Commentary: Next challenge for PM Anwar's PKR - keeping its anchor role in government
KUALA LUMPUR: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) has gone through another change in its leadership line-up following intense internal party elections on May 24. With the party's top leaders in place, PKR has quite a hill to climb in retaining influence in the unity government and keeping the country's top political job.
The anchor party of the Malaysian federal government elected Nurul Izzah Anwar as the deputy president, defeating former Minister of Economy Rafizi Ramli. Leaders aligned with Nurul Izzah also dominated the newly elected central leadership council. Minister of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad also failed to defend his vice-president post. Both Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned from the Cabinet just days after the PKR elections.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who won the party presidency unopposed, swiftly rejected claims of nepotism following his daughter's victory, arguing that Nurul Izzah was democratically elected by PKR members. Despite the predictable outrage expressed on social media by supporters of Rafizi and complaints of electoral irregularities, the party will likely recover from the divisive elections.
This was not the first time PKR had to go through an intense contest for the deputy presidency. The position has been contested at every party election since 2010. Nurul Izzah is also a popular figure within the party; she had consistently won the highest number of votes for the vice-president post at every party election from 2010 to 2018.
But the PKR's focus should not be on internal elections.
The party's biggest challenge is maintaining its position in the unity government coalition and ensuring that Anwar is re-elected as prime minister.
This challenge was acknowledged by Nurul Izzah's and Rafizi's campaigns. As it stands, there are clouds on PKR's horizon.
ANCHOR PARTY BY CIRCUMSTANCES
Despite its leadership position in the unity government, PKR has only 31 seats in the 222-member House of Representatives. Its role as the anchor party is made possible with help from its Pakatan Harapan (PH) partners – the Democratic Action Party (DAP), Parti Amanah Negara and the United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation. The coalition collectively controls 81 seats in the House, making it the largest bloc in Parliament.
Two other key members of the unity government, Barisan Nasional (BN) and Gabungan Parti Sarawak, control 30 and 23 seats, respectively. Together, the three coalitions control 134 of the 222 seats in the House.
PKR's role as the anchor party of the unity government is a result of external circumstances beyond the party's control.
First, overwhelming support from ethnic Chinese voters helped the DAP win 40 of the 55 seats it contested in 2022. Second, BN's failure in many Malay-Muslim majority seats led to the opposition Perikatan Nasional (PN) winning 74 seats.
DAP may be able to keep ethnic Chinese voters on its side and boost PH's parliamentary seat count, but there is no guarantee that the seat distribution between PN and BN will remain the same after the next general elections.
Ramanan Ramakrishnan, a PKR Member of Parliament and one of the winners of the four vice-president posts, declared that the party could potentially win 70 to 80 seats at the next general election, with Nurul Izzah as deputy president and elections director. Ramanan's statement was dismissed by Rafizi, who estimated that PKR would only be able to contest up to 50 federal seats – half of the 100 that it contested at the 2022 General Election.
Rafizi's estimation was based on what he said was an understanding with other unity government parties, especially BN, that PKR would defend only the 31 seats it won and the seats where the party came second. Rafizi likely referred to the PH-BN approach taken at the 2023 state elections to avoid three-cornered contests with PN.
COMPETITION OVER SEAT ALLOCATIONS
This public disagreement over the projected number of seats the party could win suggests that the party's next strategic focus is on outmanoeuvring unity government partners in the battle for seat allocations.
The competition over seat allocations started promptly following the conclusion of the party elections. In her first speech after she was confirmed as the deputy president, Nurul Izzah declared that the party should contest in 13 constituencies in the upcoming Sabah state election that must be held before the end of the year.
PKR's plans for the state election have no impact on the balance of power in Parliament after the next general election. But the party's plans will influence seat allocations at the federal level.
At the last Sabah state election in 2020, PKR contested only seven out of the 73 seats. It entered the Sabah state elections as a junior partner of the informal 'Warisan Plus' coalition led by Parti Warisan Sabah (Warisan), which was then leading the state government.
The outcome of the elections was disastrous. Warisan lost the state government, and PKR won only two of the seven contested seats.
The situation for PKR in the Sabah legislative assembly is not unique. Outside of Selangor, Penang, Negeri Sembilan and Perak, it has no meaningful presence in nine other state legislative assemblies. With limited influence at the state level, PKR has no choice but to ensure it dominates federal politics through respectable representation in Parliament.
UMNO'S AMBITION TO BECOME DOMINANT PARTY
The writing is on the wall. PKR would have to spar with its partners in the ruling coalition for federal seats; as a result, intense competition within the unity government can be expected.
The initial rumblings of such a contest are already evident. The United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) has openly declared its ambition to become the dominant party after the next general election.
The logical extension of this was left unsaid: If UMNO becomes the dominant party, it would be able to claim the position of the prime minister.
Currently, UMNO leads the BN coalition with 26 seats. Among the BN partners, the Malaysian Chinese Association has two seats. The Malaysian Indian Congress and Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah have one seat each.
The PKR elections may have provided clarity around the leadership succession. The next biggest challenge for the party is to ensure it remains the anchor party in the federal government after the next general elections.
This time, however, PKR will seek to become the dominant party not by accidental circumstances, but by design. This will be a monumental challenge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump and Musk are fighting. It's difficult to pick a side
SINGAPORE: Once inseparable, United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest man, Elon Musk, are now locked in a very public - and very bitter - divorce. In a matter of days, Mr Musk torched Mr Trump's signature "big, beautiful" Bill, condemned his spending plans, threatened to form a new political party and even suggested the president be impeached. Mr Trump retaliated in kind. He called Mr Musk 'a big-time drug addict', threatened to cut his companies off from government contracts and warned of ' serious consequences ' if the billionaire were to finance Democratic Party candidates running against Republicans. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Mr Trump told NBC on Saturday (Jun 7), saying he believed their relationship was over. Unlike most public spats between public figures, this one offers no easy side to take. The two men are, in many ways, cut from the same cloth. They operate with little patience for deliberation and considerable appetite for the spotlight, and are accustomed to getting their own ways. A PERSONAL FIGHT WITH NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES The trouble with breakups is that any fallout doesn't stay between the warring parties. There's always collateral damage. For example, after Mr Trump threatened to pull government deals with Mr Musk's companies, Tesla shares tanked 14 per cent and lost US$150 billion in value. This very public falling-out carries risks for both men. For Mr Trump, the feud with Mr Musk marks the first major rift with a prominent adviser in his second term. It has shattered the 'bromance' that many assumed would continue and could fracture Mr Trump's support among tech leaders and wealthy donors. Mr Musk, who spent nearly US$300 million in last year's elections, was not only Mr Trump's richest backer, but also a key bridge to Silicon Valley. He helped connect Mr Trump to tech investors and gave the pro-business wing of the Republican Party reason to support the president. Now, Mr Musk's defection could undermine Republican unity on Capitol Hill. His vocal criticism of the debt impact has emboldened some Republican fiscal hawks to oppose Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed the US House late last month. The Bill, which combines tax breaks, spending cuts, border security funding and other priorities, is the centrepiece of Mr Trump's domestic policy agenda. Critics, however, have said it could increase the deficit by as much as US$4 trillion over a decade. If it falters in the Senate due to Republican defections, it would be a significant blow to Mr Trump's legislative agenda. Moreover, Mr Musk's talk of a new centrist party and his massive online influence hint at a potential challenge to the two-party status quo, which should alarm Republican strategists. Although an actual third party is a long shot, even the suggestion feeds a narrative that Mr Trump's brand of Republicanism is alienating a segment of his base. A prolonged Trump-Musk feud could make it harder for Republicans to hold Congress in next year's midterms, given Mr Musk's financial clout and devoted following. FEUD SPREADS TO SPACE Mr Trump, for his part, appears eager to show he won't be dictated to by a billionaire ally. A White House official stressed that the administration is 'not beholden to Elon Musk on policy' and that by attacking the Bill, Mr Musk 'has clearly picked a side' against Mr Trump. In the short term, Mr Trump's hardline stance may shore up his image as a president who puts his agenda above any one person, even the world's richest man. His core base, many of whom harbour scepticism toward tech elites, might even cheer him for standing up to Mr Musk. However, Mr Trump's unpredictable retaliatory streak raises questions in Washington and on Wall Street. Would he really cut off federal contracts to SpaceX and Tesla to punish Mr Musk, even if it jeopardises US interests? NASA and the Pentagon rely heavily on SpaceX for America's spaceflight capabilities and military satellite launches. Pulling the plug on SpaceX partnerships could set back crucial programmes (like the International Space Station transport, Moon missions and defence satellite deployments) and force the government to scramble for alternatives. It's an open question how far Mr Trump is willing to go. Even some within Mr Trump's circle may urge caution, given the billions at stake and the fact that SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is integral to US-led space efforts (NASA has invested roughly US$15 billion in SpaceX projects). So, while the president talks tough, cutting Mr Musk off is not without consequences. Rattled by Mr Musk's initial threat to retire the Dragon spacecraft, NASA and Pentagon officials have contacted at least three competitors - Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Blue Origin - to assess their rocket development and availability for government missions, according to a report by the Washington Post over the weekend. CAN MUSK AFFORD TO ALIENATE WASHINGTON? For Mr Musk, this episode is a high-stakes gamble that could redefine his role in the tech and political ecosystems. On one hand, Mr Musk has rebranded himself as an independent voice, unafraid to challenge a president he once supported. This could salvage his reputation among moderates or Tesla customers who were uneasy with his closeness to Mr Trump. By distancing himself from Mr Trump, Mr Musk may refocus attention on his companies' innovations rather than partisan politics. He has already said he will curtail political spending going forward, signalling a retreat from the kingmaker role he played in 2024. On the other hand, Mr Musk is now on a collision course with the US government that could have serious business implications. If Mr Trump were to follow through on cancelling contracts, SpaceX stands to lose enormous revenue (an estimated US$22 billion in government deals is now at risk). Mr Musk must also consider the broader impact on Tesla, which until now has benefited from government electric vehicle (EV) incentives and a friendly regulatory environment. If Mr Trump now views Mr Musk as an adversary, Tesla could face a chillier reception in policy areas important to it (such as environmental credits, infrastructure support or foreign trade deals). AN EXPENSIVE BREAKUP What happens next is very much anyone's guess; it could well depend on what either man decides to post next. The Trump-Musk fallout has escalated from a policy disagreement into a personal and political reckoning. Mr Trump is defending his legislative legacy and asserting authority over a defiant former ally. Mr Musk is recasting himself as an independent visionary, willing to challenge power, but at the cost of political access. Whether this fades or hardens, the consequences will be felt well beyond Washington. Ben Chester Cheong is a law lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, and of counsel at RHTLaw Asia. He is a visiting fellow in law at the University of Reading, and a centre researcher at the University of Cambridge.
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Next challenge for PM Anwar's PKR - keeping its anchor role in government
KUALA LUMPUR: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) has gone through another change in its leadership line-up following intense internal party elections on May 24. With the party's top leaders in place, PKR has quite a hill to climb in retaining influence in the unity government and keeping the country's top political job. The anchor party of the Malaysian federal government elected Nurul Izzah Anwar as the deputy president, defeating former Minister of Economy Rafizi Ramli. Leaders aligned with Nurul Izzah also dominated the newly elected central leadership council. Minister of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad also failed to defend his vice-president post. Both Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned from the Cabinet just days after the PKR elections. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who won the party presidency unopposed, swiftly rejected claims of nepotism following his daughter's victory, arguing that Nurul Izzah was democratically elected by PKR members. Despite the predictable outrage expressed on social media by supporters of Rafizi and complaints of electoral irregularities, the party will likely recover from the divisive elections. This was not the first time PKR had to go through an intense contest for the deputy presidency. The position has been contested at every party election since 2010. Nurul Izzah is also a popular figure within the party; she had consistently won the highest number of votes for the vice-president post at every party election from 2010 to 2018. But the PKR's focus should not be on internal elections. The party's biggest challenge is maintaining its position in the unity government coalition and ensuring that Anwar is re-elected as prime minister. This challenge was acknowledged by Nurul Izzah's and Rafizi's campaigns. As it stands, there are clouds on PKR's horizon. ANCHOR PARTY BY CIRCUMSTANCES Despite its leadership position in the unity government, PKR has only 31 seats in the 222-member House of Representatives. Its role as the anchor party is made possible with help from its Pakatan Harapan (PH) partners – the Democratic Action Party (DAP), Parti Amanah Negara and the United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation. The coalition collectively controls 81 seats in the House, making it the largest bloc in Parliament. Two other key members of the unity government, Barisan Nasional (BN) and Gabungan Parti Sarawak, control 30 and 23 seats, respectively. Together, the three coalitions control 134 of the 222 seats in the House. PKR's role as the anchor party of the unity government is a result of external circumstances beyond the party's control. First, overwhelming support from ethnic Chinese voters helped the DAP win 40 of the 55 seats it contested in 2022. Second, BN's failure in many Malay-Muslim majority seats led to the opposition Perikatan Nasional (PN) winning 74 seats. DAP may be able to keep ethnic Chinese voters on its side and boost PH's parliamentary seat count, but there is no guarantee that the seat distribution between PN and BN will remain the same after the next general elections. Ramanan Ramakrishnan, a PKR Member of Parliament and one of the winners of the four vice-president posts, declared that the party could potentially win 70 to 80 seats at the next general election, with Nurul Izzah as deputy president and elections director. Ramanan's statement was dismissed by Rafizi, who estimated that PKR would only be able to contest up to 50 federal seats – half of the 100 that it contested at the 2022 General Election. Rafizi's estimation was based on what he said was an understanding with other unity government parties, especially BN, that PKR would defend only the 31 seats it won and the seats where the party came second. Rafizi likely referred to the PH-BN approach taken at the 2023 state elections to avoid three-cornered contests with PN. COMPETITION OVER SEAT ALLOCATIONS This public disagreement over the projected number of seats the party could win suggests that the party's next strategic focus is on outmanoeuvring unity government partners in the battle for seat allocations. The competition over seat allocations started promptly following the conclusion of the party elections. In her first speech after she was confirmed as the deputy president, Nurul Izzah declared that the party should contest in 13 constituencies in the upcoming Sabah state election that must be held before the end of the year. PKR's plans for the state election have no impact on the balance of power in Parliament after the next general election. But the party's plans will influence seat allocations at the federal level. At the last Sabah state election in 2020, PKR contested only seven out of the 73 seats. It entered the Sabah state elections as a junior partner of the informal 'Warisan Plus' coalition led by Parti Warisan Sabah (Warisan), which was then leading the state government. The outcome of the elections was disastrous. Warisan lost the state government, and PKR won only two of the seven contested seats. The situation for PKR in the Sabah legislative assembly is not unique. Outside of Selangor, Penang, Negeri Sembilan and Perak, it has no meaningful presence in nine other state legislative assemblies. With limited influence at the state level, PKR has no choice but to ensure it dominates federal politics through respectable representation in Parliament. UMNO'S AMBITION TO BECOME DOMINANT PARTY The writing is on the wall. PKR would have to spar with its partners in the ruling coalition for federal seats; as a result, intense competition within the unity government can be expected. The initial rumblings of such a contest are already evident. The United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) has openly declared its ambition to become the dominant party after the next general election. The logical extension of this was left unsaid: If UMNO becomes the dominant party, it would be able to claim the position of the prime minister. Currently, UMNO leads the BN coalition with 26 seats. Among the BN partners, the Malaysian Chinese Association has two seats. The Malaysian Indian Congress and Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah have one seat each. The PKR elections may have provided clarity around the leadership succession. The next biggest challenge for the party is to ensure it remains the anchor party in the federal government after the next general elections. This time, however, PKR will seek to become the dominant party not by accidental circumstances, but by design. This will be a monumental challenge.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Commentary: America First, China Next? Why Trump's new travel ban harms US interests
SINGAPORE: United States President Donald Trump has rebooted his travel ban, hitting Southeast Asia for the first time. He banned – partially or fully – citizens of 19 countries, including Myanmar and Laos, from entering the US with effect from Monday (Jun 9). He clearly learned lessons from the ban he instituted initially during his first term. Mr Trump' playbook started with an executive order on the first day of his second term ordering the State Department to launch a global review of foreign governments' vetting and screening capabilities and to identify which were 'so deficient as to warrant' a travel ban. This time, instead of calling it a 'Muslim ban' like he did eight years ago with no study, he justified the ban for national security reasons after a review of several months, claiming also that people from those countries had high rates of overstaying their visas. This policy, preordained but dressed in process, will likely be upheld by the courts. 'A CONVENIENT DISTRACTION' FROM BAD NEWS The travel ban comes amid reports of the lowest US job growth in two years, strong public criticism of Mr Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' from Elon Musk as they feud, and an antisemitic attack a week ago. 'This noxious reboot comes as a convenient distraction from so many bad news items in the form of setbacks for the Trump agenda,' Thurgood Marshall Jr, a senior Clinton official, told me. And while Mr Trump said last week's Colorado 'terror attack' for which an Egyptian national has been charged with injuring several with gasoline bombs spurred the timing of the travel ban, Egypt not being on the list undercuts his premise this ban would have prevented it from happening. This ban both appeals to his core MAGA anti-immigration base and advances his governing philosophy. Mr Trump made the real message plain as he announced the travel ban: 'We don't want them.' The 'America First' agenda includes a sweeping crackdown on immigration: So far, he has barred international students from Harvard University, halted student visa interviews for those accepted to US schools and ordered immigration raids across the country. Of course, every country can and should aim to ensure only legal and lawful immigration to their territory. Citizens from certain countries should receive higher scrutiny for any number of reasons, including whether their government sponsors terrorism. Individuals who have a high chance of overstaying their visa can also be denied one. A blanket ban on all citizens from a given country provides the easy way out administratively and a political win from his base; however, it brings upon the US geopolitical harm. SOUTHEAST ASIA NOT SPARED This time, Laos and Myanmar were included in Mr Trump's travel ban – countries that accounted for barely 11,000 of the 72 million foreign visitors in 2024 per the Department of Commerce. Rick Reece, Executive Director of non-governmental organisation Village Focus International, an American who has lived and worked in Laos since 1998, told me: 'There are so many family connections [with the US] here. Now, uncertainty with the US comes out in anger and cynicism.' 'I hope Lao people don't lose their respect and admiration for the US. My own son and wife, both Lao passport holders, would love to visit the US to see friends and family, but I can't see that happening for the foreseeable future,' he added. Tatum Albertine, a former State Department and USAID official with years of experience in Myanmar, told me it was surprising to see Myanmar included in the travel ban. 'I don't think the Trump Administration even knows what it wants out of its relationship with them,' she said. The US had already taken a reputational hit in the country in the wake of the deadly earthquake in March. 'Trump 2.0 massively failed in sending a USAID humanitarian intervention team,' she added. '[Secretary of State Marco] Rubio said they were deployed, but people on the ground tell me that was not true – those people who were ready had been fired.' The rest of Southeast Asia, including Singapore, are also caught in Mr Trump's continuing assault on immigration, with the halt to student visa interviews pending the expansion of 'social media screening and vetting'. No one knows how long this will last. Some students who have been accepted to US schools have no idea when, or if, they'll be allowed to enter the country. Those already enrolled aren't sure if they will be let back in if they head home during the summer break. In a region where the US competes with China for influence, a ban on two ASEAN member states and collateral damage from the change to student visas could strengthen China's hand. AMERICA FIRST LEADS TO CHINA NEXT While there will be no immediate fallout by banning travel from these countries given their lack of geopolitical and geoeconomic standing, there will still be consequences. Mr Trump's broader immigration policies create anxiety about US travel, amid unhappiness about his sweeping tariffs. A head of global public affairs at an American multinational told me she can't have her team meet in the US this summer because many of her international staff fear travelling there. New York City, the top US destination for internation travel, estimated 2.5 million (or 17 per cent) fewer foreign travellers in 2025. Travel from Canada, the US' top source of visitors, is expected to go down more than 20 per cent. The World Travel & Tourism Council projects a US$12.5 billion loss in international visitor spending this year. Nelson Cunningham, who served in the Biden administration as a Senior Advisor at the State Department, told me: 'If we cut off contact with the best and brightest around the world, America First cannot help but become America Alone'. 'America First inevitably leads to China Next,' he concluded. With the new travel ban, governments will continue to seek alternate markets and partners for trade and security. Businesses will see diminish their advantages with access to foreign government officials, customers and employees. The erosion of Brand America continues.
