Federal judge orders Mexican migrant seeking asylum to be released by ICE
Judge Michael H. Simon ordered the migrant, known as Y-Z-L-H, be released from custody, arguing the government had no right to detain him given his temporary legal status, or parole, was still valid through July 2025, according to The Oregonian.
Simon granted the man's habeas petition, finding that ICE officers had unlawfully and without justification detained the man in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
The migrant came to the U.S. in July 2023 and claimed he had been threatened by the violent Mexican cartel Familia Michoacana. U.S. officials let him stay temporarily on humanitarian grounds and applied for asylum about a year ago.
On June 5, he went to Portland Immigration Court for an asylum hearing and asked for more time to find a lawyer.
The government moved to dismiss his asylum case and the judge granted the dismissal over his objection. The migrant is still appealing this decision. As soon as he walked out of the courtroom, he was arrested by ICE agents and taken to Tacoma detention facility in Washington state.
Attorneys for Innovation Law Lab, an Oregon-based nonprofit legal organization that is representing the migrant, argued at the hearing that federal authorities had no lawful basis for arresting the man and had not formally revoked his temporary parole status, allowing him to remain in the United States.
The judge agreed and said that ICE failed to follow due process as they didn't explain or justify why they arrested him.
Government lawyers said the arrest was allowed because it was up to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's discretion, but the judge rejected that, saying executive agencies must follow the law and can't just do whatever they want.
"How do we know whether the secretary has complied with the law unless the secretary tells us … the basis for the ruling," Simon asked, per The Oregonian. "Isn't the whole purpose of checks and balances that the executive branch must follow the law that Congress writes and the judiciary is here to ensure that the executive branch only takes those actions that are authorized by law?"
The government initially claimed it had notified the migrant in April that his temporary status would end that month, but later reversed course in court filings, acknowledging that his parole was in fact valid through July 19, 2025, per the outlet.
A day before his arrest, Y-Z-L-H was granted a five-year work permit — a result of an October 2023 policy change by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which extended the validity period of employment authorization for asylum seekers.
He lives in Newport, Oregon and has no criminal record.
Innovation Law Lab has been involved in several high-profile immigration cases, particularly those challenging U.S. policies that impact asylum seekers.
One notable case came in 2020, when the group sued the federal government over former President Donald Trump's "Remain in Mexico" policy, which forced asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their claims were processed in U.S. courts.
The group argued the policy violated U.S. immigration law and international human rights protections. A federal appeals court agreed and blocked the policy, but the Supreme Court later vacated that ruling after the Biden administration ended the program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Human remains located after California fireworks warehouse explosion
Investigators have located human remains following an explosion at a Northern California fireworks warehouse, Yolo County said in a statement Friday. Seven were missing after the Tuesday fireworks explosion near Esparto, which gripped the small farming community. It sparked a massive fire that led to other spot fires. Nearby Fourth of July celebrations were called off.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Human Remains Found at Site of Calif. Fireworks Explosion Days After 7 People Were Reported Missing
Local authorities in northern California have discovered human remains at the site of a fireworks facility that exploded earlier this week Officials said in a statement released on Friday, July 4, that "no positive identifications have been made" The deadly incident took place on Tuesday, July 1, at around 6 p.m. local time, PEOPLE previously reported, and seven people were unaccounted for after the blastLocal authorities in northern California have discovered human remains at the site of a fireworks facility explosion days after the deadly incident first occurred. Yolo County officials announced the grim discovery in a statement on Friday, July 4, three days after the explosion and fire broke out on the evening of Tuesday, July 1. Workers from the Yolo County Coroner's Division accessed the site after it was confirmed to be safe and discovered the remains during a recovery operation, according to a statement from multiple emergency response agencies. "At this time, no positive identifications have been made," an official wrote in the release. Seven people remained unaccounted for following the incident, PEOPLE previously reported. "Recovery efforts are expected to continue throughout the weekend as investigators, coroner personnel, and fire crews work carefully and respectfully through the process," the statement said. "The Coroner's Office has been in contact with the families of those previously reported missing." Arson and bomb investigators from CAL FIRE's Office of the State Fire Marshal are leading the ongoing investigation. "Our hearts and thoughts are with those we lost, their families, and everyone impacted in our community. We are grateful for the swift response of law enforcement and emergency personnel," a spokesperson for the company operating the facility, Devastating Pyrotechnics, said in an online statement. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "Our focus will remain on those directly impacted by this tragedy, and we will cooperate fully with the proper authorities in their investigation," the spokesperson added. Marisol Ramos told NBC News earlier this week that her three sons worked at the site and have been missing since the explosion occurred. 'Let us do it,' Ramos said as she begged authorities to let her look for her adult children. 'I'm willing to go in … I want to search for my kids.' Read the original article on People
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Fact check: Trump falsely claims his highly unpopular big bill is the ‘single most popular bill ever signed'
On Friday, before signing his massive domestic policy bill, President Donald Trump proclaimed at the White House that 'it's the most popular bill ever signed in the history of our country,' adding for emphasis that 'this is the single most popular bill ever signed.' That is an up-is-down reversal of reality. The bill is wildly unpopular, poll after poll has found. While polls can be off, this bill wouldn't be popular – let alone the most popular US bill ever signed – even with a massive and widespread polling error. In a Fox News poll in mid-June, 59% of registered voters said they opposed the bill and 38% said they favored it, with another 3% saying they didn't know. In a Quinnipiac University poll in late June, 55% of registered voters said they opposed the bill and 29% said they supported it, with another 16% not weighing in. In a Pew Research Center poll in early June, 49% of adults said they were opposed and 29% said they were in favor, with 21% unsure. Reviewing these numbers and the similar findings of two other polls about the bill, CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten said on air on Monday: 'You just never see numbers this poor. I have been trying to look through the history books to find if there was another piece of legislation that was on the verge of passing that was as unpopular as this one, and…I cannot find one.' CNN senior reporter Aaron Blake reported June 20 that the polling numbers made the bill 'more unpopular than any piece of major legislation passed since at least 1990, according to data crunched by George Washington University political science professor Chris Warshaw.' And in an analysis published Friday, before Trump spoke, data journalist G. Elliott Morris wrote, 'On average across pollsters and methods, 31% of Americans support the One Big Beautiful Bill, while 54% oppose it. That net rating of -23 is, to put it mildly, absolutely abysmal.' It's possible that Trump has seen private polling that has found different numbers. And, of course, the popularity of legislation can improve after it passes and Americans feel its impacts; that's what happened with Obamacare. But if Trump has any evidence for his claim that this is the most popular bill in American history, he did not provide it on Friday. The president also made other false claims in his White House remarks: – A false claim that 'we've delivered … no tax on Social Security for our great seniors.' The bill does not completely eliminate tax on Social Security; rather, it creates a temporary additional tax deduction of $6,000 per person age 65 and older every year from 2025 through 2028 (it's a smaller deduction for individuals earning more than $75,000 per year). The White House has said that 88% of seniors will not pay tax on Social Security benefits with this additional deduction in place, up from 64% not paying tax on those benefits under current law, but even if the White House is right, the millions of seniors in the remaining 12% will still have to pay – and so will some Social Security recipients under the age of 65, who do not get this new deduction. – A false claim, which Trump has made repeatedly, that President Joe Biden allowed in '21 million' migrants. Through December 2024, the last full month under Biden, the country had recorded under 11 million nationwide 'encounters' with migrants during that administration, including millions who were rapidly expelled from the country. Even adding in so-called gotaways who evaded detection, estimated by House Republicans as being roughly 2.2 million, there's no way the total is 21 million.
