logo
Cottage owner told to delay extension until after nesting season

Cottage owner told to delay extension until after nesting season

A cottage owner has been given the go ahead to extend their home as long as they wait until the end of nesting season before removing hedgerow.
East Lothian planners granted permission for the single story extension to Spilmersford Cottage, East Saltoun, which will involve using part of a paddock next to the garden.
But they added a condition ensuring no work can begin without a thorough investigation showing no birds are in residence in the hedge, which will be removed to make way for the new building.
Approving a change of use of part of the paddock to domestic ground and the extension to the cottage, planners said: 'No removal of hedgerows shall take place between 1st March and 31st August inclusive, unless a detailed check of the site for active birds' nests has been undertaken and written confirmation has been submitted to the planning authority that no birds will be harmed and that there are appropriate measures in place to protect nesting bird interest on the site.
'The check shall be undertaken no later than 48 hours before the commencement of the development and no site clearance or other works in
connection with the development hereby approved shall commence unless the written confirmation and protection measures have been submitted to and approved in writing by East Lothian Biodiversity Officer.'
The owners of the property applied for permission to extend the cottage out to its side into part of the paddock saying that they had decided against a back garden extension because they wanted to take advantage of the sunlight which came into the property from the rear.
They said the single story extension which will prove additional living space would be in keeping with the style of cottages in the area and any hedgerow removed would be replaced in new landscaping.
Approving the application planners noted comments from their biodiversity officer who also called for measure to be put in place to ensure no badgers were disturbed in the area, which was also added into conditions.
Their report said: 'The application site is adjacent to the River Tyne Local Biodiversity Site and has a number of notable species within 200m of the property.
'The Biodiversity Officer further notes that the applicant has detailed the removal of and the intention to replace 11 metres of beech hedging, this should be detailed on any conditioned landscape plans for consideration.
'The removal of the hedge should not be undertaken within the bird breeding season. The applicant is reminded that, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, (as amended), it is an offence to remove, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest is in use or being built.
'Planning consent for a development does not provide a defence against prosecution under this act. If nesting birds are discovered after works commence, such works must stop, and a competent ecologist must
be contacted for advice.'
By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From peeing on your veg patch to hanging up old CDs – the tricks and tips that will (and won't) deter garden pests
From peeing on your veg patch to hanging up old CDs – the tricks and tips that will (and won't) deter garden pests

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

From peeing on your veg patch to hanging up old CDs – the tricks and tips that will (and won't) deter garden pests

As any gardener knows, we share our outdoor spaces with a vast array of creatures. This is mostly a wonderful and necessary thing. The majority of beasts are beneficial and ought to receive the warmest of welcomes. And given the biodiversity crisis, we must reconsider who we regard as a 'pest'. Having said that, there are organisms whose presence can imperil our garden plans. When I was studying the principles of growing food organically, I was taught a systems approach to dealing with so-called pests: choose your interventions carefully and opt for the least disruptive before considering more drastic measures. Encouraging wildlife into your garden is the first step to limiting pest damage, as a balanced ecosystem will see naturally occurring predators manage the creatures that bother your plants. Alongside this, raising strong plants and ensuring the soil they're growing in is healthy will result in a more resilient patch. If there's a creature that reappears every season, or you're growing a plant that is of interest to a certain insect, installing a physical barrier to protect your plants from damage can limit interference with the balance of the garden's ecosystem. The carrot root fly, for example, can be stopped using insect-proof mesh. Despite our best efforts, it's inevitable that sometimes we don't spot damage until it's already done, but I'd encourage you to avoid chemical measures that would cause destruction to the surrounding environment, or lead to the wholesale eradication of any population, which might then disrupt the food webs they're part of. Before you attempt whatever quick fix the social media algorithm has sent your way, read on for interventions that have a decent chance of working. How to manage slugs is my most-asked question, even though the Royal Horticultural Society has stopped describing these molluscs as pests, and says that only nine of the estimated 44 UK species of slug are 'notable plant nibblers'. In my experience, coffee grounds and eggshells do little to protect plants. Beer traps do work in that they coax slugs into a yeasty, watery grave, but they require monitoring, emptying and refilling, which is not a pleasant task. How effective they are depends on how many you put out and the size of your slug population. What does work is limiting places for slugs and snails to hide near your plants (wooden edging, bricks, pieces of wood), and encouraging predators such as frogs, newts and toads by installing a pond and maintaining wild areas for the amphibians to hunt in. Nematodes are also effective, but only in contained spaces because biological control (introducing organisms in places where they would naturally occur to boost the population) doesn't really work without boundaries. As for using wool to deter molluscs, I visited a gardener last year who claimed that surrounding tender plants with it had proved successful, but I suspect that it wouldn't remain effective after heavy rain or watering. I once worked on a growing space where foxes would chew through and rearrange our irrigation pipes weekly. It was infuriating, and if I'd had access to adequate volumes of urine to deter them I might have given it a go, as the smell can disrupt the boundaries of their territory and urge them to move elsewhere. Given how accustomed city foxes are to humans, this might only work in the countryside. Also, you would probably need to be weeing outside every day for it to put them off. A better approach would be to plug the holes in your fences and secure your bins to make your garden and food sources less accessible. If you find fox poo on your beds, try using chilli and garlic as a deterrent as they hate the smell, and cover any bare soil with holly clippings to make for a less comfortable toilet. Birdwatching is a principal pleasure of spending time in green spaces. Unfortunately, some species are as interested in the kale and strawberries we grow as we are. CDs or recycled foil hung around the garden will reflect light and keep birds off crops, but my go-to solution is bird-proof netting, carefully secured at the edges or installed over a cage so they don't sneak under and then get stuck. A traditional scarecrow might work for a short time, but the birds will get used to it. I reckon an inflatable dancing tube man would do a better job if you're happy for your garden to look like a forecourt selling secondhand cars. A few different butterflies and moths lay their eggs on the underside of leaves in the brassica family. When those eggs hatch into caterpillars, it can be a matter of days before a robust purple sprouting broccoli is reduced to a skeleton. Large and small cabbage white butterflies appear in my veg patch without fail every year and are the reason my 2023 season was entirely kale-free. Butterflies and moths are an important food source for many animals, including bats, so ideally our efforts to protect crops ought to encourage them to lay their eggs elsewhere. The most effective approach in my experience is fine, insect-proof mesh, which also stops pigeons from stripping leaves. And try planting nasturtiums as a companion plant because, despite them not belonging to the brassica family, large and small whites will lay their eggs on them, too. Sap-sucking insects that feed on new plant growth cause distortion and stunted growth; they also invite disease. There are various species, and they feed on a wide range of plants, so they're a common sight. These insects are, in turn, a food source for other creatures – including ladybird larvae, lacewings, hoverflies and insectivorous birds – so I tend not to panic when I see them as I'm fairly certain their predators will be along soon to keep their population in check. Pinching out the tips of plants, growing sacrificial plants such as nasturtiums, and gently washing the aphids off with water are low-intervention methods. Avoid using so-called 'natural' remedies such as neem oil, which will kill insects beyond the target species. Like ants, moles aren't after your plants, but what they get up to beneath them can be devastating. These rampant little burrowers feast on soil organisms such as earthworms, and if you're actively encouraging soil life with generous amounts of compost, it's no great surprise that a mole might move in. As they are territorial, it's likely you have only got one mole burrowing around your garden, and the main, humane way of encouraging it to move along is to get on its nerves. Moles are extremely sensitive to vibration and noise, so you can buy devices to stick into the ground that buzz regularly, or commit to a daily stomping ritual around your plot and hope that does the trick. A neighbour did once offer me the number of the 'mole man', but I'd rather have an empty veg plot than the death of a mole on my conscience. Ants aren't really a bother in themselves (although a red ant bite can be a nasty surprise), but they can make your aphid problem worse. Ants 'farm' aphids by moving them to your plants so they can feed and breed, then the ants feed on the aphids' honeydew (the sweet substance they excrete – yuck!) Ants like to nest in dry soil, so mulching regularly to ensure your soil is moisture-retentive can discourage them from setting up home near your plants. If they're already there, keeping the soil moist (but not drenched) will encourage them to move on. Boiling water can kill ants, but that's cruel and unnecessary. Whether you're growing in the countryside or the city, mice will be nearby. They are happy to munch on so many different plants – from germinating peas to newly planted bulbs – that once they've got their teeth into your planting plan, it can be enough to make you give up on gardening. These rodents can be a challenge to manage and, yes, a cat would be very helpful. But if, like me, you're seriously allergic to felines, try using row covers or fine mesh pinned down diligently. I have also found that – as with foxes – laying plenty of prickly holly clippings around plants does the trick.

Woman who planted nature reserve trees 'distraught' over removal
Woman who planted nature reserve trees 'distraught' over removal

BBC News

time13 hours ago

  • BBC News

Woman who planted nature reserve trees 'distraught' over removal

A woman who planted 10 native trees in a north-west London nature reserve has said she was "distraught" when they were dug up and years ago, Sonia Rosenblatt and her close friend planted the trees to "enhance the biodiversity" in site of special scientific interest (SSSI) Bentley Priory Nature Reserve in trees became a deeply personal memorial when five days later, Ms Rosenblatt's friend died suddenly."They weren't just trees to me," she said. Harrow Council said it was investigating the removal. Ms Rosenblatt said she received a verbal agreement for the planting in May 2020 from a previous head warden of Harrow Nature Conservation Forum (HNCF) – a group of volunteers who maintain most nature reserves in Harrow, including 173-acre Bentley Priory. The native trees Ms Rosenblatt planted with her friend included hazel, hornbeam, hawthorn, beech, and field maple. She told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that since the trees were removed in May, she can no longer bring herself to step foot inside the park to remember her friend."This was a place I just had to go to talk to him. I was distraught. I've never experienced pain like that. Never," she said.A few months after the planting, a Harrow Council officer threatened to have the trees removed. 'Heart and soul' Ms Rosenblatt escalated the matter to the ward councillor, Marilyn Ashton – who is also chairman of the Bentley Priory Nature Reserve Committee and deputy leader of Harrow Council – and she intervened to stop action being taken at the Ashton said: "I'm not saying it's wrong to remove them but I felt sorry for her and didn't think they were doing that much harm. It's just a few trees." Ms Rosenblatt said she maintained the trees at her own expense for five years and was shocked to discover they had been removed in said: "Initially I tried to not think about it because the pain was too much to bear. Then I got really angry." After submitting a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to Harrow Council, Sonia learned that a former council officer had issued a removal order for the trees in 2022, which was carried out in May 2025. Reasons cited for the removal of the trees in the FOI include that the planting had not been approved by the council and their removal was done for the purpose of ecological Ashton said she was not asked if the trees could be removed. Ms Rosenblatt is seeking a public apology, as well as for new trees to be planted in a satisfactory location and for those responsible for the removal to be held accountable.A Harrow Council spokesperson said: "We are aware of the trees being removed and subsequently have received a complaint on this. "We are currently looking into the circumstances of how and why this took place and will liaise directly with Sonia once our investigation is complete."

From destruction to restoration: how farmers in Madagascar are being helped to safeguard its rare plant life
From destruction to restoration: how farmers in Madagascar are being helped to safeguard its rare plant life

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

From destruction to restoration: how farmers in Madagascar are being helped to safeguard its rare plant life

Madagascar is famous for its fauna, more than its flora, which is one reason why many conservation efforts there tend to be focused on animals facing extinction. But the Missouri Botanical Garden's Madagascar Programme (MBG-Madagascar) has been trying to redress that imbalance by focusing its efforts on the forests – selecting 11 areas of the island to protect for the remarkable flora within. 'The forests are rich in terms of diversity and endemicity, with some 14,000 species,' says conservation unit coordinator Jeannie Raharimampionona. 'Ninety percent are found nowhere else in the world – and they are very, very threatened.' One of the biggest threats comes from a farming technique used by many Malagasy farmers who live in the forests of Ankarabolava-Agnakatrika, in south-eastern Madagascar. 'Slash-and-burn, a traditional agricultural practice,' says Raharimampionona. 'The first year, they cut. They leave it to dry for a year, then burn it, and plant seeds and rice on the ash,' she continues, not an inch of judgment in her voice. 'This is the way of the Malagasy. We eat a lot of rice – this is how we grow that rice.' The rural population also relies on other natural capital, such as trees for timber or fuel, and hunting wild animals for food. And when an area is no longer fertile or productive, farmers move on, and 'the forest is eaten, slowly, slowly'. But MBG-Madagascar, together with the conservation charity World Land Trust, may have found a solution – and it is one that hinges upon working with, rather than on behalf of, the people who live there, avoiding land grabs at all cost. 'Small forests feed large communities. Their food, their clothes, their houses, their medicine – everything is from the forest,' says Raharimampionona. 'And if communities feel you're restricting, or stealing their resources … They may go against your project.' Instead, MBG-Madagascar offers a win-win compromise. Any farming that takes place in protected areas is technically illegal, and often on unproductive land. 'There, the farmers are just occupants,' says Raharimampionona. So, for the past 10 years, MBG-Madagascar has worked to offer farmers ownership of an unprotected piece of land, compensating them for the crops in the protected lands if they choose to move. While helping to legalise farmers' ownership of the land, MBG-Madagascar also gives farmers seedlings for cloves and fruit trees that are lucrative in the national and international market to boost their revenue. And it offers other types of 'green employment' for residents, such as restoration, creating nurseries and growing plants. 'We invite them and encourage them to work with us, and that gives them revenue to start again.' Initially there were 85 farmers that the organisation needed to negotiate with. And now? Raharimampionona holds up a single hand. 'Five left. It has taken 10 years, but people are really seeing the benefits.' The success of the project likely lies within MBG-Madagascar's approach. 'No pressure is placed on the farmers to accept our offer,' she says. The foundation works by installing someone from the region to become a trusted site manager, who, in turn, employs a committee that includes people from local traditional hierarchies to make decisions about and protect the land. Any issues, such as lemur hunting or illegal agricultural work, are first dealt with by the codina (the local committee), who only escalate to MBG-Madagascar if necessary. 'We avoid top-down decision making. They have the freedom to decide, and we support them.' That sensitivity and community enmeshment reaches into all aspects of MBG-Madagascar's work; site spaces are built from local materials, rather than 'shiny, big buildings', and site managers live as part of the nearby population, rather than commuting from the city. Raharimampionona herself has begun to rethink what the word 'community' really means, moving away from the idea that conservation implies a division between locals and outsiders. 'I began to think more about the immigrants who join these communities, and then about me as part of the community, our team as part of the community, the plantation company as part of the community,' she says. 'Communities are larger than the village alone.' And what happened to those five farmers left in the protected area? 'They were really hard to negotiate with,' Raharimampionona says. 'So we left them to it …' But next, she beams: 'And then they came to us. They said: 'We are now ready to go out. Please pay us. Look for land for us – we are ready.'' You can support projects like Ankarabolava-Agnakatrika by donating to the World Land Trust Action Fund – conservation where it's needed most

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store