
These Are The World's Easiest And Most Difficult Fighter Jets. Where Does Rafale Sit?
Last Updated:
From the deadly grace of the Sukhoi-30MKI to the sleek, user-friendly F-16 Fighting Falcon, modern air forces operate a range of machines, each with its own flight temperament
The Indian Air Force 's air superiority display during Operation Sindoor has reignited interest in the fighter pilots inside the cockpits – and the aircraft they command. As Sukhoi-30MKIs roared across the skies and Rafales executed precision strikes, many observers were left wondering: how difficult is it to fly these powerful machines?
The answer isn't straightforward. From nimble trainers to brute-force warhorses, modern fighter jets span a wide range of complexity, and their ease, or difficulty, of flight often depends on factors like design architecture, flight control systems, mission loadouts, and the skill of the pilot.
India's fighter fleet, which includes indigenous platforms like the Tejas alongside imports like the French Rafale and Russian Sukhoi, offers a striking contrast between cutting-edge ease-of-operation and old-school muscle. Globally, the picture is just as diverse: some jets are practically intuitive, built to train rookies; others are demanding, requiring pilots to navigate layers of avionics while enduring punishing G-forces.
From the deadly grace of the Sukhoi-30MKI to the sleek, user-friendly F-16 Fighting Falcon, modern air forces operate a range of machines, each with its own flight temperament. Among the elite league of modern fighter jets, a few stand out for their forgiving flight characteristics – often thanks to advanced digital systems and ergonomic design.
Easiest Fighter Jets To Fly
JAS 39 Gripen (Sweden)
Sweden's Gripen, developed by Saab, exemplifies efficiency in the skies. Compact and lightweight, the single-engine aircraft combines multirole functionality with pilot comfort. Its automated flight controls minimise the pilot's workload, and its low-maintenance design allows operators to spend more time flying than fixing. It's no surprise that several countries have added the Gripen to their air fleets.
Tejas Mk1 (India)
India's own Tejas, born from the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) program, was envisioned to replace aging MiG-21 fighters. It delivers on ease of flight with a quadruplex digital FBW system that stabilises the aircraft during complex manoeuvres. Indian Air Force (IAF) pilots consistently report it as significantly easier to fly than its Soviet-era predecessor, with a design optimised for agility and control. Tejas isn't just homegrown – it's pilot-friendly.
Most Difficult Fighter Jets To Fly
However, not all fighter jets are created equal. Some are raw, demanding machines that test even the most seasoned pilots. High speeds, intense G-forces, and outdated avionics can make flying a daily trial of nerve and skill.
MiG-21 Bison (Russia/India)
An aging warhorse still in limited service with the IAF, the MiG-21 Bison is notorious for its difficulty. Bereft of a fly-by-wire system and packed with legacy systems, the pilot must manually control every aspect of the flight. Its high landing speeds – over 300 km/h – and cramped cockpit increase the risk of error. The jet earned the grim nickname 'flying coffin" in India, despite safety upgrades under the Bison modernisation program.
F-14 Tomcat (USA)
Now retired from US service but still remembered as a complex beast, the F-14's variable-sweep wings and heavy twin-engine body made it formidable but tricky. Pilots needed deep experience, especially during aircraft carrier landings and while managing the radar-guided AIM-54 Phoenix missile system.
Sukhoi-30MKI (Russia/India)
A cornerstone of India's air dominance strategy, the Sukhoi-30MKI is immensely powerful but far from easy. Thrust-vectoring engines give it extreme agility, but that also means pilots must manage intense G-forces and sophisticated avionics. Multitasking is crucial – pilots must juggle radar tracking, electronic warfare systems, and mission planning, all while maintaining flight stability on long-duration missions. It's a juggernaut, but it demands constant attention.
Eurofighter Typhoon (Europe)
Designed for instability to maximise manoeuvrability, the Typhoon is inherently difficult to control without its advanced digital FBW system. Mastery of its systems requires months of rigourous training, and the aircraft's complex cockpit environment leaves little room for error.
Where Does Rafale Sit?
top videos
View all
India's Rafale jets, supplied by French defense giant Dassault Aviation, sit in the middle of the spectrum. For new pilots, the learning curve can be steep, especially when handling the aircraft's high-speed manoeuvres and managing multiple threats. But for experienced aviators, the Rafale is a dream machine. Its Spectra electronic warfare system automates threat detection and response, and the aircraft can seamlessly transition between air-to-air and air-to-ground roles in a single mission. Hands-on throttle-and-stick (HOTAS) controls enable rapid response, though mastering them takes time.
Despite its complexity, the Rafale's FBW system makes basic flying tasks relatively smooth. The aircraft's omnirole capability – spanning air dominance, reconnaissance, and precision strikes – means the pilot is always in the thick of mission management, but rarely overwhelmed.
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 09, 2025, 11:19 IST
News india These Are The World's Easiest And Most Difficult Fighter Jets. Where Does Rafale Sit?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Firozabad's OEF sends first batch of Su-30 brake parachutes to Malaysian Air Force
Agra: Firozabad's Ordnance Equipment Factory (OEF) on Tuesday dispatched its first batch of brake parachutes for the Malaysian Air Force's Sukhoi-30 aircraft. Deputy general manager of the Hazratpur unit, HL Kumawat said 10 sets were sent to Malaysia following an export order placed through a local channel partner. OEF has been tasked with manufacturing 10 sets for the Royal Malaysian Air Force while continuing production for Indian Su-30MKIs, the backbone of the Indian Air Force . In Feb 2025, the DRDO transferred the brake parachute technology to OEF Hazratpur. Originally developed by DRDO's ADRDE lab in Agra (2000–2002), the system enables OEF to manufacture aerial delivery systems and brake parachutes domestically. The brake parachute is a critical safety system that slows the Su-30 during landing, preventing runway overruns. Deployed at speeds between 180–300 km/h, it uses an auxiliary parachute to extract the main chute, which then inflates to create drag. Made from Nylon 66 and covering 50 sqm, the system also assists in aborted take-offs by reducing the aircraft's landing run.


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Su-57 Source Code for India? Russia's ULTIMATE Gambit vs. F-35
News | 0Updated 2 days ago • General India's Ultimate Fighter Jet Dilemma: Su-57E Source Code vs. F-35 Power! Russia has made an unprecedented offer to India: full access to the Su-57E stealth fighter's source code, enabling local "Make-in-India" manufacturing, indigenous weapon integration (like BrahMos and Astra), and complete customization for the Indian Air Force (IAF). But with India also eyeing the proven F-35A Lightning II from the US, this video breaks down the high-stakes choice. We'll analyze the Su-57's controversies (production issues, stealth doubts, combat effectiveness) against its unique source code advantage and lower cost, while contrasting it with the F-35's technological superiority, higher price, and US operational restrictions. As US President Donald Trump's visit for the Quad Summit looms, potentially featuring the F-35 deal, India's decision on its next-gen fighter will shape its aerial dominance and geopolitical standing for decades.


NDTV
17 hours ago
- NDTV
Exclusive: Top Defence Official On Challenges, Timelines Of Deliveries
Show Quick Read Summary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed New Delhi: India's Operation Sindoor that smashed terror infrastructure deep inside Pakistan has reignited interest in homegrown defence technology and hardware. In an exclusive interview to NDTV, Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh explained the need for ensuring that import in this industry becomes an exception and not the norm. He also pointed out the critical need for defence vendors and manufacturers for sticking to timelines for deliverables, and also acknowledged challenges that often come in the way, such as geopolitical factors. "It is a problem that is not confined to our own industry. I think geopolitical factors also played a part and many of our contracts got held up. Let's take a few examples. The S-400 [missile system] got held up because of the conflict [Ukraine-Russia] there. The fourth and the fifth batteries are now probably going to come next year after almost a two-year delay," Mr Singh told NDTV. He said GE's F-404 engines got held up and as a result, disrupted Tejas' supply chain and delayed deliveries of the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) to the forces by two years. "So some of these are linked to global supply chain issues. Others could be internal management failures or inability to plan. What I can do is of course ensure that contract signings are done on time," the 1989-batch Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer from the Kerala cadre told NDTV. He said the government holds vendors accountable for long delays. The defence secretary said that on the day of the delivery in a project that was to be completed in one year, for example, India can't have a situation where it is forced to go for emergency procurement. "... There are vendors that seek time after two or even three years more to fulfil contracts. Obviously, I'm not saying it's a factor which affects only the domestic manufacturers. It affects global manufacturers as well. But somewhere accountability will have to be ensured when it comes to contract fulfilment as well, both from the public and from the private sector," Mr Singh said. During Operation Sindoor, India's homegrown air defence network stopped Pakistani missiles and drones effectively, highlighting the importance of having indigenous systems work together. On the intervening night of May 9 and 10, when Pakistan launched drone and missile attacks on Indian military and civilian areas, they met the homegrown impenetrable wall of self-defence called the 'Akashteer' system. It is part of the Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) designed by the Indian Air Force (IAF). The IACCS was the tip of the spear in the air defence (AD) component of Operation Sindoor. India's integrated AD system - which includes AD systems of the army, navy and the air force - was brought together by the IACCS, which gave the forces a net-centric operational capability, vital to modern-day warfighting.