10 Hours Into Flight, Millennial's Heart Stops
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
What started as a carefree girls' trip was nearly fatal for 34-year-old Emily Jansson, a Canadian woman who suffered a massive pulmonary embolism midair during a long-haul flight.
"On February 5 of this year, during a solo long-haul direct flight from Toronto to Dubai, on the way to meet my friends for a girls' trip, I suffered a 'catastrophic medical event,' according to my cardiologist," Jansson told Newsweek.
"About 10.5 hours into the flight, I was feeling totally fine and I finally got up—for the first time that flight—to use the restroom. I had been sleeping up until this point," Jansson said.
But what happened next was a medical emergency that most passengers and travelers only imagine in nightmares.
"While waiting for the bathroom, I had a deep, strange pain in my chest, coughed three times, and that was the last thing I remember," Jansson said. "I collapsed, hit my head on something, and went into cardiac arrest due to a massive bilateral saddle pulmonary embolism. I was unconscious for upwards of five minutes or more, according to the flight attendant who I remain in touch with."
"I had a deep, strange pain in my chest, coughed three times and that was the last thing I remember."
Thankfully, there was a doctor onboard the flight who immediately jumped into action. Flight attendants administered oxygen and monitored her during the remaining 2.5 hours of the flight, but when she landed in Dubai, Jansson's ordeal was far from over.
"I was held in Dubai airport for 3.5 hours upon landing while they administered their own medical tests and took my passport away for immigration purposes," Jansson said. "It was nine hours between landing and getting to the hospital before starting the actual treatment."
Pictures from the viral video where Emily shared her story with others.
Pictures from the viral video where Emily shared her story with others.
@alwayssingingmom/TikTok
Jansson was eventually admitted to Rashid Hospital where she spent six days in intensive care.
Jansson said: "The doctors told me it's a miracle I'm alive because of the amount of time it took before actually receiving treatment at the hospital. However, I must say that the treatment and care I received at Dubai's hospital was incredible and they are amazing."
"I died on a plane three months ago."
Jansson, who had no prior history of blood clots or thrombophilia, was wearing medical-grade compression tights and had been on a combined estrogen oral contraceptive. Her cardiologist identified the contraceptive, along with prolonged immobility during the 13-hour flight, as the cause of the medical crisis.
"At the time, I was on an estrogen hormonal oral contraceptive pill. I had no prior history of blood clots or major risk factors, aside from being on the pill and prolonged immobility. My doctors in Dubai, followed by my care team in Canada, attributed the clots to a combination of long-haul immobility and estrogen-containing birth control," Jansson said.
Are Contraceptives Dangerous During Long-Haul Flights?
Delisa Skeete Henry, MD, a board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist, told Newsweek: "Oral contraceptives, particularly combined estrogen-progestin pills, are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, which includes pulmonary embolism. [My recommendation is] to use the lowest-effective estrogen dose or consider progestin-only pills."
She also recommends discontinuing oral contraceptive pills before major surgery or prolonged immobilization.
Research shows that long-haul air travel doubles the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and that risk increases three- to fivefold when using combined oral contraceptives.
"I had no idea about the clot risk when combining estrogen birth control with long-haul travel."
When both factors are present, the risk can multiply more than 14 times, according to a case-control study published in 2003. This means women who fly long distances while taking hormonal birth control may face significantly greater danger than previously thought.
Now in recovery, Jansson has shared her story publicly in hopes of helping others recognize the risks associated with long-haul travel and hormonal contraceptives.
In a recent video on her TikTok page, she said: "I died on a plane three months ago, and it's so crazy because now I'm back working out. I'm going about my life but I literally died three months ago."
"I had no idea about the clot risk when combining estrogen birth control with long-haul travel. No doctor had ever explained that to me," Jansson said. "I lived abroad in Singapore and Europe for 10 years, working for Interpol and traveled constantly for work, all while on the pill. I used to joke that my superpower was being able to sleep the whole way. Looking back now, that feels incredibly naive."
Experts advise that women at higher risk of blood clots should take preventive measures during flights, including moving regularly, staying hydrated and using compression stockings. In very high-risk cases, it can be a good idea to stop use of hormonal contraceptives, but this should always be discussed with a health care provider.
"It truly appears to have been a 'perfect storm' situation," Jansson said. "I'm on blood thinners for the foreseeable future and recovering well physically, though it's been a long and emotional road. I'm no longer on hormonal birth control."
Jansson has been sharing her experience on TikTok, where millions of people have learned about the potential risks of flying and birth control combined. The response has been huge, and Jansson is thrilled she has been able to raise more awareness.
"It's been emotional, but also really affirming to know it might help someone else avoid what I went through," she said.
References
Martinelli, I., Taioli, E., Battaglioli, T., Podda, G. M., Passamonti, S. M., Pedotti, P., & Mannucci, P. M. (2003). Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Air Travel. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163 (22), 2771. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.22.2771
Trenor, C. C., Chung, R. J., Michelson, A. D., Neufeld, E. J., Gordon, C. M., Laufer, M. R., & Emans, S. J. (2011). Hormonal Contraception and Thrombotic Risk: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Pediatrics, 127(2), 347—357. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2221
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
US Could Make Childbirth Free, To Tackle Falling Birth Rates
America could make childbirth free for privately-insured families, in an effort to tackle declining birth rates. The bipartisan Supporting Healthy Moms and Babies Act, which would designate maternity care as an essential health benefit under the Affordable Care Act, was introduced in the Senate in May. If passed, insurance companies would be required to cover all childbirth-related expenses, including prenatal care, ultrasounds, delivery and postpartum care, without any co-pays or deductibles. Medicaid, America's government‐funded health insurance program, already covers these costs. Democratic New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who has cosponsored the bill, told Newsweek: "Even with insurance, the costs associated with having a baby can be astronomical, and expenses are even greater for women who have health complications during pregnancy, a high-deductible insurance plan, or gaps in their coverage. By requiring insurance companies to fully cover care throughout pregnancy and a year postpartum, this bill will make childbirth more affordable for families." It comes amid growing concerns about America's population. Fertility rates are projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest forecast released this year. This number is well below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration. The Donald Trump administration has made this issue one of its priorities, the White House exploring giving women a "baby bonus" of $5,000, according to an April New York Times report. Many trying to tackle this global issue have called for public health policies and financial plans to help make it easier for couples to have children in society. The financial crisis and its effect on housing, inflation and pay is generally named as a major contributor to people's decisions to delay having children, to have fewer children or not to have them at all. Republican Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith, who introduced the bill along with Gillibrand, Democratic Virginia Senator Time Kaine and Republican Missouri Senator Josh Hawley, said she hopes her bill will help change this. "Bringing a child into the world is costly enough without piling on cost-share fees that saddle many mothers and families with debt. This legislation would take away some of the burden for childbearing generations," she said in May. "By relieving financial stresses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, hopefully more families will be encouraged to embrace the beautiful gift and responsibility of parenthood." Pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum care average a total of $18,865 with average out-of-pocket payments totaling $2,854, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research organization, based on data from claims between 2018 and 2022. Financial concerns are repeatedly cited as a reason for not having children. Indeed, just a few days ago, the United Nations Population Fund warned of a global birth rate crisis, after finding that one in five had not had or did not expect to have the number of children they wanted. Some 39 percent said this was because of financial limitations. But Suzanne Bell, who studies fertility and related behaviors with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said that while "making childbirth cheaper or free is incredibly important," she does not think it will effect the birth rate. "The cost of raising a child, in particular the cost of child care, is very high and far outweighs the cost of childbirth," she told Newsweek. "We desperately need policies that support families with the cost of child care, especially families with low incomes." Beth Jarosz, a senior program director U.S. programs at the Population Reference Bureau, agreed that "reducing health care costs is important, but may not be enough to move the needle on births." "The cost of childbirth is just one of the many costs of having a child, and people are also reeling from the much bigger costs of child care, housing, and other necessities," she told Newsweek. Theodore D Cosco, a research fellow at the University of Oxford's Institute of Population Aging, called the bill "a step in the right direction" but said the same as Bell and Jarosz. "Parents generally aren't deciding whether to have children based on a $3,000 delivery bill, they're looking at the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent actually raising the child," he told Newsweek. But he added: "The policy certainly carries some symbolic weight, signaling bipartisan support for families and could potentially help build momentum for broader reforms, such as child care subsidies or paid parental leave." The other concern is that, while financial concerns are generally accepted as a major contributor to declining birth rates, they are not the lone cause. Bell said that even the policies she calls for "are also unlikely to increase the birth rate, as evidence from other countries with much more supportive policies suggest." Norway is considered a global leader in parental leave and child care policies, and the United Nations International Children's Fund (UNICEF) ranks it among the top countries for family-friendly policies. But it too is facing a birth rate crisis. Norway offers parents 12 months of shared paid leave for birth and an additional year each afterward. It also made kindergarten (similar to a U.S. day care) a statutory right for all children aged one or older in 2008. The government subsidizes the policy to make it possible for "women and men to combine work and family life," as Norway's former Minister of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion Solveig Horne said at a parental leave event in 2016. And yet, Norway's fertility rate has dropped dramatically from 1.98 children per woman in 2009 to 1.44 children per woman in 2024, according to official figures. The rate for 2023 (1.40) was the lowest ever recorded fertility rate in the country. Financial barriers "are only part of the picture," Cosco said, "psychological, cultural, and structural factors matter too." Newsweek spoke to several experts about Norway specifically, who all cited recent culture changes. For example, "young adults are more likely to live alone" and "young couples split up more frequently than before," Rannveig Kaldager Hart, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Centre for Fertility and Health said. He went on to speak about "intensive parenting," which refers to the modern parenting style in which parents invest time, money and energy into creating successful adults. The expectations of this parenting style "may cause some to postpone or have fewer children than they otherwise would," Hart said. Nevertheless, backers of the American bill seem to believe that it may be part of the solution. "Being pro-family means fostering an economy that makes it feasible to raise a child. But too often, parents find themselves dealing with sky-high medical bills following the birth of a child. This legislation would eliminate out-of-pocket maternity costs for families with private health insurance and prohibit private carriers from imposing cost-sharing on beneficiaries, empowering parents to focus on what matters most," said Hawley. Related Articles Warning Of Global Birth Rate 'Crisis' After Study Of 14 CountriesChina Makes Childbirth Change Amid Falling Birth RateTrump Administration To Give $1,000 Boost to All Newborn BabiesMore Gen Z Delay Having Kids Than Millennials Amid Birth Rate Decline Fears 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WSIB Workers Face More Than Double the National Rates of Anxiety and Depression, Survey Finds
TORONTO, June 14, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The union representing striking workers at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) has conducted a follow-up survey to assess workload and occupational stress levels, one year after their initial study. The internationally recognized survey, conducted by the Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers (OHCOW), an independent third party, shows that WSIB workers continue to report the worst results in over a decade compared to workplaces across Canada. When it comes to job-related anxiety and depression, WSIB employees experience levels that are double the national average. Preliminary findings from the updated survey indicate the situation has only deteriorated. "The WSIB is a shining example of what not to be. We will hold the WSIB accountable for their failure to protect employee wellness," said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU. "I will not rest until we fix the very real and systemic workload problem. Once we do that, we will elevate services for all Ontario workers." "Our members are tired of hearing the employer deny their lived experiences, and it's really impacting them," said Nicole Francis, Chief Steward for OCEU. "The results of the survey from last year are crystal clear, but WSIB management doesn't want to accept them because it ruins the image they are trying to project." John Oudyk, Occupational Hygienist with OHCOW, remains optimistic despite the worsening results. "Most of the factors measured in the survey were quite negative, but the engagement scores were close to typical Canadian values. This suggests that, despite their negative experience, respondents have not completely disengaged, indicating they still have hope that their work situation can improve," he said. Members of OCEU/CUPE 1750 have been on strike for over three weeks, after being sent home and locked out of their systems by the employer. Key bargaining issues remain, including dangerously high workloads that are severely impacting WSIB employees' mental health. mb/cope491 View source version on Contacts For more information, please contact: Bill ChalupiakCUPE Communications Representativewchalupiak@ 416-707-1401
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
WSIB Workers Face More Than Double the National Rates of Anxiety and Depression, Survey Finds
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The union representing striking workers at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) has conducted a follow-up survey to assess workload and occupational stress levels, one year after their initial study. The internationally recognized survey, conducted by the Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers (OHCOW), an independent third party, shows that WSIB workers continue to report the worst results in over a decade compared to workplaces across Canada. When it comes to job-related anxiety and depression, WSIB employees experience levels that are double the national average. Preliminary findings from the updated survey indicate the situation has only deteriorated. When it comes to job-related anxiety and depression, WSIB employees experience levels that are double the national average. Preliminary findings from the updated survey indicate the situation has only deteriorated. Share 'The WSIB is a shining example of what not to be. We will hold the WSIB accountable for their failure to protect employee wellness,' said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU. 'I will not rest until we fix the very real and systemic workload problem. Once we do that, we will elevate services for all Ontario workers.' 'Our members are tired of hearing the employer deny their lived experiences, and it's really impacting them,' said Nicole Francis, Chief Steward for OCEU. 'The results of the survey from last year are crystal clear, but WSIB management doesn't want to accept them because it ruins the image they are trying to project.' John Oudyk, Occupational Hygienist with OHCOW, remains optimistic despite the worsening results. 'Most of the factors measured in the survey were quite negative, but the engagement scores were close to typical Canadian values. This suggests that, despite their negative experience, respondents have not completely disengaged, indicating they still have hope that their work situation can improve,' he said. Members of OCEU/CUPE 1750 have been on strike for over three weeks, after being sent home and locked out of their systems by the employer. Key bargaining issues remain, including dangerously high workloads that are severely impacting WSIB employees' mental health. mb/cope491
