Pink smoke signals in Rome call for women priests
Excluded from the conclave to elect a new pope Wednesday -- and more broadly from the Church's entire global priesthood -- some Catholic women were determined that their voices will be heard.
In a park on a hill overlooking the dome of St Peter's and the church's Vatican headquarters, campaigners released pink smoke from flares, and demanded that women be allowed to seek ordination.
"We are saying to the cardinals, you cannot keep ignoring 50 percent of the Catholic population, you cannot go into a locked room and discuss the future of the Church without half of the Church," said Miriam Duignan.
"Whoever they elect needs to be brave enough to properly tackle the question of women's inclusion, because so far it has not been, even by Pope Francis," said Duignan, of the Wijngaards Institute in Cambridge.
Duignan was briefly detained in 2011 after she attempted to enter the Vatican to deliver a petition in support of a priest backing the activists' cause.
Had the activists taken their Wednesday protest -- a nod to the black and white smoke used by the Holy See to announce voting results -- to the Vatican, they believe a similar fate would have awaited them.
"Whenever we go down to St Peter's Square, we are detained by the police ... and we are certainly not invited to go into the conclave," Duignan said
"The only women that those 133 men will see in the next few days will be nuns who are cleaning their rooms and serving them food and tidying up after them."
The cardinals meeting Wednesday behind closed doors in the Sistine Chapel will not hear any female opinions during deliberations expected to last days, with multiple rounds of voting.
The only women they will see before white smoke rises to announce their decision has been made will be the nuns who cook, clean and serve upon them in the Santa Marta guesthouse.
In the global church as a whole, women have begun to take some senior lay roles, a process that accelerated a little under Pope Francis's papacy.
But even those who have studied theology and church ministry are excluded from the priesthood, and only priests hold the most senior leadership roles.
"Yes, Pope Francis elevated and promoted a few women into roles of responsibility, but they are always lower in status and authority than a man," said Duignan.
"Even the youngest priest in the room is the boss of the oldest, more experienced woman."
- 'A sin and a scandal' -
The campaigners say women took equal roles in worship in the early Church, before medieval reforms, and that, in Duignan's words, "the men who are going into the Sistine Chapel this afternoon know that, and they don't want everyone else to know that."
Kate McElwee, executive director of the Women's Ordination Conference campaign group, described this as an injustice and a "crisis" for the church.
"While the world may wait for white smoke or black smoke, we send up pink smoke as our hope that the Church may someday welcome women as equals," she said.
French activist Gabrielle Fidelin called it "a sin and a scandal that women are kept out of priesthood and the conclave."
According to Duignan, even after Francis's relatively reformist 12-year pontificate, only one of the 133 cardinal electors to be sequestered in conclave has taken a positive stance on women's ordination.
And she was reluctant to identify him by name, in case he found himself expelled from the gathering.
This despite the once taboo issue being given an airing in the Synod -- an assembly of clergy, clerics and laypeople -- which under Francis has included female members.
In October last year, a report was issued after Francis approved a working party to look into the idea of allowing women to become deacons -- a step before the priesthood.
It acknowledged that "the question of women's access to diaconal ministry remains open" but concluded that it was too soon to make a decision.
dc/ub/giv
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK pumps £14 bn into nuclear plant on path to net zero
The UK government Tuesday said it will invest billions of pounds in the new Sizewell C nuclear power plant as it strives to meet net zero and energy security targets. The £14.2-billion ($19-billion) investment will end "years of delay and uncertainty", the UK Treasury said in a statement, adding it would unlock a "golden age" of nuclear power to "boost the UK's energy security". The latest injection is part of budget announcements by finance minister Rachel Reeves, who is due to detail her spending priorities on Wednesday, with defence and health at the forefront. The government on Tuesday also announced that British manufacturer Rolls-Royce had won a competition to become the preferred bidder to build small modular nuclear reactors in the UK. SMRs are aimed at cutting the costs and complexity of building nuclear power stations. "The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow," Reeves said. The government added that it would invest more than £2.5 billion in nuclear fusion over five years in what it called a "record investment" for the nascent technology. - Nuclear rollout - The Labour government, which took over from the Conservatives in July, has promised to deliver "the biggest nuclear rollout program for a generation". The UK has refocused on shoring up nuclear power since the start of the war in Ukraine, in the name of energy security and faced with a fleet of ageing power stations. Britain's government is the majority shareholder in the Sizewell C plant being built in eastern England, after Chinese company CGN left the project and the other partner, French energy giant EDF, scaled back its involvement. The UK is searching for another partner to join the project, then will deliver a "final investment decision", Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokesperson said Tuesday. The Sizewell C project, which comprises two EPR nuclear reactors each with 1.6 gigawatts capacity, could cost a total £20-30 billion to build. The sum could be even higher, according to some estimates which are disputed by the government and EDF, and it is not expected to start generating electricity until 2035. "Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years," said joint managing directors of the project Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann. The government wants to increase nuclear power's share of the energy mix, as it does not emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Starmer's government has pledged by 2035 to reduce UK greenhouse gas emissions by 81 percent on 1990 levels, under plans to reach net-zero by 2050. The use of nuclear energy as an alternative to fossil fuels is highly controversial, however, with many environmental groups warning about safety risks and the disposal of nuclear waste. The Sizewell C announcement has been met with anger by some local residents worried about the impact of the new plant on the local town of Leiston in Suffolk. Near to Sizewell C is the Sizewell B nuclear power station which is due to close in 2035 -- and Sizewell A which is in the process of being decommissioned. EDF is also building the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant in southwestern England, although it has been blighted by delays and rising construction costs. "The government's decision to move ahead with Sizewell C is fantastic news for Britain, its energy security and economic growth," said EDF Energy chief executive Simone Rossi. bur-ajb/bcp/lth


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The 1600: The Political Showdown We Deserve
The Insider's Track Good morning, Four days from now, the Army will celebrate its 250th birthday. The original plan had been for a daytime festival on the National Mall, complete with displays, flyovers, meet-and-greets with Medal of Honor recipients, etc. Then President Trump, whose 79th birthday happens to also fall on Saturday, decided he wanted a bigger event complete with a grand evening parade. He's been wanting to preside over a military parade since his first term, when he went to France and was awed by the Bastille Day celebrations. (Maybe it's just me but I don't think the USA needs to emulate the French when it comes to the military). They told him then it was a bad idea and the DC streets would just get chewed up from the tank treads. More trouble than it's worth. But now he's back and there's no one left to say no, so Trump is getting his parade. Thousands of soldiers will march down Constitution Avenue alongside M1 Abrams tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles and howitzers while the president looks on. Very Pyongyang-on-the-Potomac. Hopefully we keep the big, phallic ICBMs in their silos or else it's really gonna look like something out of Putin or Lil Kim's fantasies. Put aside the dumb optics of Abrams tanks rolling through DC, this is happening at a precarious moment. All of this simmering rage that we're starting to see boil over, first on the streets of LA, will have a convenient new target. I hope I'm wrong and this event goes off fine, but you couldn't pay me to be in Washington this weekend. The good news this morning seems to be that the clashes/riots in LA appear to have been more scattered overnight. Hundreds of Marines from Camp Pendleton are on their way to the city, which seems both inflammatory and unnecessary, but as we said yesterday, this is a fight the White House wants. Newsom is playing to his base, turning this into a referendum on Trump's draconian immigration raids while images of burning self-driving Waymos and Mexican flags become the lasting images on TV and social media. Trump is, cleverly, playing up Newsom as his foil because there would be no better situation for JD Vance in '28 than running against someone who presents as the embodiment of blue-state dysfunction. Everybody wins but us, the voters, as usual. A couple other random thoughts on LA: It's hard to take Trump's tough guy law-and-order stance seriously after he just pardoned every violent J6 protester, including those who attacked cops with flagpoles and bear spray. Have we noticed how ICE is doing their most over-the-top, military-esque raids in deep blue cities? Do you think that's a coincidence? I sure haven't seen any big workplace raids in, say, South Dakota (where Kristi Noem is from), or Iowa, where Trump-voting farmers have been employing illegal immigrants just as long as anyone. There's something amusing about watching the "Don't Tread on Me" right, people who are supposed to be skeptical of the federal government, all of a sudden come to the support of masked, anonymous federal agents jumping out of trucks to snatch people at their jobs and homes. And then refusing to acknowledge when they make mistakes and accidentally arrest or deport the wrong guy. Remember when they told us they were focused only on those here illegally with criminal records or who present a threat to the community? Democrats who equivocate on this are digging their own grave. You simply cannot appear to be on the side of people throwing cement at cops. It doesn't matter that most of the protests were calm, or that things were relatively peaceful until the feds came in, or that LA is a sanctuary city and should therefore be immune from federal immigration enforcement. What matters with riots is the optics of disorder, and it never works in the protesters' favor when it comes to public opinion. I saw some talking head on CNN yesterday say that "99.9%" of L.A. was peaceful. That may be true, but it's like saying JFK's trip to Dallas was 99.9% successful until he made that left onto Dealey Plaza. The Rundown As violence erupts out of immigration enforcement protests in Los Angeles, images of protestors waving Mexican flags became a focal point of the coverage and for the Trump administration's reaction. Senior administration officials said this proved there had been an "invasion" by illegal immigrants, particularly over the past four years under former President Joe Biden, and that it was necessary to send in the National Guard and deport those in the country without legal status. Read the story. Also happening: New Jersey primaries: President Donald Trump's second-term agenda faces an early test with voters Tuesday in New Jersey, a blue state holding the first statewide elections since Trump won back the White House last year. "Trump looms large over this entire race on both sides of the aisle," said Ashley Koning, the director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. Read more. President Donald Trump's second-term agenda faces an early test with voters Tuesday in New Jersey, a blue state holding the first statewide elections since Trump won back the White House last year. "Trump looms large over this entire race on both sides of the aisle," said Ashley Koning, the director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. Read more. Trade talks: President Donald Trump described China as "not easy" to deal with, but touted progress between the two countries as negotiations in London go into their second day. "We are doing well with China. China is not easy," Trump said. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel launches deportation of Gaza-bound Madleen activists
Israel has deported Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, a day after seizing the Gaza-bound humanitarian aid ship on which she was sailing alongside 11 others. Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Thunberg flew out of Tel Aviv early on Tuesday, bound for Sweden via France, and released her photos on the flight. According to the legal rights group Adalah, which is representing Thunberg and the other activists who sailed in the Madleen vessel towards Gaza, she was among four crew members who accepted deportation. The remaining activists, who are contesting deportation, will remain in Israeli custody before appearing before judicial authorities. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said five of those subject to forced deportation proceedings are French nationals who have received consular support. Large rallies have taken place in France and other locations to protest against Israel's interception of the Madleen and detention of the crew. Israeli naval forces seized the Madleen and detained its crew early on Monday, about 100 nautical miles (185km) off the coast of Gaza, according to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, the group that organised the journey. The vessel, accompanied by Israel's navy, arrived in the Israeli port of Ashdod on Monday evening, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It was carrying humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula, to Gaza, in a bid to raise awareness about the dire humanitarian crisis in the enclave. The United Nations has warned that Gaza's entire population faces 'catastrophic hunger' following nearly two years of war and over two months in which Israel has been blocking or heavily restricting the entry of food and other essential supplies. Following an 11-week total blockade from March to May, Israel allowed minimal aid deliveries to resume. However, the distribution of those supplies has been marred by repeated shootings, with 130 aid seekers killed since May 27, according to Gaza's Government Media Office. The Foreign Ministry portrayed the Madleen voyage as a public relations stunt, mocking the vessel as a 'selfie yacht'.However, Adalah and other rights experts have slammed the seizure of the vessel and its crew as a violation of international law. 'By forcibly intercepting and blocking the Madleen, which was carrying humanitarian aid and a crew of solidarity activists, Israel has once again flouted its legal obligations towards civilians in the occupied Gaza Strip,' said Amnesty International. 'Breaking the siege is a legal duty for states and a moral imperative for all of us,' said Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory. 'Every Mediterranean port should send boats with aid, solidarity and humanity to Gaza.'