
My GP dismissed ‘common cancer symptom' because I was fit and healthy – then I was given a heartbreaking diagnosis
He says his GP wasn't overly concerned either - he had no breathlessness and wasn't losing weight - and he was just prescribed antihistamines.
5
5
5
But as the cough persisted, the now 47-year-old knew it was time to push for answers, eventually discovering he had stage 3 lung cancer.
Warren, from Suffolk, first developed the cough in 2021 when he was 44.
Describing himself as fit and healthy, he didn't think much of it at the time, especially because it was during the Covid pandemic.
"I had to test regularly in my job as cabin crew, and they always came back negative," says Warren.
"I wasn't coughing up blood or anything and had no other symptoms of illness."
Regardless, Warren decided in June 2021 he would go see his GP - who prescribed him antihistamines and acid reflux medication.
"I first went to see my GP approximately six months after my symptoms started," he says.
"My GP wasn't overly concerned to begin with as I was a marathon runner, not experiencing breathlessness or losing weight.
"Initially, I was prescribed antihistamines, which didn't make any difference, and then omeprazole when I went back, as it was then thought the problem might be acid reflux."
Eventually, in October, Warren went for an X-ray which came back as abnormal.
I'm a doctor and these 5 changes could be a sign of deadly lung cancer
In November, he had a CT scan, and a malignancy was suspected.
"Within a week, I had an appointment with a consultant who said a diagnosis could not be confirmed without a biopsy," he recalls.
"I had a PET scan in December, then a CT-guided biopsy and a respiratory test, and just before Christmas, a follow-up with the consultant, who said results were still inconclusive, but whatever it was would have to be removed."
It wasn't the greatest Christmas for Warren, knowing he was facing lung surgery the following month.
But at the same time, he was glad to be getting out whatever was there.
"I was told I wouldn't lose much of my lung function and there was no sign of any spread, which was the outcome I was hoping for," he says.
"However, I was worried. Worried about surgery, my recovery, my future. Was my life now going to change? Would I be still be able to do the things I love like running.
"And I thought about whether I would grow old and live a long life. All the things we take for granted. All these thoughts were going through my mind."
When Warren met with his surgeon, he was told he would be having robotic surgery.
Robotic surgery, specifically robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), is a minimally invasive technique used for lung cancer treatment, offering benefits like reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared to traditional open surgery.
RATS involves surgeons using a robotic system to control instruments and a 3D camera through small incisions in the chest, allowing for precise manipulation and removal of cancerous tissue.
On January 27, an upper left lobectomy was performed which took eight hours.
Warren says it was a challenging operation because they needed to go in so close to the pulmonary artery.
'Of course I knew it would be cancer'
It wasn't until February 2022 that he finally received his diagnosis: stage 3A lung cancer.
Stage 3A indicates a more advanced stage of the disease where the cancer has spread to lymph nodes on the same side of the chest as the primary tumour, but not to distant parts of the body.
"Some of my lymph nodes had been taken out during the surgery, and cancer was found in two of them," says Warren.
"Of course I knew it would be cancer.
"I have a great relationship with my care team and although nothing could be confirmed without a conclusive biopsy it was highly suspected, so I was prepared for that.
"However, I was shocked that it was stage 3A due to the fact there were some cells located in lymph nodes which I wasn't prepared for as this was not on the PET scan.
"I felt in that moment that my prognosis was a lot worse and this was going to kill me.
"It's difficult not to read statistics and compare yourself to others with a similar stage, but as my oncologist told me, everyone's situation and cancer journey is different, as is their treatment plan.
"It was a difficult time, also because I had been grounded as cabin crew since my diagnosis, which was a challenge in itself.
"I had no work to distract me from focusing on the cancer, and wondered if I would ever fly again."
During his procedure, the surgeon wasn't able to remove as much of a margin around the tumour as he would have liked because of the position of it near the mediastinum.
So in January 2022, he was referred to an oncologist, who prescribed four cycles of chemotherapy, three weeks apart.
"While the first cycle passed without incident, I developed horrendous side effects from the second cycle onwards," he says.
"My hair thinned out completely and I had fatigue and nausea, although they were well-controlled with medication, and my team did all they could to help me; the quality of my care was excellent.
5
5
"However, my scans showed the chemo, which finished in May, had been working, and in August I had four weeks of radiotherapy, 20 sessions in all, which was much easier to deal with."
Warren's final treatment, a month of radiotherapy, ended in August 2022.
Since then, all his scans have been clear.
"My treatment took approximately eight months in total – from surgery straight onto chemo and then later radiotherapy," he says.
"I was motivated to do all I could to beat this and my surgeon, oncologists and rest of the team were very supportive.
"I felt very involved in the options and decisions that were available to me, as well as the risks involved.
"As treatment finished, it was up to me to pick up on my life and fend for myself, which was quite difficult; I didn't have any counselling at the time and never really processed what had happened.
"However, in January 2023, following four-monthly scans which were all clear, I was signed off as fit to fly again, so have been back working long-haul flights and running 15-20 miles a week.
"I am living my best life again. I also started counselling to help me cope with the anxiety over whether my cancer will come back as I have been feeling agitated at every little sign of illness.
"I've now completed the counselling and like anything, you only get out of it what you put in.
"It was difficult at first to change my way of thinking, but after several sessions it allowed me to change my mindset and focus on living in the here and now, the present."
'Covid saved my life'
Warren says cancer has changed his outlook on life, and he wants to do all he can to raise awareness and fundraise for charities like Cancer Research UK.
"The first thing I did was set up a monthly donation and also a gift in my will," he adds.
"I've spent my time focusing on my fitness and running and I'm planning on doing a marathon in the future.
"My message to others is that you only need lungs to have lung cancer, even if you've never smoked or think you're too young."
Incidence rates for lung cancer in the UK are highest in people aged 80 to 84.
But Warren stresses anyone can get cancer, and would encourage people to speak to their GP if they feel something's not quite right.
He adds: "I feel Covid saved my life, because had it not arisen, I might never have been concerned to find out the cause of my cough.
"What I've learned about cancer is that you should never think it can't happen to you."
Warren is supporting Cancer Research UK's Race for Life in partnership with Standard Life. Visit raceforlife.org to find out more.
WHAT IS LUNG CANCER?
LUNG cancer is the most deadly common cancer in the UK.
It is considered a common cancer alongside prostate, breast and bowel, which together make up more than half of all new cases.
Around 49,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer every year and 35,000 die from it.
Just one in 10 patients survive for a decade or more after being diagnosed and lung tumours make up 21 per cent of cancer deaths in the UK but only 13 per cent of cases.
The main reason that it is so deadly is that symptoms are not obvious in the early stages.
When signs do appear they may include:
A cough that lasts three weeks or more, and may hurt
Repeated chest infections
Coughing up blood
Breathlessness
Unusual tiredness
The NHS does not routinely screen for lung cancer but is rolling out more tests to smokers and ex-smokers at high risk, in a bid to catch it earlier. Testing may involve X-rays and chest CT scans.
Smoking is the number one risk factor for lung cancer and accounts for about 70 per cent of cases.
Risk may also be higher for people who have inhaled other fumes or toxic substances at work, such as asbestos, coal smoke or silica.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
‘Functional beverages' are booming — but is it all hype?
Before you take that magnesium supplement or sit down to meditate, what if a drink could help you relax? Enter 'functional beverages', drinks that claim to possess additional health benefits beyond those of a standard fizzy drink or fruit juice. Functional drinks are surging in popularity, with supermarkets in Britain seeing sales increase by 24.5 per cent in the past year, according to Worldpanel by Numerator. The market research firm also said that almost 30 per cent of UK households now purchase functional drinks. However, Nichola Ludlam-Raine, a dietician with more than 15 years of clinical experience in the NHS, has warned that she 'wouldn't rely on them [functional drinks] for measurable health benefits'. Ludlam-Raine, who now works privately and is the author of How Not to Eat Ultra-Processed , said: 'Functional drinks containing ingredients like CBD [cannabidiol], lion's mane [a type of mushroom], and ashwagandha [a herb typically used in ayurvedic medicine] are part of a growing wellness trend, but the science isn't as strong as the marketing.'


The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem
The enormous popularity of beauty treatments, including dermatological fillers and Botox injections, is not solely an issue for health regulators. Changing norms and aspirations about appearances, and the way that these are marketed mainly to women and girls, are a cultural and economic phenomenon that requires wider consideration. While attitudes to these procedures and aesthetics vary, many people – including some cosmetic surgeons – are concerned that younger women account for a growing share of a highly lucrative and growing market. The death last year of 33-year-old Alice Webb in Gloucestershire, after a non-surgical Brazilian butt lift, as well as multiple reports of injuries, and the deaths of at least 28 women who have travelled to Turkey for cosmetic treatments, have increased the pressure on ministers to tighten the law. Wes Streeting's announcement of new licence requirements for UK businesses, and tighter regulation of higher-risk treatments, is probably overdue. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute recently warned that untrained people have given cosmetic injections in public toilets and hotels. Altering the law in order to exclude such 'rogue operators' ought to make high streets and the internet – where many clinics advertise – safer. Talking about the risks, as the health secretary has been doing, and holding a consultation on proposed changes, may have the beneficial effect of raising awareness even before changes are introduced. But councils will need resources if they are to be expected to enforce new rules by issuing licences, checking premises and so on. As in many other areas of economic activity, the law on its own is unlikely to be enough. Mechanisms are needed to ensure that businesses comply. It is already illegal to administer Botox or dermal fillers to children in England – although, worryingly, it is still allowed in Wales and Scotland. Mr Streeting's announcement that rules regarding children will be tightened further is particularly welcome. Strenuous efforts should be made to place them off limits for the industry as a whole. The reported preoccupation of some children with anti-ageing products is not healthy and should be discouraged. Mr Streeting did not refer to the cost to the NHS if cosmetic procedures go wrong, when announcing plans to tighten the law. But Karin Smyth, one of his ministers, has raised this. And Prof Sir Stephen Powis, who was NHS England's national medical director until last month, made the same point specifically in relation to butt lifts – the cosmetic procedure with the highest death rate of all. Ministers should expect pushback even though many experts, including plastic surgeons, favour tighter rules. The pro-growth mood of the Treasury means proposals for new regulations are unlikely to be smiled upon there. The more restrictive approach being proposed for England will also do nothing to prevent surgical tourism and could even increase it, if tighter regulation of the domestic industry results in higher prices. The gap in safeguards that allows foreign cosmetic surgery providers to market directly to the public needs to be addressed separately, which the government has begun to recognise. There is no single or instant fix. But by cracking down on cowboy operators, ministers will send a message that appearance-altering injections and other invasive treatments must be treated seriously. They are a different order of activity from applying makeup or painting nails. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.


Times
8 hours ago
- Times
Obese to get soups and shakes diet instead of weight-loss jabs
Low-calorie soups and shakes are to be prescribed to thousands of overweight people in Scotland in an attempt to reduce their dependence on expensive weight-loss drugs and provide longer-lasting health benefits. From January, 3,000 patients who have been newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes will be recruited for a clinical trial. About 300,000 Scots live with type 2 diabetes, a condition commonly linked to obesity, in which badly regulated blood sugar levels can increase the risk of heart disease, kidney disease, strokes or nerve conditions. About 10,000 of them are being treated with weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro, with injections costing the NHS £3,000 a year. The estimated annual bill of £30 million is expected to rise as manufacturers raise prices. NHS chiefs believe that not only will the soups and shakes plan be less expensive, it will also bring longer-term health benefits. In the Total Diet Replacement (TDR) plan, to be rolled out over three years, patients who have recently been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and are deemed eligible will be given low-calorie substitutes for their breakfast, lunch and dinner. The replacement meals, containing a maximum of 900 calories a day, will be delivered to patients for between three and five months. • What to do now Mounjaro's hiking its prices, by an obesity expert After this initial period, normal food will be reintroduced, but with guidance given on healthy meals through online consultations and an app. The ambition is for patients to lose up to 10 per cent of their body weight over a year. Doctors are also optimistic that up to 40 per cent of the trial participants will achieve remission from type 2 diabetes within a year. There are fears that the weight lost through injections — which work by suppressing the appetite — may last only as long as the patient is taking the drug. By contrast, the effects of diet changes should prove more long-lasting and cost effective, NHS officials believe. The TDR scheme is set to cost £5.6 million for 3,000 patients, a one-off cost of about £1,866 per person. Doctors hope the plan will help patients to fundamentally alter their diet and lifestyle. A spokesman for the Scottish government said: 'We anticipate that around 35 to 40 per cent will achieve remission from type 2 diabetes at the end of their first year on the programme, with a majority of patients benefiting from a clinically significant average weight loss of 10 per cent.' This would lead to reductions in blood pressure and contribute to a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. He added: 'We will measure impact by the number of patients recruited into this programme, the number who achieve remission and the number with clinically significant weight loss.'