logo
Why the worst of the landlord exodus may be over

Why the worst of the landlord exodus may be over

Telegraph12 hours ago

For years, the rental market has been battered by an exodus of landlords as successive governments' crackdowns have made it ever tougher to turn a profit.
The number of UK properties available to let hit an all-time low of 284,000 in March, tumbling 18pc in a year, according to analytics firm TwentyCi. The figure is 23pc lower than before the pandemic.
The market has been saturated by the huge number of ex-rental properties that have been put up for sale. In the first quarter of this year, 15.6pc of properties newly for sale had been rented at some point during the past three years, up from just 9.3pc at the start of 2023, according to TwentyCi.
The supply shock has driven up rents, which were 4.5pc higher on average in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period the year before, according to Rightmove data.
But the worst of the landlord exodus may have passed – and pressure on tenants may begin to finally ease.
Smaller landlords squeezed out
It has been a tough period for landlords. Tax credits on mortgage interest for landlords were gradually slashed between 2017 and 2020, down from 40pc for higher-rate taxpayers to a flat rate of 20pc.
Interest rates leapt, with buy-to-let mortgages at the sharper end of the increases, squeezing landlord profits even as rents rose. And thanks to Chancellor Rachel Reeves's maiden Budget, landlords now pay an extra 5pc stamp duty surcharge on additional property purchases.
A major sweep of reforms designed to protect tenants was introduced to Parliament in 2023, and is set to take effect in July, which will ban no-fault evictions, fixed-term tenancies, bidding wars and mid-contract price hikes.
Rental properties that fall short of energy efficiency standards are also set to be banned by 2030, with landlords facing an average bill of £10,000 to make sure their homes are compliant.
The tax changes that began taking effect in 2017 arrested the growth of the private rental sector, which has been split between landlords who can afford to operate in a much tougher environment, and those that cannot.
This has caused it to undergo a major restructuring in recent years, explains Richard Donnell of Zoopla. Smaller landlords have struggled and sold up while larger ones have actually grown.
'The number of landlords with one or two properties has fallen, as the smaller landlords have been more likely to leave. They didn't buy a property to have as a business… Almost 40pc of landlords bought their first property to live in, so there are a lot of accidental landlords in the business.'
In 2016, over 60pc of landlords owned just one property, and under 10pc of landlords owned five or more – today, just 45pc of landlords own a single rental property, while 17pc own five or more.
More significantly, single-property landlords are responsible for just 21pc of tenancies, while the minority of landlords with five or more properties provide nearly half. This change in the make-up of the rental sector has made it more resilient, and it has adapted to the challenges it faces today, argues Donnell.
'We're coming up to a decade since the private rental sector's growth began to stall,' he adds. 'I think we're through the worst of it now.'
Many landlords who only owned one or two properties may have initially purchased them for the potential for house price growth. But that has stalled in recent years – the average UK house price jumped 10.4pc in 2021 according to Nationwide, but was 4.7pc last year.
As mortgage rates have risen, smaller landlords with higher debt ratios have seen their margins plummet. Today, just 30pc of landlords have mortgages with a loan-to-value of over 50pc, according to Zoopla.
Donnell adds: 'Back in the day, house prices were roaring away, and [landlords] didn't need to think about cash flow. Now, you need to have low levels of debt to make it work.
'Those who bought properties to live in and ended up renting them out [have been forced out of the market by] tax changes, rising running costs, and mortgage rate changes.'
Threats are not existential for remaining landlords
The larger, wealthier landlords that remain in the sector are more equipped to deal with the challenges, says Lucian Cook, of estate agent Savills.
'Wealthier landlords can deal with higher levels of regulation – they can spread risk with some tenants who do not perform across a wide number of properties. It is much more painful if you have bad tenants and just one or two properties.' Landlords with larger portfolios can also deal better with higher energy standards, he adds.
'If you're a landlord without lots of debt and leverage, the Renters' Rights Bill [due to come in later this year] shouldn't scare you too much,' adds Richard Donnell.
The shift towards a more professional sector can also be seen by the rise in the number of landlords setting up limited companies to make their businesses more profitable, which is at a record high, according to data from estate agent Hamptons. Around 61,000 limited companies were created in 2024 for buy-to-let purposes, up from just 50,000 the year prior.
'[To shift into this company structure] is really expensive because of stamp duty and capital gains tax,' explains Hamptons' Aneisha Beveridge. 'Landlords wouldn't do that unless they were planning on staying in buy-to-let for a few years. They are adapting and taking shelter in these limited companies instead of offloading entirely.'
Gross annual yields from residential rental properties are on the rise – in Manchester, they sit at 6.9pc, up from 6pc in 2022, according to Zoopla's rental index. In London, yields remain relatively weak at 4.9pc, but have risen from under 4pc in 2021.
'The undersupply of private rented stock has been entrenched,' adds Cook. 'The landlords who have remained in the sector have benefited from some rental growth along the way. Even the more indebted ones, with mortgage rates falling slightly, combined with rental growth, have strengthened their resolve somewhat.'
A boost for first-time buyers
While landlords that remain in the rental sector are unlikely to be forced out of it, the growing barriers to entry are putting off new ones, Beveridge explains.
'The hurdles to invest in buy-to-let are much higher; you have to know what you're doing now more than ever before. Just 10pc of homes are being bought by landlords.' This is a record low, down from 16pc in 2015.
Donnell adds: 'Consumers are waking up to the running costs of property. Higher mortgage rates, gas bills, council tax, maintenance… Everything is going up.'
A sluggish sales market has been made worse by a hike in stamp duty, including for thousands of first-time buyers, some of whom face an additional £6,250 in taxes. This has meant that some landlords have only held on to their properties as they have not been able to fetch a price they are happy with.
But this may be about to change as the Bank of England relaxes stress-testing, with lenders set to allow borrowers to take out mortgages of up to £40,000 more than previously allowed. This will give first-time buyers at the top of the rental market a boost, many of whom will be looking at purchasing previously rented homes, as they tend to be cheaper.
'A relaxation of mortgage regulations, which gives first-time buyers more buying power to step into the shoes of buy-to-let landlords, means you could have a second wave of the less committed landlords looking to sell,' adds Cook.
Beveridge points out that there may be a number of landlords who are yet to refinance on to more expensive mortgages.
'It won't be until 2027 that that will be fully bedded in, due to five-year fixed rate mortgages [which began in 2022]. We might see some people choose to sell as a result of that, but for the majority of people it's already happened.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britons ‘better learn to speak Russian' without major defence spending hike, Nato chief warns
Britons ‘better learn to speak Russian' without major defence spending hike, Nato chief warns

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Britons ‘better learn to speak Russian' without major defence spending hike, Nato chief warns

British people 'better learn to speak Russian' if Sir Keir Starmer does not massively ramp up defence spending, the Nato secretary general has warned. Mark Rutte said he was 'really impressed' by the prime minister 's strategic defence review unveiled last week. And he called for Nato countries to set a 'credible path' towards spending 5 per cent of their national incomes on defence amid the growing threat from Russia. Speaking at London's Chatham House, Mr Rutte said it is 'not up to me' whether that means Rachel Reeves should consider tax hikes to pay for the commitment. He added: 'I mean, what I know is that if we want to keep our societies safe... look, if you do not do this, if you would not go to the 5%, including the 3.5% core defence spending, you could still have the National Health Service, or in other countries their health systems, the pension system, etcetera, but you had better learn to speak Russian.' He did not set out a deadline by which Nato countries will have to reach the 5 per cent target, more than double what the UK currently spends on defence. 'I have a clear view on when we should achieve that,' he said. But he added: 'I keep that to myself, because we are having these consultations now with allies, and these discussions are ongoing, and we will in the end agree on a date when we have to be there.' His plans would see a return to Cold War levels of defence spending, with Russia's war on Ukraine still raging and rising tensions around the world. Nato chief Mr Rutte is in London to see Sir Keir ahead of a Nato summit in the Netherlands this month. The visit comes just days after the PM promised to make Britain 'battle ready', outlining Labour's plans to overhaul the country's defence capabilities. Defence secretary John Healey meanwhile said Britain's army needed to become '10 times more lethal' in the face of the 'immediate and pressing threat" from Russia and the rise of China. 'We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence,' he told MPs. But the announcement descended into a row over funding, with Sir Keir refusing to commit to hiking defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2034. The PM was boosted on monday as Mr Rutte said the his plans to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence from April 2027, with an aim to rise to 3 per cent over the next parliament, were not at odds with his own proposed target for the bloc. The 5 per cent goal is not "some figure plucked from the air", he said. "The fact is we need a quantum leap in our defence. The fact is we must have more forces and capability to implement our defence plans in full." While he said the "exact details are classified", Mr Rutte said there needed to be a 400 per cent increase in air and missile defence. He said Russia could be ready to use force against Nato within five years. "The new generation of Russian missiles travel at many times the speed of sound. The distance between European capitals is only a matter of minutes. There is no longer east or west. There is just Nato." As he met with Sir Keir in the White Room of No 10, he commended the Prime Minister on the "very good stuff" in the defence review. "It is not only about the traditional things, of course we need them, like ammunition... there is also drones, innovation, building the defence industrial base. It is really broad, it is really making a big impression in Brussels I can tell you," he said. Sir Keir called Nato the "cornerstone of our defence" and the "most effective military alliance the world has ever seen", adding that the task of the upcoming summit was to make sure it serves that purpose for decades to come. Sir Keir also spoke to German chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday and the two leaders welcomed efforts by Nato allies to step up defence spending as well as Mr Rutte's suggestions to further boost it, a Downing Street spokeswoman said. The boost to the defence budget announced last week will be confirmed by chancellor Ms Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the government's priorities for the next three years.

How The History of Payments Has Always Been Modernisation
How The History of Payments Has Always Been Modernisation

Finextra

time26 minutes ago

  • Finextra

How The History of Payments Has Always Been Modernisation

While attending EBA Day 2025, Phoebe Zhou, Head of Emerging Payments, HSBC joined the FinextraTV studio. Helping to contextualise the conversation, Zhou gave a historical reflection on how the payments industry has evolved before setting out the key modern innovations. From cryptocurrency to instant payments and fraud, Zhou provides a clear and broad overview of our current state of payments and how, when we reflect, we can see that payments has always been in a state of digital transformation

Public perceptions of Starmer and Farage are perhaps a bit hazy
Public perceptions of Starmer and Farage are perhaps a bit hazy

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Public perceptions of Starmer and Farage are perhaps a bit hazy

The optics could hardly be more different. On one stage, Nigel Farage was in a Welsh former steel town talking about reopening coalmines. On another, Keir Starmer enjoyed a cosy chat with a tech multi-billionaire wearing a £7,000 leather jacket. Does this therefore show that the Reform UK leader has been successful in, to use his words, parking his tanks on Labour's lawn and becoming the voice of working people? As ever in politics, it's all a bit more complicated. For one thing, Starmer is not exactly a stranger to the factory floor. Little more than a week ago, he used a glass plant in St Helens, Merseyside, as the backdrop for a speech condemning Reform's fiscal plans. Recent months have seen him pop up at car production lines, armaments companies, rail infrastructure depots, you name it. Additionally, as prime minister you need to take every industry seriously, and it made sense for Starmer to open London tech week alongside Jensen Huang, even if the head of US semiconductor firm Nvidia is a man whose trademark look is a Tom Ford leather jacket. The complications work both ways. For all that Farage used his speech in Port Talbot to deliver a Donald Trump-like message of fossil fuel-led reindustrialisation, his natural milieu involves a bit less dirt under the fingernails. To take one example, on Monday Farage briefly mentioned being in Las Vegas two weeks ago 'launching our crypto and digital assets bill', when he was in fact a guest speaker at the lavish Bitcoin 2025 conference. It is not known if Farage was being paid for the appearance, but he is no stranger to corporate gigs. Since becoming an MP he has trousered £40,000 for a speech to an offshore taxation conference, and £280,000 promoting gold bullion, not to mention a TV job that pays about £2,500 per hour. And yet, in a poll released last week, it emerged that slightly more British voters think Farage – a public school-educated former City trader – is more working class than Starmer, who is, as we heard many times during the general election, the son of a toolmaker. What is going on? One bit of context is that actually not that many people believed it about either – 19% for Farage, and 17% with Starmer. Why so few for the prime minister? In part, it's likely to be his long pre-politics career as a lawyer and then director of public prosecutions – and particularly the knighthood that resulted. More generally, it's fair to say that voters' impressions of politicians are often a bit hazy. A long-running YouGov tracker of the most popular British politicians has Brexit-backing Conservative peer David Frost top, and the shadow education secretary, Laura Trott, third, unlikely results widely assumed to be because people have mistaken them for the more fondly recalled late TV host and Olympic cyclist respectively. More pertinent is that when it comes to actual voter support, Reform are now the top choice among working-class voters. One poll last month said that just 17% supported Labour, against 39% for Reform. Farage is very aware of this current advantage, and makes a point of regular speeches at working men's clubs, channelling Trump's paradoxical political status as a wealthy man who largely spends time with other wealthy men who nonetheless attracts support in deprived areas. All that said, Starmer is determined to shift those Reform tanks by pointing out another similarity with Trump – the fact that Farage's policies seem more generally aimed at the managerial class than those on the factory floor. Paul Nowak, the TUC general secretary, argued recently that Farage was 'cosplaying' as a voice of the working classes, and that his opposition to the government's employment rights bill and lack of a coherent economic plan showed his lack of authenticity. Even as Farage talks up the return of heavy industry and calls for the water industry to be nationalised, expect more of the same from Downing Street, plus Starmer's insistence that a 'Liz Truss 2.0' policy of mass tax cuts would hurt ordinary families the most. And if you run a factory, brace yourself for more political visits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store