logo
Resource-rich Mongolia faces political uncertainty after the prime minister resigns

Resource-rich Mongolia faces political uncertainty after the prime minister resigns

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Resource-rich Mongolia is facing political uncertainty following the resignation early on Tuesday of its prime minister in the wake of protests over endemic corruption in the landlocked Asian country, squeezed between China and Russia.
Before he lost the confidence vote in the parliament, Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai warned that his removal could undermine Mongolia's fledgling democracy. The vote followed weeks of protests sparked by reports of lavish spending by his son and calls for him to step down.
The reports, which cited expensive jewelry and helicopter rides for the son's female companion, underscored the vast gap between Mongolians who have grown extremely wealthy off the country's exports and much of the rest of the population, mired in poverty.
Here is a look at why what is happening in Mongolia matters:
A fledgling democracy between two big powers
Mongolia, a country of about 3.5 million people, borders Russia to the north and China to the south. Its stunning alpine mountains interspersed with vast deserts hold an abundance of coal, copper and other natural resources used in high-tech manufacturing.
The question of who benefits from the wealth has been a key issue since Mongolia began negotiating with foreign mining giants — rumors of secret deals and under-the-table payments have circulated for years.
After Mongolia threw off Communism at the end of the Cold War, it lost generous Soviet Union aid packages. Since then, it has been slowly becoming a democracy but is struggling to avoid falling into debt while holding Chinese and Russian interests at bay.
China is a particularly important neighbor as its ruling Communist Party buys up 92% of Mongolia's exports.
A 'spiders' web' of the greedy
Over the years, the capital of Ulaanbaataar transformed itself from a city of clunky Soviet-era buildings surrounded by traditional herders' felt tents known as gers, into a metropolis of shopping malls and fancy hotels.
The protesters have said the country's mineral riches have benefited business interests and the wealthy, while many Mongolians still live in poverty.
Early on Tuesday morning, Oyun-Erdene only got 44 votes of support in the 126-seat legislature — the State Great Khural — well short of the 64 needed, according to the head of the counting commission, M. Narantuya-nara.
Oyun-Erdene accepted defeat, saying it had been an honor to serve the nation through the coronavirus pandemic, Russia's war on Ukraine and the ongoing strife over U.S. tariffs.
But he also warned of the threat of a 'spider's web' of special interests that he said are working to hold the Mongolian people back.
What happens next?
Oyun-Erdene, who ran a coalition government, will remain prime minister until his replacement is elected in parliament, most likely from the ranks of opposition lawmakers.
Those who pick his successor will likely also have to find a platform that will satisfy the demands of the largely young and well-educated class that has led the protests. That could include moving ahead with a national sovereignty fund introduced recently to better help spread the wealth.
In stepping down, Oyun-Erdene defended his integrity but said he had made the mistake of 'paying insufficient attention to social and internal political matters.'
He also warned of political instability ahead, saying it 'could lead the public to lose faith in parliamentary rule and potentially put our democratic parliamentary system at risk of collapse.'
What do experts and the ordinary people say?
Erin Murphy, deputy director and senior fellow of India and emerging Asian economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said it's not easy to 'build that foundation for democracy' at a time when Mongolia also must tackle economic problems.
Julian Dierkes, a Mongolia expert at the University of Mannheim in Germany, said he doesn't expect any major policy changes, whoever becomes the next prime minister.
'They will be selected on the basis of personal networks and patronage,' Dierkes said.
Many people on the street seemed worried for the future and some defended the outgoing prime minister on Tuesday.
Oyun-Erdene should not be responsible for his son's failings, said Gansukh Batbayar, a military retiree in Ulaanbaatar who lauded what he described as Oyun-Erdene's efforts to 'confiscate illegally earned assets and money of corrupt officials' and distribute it more fairly.
'We barely survive in these chaotic times and our pensions are very small,' said an older woman on a public bus in Ulaanbaataar, who declined to give her name to speak about the political developments.
She counts on her children 'to have food to eat and a roof over my head,' she said.
___
Associated Press writers Didi Tang in Washington and Ken Moritsugu in Beijing contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Māori Party lawmakers for haka protest
New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Māori Party lawmakers for haka protest

Hamilton Spectator

time41 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Māori Party lawmakers for haka protest

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — New Zealand legislators voted Thursday to enact record suspensions from Parliament for three lawmakers who performed a Māori haka to protest a proposed law. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke received a seven-day ban and the leaders of her political party, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, were barred for 21 days. Three days had been the longest ban for a lawmaker from New Zealand's Parliament before. The lawmakers from Te Pāti Māori, the Māori Party, performed the haka, a chanting dance of challenge , in November to oppose a widely unpopular bill, now defeated , that they said would reverse Indigenous rights. The protest drew global headlines and provoked months of fraught debate among lawmakers about what the consequences for the lawmakers' actions should be and the place of Māori culture in Parliament. Why the punishment was so strict A committee of the lawmakers' peers in April recommended the lengthy bans. It said the lawmakers were not being punished for the haka, but for striding across the floor of the debating chamber toward their opponents while doing it. Judith Collins, the committee chair, said the lawmakers' behavior was egregious, disruptive and potentially intimidating. Maipi-Clarke, 22, rejected that description Thursday, citing other instances when legislators have left their seats and approached opponents without sanction. The suspended legislators said they are being treated more harshly than others because they are Māori. 'I came into this house to give a voice to the voiceless. Is that the real issue here?' Maipi-Clarke asked Parliament. 'Is that the real intimidation here? Are our voices too loud for this house?' Why this haka was controversial Inside and outside Parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life. The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent. As Māori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, somber and celebratory settings. They also have rung out in Parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws. Some who decried the protest haka in Parliament cited its timing, with Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings. She has privately apologized for the disruption to Parliament's Speaker, she said Thursday. A few lawmakers urged their peers to consider rewriting rules about what lawmakers could do in Parliament to recognize Māori cultural protocols as accepted forms of protest. One cited changes to allow breastfeeding in the debating chamber as evidence the institution had amended rules before. Who approved the suspensions Normally the parliamentary committee that decides on punishments for errant lawmakers is in agreement on what should happen to them. But panel members were sharply divided over the haka protest and the lengthy punishments were advanced only because the government has more legislators in Parliament than the opposition. One party in the government bloc wanted even longer suspensions and had asked the committee if the Māori party lawmakers could be jailed. Most in opposition rejected any punishment beyond the one-day ban Maipi-Clarke already served. Speaker Gerry Brownlee urged lawmakers last month to negotiate a consensus and ordered a free-ranging debate that would continue until all agreed to put the sanctions to a vote. But no such accord was reached after hours of occasionally emotional speeches in which opposition lawmakers accused the government of undermining democracy by passing such a severe punishment on its opponents. While the bans were certain to pass, even as the debate began Thursday it remained unclear whether opposition lawmakers would filibuster to prevent the suspensions from reaching a vote. By evening, with no one's mind changed, all lawmakers agreed the debate should end. Every government lawmaker voted for the punishments, while all opposition members voted against them. The law that prompted the protest Thursday's debate capped a fraught episode for race relations in New Zealand, beginning with the controversial bill that the Māori Party lawmakers opposed. The measures would have rewritten principles in the country's founding document, a treaty between Māori tribal leaders and representatives of the British Crown signed at the time New Zealand was colonized. The bill's authors were chagrined by moves from Parliament and the courts in recent decades to enshrine the Treaty of Waitangi's promises. Opponents warned of constitutional crisis if the law was passed and tens of thousands of people marched to Parliament last November to oppose it. Despite growing recognition for the treaty, Māori remain disadvantaged on most social and economic metrics compared to non-Māori New Zealanders. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Oil prices rise despite oversupply concerns
Oil prices rise despite oversupply concerns

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices rise despite oversupply concerns

Oil prices rose on Thursday morning, as investors looked past concerns about oversupply and economic growth. Brent crude futures (BZ=F) climbed 0.5% to $65.15 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) declined 0.3% at $63.04 a barrel. Earlier on Thursday morning, Hargreaves Lansdown senior equity analyst Matt Britzman said oil prices had "weighed down by growing concerns of a global oversupply". Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: Stocks rise as traders await ECB interest rate decision "Saudi Arabia is pushing for a major increase in oil production and has slashed prices for Asian buyers, signalling weaker demand," he said. The July price cut by Saudi Arabia, which is the world's biggest oil exporter, comes after the decision from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies — known as OPEC+ — over the week to increase output next month. In addition, Britzman said "ongoing trade tensions are adding to market uncertainty". There are concerns that a slowdown in the global economy due to US president Donald Trump's tariff agenda would weigh on demand for fuel. The pound edged higher against the dollar (GBPUSD=X) on Thursday morning, rising 0.1% to trade at $1.3564 at the time of writing. The US dollar index ( which measures the greenback against a basket of six currencies, hovered around the flatline at 98.85. This followed weak US economic data on Wednesday, including a sharp slowdown in private sector hiring growth, as well as a contraction in services sector. On the back of the weak data from ADP's private sector jobs report, US president Donald Trump renewed his call for Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, referencing the ADP report, Trump said that "Powell must now LOWER THE RATE. He is unbelievable!!!" Jim Reid, market strategist at Deutsche Bank ( said: "Both the ADP and the ISM services prints led investors to price in more rate cuts this year, with clear moves in response to the two prints." Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio "In fact by the close, futures were pricing in 58bps (basis points) of rate cuts by the Fed's December meeting, up +8.0bps on the day, and the highest number in over three weeks. And there's growing confidence that we'll see the first rate cut by September, with futures now almost fully pricing (97%) one by that meeting." Attention now turns to the European Central Bank's (ECB) latest decision later on Thursday, with another rate cut expected to be announced. Hargreaves Lansdown's Britzman said: "Investors are all but certain the European Central Bank will cut rates later today down to 2%. Hopes for easing grew after Eurozone inflation dipped to 1.9% in May, just below the ECB's target. "More cuts are on the cards too, with interest rates expected to fall to 1.5% by the end of the year — low enough to start actively supporting the economy." Ahead of the decision, the pound was slightly higher against the euro (GBPEUR=X), up 0.1% at €1.1882 at the time of writing. Gold prices were muted on Thursday morning, as investors weighed weak economic data and the latest developments on trade. Following talks between the US and European Union (EU) in Paris on Wednesday, EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič tweeted: "We're advancing in the right direction at pace — and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum." Meanwhile, US trade representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement that he was "pleased that negotiations are advancing quickly." Read more: Bank of England governor expects interest rates and pay to decrease this year At the same time, trade tensions remain high between the US and China, with Trump having said in a post on Truth Social in the early hours of Wednesday that it was "extremely hard" to reach a deal with China's president Xi Jinping. The different signals on trade negotiations kept gold prices steady. Gold futures (GC=F) traded at $3,307.80 per ounce at the time of writing, while the spot gold price hovered around $3,374 per ounce. In broader market movements, the UK's FTSE 100 (^FTSE) was also little changed on Thursday morning, trading at 8,799 points. For more details, on broader market movements check our live coverage here. Read more: How next week's spending review could impact your finances What is the Pension Investment Review? Eurozone inflation cools to 1.9% in May paving way for interest rate cutError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This
This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Woman Is Showing The Effects Of The Tariff War In China, And Hooooo Boy You Are Not Ready For This

Here in the US, we're experiencing the effects of President Trump's tariff wars every single day as prices continue going up. If you're wondering how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries, Emily ( a Canadian living in China, recently shared a video explaining exactly how things have changed for her in the grocery store over there. Emily's video starts out, "Hello from China. So, I'm in a grocery store right now, and I wanted to show you how the American tariffs are affecting Chinese customers." @ / Via "So, I was gonna get some beef for dinner tonight, and I saw this," she says, holding up a package of beef. "What used to be here is American beef. But now, as you can see, it says Australian beef." @ / Via "And I did look around," she added. "I couldn't find one single pack of beef from America. So I guess China just stopped buying beef from America, and it went straight to Australia." @ / Via "The whole idea that China is hurting because of the American tariffs? Well, they're not, because they are not as dependent on the US. In fact, only 18% of Chinese imports come from America. And for stuff like beef and soy, they can just go somewhere else easily." @ / Via Trading Economics says that the number is even lower than Emily suggested, putting the percentage of China's imports that come from the US at around 7% in 2023. According to the USDA, the US exported $1.58 billion worth of beef to China in 2024. Reuters also notes that in 2022, "soybeans were the No. 1 U.S. product imported by China," but that "the U.S. has lost competitive advantage to Brazil." "So I guess I'm having Australian beef for dinner tonight instead of American beef," Emily continued. "And honestly, because of the food quality, I probably trust Australian beef better." "And this box of beef right here is 50 RMB, which is about $7 USD." "So to answer the question, China ain't hurting. And if anything, I think we're probably doing even better because now [we have] better beef that tastes better and at a better price." @ / Via "So, thank you, Trump, for that," she concluded. Unsurprisingly, commenters had a lot to say on the topic. "USA put sanctions on themselves," one said. "No country is hurting apart from the US," said another. "I don't see China going back to the USA for those products in the next 4 years. Sadly a lot of American farmers are big fans of Trump." The video even made its way over to Twitter (now known as X), where even more people shared their opinions. "So Trump trying to beef up American exports, actually lead to losing customers to export to," said one. "Our tariff tiff countries have other options. America isn't the only trade partner in the world. We're even less desirable now because we aren't trusted." "There's nothing the United States can offer that the rest of the world doesn't already have. Except for serial killers and deep-fried hot dogs." You can watch Emily's full video below, and follow her over on TikTok. What do you think? Were you surprised to learn how the tariffs are affecting people in other countries? Let us know in the comments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store