logo
Aukus vital to ‘deter Chinese aggression', say US lawmakers, as Trump urged to recommit to submarine deal

Aukus vital to ‘deter Chinese aggression', say US lawmakers, as Trump urged to recommit to submarine deal

The Guardian4 hours ago

The Aukus pact is vital to 'deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region', Republican and Democrat lawmakers in the US have told the Pentagon, urging the US to recommit to the nuclear submarine deal with Australia and the UK.
The Trump administration announced this month it would undertake a 30-day review of the Aukus agreement – the deal struck in 2021 that would see US nuclear submarines sold to Australia, and new-design nuclear-powered Aukus submarines built in the UK and Australia.
A letter addressed to defence secretary Pete Hegseth, signed by five Republican and Democrat lawmakers, urged the Pentagon to back Aukus, despite growing concerns over laggard shipbuilding in both the US and UK.
'As the department of defense begins its 30-day review of the trilateral Aukus mission, we write to you to express our strongest support for the agreement.
'This is a defense alliance that is overwhelmingly in the best interest of all three Aukus nations, as well as the entire Indo-Pacific region. Indeed, as you noted in February when Australia provided the U.S. with a $500m Aukus payment, 'this is not a mission … America can undertake by itself. It has to be [done by] robust allies and partners. Technology sharing and subs are a huge part of it.'
The letter said the breadth and depth of support for Aukus within the US Congress had grown dramatically and 'we have worked quickly to recognize Aukus's mission to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
It also pointed to progress made, saying 'legislation necessary for Aukus to proceed had passed Congress; shipbuilding rates in the US had lifted substantially; and Australian naval officers had begun joint training on US nuclear-powered submarines.'
Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, who is in London on his way to the Nato meeting at The Hague, said he was 'not going to speculate about what the review will ultimately say' but stressed a review of a major defence project was a 'perfectly natural step' for an incoming administration to take, one that was supported by Australia.
Asked about workforce challenges faced by both the US and UK shipbuilding industries, Marles said the 'human dimension' was a key challenge in securing Aukus submarines.
'We are confident that we can get this right, but we're not sanguine about it. There is a lot of work to be done to meet the human challenge, but we believe we can get it done.'
Democratic Congressman Joe Courtney, co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus (and whose district in Connecticut includes the shipbuilding hub of Groton), as well as Republicans Michael McCaul, chair emeritus of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, were the lead signatories on the letter.
Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defence for policy at the Pentagon, is leading the 30-day US review, due to report in July.
Colby has consistently declared he is 'very sceptical' about the pact and its benefits for America.
He told the US Senate armed service committee that the US was not building enough submarines for its own defence, and would not sell submarines to Australia if that might jeopardise American interests.
'We don't want our servicemen and women to be in a weaker position and more vulnerable … because [the attack submarines] are not in the right place at the right time.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Under pillar one of the Aukus agreement, the US will sell Australia between three and five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, with the first to be delivered in 2032.
These will replace Australia's ageing Collins class diesel-electric submarines to cover the 'capability gap' before Australia's own Aukus nuclear-powered submarines can be built.
By the 'late 2030s', according to Australia's submarine industry strategy, UK shipbuilders will deliver the first specifically designed and built Aukus submarine to its own Royal Navy.
Australia's first Aukus submarine – based on the UK design but to be built in South Australia – will be in the water 'in the early 2040s'.
Aukus is forecast to cost Australia up to $368bn to the mid-2050s.
Australia is providing significant subsidies to the industrial bases of both the US and UK. It has already paid $A798m (US$500m) – the first instalment of $A4.7bn pledged – to the US. It will pay A$4.6bn to the UK.
But the deal's feasibility has come under significant pressure regarding both nuclear-capable senior partners.
The US navy already has a shortfall of submarines, expected to worsen over coming years, and shipyards in America are running up to three years late in building new Virginia-class submarines, a 2024 US navy report found.
The UK parliament announced its own inquiry into Aukus in April, which will examine whether 'geopolitical shifts since the initial agreement in 2021' have rendered the agreement unworkable.
In Australia, there have been calls from a chorus of voices – including naval experts, former prime and foreign ministers, submariners, anti-war groups, and the Greens – for a domestic inquiry into Aukus, its feasibility and potential benefits to Australia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neither Israel nor Iran seem committed to Trump's script. Daytime will test the durability of any ceasefire
Neither Israel nor Iran seem committed to Trump's script. Daytime will test the durability of any ceasefire

Sky News

time30 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Neither Israel nor Iran seem committed to Trump's script. Daytime will test the durability of any ceasefire

These days, peace is a post on social media. On Donald Trump's Truth Social site, it came in two parts. Part one read: "CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, IT'S TIME FOR PEACE." The Magna Carta it wasn't, but it was a peace treaty for our times - a US president announcing there would be no retaliation against Iran's missile attack. An anxious world watching for US bombers returning to Iranian skies could cool its jets - and the primetime president could feel vindicated, having enjoyed the sugar rush of strategic success. Trump has tweaked the politics and military landscape around Iran to suit US interests, without a single American life lost. He had framed US intervention in Iran as an effort to prevent a "forever" foreign war, not to provoke it, and he is sitting pretty, following ugly predictions he'd be sucked into conflict. Then, on Truth Social, there was peace "part two". A couple of hours after announcing non-retaliation, Trump wrote the sequel: "Ceasefire." He posted: "CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!" - saying a "complete and total" ceasefire had been fully agreed between Israel and Iran. Quite the day of problem-solving for the self-styled "peacemaker-in-chief". Quite the day of problems unsolved too - time will tell. As deadlines loomed, neither Israel nor Iran appeared fully committed to the Trump script, and fresh missiles were fired overnight. Daytime will test the durability of a ceasefire. There are motivations on both sides to continue a conflict in which both see the other as an existential threat. Can Tehran regard Donald Trump as a trusted broker of peace when he floated the idea of regime change in Iran, as pursued by Israel? Can Israel be convinced to pull back on its military advantage when its instinct will be to reinforce superiority and undermine an Iranian rebuild? Trump's influence will be tested, as ever, when he flies to a NATO summit in The Netherlands today. For him, it can be a difficult crowd and one for whom he remains a mystery. A positive result in the Middle East will help to confound their curiosity, for the better.

South Dakota eager for Trump's statue garden near Mount Rushmore despite local opposition
South Dakota eager for Trump's statue garden near Mount Rushmore despite local opposition

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

South Dakota eager for Trump's statue garden near Mount Rushmore despite local opposition

Officials in South Dakota are pushing hard to build President Donald Trump 's proposed National Garden of American Heroes in the Black Hills near Mount Rushmore, but the effort has sparked a backlash from Indigenous groups who see the area as sacred. A mining company has offered to donate 40 acres (16 hectares) less than a mile from Mount Rushmore, where massive sculptures of four of the nation's most prominent presidents are carved out of granite. 'The Black Hills mark the perfect location to achieve your vision for the National Garden of American Heroes,' Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden wrote in a letter to Trump. 'Together, we will make this project happen in a way that honors America's heroes, takes advantage of South Dakota's natural beauty, and incorporates the most iconic monument to our greatest leaders: Mount Rushmore National Memorial.' But the Black Hills have long been the subject of disputes between South Dakota and its tribes. The 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie recognized that the Black Hills belong to the Sioux people, but the U.S. government seized the land less than a decade later to mine for gold. A 1980 Supreme Court decision found that the U.S. violated the treaty, but the tribes refused the $1.3 billion in compensation they were offered and maintained their rights to the land. Indigenous groups also oppose drilling project The mining company, Pete Lien & Sons, also has had conflicts with Indigenous groups in the area, most recently because of an exploratory drilling project for graphite near the sacred Lakota site of Pe' Sla. The company also is working with theme park designer Storyland Studios to build an attraction in the Black Hills opposed by some Indigenous groups. 'It's absurd for Storyland Studios and Gov. Rhoden to claim they care about preserving history while they watch Lien & Sons attempt to destroy Pe' Sla, and do nothing,' said Taylor Gunhammer, an organizer with the Indigenous advocacy group NDN Collective. 'They are the ones erasing and paving over history, not preserving it,' Gunhammer said. Rhoden's press secretary, Josie Harms, wrote in a statement that the garden "will have no disruption to either state or tribal land' because the tract of land is owned by Chuck Lien, owner of Lien & Sons, and his family. Pete Lien & Sons did not respond to multiple requests from The Associated Press for comment. Trump's garden to feature 250 statues of historical figures Trump signed an executive order earlier this year to build the garden, to feature 250 life-size statues of historical figures in honor of the country's 250th birthday on July 4, 2026. Applications for sculptors are due in early July, though the administration no longer seeks to have it completed by next summer. The U.S. House has approved $40 million for the project, which is being overseen by the Department of Interior and the National Endowment for the Humanities. The Senate hasn't yet approved the funding. Trump first announced the project in his first term in a July 3, 2020, speech at Mount Rushmore at a time during the Black Lives Matter movement when some protesters were tearing down statues depicting Confederate generals and others. 'Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our Founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities,' Trump said in that speech. 'But no, the American people are strong and proud, and they will not allow our country, and all of its values, history, and culture, to be taken from them.' In a 2021 executive order, Trump called for statues depicting a range of prominent figures, from the likes of Amelia Earhart, Muhammad Ali and Steve Jobs to more controversial ones like Christopher Columbus and President Andrew Jackson. No site was selected, however, and the garden was never funded by Congress. The Department of Interior said the revived garden project is still in the 'planning and discussion phase' and declined to say which sites it is considering. It's unclear if any other states are seeking to host the statue garden. As governor, Noem offered land for the garden When Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was the state's governor, she offered the mining company's 40 acres of land in the Black Hills. Her successor, Rhoden, doubled down on that offer in his letter, emphasizing the site would be 'in sight of Mount Rushmore.' South Dakota Republican U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson also wrote a letter to Trump, and said he will 'keep advocating for this iconic landmark to make its home in the Black Hills' in a social media post. Darren Thompson, director of media relations for the Indigenous nonprofit Sacred Defense Fund, called for more discussions with Indigenous groups in the Black Hills. 'It's a very touchy and sensitive subject that I think requires input by the local Indigenous people who have claim to the land and cultural ties to the land,' Thompson said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store