ESPR: How to Anticipate and Influence Future European Legislation for Sustainable Fashion
Defi is a professional economic development committee (CPDE) financed by the fashion and luxury industry. The committee has called upon the expertise of consulting firm 2B Policy's co-founder Baptiste Carrière-Pradal for its new report. Carrière-Pradal also heads the technical secretariat of PEFCR (product environmental footprint category rules), which recently received the green light from the European Commission for its eco-score dedicated to the professional sphere of apparel and footwear.
Over thirty pages, this new ESPR reference document summarises the most immediate challenges relating to the future regulations, some aspects of which are still being finalised. These include the obligation to publish the number of unsold goods destroyed in 2025, ahead of the destruction ban that will apply to large companies from July 2026, then to medium-sized companies from 2030.
A digital product passport (DPP) is also on the agenda, providing information on a product's durability, the materials and substances used in its production, and its end-of-life possibilities. In addition to the notions of physical and emotional durability (i.e., attachment to a product over time), eco-design, repairability, and recyclability are also on the agenda.
Federations close ranks
"When we started to discuss the ESPR with brands and federations, we saw that there was a bit of panic on board," Clarisse Reille, general manager of Defi, told FashionNetwork. "Our aim with this document was therefore to make regulations intelligible, but also to influence them through the knowledge we have of companies and the field. And all the federations in the sector have mobilised to work together on this project, where they usually tend to do things more or less on their own."
For Baptiste Carrière-Pradal, the significance of these exchanges is all the greater given that ESPR is a pivotal player in the European "Green Deal". At a time when the Euratex confederation is pointing to the volatility of European projects for sustainable fashion, Carrière-Pradal points out that the ESPR has escaped the simplification cycle (perceived as a back-pedal by certain federations and NGOs) recently launched by Brussels. Above all, this text, which could influence product composition as well as establish new quality criteria, will be subject to a tighter negotiating schedule. This leaves a short window of opportunity to influence the final texts.
"The European Commission is due to issue a third study report on the subject, which will begin to specify its choices in November this year," said Carrière-Pradal. "This report will be submitted to stakeholders for comment. A fourth and final report will then arrive in early 2026. This will be followed by the work of a European working group, the Ecodesign Forum, which will exchange views with the European Commission to validate the project's political orientations. This phase should be completed during the first half of 2027, bearing in mind that the EC wants to avoid any delays, as textiles are the first sector to be covered by ESPR."
Textiles, the first sector to be covered by ESPR
Carrière-Pradal highlighted that this is the reason why France has moved so quickly on its Climate, Agec, and fast-fashion laws, in the hope of influencing the Commission's work on ESPR. The choice of the textile sector to take the lead would officially be due to a multi-sector assessment of existing impacts and possible improvements. Two points on which textiles would stand out.
"I have a slightly different vision," confides Clarisse Reille. "Fashion is generally not taken seriously. What's more, when we look at the impact of the sector, we see that it's mainly due to ultra-fast-fashion, which has every interest in spreading its problems throughout the sector, to dilute its responsibility. And public authorities tend to be more attentive and benevolent towards sectors whose customers are mainly men. This analysis, which is less rationalist, is shared by the heads of federations."
The head of Defi stresses above all that France, through its existing legislation and the joint work of its federations, will have a say in the final shape of the ESPR. This is confirmed by Carrière-Pradal: "Until recently, France was the only country to have an eco-organisation to manage the end-of-life of textiles, Refashion. But it's also important to bear in mind that, even if the French State has more weight than others in Brussels, the Commission still has an obligation to listen to other players."
The reference document produced by Defi with the support of the various French textile-clothing federations is freely accessible in the Studies section of the forum's portal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
EU brands turn to obscure customs clause to soften blow of Trump's tariffs
European brands scramble to find ways to ease US tariff pain as labels including L'Oreal increasingly explore the decades-old 'First Sale' law and low US consumer confidence limits room for price hikes. L'Oreal and a growing number of European fashion and cosmetics companies are exploring use of an obscure, decades-old US customs clause known as the "First Sale" rule as a potential way to soften the impact of US President Donald Trump 's tariffs. While Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a deal this week for US tariffs of 15% on most imported EU goods - half the initially threatened 30% - that is still 10 times higher than the average tariff on EU imports before Trump's return to the White House. Some apparel and consumer brands are understandably wary of passing on the higher duties through price hikes to inflation-weary US consumers. That's why they are looking to invoke the "First Sale" rule, which allows companies to pay lower duties by applying tariffs to the value of a product as it leaves the factory - much lower than the eventual retail price. 'It's part of the possibilities,' L'Oreal CEO Nicolas Hieronimus told Reuters on Tuesday. "We will make decisions," he added, without giving a timeframe. Brands like Italy's high-end sneakers maker Golden Goose, outerwear specialist Moncler and fashion label Ferragamo have all touted the strategy. "It's a significant benefit," Moncler executive director Luciano Santel said in a call with analysts, estimating the production cost at around half the import price. The strategy, which can only be invoked for goods clearly destined for sale in the US and involving multiple foreign transactions, is not without risk, however. It requires a detailed paperwork trail, a firm grip on supply chains and legal structures to handle the required transactions. Consultants including KPMG and PwC have seen a surge this year in enquiries from companies into how to use this method to ease the burden of Trump's tariffs. "We've got three times more requests than usual," for mitigation strategies including the First Sale rule, said Ruth Guerra, a partner at KPMG in Paris, adding that the rule could also be combined with other measures. To benefit from lower customs duties, a company must prove that US-bound products have gone through multiple transactions. Usually that means the goods are sold from the factory gate to a middleman and then to a US-based company handling the goods. All transactions must be handled at arm's length by clearly distinct entities. Usually a US subsidiary is involved to avoid revealing confidential information to an external entity, PwC custom and tax lawyer Francesco Pizzo explained. "In our case the 15% tariffs will potentially translate into a 3% impact on the US retail price", Golden Goose CEO Silvio Campara said, adding that the US accounted for roughly 35% of its revenue. While several major textile and apparel companies have been using First Sale for a while, many had overlooked the strategy while the tariff environment remained low, said Mark Ludwig, national leader of trade and tariff advisory services at consultancy RSM in New York. "Now the cost-effectiveness is much higher," said Lucio Miranda, founder of consultancy firm ExportUSA, who expects a jump in First Sale use with interest from companies in other industries. There is no publicly available data on goods imported through the First Sale rule, but a 2009 investigation by the US International Trade Commission found that 8.5% of importing entities over a year used the workaround, equivalent to 2.4% of total US import value. Nearly half of that amount was linked to footwear and apparel. For French cosmetics producers, US duties present a new challenge as the industry had benefited from zero tariffs. "While the agreement brings an end to uncertainty, it brings a significant threat to the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, head of French cosmetics lobby group Febea. The First Sale rule is also only available to companies that can comply with a strict process which entails other risks as well. "One of the biggest problems with selecting First Sale is that only fancy people can truly afford it - both the compliance costs and the risks of audit that come with it," said US-based tariff and trade lawyer Michael T. Cone. Improper use could also lead to penalties, he said, noting that the US Customs and Border Protection agency routinely audits and denies use of the rule. "Importers must proceed with utmost caution,' he said.
Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
EU brands turn to obscure customs clause to soften blow of Trump's tariffs
European brands scramble to find ways to ease US tariff pain as labels including L'Oreal increasingly explore the decades-old 'First Sale' law and low US consumer confidence limits room for price hikes. L'Oreal and a growing number of European fashion and cosmetics companies are exploring use of an obscure, decades-old US customs clause known as the "First Sale" rule as a potential way to soften the impact of US President Donald Trump 's tariffs. While Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a deal this week for US tariffs of 15% on most imported EU goods - half the initially threatened 30% - that is still 10 times higher than the average tariff on EU imports before Trump's return to the White House. Some apparel and consumer brands are understandably wary of passing on the higher duties through price hikes to inflation-weary US consumers. That's why they are looking to invoke the "First Sale" rule, which allows companies to pay lower duties by applying tariffs to the value of a product as it leaves the factory - much lower than the eventual retail price. 'It's part of the possibilities,' L'Oreal CEO Nicolas Hieronimus told Reuters on Tuesday. "We will make decisions," he added, without giving a timeframe. Brands like Italy's high-end sneakers maker Golden Goose, outerwear specialist Moncler and fashion label Ferragamo have all touted the strategy. "It's a significant benefit," Moncler executive director Luciano Santel said in a call with analysts, estimating the production cost at around half the import price. The strategy, which can only be invoked for goods clearly destined for sale in the US and involving multiple foreign transactions, is not without risk, however. It requires a detailed paperwork trail, a firm grip on supply chains and legal structures to handle the required transactions. Consultants including KPMG and PwC have seen a surge this year in enquiries from companies into how to use this method to ease the burden of Trump's tariffs. "We've got three times more requests than usual," for mitigation strategies including the First Sale rule, said Ruth Guerra, a partner at KPMG in Paris, adding that the rule could also be combined with other measures. To benefit from lower customs duties, a company must prove that US-bound products have gone through multiple transactions. Usually that means the goods are sold from the factory gate to a middleman and then to a US-based company handling the goods. All transactions must be handled at arm's length by clearly distinct entities. Usually a US subsidiary is involved to avoid revealing confidential information to an external entity, PwC custom and tax lawyer Francesco Pizzo explained. "In our case the 15% tariffs will potentially translate into a 3% impact on the US retail price", Golden Goose CEO Silvio Campara said, adding that the US accounted for roughly 35% of its revenue. While several major textile and apparel companies have been using First Sale for a while, many had overlooked the strategy while the tariff environment remained low, said Mark Ludwig, national leader of trade and tariff advisory services at consultancy RSM in New York. "Now the cost-effectiveness is much higher," said Lucio Miranda, founder of consultancy firm ExportUSA, who expects a jump in First Sale use with interest from companies in other industries. There is no publicly available data on goods imported through the First Sale rule, but a 2009 investigation by the US International Trade Commission found that 8.5% of importing entities over a year used the workaround, equivalent to 2.4% of total US import value. Nearly half of that amount was linked to footwear and apparel. For French cosmetics producers, US duties present a new challenge as the industry had benefited from zero tariffs. "While the agreement brings an end to uncertainty, it brings a significant threat to the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, head of French cosmetics lobby group Febea. The First Sale rule is also only available to companies that can comply with a strict process which entails other risks as well. "One of the biggest problems with selecting First Sale is that only fancy people can truly afford it - both the compliance costs and the risks of audit that come with it," said US-based tariff and trade lawyer Michael T. Cone. Improper use could also lead to penalties, he said, noting that the US Customs and Border Protection agency routinely audits and denies use of the rule. "Importers must proceed with utmost caution,' he said.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Italy hands fast fashion retailer Shein €1 million greenwashing fine
The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) announced on Monday that it had issued fast fashion company Shein with a €1 million fine for 'misleading and/or deceptive environmental messages and claims'. Authorities gave the fine to Infinite Styles Services Co. Limited, a Dublin-based company that manages Shein's website in Europe. 'Through its website and other promotional and/or informational online pages, the company disseminated environmental claims within the sections #SHEINTHEKNOW, evoluSHEIN, and Social Responsibility that were, in some instances, vague, generic, and/or overly emphatic, and in others, misleading or omissive,' said AGCM in a statement. In particular, AGCM criticised Shein's claims about recyclability and its 'circular system' for minimising waste, which were 'found to be either false or at least confusing'. Italian officials also contested Shein's statements on its greenhouse gas emissions targets. The firm claims it is aiming to reduce emissions by 25% by 2030 and says it hopes to reach net zero by 2050. AGCM said these proposals were 'vague and generic' and 'were even contradicted by an actual increase in Shein's greenhouse gas emissions in 2023 and 2024'. AGCM is the second European competition authority to fine Shein in just over a month, after France's antitrust agency issued the firm with a €40mn penalty in July. An 11-month investigation by the DGCCRF found that Shein had engaged in 'misleading commercial practices towards consumers', particularly 'on the reality of the price reductions granted and on the scope of the commitments concerning environmental claims'. Shein accepted the fine and said it had already taken steps to rectify the breaches after it was notified by the regulator last year. Keeping prices low The firm does not publicly disclose earnings updates, although sources familiar with the company told Bloomberg that in the first quarter, the firm's net income rose to over $400m (€346m), while revenue was almost $10 billion (€8.6bn). According to the sources, Shein's profit margin was lifted by customers rushing to get ahead of tariffs from the US administration. The China-founded retailer has built up a strong consumer base by offering ultra-cheap products, although its environmental and labour practices have come under scrutiny. The latter has notably stalled its ambitions to launch an IPO (initial public offering) in London, according to reports. Shein filed to list in the UK capital more than a year ago, although Chinese and UK regulators have failed to agree on the language included in the risk disclosure section of its prospectus, particularly where this relates to human rights abuses. Shein faces claims that it sources cotton from China's Xinjiang region, where the US and NGOs have accused the Chinese government of forced labour and human rights abuses targeting Uyghur people. Due to the hold up in London, the Financial Times first reported last month that the retailer had confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong. Shein has also come under scrutiny from the European Commission, which has opened probes related to Shein's potential violations of EU consumer protection rules and the Digital Services Act. Shein did not immediately respond to Euronews' request for comment.
