Paramedic jailed for spiking pregnant lover with abortion drug
Stephen Doohan, 33, was married when he met the woman on holiday in Spain in 2021 and began a long-distance relationship.
In March 2023, the woman travelled to Edinburgh to see him after learning she was pregnant, the High Court in Glasgow heard.
The court heard that Doohan inserted an abortion drug in her vagina without her knowledge during consensual sex on 17 March 2023.
Doohan had previously pleaded guilty to sexual assault and depositing a drug into the woman's vagina causing her to abort, and depositing with intent to cause her to abort.
On Monday at the High Court in Glasgow, he was sentenced to 10 years and six months in prison.
The court heard that Doohan convinced the woman to lie to medics at the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary because he thought he would be arrested if she told the truth.
The victim attended another regional hospital with her sister and was told that she was having a miscarriage.
The court heard that in May 2023, the woman complained to the Scottish Ambulance Service, which launched an investigation.
It revealed that on 14 March, the day the woman told Doohan she was pregnant, he used a work intranet to search for abortion drugs, the court was told.
Police were then called in.
Sentencing, judge Lord Colbeck said: 'You put her through considerable pain over a number of days, and left her facing a lifetime of pain and loss.'
He also said Doohan caused 'long-term psychological injury' to his victim.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police arrest more Palestine Action supporters
Police in London arrested dozens of protesters on a second successive Saturday for supporting Palestine Action, a week after the UK government banned the activist group under anti-terror laws. "Officers have made 41 arrests for showing support for a proscribed organisation," the Metropolitan Police said on X, noting another person had been arrested for common assault. "The area was cleared within the last hour," it added in a mid-afternoon update. Footage showed police moving in on a small group of protesters displaying signs supporting Palestine Action who had gathered at lunchtime at the steps of the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square. Campaign group Defend Our Juries, which had announced it would hold rallies Saturday in several UK cities "to defy" the ban, criticised the response. "The Metropolitan Police were out in force again today, arresting more than 40 people in Parliament Square for holding signs opposed to genocide and supporting Palestine Action," a spokesperson told AFP. "Who do the police think they are serving in this?" the spokesperson added, calling the ban "Orwellian". It comes a week after the arrest of 29 people, including a priest and a number of health professionals, for offences under anti-terrorism laws. - Support now a crime - Police have warned since the Palestine Action ban kicked in on July 5 that expressing support for it was now a crime. "It is a criminal offence to invite or express support for a proscribed organisation," the Met said on X ahead of Saturday's planned protests. "As we saw last week, those who do breach the law will face action." Palestine Action's proscription cleared parliament in the first days of July, and a last-ditch High Court challenge failed to stop it becoming law. The government announced plans for the ban under the Terrorism Act 2000 days after the group's activists claimed to be behind a break-in at an air force base in southern England. Two aircraft there were sprayed with red paint, causing an estimated £7 million ($9.55 million) in damage. Four people charged in relation to the incident remain in custody. Palestine Action has condemned the proscription -- which makes it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison -- as an attack on free speech. jj/yad-jj
Time Business News
23 minutes ago
- Time Business News
Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance if Living Separately Without Sufficient Cause: Allahabad High Court
In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court ruled that a wife who resides separately from her husband without sufficient cause is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The decision came while setting aside a February 17, 2025, order passed by the additional principal judge of the family court in Meerut, which had directed the husband to pay ₹5,000 per month as maintenance to his estranged wife. The matter came before Justice Subhas Chandra Sharma through a criminal revision petition filed by the husband, Vipul Agrawal, who challenged the family court's order on the grounds that the trial court itself had found that his wife had failed to establish any valid reason for living separately and yet had awarded maintenance in her favour. The High Court took note of the family court's findings, which had observed that the wife could not prove that she was residing apart from her husband due to his neglect or refusal to maintain her. Despite this, the family court had granted her maintenance, which the High Court found to be inconsistent with the legal framework laid down under Section 125(4) of the CrPC. This provision explicitly disqualifies a wife from claiming maintenance if she is living separately without just cause. Justice Sharma pointed out that the lower court's reasoning was contradictory, as it accepted the absence of sufficient grounds for separation yet proceeded to award maintenance, thereby violating the statutory bar under the said provision. During the proceedings, counsel for the husband argued that the trial court had overlooked the petitioner's financial capacity and erroneously fixed ₹8,000 as monthly maintenance—₹5,000 for the wife and ₹3,000 for the minor child. In response, counsel for the wife and the state maintained that the woman had separated due to the husband's neglect, which warranted the maintenance order. However, the High Court did not find merit in this contention in light of the trial court's own factual findings. The High Court, in its order dated July 8, remanded the matter to the family court for fresh adjudication, directing that both parties be granted a fair opportunity to present their case. In the interim, the husband has been ordered to pay ₹3,000 per month to the wife and ₹2,000 per month to the child until the matter is finally decided. This ruling reiterates the principle that a wife cannot claim maintenance as a matter of right unless she satisfies the statutory conditions under Section 125 of the CrPC, particularly when she chooses to live apart from her husband without sufficient justification. News source TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
More than 40 arrested at London protest in support of banned group Palestine Action
LONDON — More than 40 people were arrested Saturday at a protest in central London against the Palestine Action group being proscribed a terrorist organization by the government following a break-in and vandalism at a Royal Air Force base. The Metropolitan Police said 42 people had been arrested by late afternoon. All but one of the arrests were for showing support for a proscribed organization, which police have said includes chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. Another person was arrested for common assault.
