
Countries gather to thrash out deal on 'plastic crisis'
Scientists have estimated that there are nearly 200 trillion pieces floating in the world's oceans, and this could triple if no action is taken.
In 2022, countries agreed to develop a legally binding global treaty to cut the waste and the harmful chemicals some plastics contain – but after two years no agreement has been reached.
On Tuesday, the world's nations meet again at a UN conference in Geneva – could they finally agree how to curb the plastic excesses?
Human societies have used plastics that occur naturally in the environment for hundreds of years, in the form of rubber, horn and shellac.
But the 20th Century brought the explosion of synthetic plastics, made from processing fossil fuels.
The material's versatility, strength and heat-resistant properties has lent itself to thousands of uses, from sewage pipes to life-saving medical equipment, to clothing.
It has become ubiquitous in a short time without understanding its full impact, explains Dr Alice Horton, research scientist at the National Oceanography Centre.
"Proportional to life on earth, plastics have been around for no time at all, there are people alive that weren't using plastics as children. I think that's what makes this quite a concerning material," said Dr Horton.
"It has exploded in such a way that we are using it in every application in our lives and yet we are suddenly realising there may be problems with it."
Levels of plastic production have grown exponentially over the last few decades. In 1950 two million tonnes was produced, by 2022 that had risen to 475 million tonnes.
Although plastic can be reused, the cost and availability of recycling infrastructure means very little is. About 60% of all plastics are single use and just 10% are estimated to be recycled, according to analysis in Nature.
Plastic has been shown to accumulate in the marine environment where it poses particular problems for wildlife who can ingest it.
"They can confuse it as food, which then harms their internal organs and also can lead to fatalities, because of digestion difficulties," said Zaynab Sadan, global plastics policy lead at WWF.
She said they could also become entangled in discarded fishing gear or plastic packaging that has entered the ocean from sewage systems.
When it enters the environment, most plastic breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces – known as microplastics. They have been found across all geographical ranges, from the deep sea to mountain tops, and across all living systems ever tested.
Research is continuing to understand the full impact, with different species faring better than others. But Dr Horton from the National Oceanography Centre warns there is a threshold where animals will start to be harmed.
"When we [get] accumulation of plastic in tissues we start seeing inflammation, cell damage, hormonal changes. Things that are not outright going to kill an organism but likely to have this accumulative, long-term effect whereby they get weaker and weaker, and sicker and sicker, and either become diseased or die," she explained.
Plastics are a "grave, growing and under-recognised danger" for human health, according to a new expert report.
The Lancet Countdown estimated that health-related disease and death from the "plastic crisis" is responsible for at least $1.5tn (£1.1tn) a year in health-related damages.
These impacts can range from air pollution from the production of plastic, through to elevated risk of cancer, respiratory illnesses and miscarriages from plastic contamination in our bodies.
Plastics contain more than 16,000 chemicals such as dyes and flame retardants, some of which are toxic and cancer-causing.
Despite the growing body of evidence of the hazards of plastic, the Lancet report highlights that there is a lack of transparency as to what is in most products. Just a quarter of plastic chemicals have data on their impact, but of those tested 75% were found to be "highly hazardous".
In 2022, countries agreed a global treaty was needed in two years to tackle the issue.
That deadline passed in December 2024, after five rounds of negotiations, with no treaty having been signed.
On Tuesday, more than 170 nations will meet again to try to get a deal over the line.
The main issues they are trying to get agreement on include:
Targets on cutting the production levels of single-use plastics
Bans on some of the most harmful chemicals in plastic
Universal guidance on the design of plastic products
Financing of this effort
Products that have to meet consistent design standards can help to improve recycling, save costs and reduce the demand for virgin plastics, Rob Opsomer, executive lead of plastics and finance at the Ellen McArthur Foundation, which co-convenes the Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, told the BBC.
"So, to give you one example, a drinks bottle, if it is coloured, the value of what you can get from it if you sell the recycled material is half the value of a clear, uncoloured bottle," he explained.
Nearly 100 countries, including the UK, are calling for an "ambitious" treaty which would include a commitment to limit production levels. But there has been strong opposition from a group of oil-producing nations including Russia and Saudi Arabia who want the talks to focus not on producing less, but recycling more.
Demand for oil in global energy and transport systems is expected to peak in the next few years as countries move to greener technologies. This could leave plastic as one of the few growth markets for the oil industry. Any efforts to limit production could pose short term economic damage to the petrostates.
But for those users of plastics not having clear, global regulations is costing them.
"It is a fundamental risk. Businesses don't want packaging with their brand name on it to be littering the streets and our oceans," said Opsomer.
He said there was also the cost for businesses of having to comply with hundreds of new standards globally every year on plastics.
The Business Coalition, which includes some of the biggest global users of plastic such as Nestle and Unilever, is calling for governments to introduce coordinated taxes on their businesses to help pay for the cost of recycling and cleaning up plastic waste.
Single-use plastic is the biggest contributor to plastic waste in the environment, and most of our daily consumption of this comes from food packaging.
You can take a reusable container or cup if you are getting a takeaway, and when food shopping consider taking a reusable sealed bag to weigh your fruit and vegetables.
It is estimated that more than a quarter of microplastics in the environment come from car tyres. For those that are able, walking and cycling to the local shops or sharing car journeys with friends or neighbours can help.
And avoid plastics that break down to microplastics more easily – such as chewing gum and glitter. There are many non-plastic alternatives still available which means you can keep having fun at festivals. – BBC

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Conflict, climate change fuel Africa's hunger emergency
While global hunger has shown signs of gradual decline over the past three years, Africa stands as a painful exception to this trend. A newly released UN report, 'The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World,' reveals that hunger worldwide has been decreasing for a third consecutive year — falling from 8.7 percent in 2022 to 8.2 percent in 2024. However, this progress has not only bypassed Africa but left the continent further behind. Africa continues to suffer a disturbing rise in food insecurity. Across the African continent, the crisis has reached a critical threshold. In 2024, more than one in five people in Africa — over 307 million individuals — were chronically undernourished. This means millions of people are not getting enough food to maintain a healthy and active life, with children particularly vulnerable to stunted growth, cognitive impairment, and increased risk of death. The number is not merely a statistic; it reflects daily suffering, malnutrition, and the erosion of human dignity on a vast scale. Almost 1 billion Africans, roughly two-thirds of the continent's population, cannot afford a healthy diet. This inability to access balanced, nutritious food is not only a humanitarian crisis, but also a serious threat to public health, economic development, and political stability. In many countries, the burden of food insecurity disproportionately affects women and children, especially in rural areas, where food access is often limited by geography, infrastructure, and entrenched inequality. More than 50 percent of Africa's population now experiences moderate or severe food insecurity — a rate higher than in any other region of the world, and more than double the global average. And the future appears bleak. If current trends persist, projections indicate that by 2030, Africa will account for nearly 60 percent of the 512 million chronically undernourished people worldwide. Understanding why hunger is rising in Africa requires a deeper look at the multiple forces fueling this crisis. Chief among these are armed conflict, climate change, and economic instability — each of which not only contributes independently to food insecurity but also exacerbates the others, creating a dangerous feedback loop that is pushing millions to the edge of survival. Armed conflict is one of the most immediate and devastating drivers of hunger across Africa. From the Horn of Africa to the Sahel, from eastern Democratic Republic of Congo to the war-torn regions of Sudan, violence has uprooted families, destroyed crops, and disrupted trade and food distribution networks. In Sudan, for example, brutal fighting has led to famine-like conditions in parts and among populations living in displacement camps. Skyrocketing prices have made food inaccessible to millions Dr. Majid Rafizadeh Beyond conflict, climate change has become a relentless and unignorable force driving hunger across the continent. Africa is disproportionately affected by global warming, even though it contributes the least to greenhouse gas emissions. Recurrent droughts, erratic rainfall, desertification, and extreme weather events have severely undermined agricultural output in multiple regions. Eastern and southern Africa have been particularly hard-hit by climate-related disasters. Somalia has experienced one of the worst droughts in its history, affecting nearly half its population and leading to large-scale displacement. In the Horn of Africa and southern Madagascar, failed rainy seasons have wiped out crops and livestock, leading to food shortages that stretch from village markets to urban centers. Desertification now affects almost half the continent, making formerly fertile lands barren and unusable. At the same time, rising temperatures and increased frequency of floods and cyclones are damaging infrastructure, contaminating water sources, and leaving already vulnerable communities exposed to diseases and hunger. As climate change continues to escalate, the risks to Africa's food security will multiply unless decisive adaptation strategies are implemented. Compounding the effects of conflict and climate change is a profound and persistent economic instability. While food might be available in some markets, skyrocketing prices have made it inaccessible to millions. The impact of global food price inflation has been most severe in Africa, where a large portion of the population lives on less than $2 a day. The result is simple, but devastating: Even when food is available, people cannot afford to buy it. In addition, structural issues, such as poor infrastructure, inefficient food systems, and underinvestment in agriculture, further weaken food security. For instance, food in Africa often travels vast distances, sometimes over 4,000 km, taking more than three weeks to reach markets. In this time, a third of perishable food is lost. Without improvements in storage, transportation, and market access, food losses will continue to erode already fragile food security. At the same time, population growth is outpacing gains in agricultural productivity, making it increasingly difficult for nations to feed their citizens. These interwoven crises cannot be solved by emergency food aid alone. What Africa needs is a comprehensive, holistic approach that addresses both the immediate needs of hungry populations and the structural causes of food insecurity. To reverse the current trajectory, a broad spectrum of coordinated actions must be undertaken at the local, national, and international levels. A first and urgent priority is to promote peace and enhance humanitarian access in conflict zones. Without the restoration of security and stability, food aid will continue to be blocked, and agricultural activities will remain suspended. Peacebuilding initiatives, support for ceasefire agreements, and diplomatic interventions are essential. At the same time, governments and armed groups must allow unhindered access to humanitarian organizations, enabling them to reach displaced and starving populations with food, water, and medical care. Population growth is outpacing gains in productivity Dr. Majid Rafizadeh In parallel, Africa must invest in climate-resilient agriculture. This means shifting from rain-fed farming to more sustainable irrigation systems, promoting the use of drought-resistant crops, and training farmers in climate-smart practices. Water conservation, soil restoration, and reforestation efforts must be scaled up. Governments should build early warning systems to detect and respond to droughts, floods, and crop failures before they spiral into crises. These adaptation strategies are no longer optional; they are necessary to protect lives and livelihoods in an era of climate volatility. Efforts must also focus on rebuilding Africa's broken food systems. This includes improving rural infrastructure to reduce transport times and spoilage, increasing investment in agricultural research, and empowering smallholder farmers with access to credit, land, and modern farming technologies. Governments must create favorable policies that promote local food production and reduce dependency on imports. At the same time, regional cooperation is needed to create cross-border food corridors, enabling countries to share resources and stabilize prices during times of shortage. Economic reforms and social safety nets are also essential. Countries must prioritize macroeconomic stability, manage debt burdens, and control inflation to protect household purchasing power. Meanwhile, social protection programs, such as cash transfers, subsidized food markets, school feeding programs, and nutrition programs for pregnant women and children, should be expanded. These programs protect the most vulnerable and also strengthen communities' ability to withstand shocks. Finally, a meaningful response to Africa's hunger crisis requires robust international cooperation and increased financial support. The World Food Programme has called for $5.7 billion in additional funding to meet urgent needs, but donor contributions remain far below target. Humanitarian efforts must be linked to long-term development strategies to build resilience, reduce dependency on aid, and create lasting change. The international community must treat Africa's hunger crisis not as a peripheral issue but as a central test of global solidarity and shared responsibility. In conclusion, the rise of hunger in Africa is a profound moral and political challenge. It is a crisis born from conflict, intensified by climate change, and worsened by economic vulnerability. As the rest of the world makes strides in reducing hunger, Africa is falling deeper into distress. Failure to act decisively will not only lead to the suffering of hundreds of millions, but also undermine global progress toward ending hunger everywhere. The time to act is now. Africa must not be left behind. • Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian American political scientist. X: @Dr_Rafizadeh


Asharq Al-Awsat
4 days ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
WHO to Asharq Al-Awsat: Gaza Health Crisis Critical, Immediate Global Intervention Needed
The World Health Organization has issued an urgent appeal for immediate international intervention in Gaza, warning that the catastrophic health situation in the besieged enclave is spiraling beyond control amid unrelenting Israeli attacks and a worsening humanitarian crisis. The UN agency has documented 746 Israeli strikes on Gaza's health sector since the war began, and warned that without fuel, critical health services face total shutdown. The health situation in Gaza is catastrophic and continues to deteriorate at an alarming rate, Dr. Hanan Balkhy, WHO Regional Director for the Eastern Mediterranean, told Asharq Al-Awsat. The health system is barely functioning due to ongoing hostilities, the blockade, and the lack of basic resources to keep medical facilities running, she added. Balkhy said that only 18 of Gaza's 36 hospitals are partially operational, and even those are working under extreme risk and with severe shortages of fuel and essential medical supplies. She warned that key units, such as intensive care, emergency departments, dialysis wards and oxygen stations, face imminent closure as no fuel has entered Gaza in more than 120 days. Access severely restricted Amid worsening security conditions, nearly 90% of Gaza is either under evacuation orders or classified as closed military zones, making it nearly impossible for patients, healthcare workers and humanitarian aid to move freely, Balkhy said. Healthcare facilities are under unprecedented pressure due to soaring injury rates and rising cases of severe malnutrition, especially among children and pregnant women, she said. All of this is unfolding as medical supplies are depleted daily and supply chains are severely disrupted, making the provision of life-saving care increasingly difficult. The crisis is further compounded by restrictions on international medical teams. WHO said 58 doctors and specialists have been denied entry since March, while only 16% of its 2025 emergency response plan for Palestine has been funded. 'Unprecedented' public health emergency What the organization is witnessing in Gaza is a multi-dimensional humanitarian and public health catastrophe of unprecedented scale and severity, Balkhy stressed. Since the start of the war in October 2023, more than 60,000 people have been killed and over 145,000 injured, many of them women and children. The disaster extends beyond physical injuries and psychological trauma; Gaza now faces an existential threat in the form of famine, she warned. In July alone, 77 people died from malnutrition, including 27 children under the age of five. Since April, over 20,000 children have been treated for acute malnutrition, more than 3,000 of whom are in critical condition. More than 40% of pregnant and breastfeeding women are suffering from severe undernourishment. WHO said the four remaining therapeutic feeding centers in Gaza are overwhelmed, operating far beyond capacity and critically low on supplies. Stocks are expected to run out by mid-August, risking a full collapse of life-saving nutrition services. The cumulative impact of these factors not only threatens current health outcomes but endangers the long-term viability of the entire healthcare system, said Balkhy. It deprives civilians of their right to live with dignity. Mounting medical needs Balkhy said over 14,000 patients in Gaza require urgent medical evacuation, including cancer patients, people with chronic diseases, and critically ill children, none of whom can be treated locally due to the decimation of the healthcare system. The remaining operational facilities are struggling to cope amid severe shortages of antibiotics, insulin, cancer medications, and surgical supplies, she said. The prolonged fuel crisis threatens to shut down ICUs, dialysis machines, oxygen generators, and operating theatres. The most vulnerable, children, pregnant and lactating women, and the elderly, are bearing the brunt. Thousands of children are being hospitalized monthly with life-threatening hunger-related complications. Meeting these urgent needs requires more than just medical services. It demands sustained access to fuel and supplies, unimpeded movement for humanitarian workers, and at least a minimum operational capacity across health facilities, Balkhy said. The scale of need demands a rapid and large-scale international response, including medical, logistical and financial support. WHO under fire The WHO is facing immense operational challenges in Gaza, with security risks topping the list. On July 21, the agency's staff residence in Deir al-Balah was struck three times, forcing the evacuation of employees and their families under heavy bombardment. One staff member remains in detention, and WHO is calling for his immediate release. Its main warehouse was also damaged and subsequently looted. These threats don't only affect WHO, but also other UN agencies operating in Gaza, Balkhy said, adding that getting medical shipments into the enclave remains difficult due to limited approvals. The restrictions on international medical missions have significantly undermined our response efforts, she said, repeating that 58 medical professionals were denied entry since March. Emergency response underway Despite the dangers, WHO remains on the ground and committed to its operations in Gaza. Since August 1, the agency has delivered 24 trucks loaded with essential medicines, surgical supplies, lab equipment and water testing kits to overwhelmed hospitals. WHO has also helped evacuate 47 patients along with 129 companions to countries including Spain, Türkiye, France, Norway and Jordan. The organization is working to ensure a steady and secure flow of fuel and medical supplies into Gaza. It continues to call for the immediate release of its detained colleague and for the protection of health workers and medical infrastructure, in line with international humanitarian law, Balkhy said. She reaffirmed WHO's commitment to scaling up its response, in cooperation with humanitarian partners, despite the immense challenges on the ground.


Al Arabiya
5 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Earth is spinning faster: Aug. 5 set to be one of the shortest days on record
The Earth's solar day on Tuesday is set to be one of the shortest days on record, lasting a few milliseconds short of the typical 24 hours, according to reports. While the slight difference of 1.25 milliseconds may not be naturally discernible, it is enough to get scientists studying shifting trends in the Earth's rotation. A usual 24-hour solar day is measured from noon to noon, which adds up to 86,400 seconds. However, scientists have predicted three dates in 2025 which will be shorter than 24 hours. These include July 9, July 22, and August 5. The shortest day ever was July 5 last year, falling 1.66 milliseconds below the 24-hour mark. According to a 2024 article published in Nature by Duncan Carr Agnew, global warming may be a contributing factor in this shift. However, postulates that the accelerated rotation of the Earth is more likely due to slower rotation of the Earth's liquid core, making the rest of the planet spin faster.