logo
Pride Cymru ban involvement of political parties

Pride Cymru ban involvement of political parties

Yahoo15-05-2025

Wales' biggest Pride event has banned political party involvement in solidarity with the transgender community.
Pride Cymru said this was in "response to community feedback" and a request from the Trans Safety Network to "ensure the safety" of attendees in Cardiff.
Earlier this week, Birmingham, Brighton, London and Manchester Prides announced that political parties would not be welcome at their events in an official capacity until they demonstrated a "tangible commitment to trans rights".
The announcement comes after the Supreme Court ruled that the term "woman" in the Equality Act was defined by biological sex.
The ruling was welcomed by some campaigners representing lesbian, gay and bisexual people who say it protects single-sex groups, while others shared concerns about the impact on the trans community.
Pride Cymru said individuals who belong to political parties can attend the event on 21 and 22 June, but not as representatives.
In an open letter urging organisers to ban political involvement, the Trans Safety Network said: "Our trans, non-binary and intersex communities are under an ideological attack right now. Politicians are openly debating how to remove our basic human rights.
"Pride is and always has been a protest. It is a chance for all members of the LGBTQIA+ community to show solidarity."
UK Pride groups suspend involvement of political parties
Glasgow Pride bans political parties over gender 'inaction'
The recent Supreme Court ruling clarified existing equality laws, and means that the term "woman" in the Equality Act refers solely to biological women.
The legal dispute began in 2018, when the Scottish Parliament passed a bill designed to ensure gender balance on public sector boards.
For Women Scotland complained that ministers had included transgender people as part of the quotas in that law.
After the ruling they said women could "now feel safe that services and spaces designated for women are for women".
The ruling was also welcomed by some other gender critical groups including Scottish Lesbians, which describes itself as a grassroots campaigning organisation with around 70 members, made up of "lesbians of all ages across Scotland."
Directors of the group, which made submissions to the Supreme Court in the case, told the BBC: "The Supreme Court decision, which was a clarification of existing law, protects the rights of lesbians as same-sex attracted women.
"As lesbians we're very relieved that our rights have been protected, and disappointed that Pride has once again abandoned lesbians."
Some UK organisations - including in sport and politics - have changed or updated their policies around single-sex teams and spaces such as toilets and changing rooms in response to the ruling.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which enforces equalities law and provides guidance to policymakers, issued interim guidance for service providers which said access to such spaces must be based on biological sex.
The EHRC said the impact of the ruling was that "if somebody identifies as trans, they do not change sex for the purposes of the [Equality] Act, even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC)".
In this respect, the EHRC says, "a trans woman is a biological man" and "a trans man is a biological woman".
As part of the judgement, Supreme Court judge Lord Hodge stressed that the law still gave protection against discrimination to transgender people.
The four Pride groups which took the decision to exclude political parties represent some of the most popular Pride groups in the UK, with a combined average attendance of over one million people.
A statement from the group of Pride organisers said there was a "disturbing global trend... where LGBTQ+ rights are being systematically rolled back".
It said the Supreme Court ruling "underscores the urgent need for immediate action", adding that the move to suspend political party participation was a "refusal to platform those who have not protected our rights".
The groups have called for "full and enforceable protections under the Equality Act", "timely and dignified access to NHS gender-affirming healthcare", a reform of the gender recognition certificate process and "sustainable funding for trans-led services and support organisations across the UK".
Birmingham Pride had already announced its own ban on some political parties, as had Belfast and Southampton Pride events. Glasgow Pride has also banned political parties from this year's festival.
Political parties are often involved in marches and demonstrations at Pride, often with notable politicians using the opportunity to share their parties' beliefs around LGBT+ issues.
Mark Drakeford and Vaughan Gething have previously attended Cardiff Pride in a political capacity. Sir Keir Starmer, Sir Ed Davey, Carla Denyer and Boris Johnson have also all previously publicly attended Pride marches.
A spokesperson for LGBT+ Lib Dems said the group was "sickened to our core" at the ban, and accused Pride organisers of creating a "blanket suspension" which was "lumping them in" with other political parties.
They told the BBC: "We look forward to a constructive dialogue with Pride organisers so we can come back bigger and better."
LGBT+ Conservatives said it was "dismayed that community organisations who were established to promote inclusion - and who are in receipt of public funds - have unilaterally decided, without consultation, to ban all party political organisations".
Labour, Plaid Cymru, The Green Party and Reform have been contacted for comment.
From a stage in a lorry to party of 50,000
Firms accused of 'rainbow-washing' ahead of Pride
Gender ruling offers clarity after years of ambiguity

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court Suffers Embarrassing ‘Software Malfunction'
Supreme Court Suffers Embarrassing ‘Software Malfunction'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court Suffers Embarrassing ‘Software Malfunction'

The U.S. Supreme Court has suffered an embarrassing technical screw-up after releasing the cases it would hear to attorneys and others in the legal community days ahead of schedule. It's the second such event in less than 12 months, following the accidental release of major case updates last year. Notifications about which cases would be granted or denied review next week were not supposed to be released until Monday, but an 'apparent software malfunction' saw the decisions released to lawyers on Friday afternoon. Mass confusion reigned as multiple attorneys compared the information in their inboxes to the court's online docket, which did not match up. As such, the court then made the unusual move of publicly releasing its orders list. 'Due to an apparent software malfunction, email notifications concerning action by the Court scheduled to be included on the order list set for release on Monday, June 9, at 9:30 a.m., were sent out this afternoon,' Supreme Court Public Information Officer Patricia McCabe said in a statement sent to reporters. 'As a result, the Court is issuing that order list now.' In June of last year, the court suffered a similar technical issue which saw a major abortion rights ruling briefly uploaded in error. This followed the serious leak of the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022, which set off a major political firestorm. 'Accidents happen, and the court should be encouraged to provide more access to its rulings, like the email notification service that apparently caused today's glitch,' Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center has said. The Supreme Court has been contacted for comment.

Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania

time3 hours ago

Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican appeal and left in place a Pennsylvania court decision allowing people to cast provisional ballots when their mail-in votes are rejected for not following technical procedures in state law. The court released the decision Friday, after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications about orders that had been slated to be released Monday. A technological error also resulted in an opinion being posted early last year. The justices acted in an appeal filed by the Republican National Committee, the state GOP and the Republican-majority election board in Butler County. Pennsylvania's top court ruled last year that the county must count provisional ballots that were cast by two voters after they learned their mail-in ballots were voided because they arrived without mandatory secrecy envelopes. Pennsylvania Democrats had urged the court to stay out of the case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store