logo
Laptop left charging on bed causes house fire in Bendigo

Laptop left charging on bed causes house fire in Bendigo

When Kate Robinson thinks back to the sight of thick black smoke billowing from her roof last month, she becomes deeply distressed.
"There was nothing salvageable," she said.
Ms Robinson's Bendigo home and yoga studio were destroyed by fire on May 30, when she popped out for about an hour to run errands.
She returned to find her home on fire.
"I went into my bedroom and there were flames on my bed almost up the ceiling," she said.
Ms Robinson ran out of the burning building to find her dog, which had made its way outside, and ring triple-0.
She wants to warn others about the risks associated with leaving devices on charge.
Fire Rescue Victoria said the fire at Ms Robinson's home on Bakewell Street in North Bendigo was caused by a laptop charging on a bed.
A building insurer and a forensic fire expert showed Ms Robinson the burnt laptop and told her they believed the lithium battery inside the computer overheated on a blanket on her bed, causing it to catch alight.
"Once they started asking me questions about why there was so much intensity around my bed, and what was on my bed … I remembered that the laptop had been charging there," she said.
Ms Robinson said the laptop was an 18-month old AppleMac Pro and it had started to lose charge more often in the lead up to the fire.
"It seemed to be going flat a lot, which can identify a faulty battery," Ms Robinson.
Fire Rescue Victoria commander Craig Houlahan attended the blaze.
"It was clear the fire had actually started from the bed," he said.
"It was quite obvious with the development of the fire that it was the laptop, because of the battery."
Apple Australia has been contacted for comment.
Commander Houlahan said the fire had prompted new warnings about the risks involved with leaving devices on charge unattended.
"The main thing is that if you're charging any electrical device, you have it on a hard surface and that allows it to cool," he said.
Mr Houlahan said across Victoria, there was at least one call to fire authorities every day related to charging devices.
"Over the years that's changed because a lot of our devices now are battery-operated," Mr Houlahan said.
His advice was to think about four key things before charging a laptop, tablet or mobile phone.
These included overheating of batteries through excessive charging, checking devices for damage, not charging in your bedroom and avoiding charging laptops overnight.
He also said working smoke alarms were crucial as a house fire could spread throughout a home within 3 minutes.
"Every bedroom should have a working smoke alarm in it," Mr Houlahan.
Ms Robinson is now living in a rental property offered through her insurer.
She said she was grateful to have been able to save her dog from the fire, and for her community's support, but the experience has stayed with her.
"There's still a lot of grief and sadness about losing my space," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance
Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance

News.com.au

time19 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance

A former AFL player reportedly tested positive for a performance-enhancing substance while playing in a lower-level competition following the end of his professional career. The player, who finished his AFL career in 2023, has this year been placed under provisional suspension, per Code Sports. It's understood the player tested positive while playing in a lower-level league last year, and despite having put an end to his professional career by that stage, could still be tested under the AFL's Anti-Doping Code within 12 months of his AFL exit. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. The report elected not to name the player in question. The player's test was undertaken by Sport Integrity Australia; the governing body, formerly known as ASADA, which aims to preserve fairness at all levels of Australian sport. Under the AFL Anti-Doping Code, if a player intentionally takes a prohibited substance to gain an advantage, they are subject to a maximum ban of four years. Local leagues, including the state competitions, are held to the same rules. In late 2024, ex-Melbourne player Joel Smith was suspended four years by SIA for cocaine use and trafficking after turning up a positive result on a matchday test in August 2023. But unlike Smith's circumstances, Niall reports the unnamed player in question's alleged breach was 'for a substance that is banned both in and outside the competition'. He noted also that positive results for performance-enhancing drugs were 'extremely rare' in the AFL, as cases of positive tests for illicit substances are more common. Then-Collingwood players Josh Thomas and Lachie Keeffe copped two-year bans in 2015 after testing positive for performance-enhancing drugs. The 'Essendon 34' that were banned for the 2016 season after four years' worth of investigation did not return positive tests for a banned substance but rather were suspended on circumstantial evidence they were administered with a banned substance.

Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges
Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges

A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.

Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'
Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'

EXCLUSIVE A police prosecutor who was found to have harassed a female court officer while working inside a courtroom has been cleared of all charges, on the basis that the act could have been 'a joke'. SA Police officer Greg Hill, 62, was charged with aggravated indecent assault after he was reported for 'tickling' the left buttock of the court officer after she called him into a courtroom in 2022. The woman was working as a court officer, which ensures the smooth running of the court and includes letting lawyers know when they are required in the courtroom. The woman told police she was holding the door open for Mr Hill when he 'touched her left buttock'. She described the touch as 'feeling his fingers move in a tickling movement'. 'It made her angry as he had no permission to touch her,' the court heard. She told police she said to him: 'I wouldn't be doing anything like that to me if I were you' to which Mr Hill 'stepped back and laughed'. She then said: 'I'm serious, I'll have you for sexual harassment' before Mr Hill replied: 'I don't know whether to take you seriously or not'. The incident was captured on CCTV and showed that Mr Hill had his fingers 'curled' and that 'movement of his fingers was consistent with a tickling motion'. The magistrate was 'satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt' that Mr Hill 'deliberately tickled [the woman's] left buttock, it could not be proven that he did so for 'sexual gratification or [to] cause sexual humiliation.' The magistrate said that while the 'harassing, unacceptable and disrespectful' act amounted to 'unwanted touching' - the element of indecency could not be proven. 'It was just as likely the action was a joke or ill-conceived gesture,' the magistrate said. 'There was no suggestion of any flirting behaviour by the defendant. The touch was not accompanied by any comment or other behaviour.' He was found not guilty and acquitted of the charge. The matter was put before the SA Supreme Court last week after the Commissioner of Police appealed against the acquittal. Supreme Court Justice Laura Stein dismissed the appeal on Thursday, finding the magistrate did not err in finding a 'failure to establish sexual intention'. 'Regardless of that conclusion, I reiterate the Magistrate's comments that the behaviour was harassing, unacceptable, inappropriate and should not have occurred,' Justice Stein said in her decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store