
Why the worst of the landlord exodus may be over
For years, the rental market has been battered by an exodus of landlords as successive governments' crackdowns have made it ever tougher to turn a profit.
The number of UK properties available to let hit an all-time low of 284,000 in March, tumbling 18pc in a year, according to analytics firm TwentyCi. The figure is 23pc lower than before the pandemic.
The market has been saturated by the huge number of ex-rental properties that have been put up for sale. In the first quarter of this year, 15.6pc of properties newly for sale had been rented at some point during the past three years, up from just 9.3pc at the start of 2023, according to TwentyCi.
The supply shock has driven up rents, which were 4.5pc higher on average in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period the year before, according to Rightmove data.
But the worst of the landlord exodus may have passed – and pressure on tenants may begin to finally ease.
Smaller landlords squeezed out
It has been a tough period for landlords. Tax credits on mortgage interest for landlords were gradually slashed between 2017 and 2020, down from 40pc for higher-rate taxpayers to a flat rate of 20pc.
Interest rates leapt, with buy-to-let mortgages at the sharper end of the increases, squeezing landlord profits even as rents rose. And thanks to Chancellor Rachel Reeves's maiden Budget, landlords now pay an extra 5pc stamp duty surcharge on additional property purchases.
A major sweep of reforms designed to protect tenants was introduced to Parliament in 2023, and is set to take effect in July, which will ban no-fault evictions, fixed-term tenancies, bidding wars and mid-contract price hikes.
Rental properties that fall short of energy efficiency standards are also set to be banned by 2030, with landlords facing an average bill of £10,000 to make sure their homes are compliant.
The tax changes that began taking effect in 2017 arrested the growth of the private rental sector, which has been split between landlords who can afford to operate in a much tougher environment, and those that cannot.
This has caused it to undergo a major restructuring in recent years, explains Richard Donnell of Zoopla. Smaller landlords have struggled and sold up while larger ones have actually grown.
'The number of landlords with one or two properties has fallen, as the smaller landlords have been more likely to leave. They didn't buy a property to have as a business… Almost 40pc of landlords bought their first property to live in, so there are a lot of accidental landlords in the business.'
In 2016, over 60pc of landlords owned just one property, and under 10pc of landlords owned five or more – today, just 45pc of landlords own a single rental property, while 17pc own five or more.
More significantly, single-property landlords are responsible for just 21pc of tenancies, while the minority of landlords with five or more properties provide nearly half. This change in the make-up of the rental sector has made it more resilient, and it has adapted to the challenges it faces today, argues Donnell.
'We're coming up to a decade since the private rental sector's growth began to stall,' he adds. 'I think we're through the worst of it now.'
Many landlords who only owned one or two properties may have initially purchased them for the potential for house price growth. But that has stalled in recent years – the average UK house price jumped 10.4pc in 2021 according to Nationwide, but was 4.7pc last year.
As mortgage rates have risen, smaller landlords with higher debt ratios have seen their margins plummet. Today, just 30pc of landlords have mortgages with a loan-to-value of over 50pc, according to Zoopla.
Donnell adds: 'Back in the day, house prices were roaring away, and [landlords] didn't need to think about cash flow. Now, you need to have low levels of debt to make it work.
'Those who bought properties to live in and ended up renting them out [have been forced out of the market by] tax changes, rising running costs, and mortgage rate changes.'
Threats are not existential for remaining landlords
The larger, wealthier landlords that remain in the sector are more equipped to deal with the challenges, says Lucian Cook, of estate agent Savills.
'Wealthier landlords can deal with higher levels of regulation – they can spread risk with some tenants who do not perform across a wide number of properties. It is much more painful if you have bad tenants and just one or two properties.' Landlords with larger portfolios can also deal better with higher energy standards, he adds.
'If you're a landlord without lots of debt and leverage, the Renters' Rights Bill [due to come in later this year] shouldn't scare you too much,' adds Richard Donnell.
The shift towards a more professional sector can also be seen by the rise in the number of landlords setting up limited companies to make their businesses more profitable, which is at a record high, according to data from estate agent Hamptons. Around 61,000 limited companies were created in 2024 for buy-to-let purposes, up from just 50,000 the year prior.
'[To shift into this company structure] is really expensive because of stamp duty and capital gains tax,' explains Hamptons' Aneisha Beveridge. 'Landlords wouldn't do that unless they were planning on staying in buy-to-let for a few years. They are adapting and taking shelter in these limited companies instead of offloading entirely.'
Gross annual yields from residential rental properties are on the rise – in Manchester, they sit at 6.9pc, up from 6pc in 2022, according to Zoopla's rental index. In London, yields remain relatively weak at 4.9pc, but have risen from under 4pc in 2021.
'The undersupply of private rented stock has been entrenched,' adds Cook. 'The landlords who have remained in the sector have benefited from some rental growth along the way. Even the more indebted ones, with mortgage rates falling slightly, combined with rental growth, have strengthened their resolve somewhat.'
A boost for first-time buyers
While landlords that remain in the rental sector are unlikely to be forced out of it, the growing barriers to entry are putting off new ones, Beveridge explains.
'The hurdles to invest in buy-to-let are much higher; you have to know what you're doing now more than ever before. Just 10pc of homes are being bought by landlords.' This is a record low, down from 16pc in 2015.
Donnell adds: 'Consumers are waking up to the running costs of property. Higher mortgage rates, gas bills, council tax, maintenance… Everything is going up.'
A sluggish sales market has been made worse by a hike in stamp duty, including for thousands of first-time buyers, some of whom face an additional £6,250 in taxes. This has meant that some landlords have only held on to their properties as they have not been able to fetch a price they are happy with.
But this may be about to change as the Bank of England relaxes stress-testing, with lenders set to allow borrowers to take out mortgages of up to £40,000 more than previously allowed. This will give first-time buyers at the top of the rental market a boost, many of whom will be looking at purchasing previously rented homes, as they tend to be cheaper.
'A relaxation of mortgage regulations, which gives first-time buyers more buying power to step into the shoes of buy-to-let landlords, means you could have a second wave of the less committed landlords looking to sell,' adds Cook.
Beveridge points out that there may be a number of landlords who are yet to refinance on to more expensive mortgages.
'It won't be until 2027 that that will be fully bedded in, due to five-year fixed rate mortgages [which began in 2022]. We might see some people choose to sell as a result of that, but for the majority of people it's already happened.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Rachel Reeves spending review live - when it starts and what to expect
Rachel Reeves will deliver her long-anticipated spending review on Wednesday after weeks of behind-the-scenes wrangling. The Chancellor is set to announce billions of pounds will be spent on the NHS, schools and tech - but other areas are expected to face painful cuts. Ms Reeves will unveil her plans at around 12.30pm following Prime Minister's Questions. Among the headline announcements will be a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget and an £86billion package of funding into research areas. Unlike Budgets, Spending Reviews have no legal basis. Instead, they set out what the Government intends to do with its spending plans over the following years. There will be no tax changes in the Spending Review as these require new legislation. When the Chancellor presents the Budget, all the measures on taxation are contained in an annual Finance Bill. Parliament debates the Budget and scrutinises the Finance Bill. This does not happen with a Spending Review. It means some announcements - including the winter fuel payment U-turn - might be mentioned at the Spending Review. But details on exactly where the money will come from to pay for the policy are not expected until the Autumn Budget later this year. One of the biggest winners of Wednesday's Spending Review is expected to be the science and technology sector, which will get an £86billion package of funding into research areas, including into new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries. The health service is also expected to be a big winner, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. This includes a major expansion of free school meals to 500,000 more pupils. The Ministry of Justice, which was one of the first departments to settle its budget, will see a £4.7billion funding injection to build three new prisons amid an ongoing overcrowding crisis in jails. The Ministry of Defence also already had a clearer idea of its funding settlement, with the PM having earlier this year announced plans to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an aim to get it to 3% by 2034. Some £15.6billion will also be handed to mayors for major transport projects across the country. This will go towards plans to improve trams, trains and buses in the North and the Midlands. Click here to read the full run-down

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Jobe Bellingham treads Jude's path to Dortmund but he is more than a little brother
Jobe Bellingham is Jobe Bellingham. He is not just Jude's brother. He is not living in the shadow of anyone and he is, quietly, but surely, establishing himself as one of England's best young players. It could be hard being the younger brother of the country's finest player. Younger siblings of famous people can find life challenging, even without pursuing the exact same career. At the age of just 19, Jobe has not shied away from anything and this week followed in his older brother's footsteps, signing for Borussia Dortmund, the club Jude played for after leaving Birmingham City when he was still 17. After two years of rapid progress playing for Sunderland in the Championship, the last of Jobe's 89 appearances for the club came in their thrilling play-off final victory over Sheffield United last month. Signed for just £2 million in the summer of 2023, largely thanks to his close relationship with sporting director Kristjaan Speakman, who helped steer both Bellingham brothers through the academy at Birmingham, Jobe will become the most expensive player in Borussia Dortmund's history if all the clauses are met. His new home 💛 — Borussia Dortmund (@BVB) June 10, 2025 The pressure, as it always has been when you have the same surname as one of the most famous players in the world, will be on him once more. Recognising that the Bellingham family always had a path mapped out for the midfielder, Sunderland did not stand in his way and the fee of £28 million, with another £4.2 million due in achievable add-ons, represents a remarkably profitable piece of business. Bellingham was one of Sunderland's best players last season and, while his departure certainly weakens them, it is telling that there has been little resentment surrounding his exit. After all, Bellingham did what he signed for Sunderland to do. He developed as a player and helped the team improve. A talent like his was always going to move on eventually and, after two years, he and his family felt the time was right to take on an even bigger challenge at a Champions League club like Dortmund. Farewell to Wearside 'It's time for me to say farewell to all the loyal people of Sunderland,' Bellingham wrote on Instagram. 'Who have powered me through two incredible years in Red & White. 'You welcomed me as a kid leaving home for the first time, and I am proud that our relationship has grown to be so strong ever since. Your support for the team and I since I arrived at your club was unwavering, and for that I am forever indebted to you as people and supporters. 'I will always represent Wearside in all that I strive to achieve in the rest of my career, wherever that may be. 'I hope that I have made you proud along the way, and in return you have made me the player that has reached the heights I find myself at today. So thank you. I will love and remember you fondly for the rest of my life, from the bottom of my heart.' After a difficult and challenging first season on Wearside, in which Sunderland struggled under three different managers and he – at the age of just 18 – was asked to play out of position as a striker, Bellingham has been brilliant in the centre of midfield, playing in a slightly deeper role. He has pace, power and finesse. Anyone who watched him last season knew he was destined for bigger and better things. Not least Régis Le Bris, his manager, the Frenchman who unexpectedly guided a young Sunderland side to promotion in his first season in charge. It was perhaps telling, when asked to explain Bellingham's qualities, that the first thing Le Bris mentioned when asked by Telegraph Sport earlier this year was 'ambition'. That can be perceived as a negative word, especially in football when you are playing for a big, proud club like Sunderland. But Le Bris meant it as a compliment. It is the ambition to improve and to learn; the constant drive and determination to be a better player than the one he is today. 'There are many [qualities], there is a long list,' Le Bris said. 'Probably his ambition is one of the first ideas I have when I think about Jobe. 'He is very ambitious, but this ambition is not naive. It is connected with what he is doing every day in training and every game on the pitch. 'He has many good qualities as a footballer. He is very powerful and he understands the game very well. He is really interested in the game and because of that he is able to improve with experiences. He can learn very quickly. One of the things that constantly stands out is Bellingham's maturity. He is already an imposing physical specimen, but there is no hint of arrogance or conceit. 'He is older than his age,' Le Bris added. 'He has more maturity. He is like an exception in the sport. It is not easy to play at the level he is doing so at his age, but he is doing so well. 'I don't know what he will go on to achieve, it is too early to tell, but he has already achieved a high level of consistency.' There is also a humbleness. Protected by his father Mark, who lived with him in the North East and will now move to Dortmund with him, there is no desire to play the media game. Having made such a high-profile move to Germany for such a significant fee, there will be more interest in him than ever before. Speaking to Dortmund's club website, the teenager spoke confidently and clearly. Asked about the move, having had interest from a number of other clubs in England and Germany, he replied: 'To be honest, I had to think about it for a long time. Not because of anything that has to do with the club, but because of my story, my personal journey with Sunderland. 'I weighed [things up] for a long time. That's why I'm sure it's the right decision. I talked to many people in the club, some I already knew. Of course also with the trainer, in whom I really believe and who fortunately also believes in me. 'But the decisive factor was probably the conversation with Mr [Hans-Joachim] Watzke [Dortmund's CEO]. He finally convinced me to sign with Borussia Dortmund. I'm sure I made the right decision. I'm really excited now. 'To be honest, I've improved quite a lot. Technically, tactically, physically, just everything. I try to improve myself every day. I like to work, I am disciplined and committed, because I take it all very seriously. 'I try to improve my craft and not be influenced by external influences and such things. I think that was also important to sign here at Dortmund at the end, because it was the best decision I could make. 'I will continue here in the same way, working hard and simply focusing on the essentials. I work hard for the team and for my team-mates and hope that we can experience some really good moments together. Once I get used to it [the new club and environment] and can start to perform… the rest will come by itself.'