Stunning Pink Rescue Cockatoo Thinks Her Yummy Treat is So 'Rock and Roll'
Even though it's tough seeing the physical and psychological struggles many rescue animals go through, it's all the more comforting to see them on the mend and living happy lives after they've been rescued. Where once there lives were full of hardship and pain, these critters now have enough comfort and support to appreciate the little things in life—including snack time.
Pinkie, a beautiful pink Galah Cockatoo, was in rough shape when she first came to Home at Last Pet Sanctuary, but now that she's surrounded by a loving and supportive care team, things are looking better than ever. Her rescuers have been transitioning Pinkie to a healthier diet, and the stunning Galah thinks that her new snacks are really "rock and roll!"
Wow! Pinkie is so thrilled over her "rock and roll" birdie snacks, she even flares open her "pop-up mohawk" to prove it! In case you're not in the know about bird body language, Cockatoos raise their crests when they're excited (usually the happy, confident kind of excited). Pinkie clearly went through a lot before coming to Home At Last Parrot Sanctuary and is still recovering from the plucking and self-harm injuries she arrived with, so it's wonderful to see the Galah getting genuinely excited and enjoying herself!We don't know what kind of diet Pinkie had before being rescued, but it clearly wasn't sufficient for her needs and probably contributed to her stress and anxiety. However, a lot of inexperienced bird parents (especially those who don't put in the effort to treat their birds properly) make mistakes when feeding their birds, the most common of which is feeding them an all-seed diet. Galahs, along with other parrots and Cockatoos, do eat lots of seeds, but that isn't all they eat, and keeping them on an all-seed diet can lead to health complications like obesity and liver disease.
So what diet should Galahs/Cockatoos be on? The Melbourne Bird Veterinary Clinic recommends a diet that's 50% high-quality Cockatoo pellet food, with the other 50% consisting of bird-safe fresh fruits and vegetables, certain edible grasses and flowers from their native habitat (Galahs hail from Australia), plenty of fresh water, and a few tasty treats—including seeds. Now that's a rock and roll diet!
The Home At Last Parrot Sanctuary is a Nevada-based animal rescue dedicated to rescuing and rehabilitating "abused, neglected, or displaced companion parrots." As wonderful as parrots and other talking birds are, they're very high-maintenance, long-lived, and often misunderstood animals that require serious commitment and care. A lot of pet parents adopt pet birds without truly realizing what they're getting themselves into, which often leads to them neglecting or mistreating their pets. Even if the mistreatment is unintentional, it often leaves parrots in dire straits.
That's where groups like Home At Last come in. Home At Last takes in rescued parrots and accepts owner surrenders to try and give these poor parrots another chance at a happy life. While they do function as a permanent sanctuary for physically or emotionally disabled parrots, when possible, they try to rehabilitate their birds and try to help them find their true forever families.
We're not sure if Pinkie will eventually be put up for adoption or if she's a permanent resident at Home At Last. The important thing is that she's safe, happy, and free to live her "rock and roll" lifestyle in peace and comfort!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
8 Popular Ice Cream Flavors Have Been Recalled in Ohio
With the weather heating up for this summer, an Ohio-based creamery has initiated a voluntary recall for eight of its ice cream flavors. The Ohio Department of Agriculture reported this week that Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery is recalling eight ice cream flavors due to undeclared allergens. This establishment, which is currently located in Wauseon, Ohio, distributed affected products to stores in Arlington, Canton, Cleveland and West Unity. There were also affected Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery products in Indiana and Michigan. Thankfully, no illnesses have been reported despite this recall. "There have been no reports of illness involving products addressed in this recall, however, individuals exhibiting signs or symptoms of an allergic reaction after consuming Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery Ice Cream involved in this recall should contact a physician immediately," the Ohio Department of Agriculture said in a press release. Here are the eight ice cream flavors being recalled: Avalanche Cacao Chocolate Peanut Butter Chocolate Strawberry Chocolate Brownie Bites Cookies and Cream Cookie Dough Mocha Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery products impacted by this recall have been removed from store shelves. If you purchased any recalled Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery products, you are encouraged to return them to the place of purchase for a refund. Turkeyfoot Creek Creamery consumers are also being advised to call 419-583-7124 if they have any remaining questions. 8 Popular Ice Cream Flavors Have Been Recalled in Ohio first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 11, 2025
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Local businesses, organizations come together to host tornado relief event
Several local businesses and organizations came together at the Laurel-London Optimist Club June 1 to provide free items to tornado-affected residents of Laurel County. The "London Community Tornado Relief Event" was made possible by David Byrd of All American Events, Melanie Hester of American Scrub Company and Kaitlyn Floyd on her own behalf. Hester said the goal of the event was to "bring joy to the kids and families in the community." "With all the heartbreak right now, I just think this is so needed," Floyd added. At her booth, Floyd sold t-shirts made by Harlan-based business Shirt Shack Screen Printing. Funds raised by the t-shirt sales will go toward supporting families impacted by the May 16 tornado. Floyd said Martin's Peterbilt is matching the amount raised, doubling the profit. Raffles additionally took place with donations from businesses in the community. Also among those hosting booths were Hoss Auto Sales and Family Health Care Associates who collaborated to provide an array of items needed by those affected at this time including tarps, toiletries, basic hygiene products, snacks, beverages, and pet food. Working the booth were Vanessa Watson and Faith Vaught with Family Health Care Associates, as well as Steve and Kaylee Watson with the auto shop. Alesha Staley was present on behalf of Second Mile Behavioral Health to send the message that their therapists can help tornado survivors with the trauma they may have from the recent storm. "Our therapists stay pretty booked but when the tornado hit and we knew there would likely be an increase in needs, they started opening up more availability," said Staley. Reach the mental health service at (606) 657-5504. Southern Sips & Sweets, Kendra's Shaved Ice, and the Mom and Daughter Shop provided cool treats on the warm day. While the Mom and Daughter Shop no longer has a home, owner BJ Cromer is selling ice-cream to raise funds for her grandson, Liam Brown, who has cancer. At the event however, Cromer gave out free ice cream while accepting donations toward Liam. Additional booths included the North Laurel Middle School's girls basketball team, the U.S. Army, McDonald's, Love at First Bite, Somerset Community College, and Senture. Children at the event gravitated to the inflatables provided by All American Events, a local service ran by Byrd and Austin Schaser which handles inflatable rentals. Us and Sometimes Joe, a band made up of London natives, also performed as community members visited booths. The event served as a testament to the community's resilience.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Montana Supreme Court strikes down trio of abortion bills as unconstitutional
In this photo illustration, packages of Mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning clinic on April 13, 2023 in Rockville, Maryland. A Massachusetts appeals court temporarily blocked a Texas-based federal judge's ruling that suspended the FDA's approval of the abortion drug Mifepristone, which is part of a two-drug regimen to induce an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy in combination with the drug Misoprostol. (Photo illustration by) A trio of abortion-related bills, passed in 2021, were declared unconstitutional by a nearly unanimous Montana Supreme Court on Monday. Nearly, because Justice Jim Rice wrote both a concurring and dissenting opinion affirming again Montana's constitutionally protected right-to-privacy, which includes medical procedures and abortion. The laws were halted before they could even be practically enacted, so the hurdles to the procedure, including waiting periods, mandatory ultrasound, a pile of documentation and banning abortion after 20 weeks, even before the point of fetal viability, never rippled throughout the state. Justice Beth Baker wrote the opinion on behalf of the court, which not only reaffirmed the state Constitution's right-to-privacy as unique and separate from federal cases on abortion, but also took the state to task for failing to support its claim that the State of Montana had a compelling interest in abortion, while not proving that any of the legislative hurdles were scientifically supported. The lawsuit was brought by Planned Parenthood of Montana, and had a handful of other entities that wrote friends-of-the-court briefs, including a group of delegates to the 1972 Montana Constitutional Convention. The three laws that were challenged were House Bill 136, House Bill 140 and House Bill 171: HB 136 would have banned abortion at 20 weeks, even though expert opinion agreed that fetal viability is not possible until at least 22 weeks. HB 171 would have put paperwork and more requirements for healthcare providers who provide abortion via medication or telehealth, subjecting them to both civil and criminal penalties. HB 180 would have required healthcare professionals to provide both ultrasound and fetal heartbeat tones to those considering abortion, and requiring a patient to sign a form created by the state, demonstrating that the patient had been offered the choice, and yet declined. Because fetal viability — or the concept a child can survive outside the womb — is dictated by a host of factors, including medical science and approximate age of the fetus, the court rejected the state's attempts to prescribe a fixed number of weeks for viability. 'A fixed gestational age that does not allow a provider's case-specific determination fails to ensure that the government does not interfere with an individual's private medical decision,' the ruling said. 'Until a fetus is viable and able to survive outside the womb, the right of personal autonomy belongs to the person on whose body the fetus depends. 'We find no legal authority for the idea that the state's interest in preserving fetal life or the fetus' right to life takes precedence over all constitutional protections and dignities of the mother.' Attorneys for the state had argued that physical safety risks of abortion increase as the pregnancy progresses, and that abortions lead to worse mental health outcomes, an argument that the Supreme Court dismissed and debunked. 'The record shows that abortion is safe,' the decision said. 'As the district court noted, there were zero deaths cause by abortion in Montana between 2010 and 2020 and only 25 of 8,402 (0.3%) reported abortions in Montana from 2016 to 2021 resulted in complications. This court cannot find a bona fide health risk simply based on a detailed step-by-step description of what the state defines as 'barbaric' and 'gruesome' procedure when the overwhelming evidence shows that procedural abortions are safe.' The ruling also said if the state wanted to address health outcomes or mental health issues, banning abortion was not the least restrictive way to do it. The court also pointed out waiting-periods and requiring multiple in-person visits, as outlined by HB 171, actually increased the odds of harm or complications, instead of avoiding them. 'The record demonstrates that compliance with the 24-hour wait period, the multiple in-person visits, and the telehealth ban serve only to delay access to abortion care — thus increasing the odds that the patient will not be able to obtain an abortion or increasing the odds of the very complications this state asserts it wishes to protect against,' the opinion said. The ruling also said in addition to violating the state's constitutional provisions for privacy, it also impacted physician's free-speech rights by requiring them to provide forms and documents, for example, information about a disputed abortion reversal procedure, that have not been medically verified or supported. They said HB 171 compelled healthcare professionals to give advice contrary to their training and conscience. Physicians and experts also raised concerns about the state's assertion abortion led to other health care concerns, for example, an increase in breast cancer, which has never been scientifically established. 'Forcing medical providers to give medical advice that they disagree with — like the safety and efficacy of abortion reversal — is a form of compelled-speech triggering protections,' the ruling said. '(Planned Parenthood) asserts that patients may mistakenly understand the consent form to indicate DPHHS's and their provider's approval of abortion reversal.' The ruling calls such compelled speech egregious because it 'favors one viewpoint over another — namely, the viewpoint that abortion reversal is safe and possible over the judgements and viewpoints of providers that it is unsafe, ineffective and undermines informed consent.' The court noted the state does not mandate documentation or consent that requires medical providers to discuss the risk of carrying a pregnancy to term. Finally, the court also called into question the real purpose of HB 140, which mandates ultrasounds and fetal heart tones before an abortion, something that providers said either happens during the course of pregnancy, but may not be medically necessary. 'The court stated it was 'left with the strong impression that the law aims to advance the ulterior motive of discouraging abortion,' which is unacceptable under the law,' the ruling said. Montana's highest court found that in the case of HB 140, it was exactly substituting the judgment of the state, and the lawmakers who supported it, with the views of the doctor. 'The court's decision further protects what Montanans need and deserve: Legal access to compassionate, timely abortion care, free from government interference. At the same moment as this win for Montanans, anti-abortion politicians continue to threaten to decimate access to care by 'defunding' Planned Parenthood via the reconciliation bill before Congress, in an effort to shut down health centers who provide abortion and other reproductive care. Montanans agree that abortion should remain legal and accessible, and Planned Parenthood of Montana will always do whatever we can to ensure that patients in Montana have access to abortion care,' said Martha Fuller, president and CEO of Montana Planned Parenthood, after the ruling in a statement. The case was active for several years of litigation, and had district court Judge Amy Eddy sitting in place of former Chief Justice Mike McGrath, who retired at the end of 2024, as well as Judge Shane Vannatta, who was sitting in for Dirk Sandefur, who also retired. McGrath has since been replaced by Chief Justice Cory Swanson, and Sandefur was succeeded by Justice Katherine Bidegaray.
