
Jewish doctors feel ‘intimidated and unsafe' at BMA conference
The three-day meeting is used to set out the doctor union's policies and priorities based on motions put forward by members, but 43 – about 10 per cent of the total – were about Israel, Gaza, Palestine, anti-Semitism or Zionism.
Just five were concerned about other 'international relations'.
The Jewish Medical Association (JMA) said members attending the conference 'feel intimidated, unsafe and excluded' and that it had 'felt it necessary to seek advice from' the Jewish support charity the Community Security Trust (CST) and BMA 'to ensure the safety and protect the wellbeing of Jewish representatives'.
At the same time, a protest staged outside the conference venue in Liverpool used 'old shoes' to represent healthcare workers killed in Gaza - a visual statement synonymous with the shoes of Jewish people killed at concentration camps during the Holocaust - and considered anti-Semitic by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
The BMA was last week accused of a 'cover-up' for dropping an investigation into its president, Mary McCarthy, for posts she made on X about the conflict in Gaza.
Having initially decided there was a case for Dr McCarthy, a leading GP, to answer, after an independent review into a complaint by Labour Against Antisemitism, the BMA decided not to take it further because it had not been made by a member or employee of the union.
All five motions prioritised for debate by the BMA's 'agenda committee' on Tuesday relate to Israel or Palestine.
One simply asks members to agree that 'criticism of the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza is not per se anti-Semitic'.
Others echo the sentiment that doctors should be able to criticise states and the Government's 'contravening international law' and that there should not be 'punitive measures' taken against doctors who partake in 'Palestine advocacy'.
Another motion from one faction says it 'condemns in the strongest terms the systematic destruction of hospitals in Gaza and the killing of more than 1,000 healthcare workers since October 7, 2023, as grave violations of international law and an affront to medical neutrality'.
The JMA said there were 'zero motions prioritised for discussion about any other international matters, not even those that one might expect to be of some interest to compassionate UK doctors, such as the famine in Sudan, war in Ukraine or the disastrous impact on public health of the new US administration's health policy and its withdrawal from the World Health Organisation'.
It also raised concerns about a protest outside the conference from Health Workers 4 Palestine (HW4P), which it said had organised 'a visual protest against Israel's genocide and to show solidarity with the 1500+ health workers martyred over the past 20 months'.
It said the protest was 'unrelated to the BMA' but 'inflammatory' because it had asked for 'old shoes to be brought' in a visual statement that is synonymous with the Holocaust.
The JMA said: 'Many British people will be very aware that the piles of victims' shoes left behind at Nazi concentration camps became synonymous with a memorial of millions of Jews murdered in those camps during the Holocaust.
'According to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, the use of such symbolism undermines memorial of the Holocaust and by definition is antisemitic.
'Therefore we expect this protest to be moved from its proximity to the ARM so that Jewish members of the ARM do not have to suffer further offence, exclusion and harassment.'
A BMA spokesperson said: 'We are totally clear that antisemitism is completely unacceptable. There is no place for it in the BMA, NHS, or wider society and we condemn antisemitism in the strongest possible terms, as we do with all discrimination based on race, religion, sexuality, gender or disability.
'The BMA's annual representative meeting is an inclusive space, where wellbeing of members and staff is our priority and we've put in place a number of measures and sources of support to ensure this. We are also confident that we are complying with all of our obligations under the Equality Act and our own EDI policies.
'The BMA has a long and proud history of advocating for human rights and access to healthcare around the world, and motions submitted to this year's conference reflect the grave concerns doctors in the UK have about the Gaza conflict and the impact on civilians and healthcare.
'As with previous annual representative meetings, organisations and groups external to the BMA will choose to demonstrate outside the venue. They are entitled to do this, but we recognise that member and staff safety remains paramount. Regarding a demonstration outside this year's ARM, we have received some concerns from members and staff, have updated our security teams and are liaising with the police to request that all protests are managed safely.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Molly-Mae says daughter Bambi has been part of ‘biting pandemic' at nursery
Molly-Mae Hague has revealed that her daughter Bambi is part of a 'biting pandemic' at her nursery, as she admits she 'doesn't know' the best way to deal with her two-year-old's behaviour. In a vlog posted to YouTube on Sunday (17 August), the influencer said that Bambi's nursery contacted her to tell her that her child has been biting others. 'Basically at her nursery at the minute, there's a bit of a biting pandemic going on and all of the children are biting one another.' The 26-year-old mother said she was torn on whether to treat Bambi to ice cream later that day, as she was concerned that it was a 'reward for bad behaviour'. However, she said she didn't know if she 'should bring attention to it', as she believes Bambi may be biting 'to get a reaction'.


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zelensky is coming to the White House with France and the UK standing behind him - but who's side is Trump on?
President Donald Trump will witness a truly unified front Monday as leaders of Europe visit the White House to deliver one message: the continent is standing with Ukraine. The question for the president and countries such as the U.K. and France - that are long-standing allies, is whether Europe and America are also together in their message. By achieving peace in Ukraine, after conflict broke out on his predecessor's watch, Trump hopes to win a Nobel Peace Prize. But he has also been seen as a president who cozies up to American rival Russia. If Friday's meeting with the other side was any indication, the president's plan for inking a peace agreement involves making significant concessions to Vladimir Putin. The Russian president visited Alaska to meet with Trump, where uniformed U.S. troops rolled out a red carpet for his arrival and Trump treated him like an honored guest. After their conversation, Trump announced that he was abandoning his demand for an immediate ceasefire and it was reported that he'd made two key concessions to the Russian leader by agreeing to accept Russian demands for the cessation of the entire Donbas region and an end to Ukraine's NATO ambitions. Over the weekend, Trump envoy Steve Witkoff touted a separate development in the talks as a win for the U.S. and Ukraine: Putin supposedly agreed to the prospect of the U.S. providing an Article 5-like security guarantee to Ukraine, pledging support in the event of further Russian aggression. It's not clear how far that acceptance would extend, particularly if other NATO countries signal interest in signing security pacts with Ukraine. European leaders visiting the White House on Monday will walk a delicate line. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, part of the delegation, made clear over the weekend that the 'coalition of the willing' supports Trump's efforts to continue peace talks with Russia. But Ukraine must be involved, they'll argue, and must be in control of drawing its own red lines. Trump will have to decide if even that marginal level of pushback is, in his mind, more of an obstacle to peace than Putin's demands for territory currently occupied by Ukrainian forces. Ahead of Friday's summit in Anchorage, members of the same coalition appealed to Trump over the course of several days to not negotiate away territory on Ukraine's behalf, with many insisting that Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky should be part of any talks with Putin; direct Russia-Ukraine talks were agreed upon in May, then delayed indefinitely. On Sunday, Trump erased all doubt as to where he stood. In a Truth Social post, he demanded that Zelensky give up the Crimean Peninsula as well as ambitions of joining the NATO security alliance. 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight. Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' the president wrote. The supposed movement of Putin on a security guarantee for Ukraine, protecting it from a future Russian attack, remains the only point of positive momentum for the Ukrainian side. But Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were evasive about the specifics of the kind of agreement Putin said he would consider — Witkoff in particular couldn't say whether it would involve U.S. or European boots on the ground in Ukraine in the event of a second Russian invasion, a complicated prospect given the unpopularity of aid for Ukraine among Trump's base. Whether European countries would be able to commit to the kind of direct military support that the U.S. could under a hypothetical peace agreement remains unclear, and a question they'll likely insist be answered. Zelensky, in his own Saturday statement, implied that Ukraine would not accept anything less than a reliable, concrete plan with European involvement to protect Ukraine's sovereignty in the future. 'Security must be guaranteed reliably and in the long term, with the involvement of both Europe and the U.S.,' he wrote on Twitter. The hand-picked members of the European delegation — Starmer, Finnish president Alexander Stubb, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, French president Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and the EU's Ursula von der Leyen — have all worked to foster positive relations in their own dealings with Trump. Their charm offensive on Zelensky's behalf could succeed in changing Trump's mind, given his proven willingness to reverse course on many issues in the foreign policy sphere. But after Putin's flattery erased the president's threat to levy further sanctions against Russia unless a ceasefire was reached, it's not clear whether they'll have any success in convincing the U.S. president that his Russian chum is engaged in stalling tactics. For Trump, his lonely quest for recognition of his peacemaking efforts continues. Ukraine presents the ultimate test of his alleged skills, and it's clear that the president has a long way to go before he wins over either side to the idea of laying down arms. On Monday morning, the president was defiant, at once both insisting that his critics and doubters were wrong once again and sending a clear red flag to the visiting European delegation: 'I know exactly what I'm doing,' he raged on Truth Social. 'I don't need the advice of people who have been working on all of these conflicts for years, and were never able to do a thing to stop them.'


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Downing Street indicates shift in position on Ukraine ceasefire
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is prepared to support a peace deal in Ukraine without a prior ceasefire, Downing Street has indicated. The UK government's updated position prioritises ending the conflict over an immediate ceasefire, aligning with Russian President Vladimir Putin 's approach. This stance follows a summit between Mr Putin and US President Donald Trump, where Mr Trump reportedly dropped demands for an immediate ceasefire. The UK has stressed that international borders must not be changed by force, after Mr Trump floated the possibility of Ukraine ceding territory. Sir Keir will meet with Mr Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington DC to discuss peace efforts.