Questions raised for unaccounted funds at Gauteng Social Development
Between April and December 2024 alone, an additional R210-million in irregular spending was generated, while two Pretoria-based children's homes went without subsidy payments.
This move has fuelled criticism of the department's handling of non-profit organisation (NPO) funding.
Despite persistent warnings from the Auditor-General, no investigations or accountability measures were taken, said Alan Fuchs, DA Member of the Gauteng Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA).
'Officials and politicians act as though the law doesn't apply to them,' said Fuchs.
He accused Premier Panyaza Lesufi and Social Development MEC Faith Mazibuko of failing in their oversight responsibilities and allegedly sitting on forensic reports that could reveal corruption.
The fallout has had a real-world impact. Fuchs warned that mismanagement has forced many NPOs to shut their doors, leaving hundreds of children, the elderly, and disabled residents without critical care services.
'Echoes of Life Esidimeni can be heard,' he said, referencing the infamous tragedy in which mentally ill patients died after being moved to unlicensed NGOs.
DA Shadow MEC for Social Development, Refiloe Nt'sekhe, has tabled a motion in the Legislature for an official inquiry into the department's failures. But it has yet to be debated, a delay she claims is a political strategy to shield those implicated.
'There's literally no political will or accountability here,' Nt'sekhe said in an interview with Rekord, expressing frustration over the department's silence and refusal to release key forensic reports.
She pointed to audits conducted by firms BDO and Bowmans, as well as the Special Investigating Unit's work, as further evidence of widespread financial misconduct.
These reports have not been made public, and role players interested in finding the truth have to rely on whistleblower leaks.
'We even said they should be tabled in the portfolio committee and also be tabled in the House. To date, nobody has seen these reports,' she said.
The DSD has reportedly reduced its funded NPOs from 2 061 in 2014 to just 1 328 in 2025.
Nt'sekhe called this a 'significant decrease' and said it raises 'serious concerns about the support available for poor and vulnerable Gauteng residents'
As of the time of publication, questions submitted to the DSD have gone unanswered.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Just whose dialogue is it? South Africa's ‘citizen-led' convention fails its own test
Graphic: John McCann/M&G President Cyril Ramaphosa opened the National Dialogue at Unisa this past weekend with the promise that it belongs to 'all South Africans', asserting that 'no voice is too small and no perspective too inconvenient to be heard'. The convention, held under the banner ' Uniting Voices, Shaping the Nation ,' brought together more than 1000 delegates from about 200 organisations. But beneath this image of inclusivity lies a difficult truth: this process is not citizen-led in practice, and its planning, structure and execution reflect a top-down, state-managed initiative that is more performative than participatory. While the idea of a nationwide dialogue is commendable — especially given the deep crises South Africa faces — the launch at Unisa revealed a disconnect between the democratic ideals being invoked and the opaque mechanisms underpinning the process. The From the onset, the process has been coordinated by an inter-ministerial committee and an eminent persons group, none of whom were publicly nominated or confirmed through open civil processes. Even the composition of the steering committee, a supposedly 'broad-based' body mandated to guide the next phases of the dialogue, was not informed by transparent consultations. Instead, it was deliberated during invitation-only sectoral sessions at the end of the first convention. If this was a citizen-led process, what participatory frameworks were employed? What tools were used to ensure representation of South Africa's demographic and geographic diversity? Where are the independent observers or facilitators to verify this dialogue's legitimacy? One cannot call a process people-centred while bypassing the people in its design. Much of the framing mimics the rhetoric of grassroots mobilisation, with the dialogue promising thousands of ward-level conversations and submissions through a Despite a price tag of The dialogue takes place in a fractured political moment. The What many participants and observers have noted — both in If this is truly a moment for a national reset, then the dialogue must demonstrate it is capable of redistributing power, not only opinion. That means embracing independent community facilitation, co-creating metrics for inclusion, publishing detailed minutes of all sessions and allowing citizens — not technocrats — to define what matters. The old frameworks of centralised planning, symbolic inclusion and post-hoc validation cannot fix a democracy that is haemorrhaging trust. This convention should have begun with a presentation on the methodology used to select voices in the room, the feedback loops planned for tracking citizen input and the criteria for inclusion at every level of the process. Instead, we got speeches about shared futures from the same actors who dominated the past. Even the public-facing narrative implies the dialogue will culminate in another 'people's compact', but there is little detail on how it will be validated by the people themselves. If speech without substance is just noise, then consultation without transparency is political theatre. South Africa deserves better. The dialogue can still live up to its potential — but only if it turns away from state-orchestrated mobilisation and toward genuine democratic renewal. Otherwise, the phrase 'citizen-led' becomes just another slogan. And we've heard enough of those. To avoid this, the next phase must reframe how legitimacy is built — from process to participation. Rather than defending the structures already put in place, the government must now invite an independent, community-led audit of the convention's first phase. Facilitators for future sessions should be chosen from grassroots civic organisations with no ties to the state. Each provincial leg of the dialogue must publish weekly updates on whose voices are being included, how inputs are being tracked and what's being left behind. This is the only way to demonstrate that this is not another elite negotiation exercise in disguise, but a sincere attempt to devolve democratic power to the very citizens whose future is at stake. Anything less, and we will have squandered an opportunity under the banner of progress. Dr Lesedi Senamele Matlala is a governance scholar and lecturer at the School of Public Management Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, focusing on public policy, citizen engagement and evaluation.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
US charity says halt in visitor visas for Gazans will harm wounded children
The US-based charity Heal Palestine and other rights groups criticised the state department's decision to stop visitor visas for Palestinians from Gaza, saying it will harm wounded children seeking medical treatment on short-term US visas. The state department said on Saturday it was halting all visitor visas for Gazans while it conducted 'a full and thorough' review after far-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer said Palestinian refugees were entering the US. Heal Palestine said there was no refugee resettlement programme as stated by Loomer and the group's efforts were part of a medical treatment programme. It said the programme was run on donations and did not use US government money. The charity sponsored and brought 'severely injured children to the US on temporary visas for essential medical treatment not available at home', it said in a statement. 'After their treatment is complete, the children and any accompanying family members return to the Middle East.' The US has issued more than 3,800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the US, to holders of Palestinian Authority travel documents this year. The figure includes 640 visas issued in May. The Palestinian Authority issues travel documents to residents of the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza. The state department said a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas were issued to people from Gaza in recent days but did not provide a figure. The Council on American Islamic Relations and the Palestine Children's Relief Fund condemned the decision to stop the visas. Loomer told the New York Times she spoke to secretary of state Marco Rubio to warn about what she called a threat from 'Islamic invaders'. Rubio said the government was evaluating the process of granting such visas after concerns by some members of Congress regarding alleged ties to extremism. He said their offices had presented evidence of such ties but he gave no details. Gaza has been devastated by Israel's military assault, which has killed tens of thousands, caused a hunger crisis and prompted genocide and war crimes accusations at international courts. The US ally denies the accusations and said its offensive is in self-defence after an October 2023 attack in Israel by Hamas militants in which 1,200 were killed and about 250 taken hostage.
The Herald
5 hours ago
- The Herald
ANC to discipline Gigaba and Mchunu for 'opportunistic assault' on party
Bhengu said their comments did not reflect the views of any legitimate structure of the movement. 'And [the comments] must be seen as an opportunistic assault on the collective image, credibility, and cohesion of the ANC. The ANC categorically states that it is a revolutionary movement guided by democratic centralism principles and led through disciplined structures.' The party gagged the two, saying: 'Communications in the ANC is a constitutional mandate of the secretary-general [Fikile Mbalula], these powers are entrusted to the national spokesperson [Bhengu] for operational purposes. Any deviation from this established protocol undermines internal cohesion, unity and renewal. No comrade, regardless of their history or standing, is above the requirements of organisational discipline.' Bhengu said the party would take the necessary steps against Gigaba and Mchunu. 'No comrade will be exempt from the discipline of the organisation, which demands unity, discipline and revolutionary morality from all. As we advance the programme of renewal in the ANC and society, we must intensify our efforts to serve our people with humility and dignity,' said Bhengu. 'The renewal programme cannot coexist with ill-discipline; we have no tolerance for conduct that seeks to weaken the collective. We call on all members and leaders of our movement to return to the basic principles and values of our movement and be committed to respecting the integrity and sanctity of our organisational processes.' SowetanLIVE
