Bangladeshi Arrested: গল্ফগ্রিন থেকে বাংলাদেশি অনুপ্রবেশকারী সন্দেহে ধৃত ১ মহিলা
Bangladeshi Arrested: গল্ফগ্রিন থেকে বাংলাদেশি অনুপ্রবেশকারী সন্দেহে ধৃত ১ মহিলা | Zee 24 Ghanta
Bangladeshi Woman Detained from Golf Green on Suspicion of Illegal Entry from Bangladesh
Bangladeshi Woman Detained from Golf Green on Suspicion of Illegal Entry from Bangladesh
|
Updated:
Jul 30, 2025, 11:35 PM IST
Advertisement
Bangladeshi Woman Detained from Golf Green on Suspicion of Illegal Entry from Bangladesh
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Legal arrest, linguistic misstep: Delhi Police FIR stirs 'Bangladeshi language' row
A legitimate arrest of an illegal immigrant in Delhi has spiralled into a politically charged controversy, after an internal communication by the Delhi Police allegedly referred to Bengali as a "Bangladeshi language". The error, though seemingly minor, stirred a political storm, especially in poll-bound West Bengal, where language and identity are deeply intertwined. The alleged error pitted the Centre and the Trinamool Congress against each LANGUAGE THAT DOES NOT EXISTThe controversy erupted with an internal police note during the investigation of an FIR registered on March 11, 2025. The document referenced evidence in the "Bangladeshi language" — a term that has no linguistic basis. The official language of Bangladesh is Bengali, which is also widely spoken in Indian states like West Bengal, Tripura, and parts of semantic slip was swiftly politicised. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took to X (formerly Twitter), writing, "See now how Delhi police, under the direct control of the Ministry of Home, Government of India, is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!"THE FIR THAT SPARKED ROW The case involves 27-year-old Mohammad Jewel Islam, a Bangladeshi national arrested from the Bhogal–Jangpura area in South Delhi. According to the FIR filed at Lodhi Colony Police Station, Islam had entered India illegally in 2021 via the Cooch Behar border in West Bengal, without valid interrogation, Islam submitted a Bangladeshi National ID (No. 3325183683) and the identity cards of his mother and brother, confirming his Bangladeshi citizenship. He had procured an Aadhaar and PAN card in Delhi using allegedly forged documents, with the help of an agent from Hazrat has since been booked under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Foreigners Act, and the Aadhaar Act. Seven more individuals were arrested in connection with similar document-related GAP THAT'S OVERSHADOWING THE CASEWhile the arrest and evidence appear legally sound, the fallout from the language misstep has dominated headlines. The mention of "Bangladeshi language" was not part of the FIR, but a note accompanying a translation request. However, it has become the focal point of political argue that such errors reflect a lack of cultural and linguistic awareness within enforcement bodies. Film personalities and community leaders across the Bengali diaspora have condemned the terminology as reductive and harmful, particularly in a country as linguistically diverse as VS PROFILING: WHERE'S THE LINE?The case has raised uneasy questions about how identity is perceived in law enforcement. While the FIR process demonstrated procedural diligence, the reference to language has sparked concerns over ethnic is no language called "Bangladeshi." Bengali, the official language of Bangladesh, is also a constitutionally recognised Indian language. Dialects such as Sylheti, Rarhi, Rajbanshi, and Chittagonian are spoken across both India and Bangladesh, often with indistinguishable warn that using language as a proxy for nationality is dangerous. In a multilingual country like India, dialects don't follow borders. A resident of Cooch Behar or Malda may speak in a dialect nearly identical to someone from across the border in Rajshahi or Khulna. Mistaking that for evidence of foreignness risks criminalising speech and misidentifying OF SPEECH: WHY DIALECT CAN'T DECIDE CITIZENSHIPThe Bangladeshi national's arrest was based on tangible documents, not speech. Yet, the fallout underscores a deeper flaw: the assumption that language can denote citizenship. This case highlights the urgent need for training law enforcement in linguistic and cultural competence.A speaker's dialect cannot serve as biometric data. As experts and politicians have pointed out, legitimate Indian citizens across Tripura, Assam's Barak Valley, and Meghalaya speak dialects like Sylheti, which are also common in POLICE'S SILENCE, BJP'S REBUTTALThe Delhi Police has not issued a formal statement on the language error, allowing political parties to dominate the narrative. The BJP defended the terminology, with National Information in-charge Amit Malviya writing on X, "Nowhere in the Delhi Police letter is Bangla or Bengali described as a 'Bangladeshi' language."advertisementMalviya added, "Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators.' However, his comment that 'dialects like Sylheti are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis" triggered Susmita Dev responded sharply: 'Now BJP calls Sylheti a Bangladeshi language... We have lived in this region since 1874 as part of Assam, and before that, Bengal. Zero knowledge of history.' Congress's Gaurav Gogoi also joined in, saying, 'Today the BJP IT cell insults the Bengali language spoken by lakhs of people in Tripura, Meghalaya and the Barak Valley of Assam.'WHAT THIS COMES AROUND ASThis case underscores how fragile public trust becomes when administrative errors collide with questions of identity. In the context of West Bengal's politics, where language is central to cultural and political identity, such a mistake is seen as more than a bureaucratic enforcement agencies acknowledge the complexity of India's linguistic landscape, and communicate with greater precision, even a misused word risks overshadowing legitimate law enforcement work — turning proof into politics and mistakes into movements.- EndsMust Watch
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bangladesh arrests 48 Indian fishermen, impounds three boats
Bangladesh Navy has arrested 48 Indian fishermen, including 14 on Saturday (August 2, 2025) night, who strayed into Bangladeshi waters over the past 20 days. It has also impounded three trawlers. All the fishermen are from the Kwakdip area of the Sunderbans in West Bengal's South 24 Parganas district. While on July 13, two trawlers – FB Jhar and FB Mangalchandi – were impounded, the third boat – Paromita – was detained on Saturday (August 2, 2025) night. The District Magistrate of South 24 Parganas, Sumit Gupta, said the administration has informed the Union Home Department about the arrest of the fishermen. 'It (repatriation) is not in the local authority's jurisdiction. Since this is a matter of international relations, the Home Department is looking into it,' Mr. Gupta told The Hindu. Visuals shared by local media showed the fishermen in custody of Bangladeshi authorities, with their wrists tied to their waists with ropes. All Bengal Fishermen Association member Joy Krishna Haldar slammed the arrested fishermen and demanded 'strict punishment' for them. 'We have decided that no one should venture out beyond the maritime borders even if we do not catch any fish and come back empty-handed and starve,' Mr. Haldar, who is also from Kwakdip, told The Hindu on Monday (August 4, 2025). Also read: Lost song of the Sundarbans' fisherfolk 'This has become an annual problem. Why do they go beyond the maritime boundary when they know the consequences? This looks deliberate,' he added. Mr. Haldar said fishermen become 'greedy' and stray into the Bangladeshi waters in hope of a better catch, especially the Hilsa. Fish from Bangladeshi waters commands a premium in West Bengal, he added. He said that the association has decided to sever ties with the detained fishermen. Last year, 95 fishermen released by Bangladesh were felicitated by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in Sagar Island. India also repatriated 90 Bangladeshi fishermen detained in Indian waters. While India returned two trawlers belonging to Bangladeshi fishermen, six Indian vessels were returned by the neighbouring country in the exchange held near the International Maritime Boundary Line.
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Delhi HC denies bail to man held for raping, killing minor cousin
New Delhi, Aug 4 (PTI) The Delhi High Court has refused to grant bail to a man, accused of raping and killing his eight-year-old cousin, saying a relationship of trust between cousins was exploited in a 'brutal" way. Justice Girish Kathpalia's August 1 judgment further noted public outcry and media coverage of the incident couldn't get the gravity of offence diminished. 'At the stage of bail, the court cannot minutely examine the evidence on record. The broad picture recorded above shows the gruesome manner in which an eight year old girl was raped and killed, that too by her own cousin," the order said. The court said the offence under Section 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) POCSO Act was punishable with rigorous imprisonment for minimum term of 20 years which may extend to life imprisonment. The provision under Section 6 of the act not just fixes the minimum punishment as rigorous imprisonment for 20 years, the order said, but further stipulates that life term shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life of the convict. Of course, the other offence being under Section 302 (murder) IPC is punishable with death as well, the court added. 'It is not just the grave consequences of the offences alleged against the accused. One also cannot ignore that a relationship of trust between the cousins was exploited by the accused and in a such brutal manner," Justice Kathpalia said. The man was booked in April 2016 on the statement of the minor girl's father, who said she had gone missing while playing outside her house after what seemed like a kidnapping. During the investigation, the police learnt the girl was last seen with her cousin and the next day, a girl child's body was recovered behind a cremation ground in Uttam Nagar area. The body was identified to be of the victim and the accused was arrested subsequently. The man sought bail arguing he was framed owing to public pressure and media trial. Saying he had been in jail for over nine years, the accused said he couldn't be confined indefinitely. The prosecutor opposed the plea saying despite the COVID lockdown and other factors, four of the 20 prosecution witnesses were examined with all of them supporting the police's case. He also referred to the DNA profiling, which reflected DNA of the accused on the body and clothes of the girl. The high court said prolonged incarceration was certainly a ground to release the accused on bail, but not the solitary ground. 'The court has to keep in mind various judicially sanctified parameters, including the nature and gravity of the alleged crime and the material on record to support the same," it said. PTI SKV SKV AMK AMK view comments First Published: August 04, 2025, 18:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
