logo
‘Bizarre and wrong': Danish zoo sparks debate with plea for pets to use as food

‘Bizarre and wrong': Danish zoo sparks debate with plea for pets to use as food

The Guardian3 days ago
After a Danish zoo posted a reminder of its long-running programme allowing people to donate their healthy, small pets to be 'gently euthanised' and fed to predators, reaction poured in from across the globe.
But beyond the battleground playing out on social media – where some protested against the idea of using pets as prey and others praised the zoo's efforts to drum up a practical food supply – some were swift to point out that the zoo was simply laying bare the reality of keeping carnivores in captivity.
'If you accept the fact that you have carnivores in human care, either as a pet or as a zoo, you will agree to the fact that you feed them animal matter. Basically there is no other choice,' said Marcus Clauss, the co-director of the Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife at the University of Zurich, pointing to vegan dog food as one of the few exceptions to this. 'And then the logical next step is the question, where do you source that animal product from?'
As the zoo's plea made headlines around the world, Aalborg zoo closed comments on its post, citing 'hateful and malicious rhetoric'. The zoo said it was simply aiming to mimic the natural food chain by urging those with chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs that need to be put down to instead hand them over to the zoo. 'That way, nothing goes to waste – and we ensure the natural behaviour, nutrition and wellbeing of our predators.'
Few would question the alternative, even though it came with the risk that zoo animals could end up being fed meat from animals raised in relatively poor conditions, said Clauss. 'As long as it's beef from the slaughterhouse, nobody sees it and nobody needs to think about it,' he said. 'As soon as it's an animal that is being killed at the zoo, it's in everybody's face.'
Some of the backlash was likely down to the wording of the appeal, said Dan Ashe of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, which counts more than 200 accredited facilities spanning from the US to the UAE. 'I think the thing that people maybe see as potentially shocking is the use of the word pet,' he said.
He chalked it up to cultural differences. 'Professionally, I would not expect anything like that to happen at one of our accredited zoos, certainly not here in the US. But our accreditation policies wouldn't necessarily prohibit it.'
The plea, however, spoke to a common understanding among zoos around the world: the importance, both nutritionally and behaviourally, of mimicking nature by feeding carnivores the entire carcass of animals. 'Carcass-feeding is a regular feature of what our members do when they are available, some of our members accept donations of road-killed deer or animals,' said Ashe.
Some zoos had actively sought to spotlight this, he said, citing a recent event at Denver zoo where the public was invited – and warned appropriately beforehand – to watch as lions were fed pig carcasses. 'The lions seemed to benefit, and certainly the guests who chose to watch it – it was packed,' he said.
Others, however, found little redeeming in the Danish appeal. 'To me this was so far beyond the pale,' said Clifford Warwick, a UK-based consultant biologist and medical scientist. 'The entire thing is bizarre and wrong.'
As the zoo did not specify how the donated pets would be euthanised, Warwick worried it would be impossible to do so in a way that was both humane and ensured that the animals remained safe to be eaten by predators such as the European lynx.
'And there's no validity to their claim of needing to give animals a natural diet this way,' he said. 'Lynx don't eat guinea pigs. Where do they get guinea pigs from? Lynx would eat almost any small mammal, sure, but they can't turn around and say that's a natural behaviour.'
Aalborg zoo did not reply to a request for an interview.
At a time when animal shelters around the world are grappling with overcrowding, Warwick also bristled at what he saw as the wider implications of the zoo's message. 'It further devalues the lives of pets … It's a horrendous devaluation of animal life,' he said. 'Are you really happy saying: 'OK, well Rex or Bruno, the time has come, there's a hungry lion at the local zoo. Bye, off you go.''
The wide range of reactions hints at the many factors that play into the broader question of how to keep carnivores fed at zoos, said Alessandro Di Marzio, the science lead at Riga zoo.
'Zoos are spread across a wide range of areas, so you'll find places where certain techniques are considered acceptable and more or less normal for society, while in other areas they're not,' he said, with local laws, economic resources and culture also helping to shape these tactics. 'It depends on all these circumstances.'
The resulting clash of cultures has at times been glaring; earlier this year, Germany's Nuremberg zoo sparked protests after it confirmed it had killed six of its 12 Guinea baboons due to overcrowding and had fed the primates to lions, tigers, maned wolves and marbled polecats.
In Denmark, Copenhagen zoo was the focus of global protests in 2014 after it put down an 18-month-old giraffe, citing the risk of inbreeding, and fed some of the meat to the zoo's lions.
For Clauss, the heated debate unleashed this week recalled one of the emails sent to Copenhagen zoo after the euthanasia of the giraffe. 'It said: 'Why do you have to kill animals to feed your carnivores? Can't you just buy meat?''
While he did not think the view was representative in any way, he marvelled at how the Danish appeal had served to kickstart a global conversation. 'The amazing thing is that we learn about these things because of zoos,' he said. 'And not because of what we do at the supermarket.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Folkestone Museum's Anglo-Saxon skeleton is helping us to understand and honour the past
Folkestone Museum's Anglo-Saxon skeleton is helping us to understand and honour the past

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Folkestone Museum's Anglo-Saxon skeleton is helping us to understand and honour the past

I found Paul Daley's opinion piece on displaying human remains an interesting read (Times change, so do people. So why does the British Museum still think it's OK to display human remains?, 6 August). I am always glad to discuss the reasons why museums retain and display human remains. First, I completely agree that human remains taken by colonial powers should be repatriated rather than displayed in international institutions. I disagree strongly, however, with the idea that there is no value (aside from shock value) to displaying human remains. Through museums it is possible to learn about death and human remains in a respectful way – without the gore you often find in the media. At Folkestone Museum, we display the human remains of an Anglo-Saxon woman from a cemetery on the hill above our town. She was exhumed during an excavation in 1908. The rest of the skeletons excavated from that cemetery were collected together in a single tea chest and reburied, which I don't consider especially respectful. I believe that by telling our skeleton's story in as complete a way as we can, through our research, display and educational work, we can honour her memory best. Through this work, our skeleton has become beloved to generations of visitors to the museum. For over a hundred years, she has inspired people to learn more about the past and at least one person has become an archaeologist after meeting her. Our work aims to help visitors build empathy with the people who lived before us and our skeleton is an important part of that work. Daley writes of 'the purported scientific benefits of holding such specimens' – but doesn't address these substantially. As scientific techniques improve, our skeleton at Folkestone will continue to contribute to our knowledge of the ancient world. Her DNA is currently part of a large scientific study. If we reburied her, we would lose a huge amount of future knowledge and understanding about the past, about her and about her community. Coralie CloverMuseum manager and curator, Folkestone town council

105-year-old taken as PoW after torpedo attack tells Sophie of VJ Day liberation
105-year-old taken as PoW after torpedo attack tells Sophie of VJ Day liberation

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

105-year-old taken as PoW after torpedo attack tells Sophie of VJ Day liberation

One of the oldest surviving veterans of the Second World War has told the Duchess of Edinburgh over a cup of tea how his Royal Navy ship was torpedoed by the Japanese before he was held as a prisoner of war for more than three years. Sophie met 105-year-old Royal Marines veteran James 'Jim' Wren in Salisbury on Tuesday ahead of the 80th anniversary of Victory over Japan Day (VJ Day), which marks the surrender of Japan to the Allied Forces on August 15 and the end of the Second World War. Mr Wren survived the sinking of HMS Repulse in December 1941 but was captured by the Japanese in Singapore in February 1942. He spent the next three and a half years as a prisoner of war and was still in captivity in August 1945 when the war ended. When the duchess, who is patron of The Java Far East Prisoner of War Club 1942, asked if his family knew he had survived, Mr Wren said: 'It was right until the end of the war until they knew I was alive. 'So they suffered all this time.' Mr Wren sat next to Sophie surrounded by four generations of his family, including his daughter Denise Dables, 69, son-in-law Andy Dables, 72, his granddaughter Kirsty Dables, 51, and great-granddaughters Freya, 18, and Ellie, 16. The veteran caused mirth when Sophie asked what had attracted him to serve in the Navy, and he replied: 'Nothing attracted me to the Navy – I didn't want to be in the Navy.' Mr Wren applied to join the RAF and the Army when he was 19, but was turned down. He then joined the Navy after his uncle, a retired Royal Marine, was recalled on reserve. After completing the eight-month training course, Mr Wren was posted to join the battlecruiser HMS Repulse in the autumn of 1940. On December 10 1941, HMS Repulse was sunk by Japanese aircraft off the coast of Malaya, in what is now Malaysia. Mr Wren recalled: 'It was around 11 o'clock in the morning, I was having a cup of tea on the mess deck and the alarm was raised. 'I dropped my cup and as I left the mess deck, the first bomb dropped right behind me. 'Fortunately, it didn't explode – I was able to go down two or three decks before it exploded. 'It was torpedo after torpedo,' Mr Wren added. The veteran, who grew up in Sussex, also remembered when he was captured by Japanese soldiers alongside a group of civilians as they attempted to flee Singapore on a boat. 'It must have been awful, because you were surrounded by women and children,' the duchess told Mr Wren, who nodded. 'We didn't know when our next meal was coming from or when our next drink was coming from…' he added. 'They had no idea how to deal with prisoners of wars, the Japanese – no idea.' Mr Wren was kept as a prisoner in Sumatra until he was released in August 1945, after Japan surrendered. Son-in-law Andy Dables said Mr Wren did not start sharing his war memories until he was 99. 'We are just impressed that he remembers everything – he's as sharp as any,' Mr Dables said. 'But you wouldn't just forget anything like that, though, would you?' The King will commemorate the 80th anniversary of VJ Day on Friday with an address to the nation, Buckingham Palace previously said. Charles's pre-recorded audio message will be broadcast on VJ Day ahead of a service of remembrance attended by the King and Queen, Second World War veterans and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store