating provision of doubtful debts in one year, they continued to extend loans in the same or subsequent years.' The Sebi report said that from FY13 to FY23, total outstanding annual expenditure on CLE by R Infra was 25-90% of the latter's total assets. The markets regulator said R Infra allegedly did not disclose CLE as its related party in order to avoid having to obtain approval from the shareholder and audit committees, and the checks and balances imposed on related-party transactions as per law. Sebi found CLE to be a related party of R Infra on the basis of documentation. These included submissions made by CLE to Yes Bank in order to avail of loans acknowledging Reliance Infra is one of its promoters. Reliance Infra audit committee meeting minutes mention CLE as a group company. Signatories of CLE's bank accounts were all having email IDs from the Reliance ADA group domain, that is, @ Other supporting data include statements of key management personnel (KMPs) recorded during the Sebi investigation. Also, directors and KMPs appointed in CLE were directors and executives of Reliance Group. Sebi's report alleged that Anil Ambani, by virtue of his position as chairman of Reliance Group (formerly Reliance ADAG), held over 40% shareholding in Reliance Infrastructure entities in which he had significant control and influence till March 2019. He was also nonexecutive chairman and director in R Infra till March 25, 2022.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anil Ambani summoned by ED in ₹17,000 crore loan fraud investigation
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has summoned Anil Ambani , chairman and managing director of Reliance Group , for questioning in connection with its ongoing investigation into an alleged `17,000-crore loan fraud case . He's been asked to appear on August 5 at ED headquarters in the Capital, people in the know told last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group across 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act ( PMLA ).In a related development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) shared with ED and two other agencies the findings of a separate probe, launched by it into alleged diversion of `10,000 crore by Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). Sebi's report, accessed by ET, alleged R Infra diverted a large amount of money disguised as intercorporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group units through CLE Pvt Ltd, an undisclosed related party is said to be the 'C' company that had cropped up during investigation and was the subject of much engineering, procurement and construction firm has its office at Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai.A person close to Reliance Group questioned the findings. 'Reliance Infrastructure publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, and Sebi did not make any independent discovery. Reliance Infra had an exposure of Rs 6,500 crore. The allegation that the diverted amount is Rs 10,000 crore only serves to sensationalise the magnitude and is not based on facts,' the person told ET. 'When the exposure was Rs 6,500 crore, how can the diversion be Rs 10,000 crore? Reliance Infra diligently pursued recovery of its dues in this Infra arrived at a settlement to recover its entire exposure of Rs 6,500 crore through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court Judge and filed before the Bombay High Court, the person said.'Odisha distribution companies contemplated in the settlement are operational, and their recovery is pending before the courts,' he added. 'This amount is fully recoverable, contrary to the allegations.' The person also denied receipt of any notice from Sebi on the the second week of May, Sebi sent a formal communication to ED, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to look into the matter independently. The market regulator's investigation found alleged non-compliance with approval and disclosure norms on related party transactions. 'This camouflaged the material diversion of funds to the undisclosed related part as genuine business transactions,' according to the Sebi regulator said non-compliance with statutory provisions resulted in R Infra 'withholding crucial information in its financial statements with respect to diversion of funds for the ultimate benefit of its promoter and related entities.'It added that 'by considering CLE as a third party company, R Infra avoided accurate and meaningful disclosures of specific fair value adjustments… and thereby misstated the financial statements… the misstatement continues till date.'Company dealingsAccording to the Sebi report, R Infra had various financial dealings with CLE in the form of ICDs, investments in equity and corporate guarantees. As of March 31, 2022, this amounted to Rs 8,302 crore. Sebi's investigations are for the period between FY16 and report said that from FY17 to FY21, R Infra had written off Rs 10,110 crore on account of fair value adjustment, provisions, impairment added that R Infra 'continued to provide advances to CLE despite recognising incapacity of CLE to repay the loans, that is, even after creating provision of doubtful debts in one year, they continued to extend loans in the same or subsequent years.'The Sebi report said that from FY13 to FY23, total outstanding annual expenditure on CLE by R Infra was 25-90% of the latter's total markets regulator said R Infra allegedly did not disclose CLE as its related party in order to avoid having to obtain approval from the shareholder and audit committees, and the checks and balances imposed on related-party transactions as per found CLE to be a related party of R Infra on the basis of documentation. These included submissions made by CLE to Yes Bank in order to avail of loans acknowledging Reliance Infra is one of its promoters. Reliance Infra audit committee meeting minutes mention CLE as a group company. Signatories of CLE's bank accounts were all having email IDs from the Reliance ADA group domain, that is, @ supporting data include statements of key management personnel (KMPs) recorded during the Sebi investigation . Also, directors and KMPs appointed in CLE were directors and executives of Reliance report alleged that Anil Ambani, by virtue of his position as chairman of Reliance Group (formerly Reliance ADAG), held over 40% shareholding in Reliance Infrastructure entities in which he had significant control and influence till March 2019. He was also nonexecutive chairman and director in R Infra till March 25, 2022.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Godrej Properties acquires 34 acres land in Vadodara
NEW DELHI: Mumbai-based Godrej Properties (GPL) has acquired 34 acres of land in Vadodara . The development on this land will primarily comprise of plotted residential units and will offer an estimated saleable area of nine lakh sq ft. This marks GPL's second land acquisition in Gujarat in the last one year. Earlier, in October 2024, the company had acquired a three-acre parcel in Vastrapur, Ahmedabad. The company recently acquired a 48-acre land parcel through outright purchase in Doddaballapur, Bengaluru. The development on this land will primarily comprise of plotted units with a development potential of 1.1 million sq ft.
